[QGIS-Developer] QGIS 2.99 server – libdummy.so woes

[Vincent Habchi]

Guys,

libdummy.so does not link properly on OS X. It binds to non-existent dylibs 
(well, TBH, it binds to actual dylibs, but the path to them is wrong). As a 
stopgap measure, can I simply delete this lib before packaging the app? I’m not 
sure what this library is used for.

Thanks, happy new year to all the team!

Vincent

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Raster 'Save As' in 2.99 - missing *Map View Extent'

[Lene Fischer]

THANKS!!
You´re ever so fast

Lene

-Original Message-
From: Nyall Dawson [mailto:nyall.daw...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 3. januar 2018 00:30
To: Lene Fischer
Cc: qgis-developer
Subject: Re: [QGIS-Developer] Raster 'Save As' in 2.99 - missing *Map View 
Extent'

On 3 January 2018 at 04:16, Lene Fischer  wrote:
> Hi
>
> Trying to use ‘Save As’ in 2.99 (Coderevision b59bd94e87)
>
>
>
> In 2.18 there are a button ‘Map View Extent’ which is Excellent when I 
> save from a WMS layer. But it´s gone ??
>

Reproduced and fixed in https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5972

Thanks!

Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Rename Style manager to Symbol manager in 3.0?

[delazj]

Hi, 
Looks like this issue is back again (for reference, see 
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/2765 for a related issue) and at some point, 
still from a doc writer perspective, it's not easy to be sure that you are 
clear enough for the reader, using same namings.
We need to find two different names for these two dialogs, whatever plans we 
have. These are two really different features. Given that the issue is raised 
in ML (as requested in the PR discussion), maybe the time has come.

Regards, 
HarrissouLe 3 janv. 2018 2:44 AM, Nyall Dawson  a écrit 
:
>
> On 3 January 2018 at 11:15, Alexandre Neto  wrote:
> > While writing some tutorials, I have noticed some possible nomenclature
> > confusion between Symbols (as compounds of stacked markers, lines, fills
> > outlines and color ramps) and Styles (a vector layer symbols and labels
> > settings).
> >
> > We currently have to places we call "Style manager":
> > 1. The symbols library that we open by going to Options > Style Manager;
> > 2. The Style manager tab in the Layer Styling panel.
> >
> > I think that the first one should be renamed to "Symbols manager", since it
> > exclusively allows to create, edit, group, import and export symbols, and
> > not styles.
> >
> > On the other hand, the Style manager in the Layer Styling panel allows to
> > create, manage, load, save as default the layers' styles (unfortunatly it
> > does not allow to save styles as we can do in properties).
> >
> > Any strong opinions about this?
>
> -1
>
> The "style manager" dialog shows non-symbol objects also (specifically
> color ramps). And in future, I'd like to see this extended to include
> font style presets, preset colors schemes, and other non-symbol
> objects.
>
> Nyall
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

[Mathieu Pellerin]

I'm -1 to label 3.0 a "beta" product. I'd argue that in many respects, 3.0
is a more stable and reliable product than 2.18.

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Bernd Vogelgesang  wrote:

> Am 02.01.2018, 23:39 Uhr, schrieb Nyall Dawson :
>
>
>
>>> I think on balance I prefer option #2 as it will get more people using
>>> QGIS 3 - we must just be careful to tell people that it is ‘next-gen’ and
>>> that the LTR is still 2.18….
>>>
>>
>> Ok, let me re-word option 2 as:
>>
>> "2. Carefully manage release expectations, with detailed explanations
>> of known issues and regressions in the release notes. Stress in press
>> releases/release notes that 3.0 is a new major release and that the
>> QGIS team do not consider it a suitable replacement for the current
>> stable LTR release, and that it is highly recommended that
>> organisations do not replace their existing QGIS 2.x installations
>> before careful in-house testing and evaluation of its suitability for
>> their workplace. The next stable LTR QGIS release will be QGIS 3.2."
>>
>> Nyall
>>
>
> 
>
> I like all your elaborated wordings, but couldn't you just brand 3.0 with
> a huge red BETA mark, and nearly everyone should know what this means:
> Evaluation: Yes!, Production: Maybe, on yout own risk.
>
> 
>
> ___
>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>
>
> --
> Bernd Vogelgesang
> Siedlerstraße 2
> 91083 Baiersdorf/Igelsdorf
> Tel: 09133-825374
>
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

[Bernd Vogelgesang]

Am 02.01.2018, 23:39 Uhr, schrieb Nyall Dawson :




I think on balance I prefer option #2 as it will get more people using  
QGIS 3 - we must just be careful to tell people that it is ‘next-gen’  
and that the LTR is still 2.18….


Ok, let me re-word option 2 as:

"2. Carefully manage release expectations, with detailed explanations
of known issues and regressions in the release notes. Stress in press
releases/release notes that 3.0 is a new major release and that the
QGIS team do not consider it a suitable replacement for the current
stable LTR release, and that it is highly recommended that
organisations do not replace their existing QGIS 2.x installations
before careful in-house testing and evaluation of its suitability for
their workplace. The next stable LTR QGIS release will be QGIS 3.2."

Nyall




I like all your elaborated wordings, but couldn't you just brand 3.0 with  
a huge red BETA mark, and nearly everyone should know what this means:  
Evaluation: Yes!, Production: Maybe, on yout own risk.





___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



--
Bernd Vogelgesang
Siedlerstraße 2
91083 Baiersdorf/Igelsdorf
Tel: 09133-825374
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Removing QgsProject.instance() from Python bindings?

[Nyall Dawson]

>>
>> Just wondering... before 3.0 launch, should we remove
>> QgsProject.instance() from the Python bindings, in favour of something
>> like iface.activeProject()?
>>
>> Sometime in the future (4.0?) we'll end up killing
>> QgsProject.instance(), but in the meantime is it a good move to push
>> people away from relying on this method?
>>
>> I'd say yes, given that the 2.x -> 3.0 api break is so huge anyway and
>> will generally result in substantial plugin rewriting (vs just
>> modifying a few methods), maybe we're better off to get PyQGIS
>> developers to deal with this now and factor it into their new
>> designs?*
>>
>> Nyall
>>
>> * based on the belief that 3.x -> 4.0 will be a gentler transition!!
>> ___

Ok, based on the results of https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5974 ,
we'll have to defer this until 4.0 when (hopefully) we have much fewer
QgsProject::instance() calls in core/gui/providers.

Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Rename Style manager to Symbol manager in 3.0?

[Nyall Dawson]

On 3 January 2018 at 11:15, Alexandre Neto  wrote:
> While writing some tutorials, I have noticed some possible nomenclature
> confusion between Symbols (as compounds of stacked markers, lines, fills
> outlines and color ramps) and Styles (a vector layer symbols and labels
> settings).
>
> We currently have to places we call "Style manager":
> 1. The symbols library that we open by going to Options > Style Manager;
> 2. The Style manager tab in the Layer Styling panel.
>
> I think that the first one should be renamed to "Symbols manager", since it
> exclusively allows to create, edit, group, import and export symbols, and
> not styles.
>
> On the other hand, the Style manager in the Layer Styling panel allows to
> create, manage, load, save as default the layers' styles (unfortunatly it
> does not allow to save styles as we can do in properties).
>
> Any strong opinions about this?

-1

The "style manager" dialog shows non-symbol objects also (specifically
color ramps). And in future, I'd like to see this extended to include
font style presets, preset colors schemes, and other non-symbol
objects.

Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Rename Style manager to Symbol manager in 3.0?

[Nathan Woodrow]

+1.  That has always bugged me.

- Nathan

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Alexandre Neto 
wrote:

> While writing some tutorials, I have noticed some possible nomenclature
> confusion between Symbols (as compounds of stacked markers, lines, fills
> outlines and color ramps) and Styles (a vector layer symbols and labels
> settings).
>
> We currently have to places we call "Style manager":
> 1. The symbols library that we open by going to Options > Style Manager;
> 2. The Style manager tab in the Layer Styling panel.
>
> I think that the first one should be renamed to "Symbols manager", since
> it exclusively allows to create, edit, group, import and export symbols,
> and not styles.
>
> On the other hand, the Style manager in the Layer Styling panel allows to
> create, manage, load, save as default the layers' styles (unfortunatly it
> does not allow to save styles as we can do in properties).
>
> Any strong opinions about this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Alexandre Neto
>
>
> --
> Alexandre Neto
> -
> @AlexNetoGeo
> http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
> http://gisunchained.wordpress.com
>
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Rename Style manager to Symbol manager in 3.0?

[Alexandre Neto]

While writing some tutorials, I have noticed some possible nomenclature
confusion between Symbols (as compounds of stacked markers, lines, fills
outlines and color ramps) and Styles (a vector layer symbols and labels
settings).

We currently have to places we call "Style manager":
1. The symbols library that we open by going to Options > Style Manager;
2. The Style manager tab in the Layer Styling panel.

I think that the first one should be renamed to "Symbols manager", since it
exclusively allows to create, edit, group, import and export symbols, and
not styles.

On the other hand, the Style manager in the Layer Styling panel allows to
create, manage, load, save as default the layers' styles (unfortunatly it
does not allow to save styles as we can do in properties).

Any strong opinions about this?

Thanks.

Alexandre Neto


-- 
Alexandre Neto
-
@AlexNetoGeo
http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
http://gisunchained.wordpress.com
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

[Denis Rouzaud]

>
>
>
>
> Ok, let me re-word option 2 as:
>
> "2. Carefully manage release expectations, with detailed explanations
> of known issues and regressions in the release notes. Stress in press
> releases/release notes that 3.0 is a new major release and that the
> QGIS team do not consider it a suitable replacement for the current
> stable LTR release, and that it is highly recommended that
> organisations do not replace their existing QGIS 2.x installations
> before careful in-house testing and evaluation of its suitability for
> their workplace. The next stable LTR QGIS release will be QGIS 3.2."
>

I agree on release asap knowing it might not be the most stable release
ever.
But, I would make sure
* we have a serious effort on bugfixing prior to the release and following
it
* we do not release with severe AND prominent known issue
* we have a shorter dot release cycle (maybe once a week or switch to
nightly builds) to avoid waiting too long for fixes

Best regards,
Denis
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

[Paolo Cavallini]

Fully agreed, both with the general meaning and with the wording.
Thanks.

Il 2 gennaio 2018 23:39:17 CET, Nyall Dawson  ha 
scritto:
>On 3 January 2018 at 06:51, Tim Sutton  wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 02 Jan 2018, at 12:16, Nyall Dawson 
>wrote:
>>
>> On 2 January 2018 at 19:54, Mathieu Pellerin 
>wrote:
>>
>>
>> +1 to set a release date for the last week of January. That'll give
>us 2 weeks of freeze period (assuming the vote turns out not to extend
>the soft freeze) which can be used to focus on fixes only. The soft
>freeze period saw a nice set of fixes too, which was nice.
>>
>>
>> I'm in favour of hard freezing this time (assuming we can get those
>> last couple of PRs reviewed quickly and merged).
>>
>> But I'm against setting a hard deadline for the final release yet.
>> That said truth is that IMO 3.0 still feels very buggy, and there's
>> lots of open high priority regressions against it. I think we've got
>> two options:
>>
>> 1. Move to a regular "are we ready for final release?" vote
>>
>> or
>>
>> 2. Just decide that 3.0.0 will have bugs, and that we should "release
>> early, release often" and hope that we stabilise things quickly for
>>
>> 3.0.1/3.0.2/…
>>
>>
>>
>> I think on balance I prefer option #2 as it will get more people
>using QGIS 3 - we must just be careful to tell people that it is
>‘next-gen’ and that the LTR is still 2.18….
>
>Ok, let me re-word option 2 as:
>
>"2. Carefully manage release expectations, with detailed explanations
>of known issues and regressions in the release notes. Stress in press
>releases/release notes that 3.0 is a new major release and that the
>QGIS team do not consider it a suitable replacement for the current
>stable LTR release, and that it is highly recommended that
>organisations do not replace their existing QGIS 2.x installations
>before careful in-house testing and evaluation of its suitability for
>their workplace. The next stable LTR QGIS release will be QGIS 3.2."
>
>Nyall
>___
>QGIS-Developer mailing list
>QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
>List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

-- 
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità.___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Raster 'Save As' in 2.99 - missing *Map View Extent'

[Nyall Dawson]

On 3 January 2018 at 04:16, Lene Fischer  wrote:
> Hi
>
> Trying to use ‘Save As’ in 2.99 (Coderevision b59bd94e87)
>
>
>
> In 2.18 there are a button ‘Map View Extent’ which is Excellent when I save
> from a WMS layer. But it´s gone ??
>

Reproduced and fixed in https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5972

Thanks!

Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

[Nyall Dawson]

On 3 January 2018 at 06:51, Tim Sutton  wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 02 Jan 2018, at 12:16, Nyall Dawson  wrote:
>
> On 2 January 2018 at 19:54, Mathieu Pellerin  wrote:
>
>
> +1 to set a release date for the last week of January. That'll give us 2 
> weeks of freeze period (assuming the vote turns out not to extend the soft 
> freeze) which can be used to focus on fixes only. The soft freeze period saw 
> a nice set of fixes too, which was nice.
>
>
> I'm in favour of hard freezing this time (assuming we can get those
> last couple of PRs reviewed quickly and merged).
>
> But I'm against setting a hard deadline for the final release yet.
> That said truth is that IMO 3.0 still feels very buggy, and there's
> lots of open high priority regressions against it. I think we've got
> two options:
>
> 1. Move to a regular "are we ready for final release?" vote
>
> or
>
> 2. Just decide that 3.0.0 will have bugs, and that we should "release
> early, release often" and hope that we stabilise things quickly for
>
> 3.0.1/3.0.2/…
>
>
>
> I think on balance I prefer option #2 as it will get more people using QGIS 3 
> - we must just be careful to tell people that it is ‘next-gen’ and that the 
> LTR is still 2.18….

Ok, let me re-word option 2 as:

"2. Carefully manage release expectations, with detailed explanations
of known issues and regressions in the release notes. Stress in press
releases/release notes that 3.0 is a new major release and that the
QGIS team do not consider it a suitable replacement for the current
stable LTR release, and that it is highly recommended that
organisations do not replace their existing QGIS 2.x installations
before careful in-house testing and evaluation of its suitability for
their workplace. The next stable LTR QGIS release will be QGIS 3.2."

Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

[James Shaeffer]

Not a major contributor by any means, but I agree with Tim on this.

James Shaeffer

> I think on balance I prefer option #2 as it will get more people using QGIS 3 
> - we must just be careful to tell people that it is ‘next-gen’ and that the 
> LTR is still 2.18….
>
>Regards
>
>Tim

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

[Tim Sutton]

Hi

> On 02 Jan 2018, at 12:16, Nyall Dawson  wrote:
> 
> On 2 January 2018 at 19:54, Mathieu Pellerin  wrote:
>> 
>> +1 to set a release date for the last week of January. That'll give us 2 
>> weeks of freeze period (assuming the vote turns out not to extend the soft 
>> freeze) which can be used to focus on fixes only. The soft freeze period saw 
>> a nice set of fixes too, which was nice.
>> 
> 
> I'm in favour of hard freezing this time (assuming we can get those
> last couple of PRs reviewed quickly and merged).
> 
> But I'm against setting a hard deadline for the final release yet.
> That said truth is that IMO 3.0 still feels very buggy, and there's
> lots of open high priority regressions against it. I think we've got
> two options:
> 
> 1. Move to a regular "are we ready for final release?" vote
> 
> or
> 
> 2. Just decide that 3.0.0 will have bugs, and that we should "release
> early, release often" and hope that we stabilise things quickly for
> 3.0.1/3.0.2/…


I think on balance I prefer option #2 as it will get more people using QGIS 3 - 
we must just be careful to tell people that it is ‘next-gen’ and that the LTR 
is still 2.18….

Regards

Tim

> 
> Nyall
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

—







Tim Sutton

Co-founder: Kartoza
Project chair: QGIS.org

Visit http://kartoza.com  to find out about open source:

Desktop GIS programming services
Geospatial web development
GIS Training
Consulting Services

Skype: timlinux 
IRC: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

[Luigi Pirelli]

+1 for freeze and more bug fix... I've report about processing regresións

On Tuesday, 2 January 2018, Nyall Dawson  wrote:

> On 2 January 2018 at 19:54, Mathieu Pellerin  wrote:
> >
> > +1 to set a release date for the last week of January. That'll give us 2
> weeks of freeze period (assuming the vote turns out not to extend the soft
> freeze) which can be used to focus on fixes only. The soft freeze period
> saw a nice set of fixes too, which was nice.
> >
>
> I'm in favour of hard freezing this time (assuming we can get those
> last couple of PRs reviewed quickly and merged).
>
> But I'm against setting a hard deadline for the final release yet.
> That said truth is that IMO 3.0 still feels very buggy, and there's
> lots of open high priority regressions against it. I think we've got
> two options:
>
> 1. Move to a regular "are we ready for final release?" vote
>
> or
>
> 2. Just decide that 3.0.0 will have bugs, and that we should "release
> early, release often" and hope that we stabilise things quickly for
> 3.0.1/3.0.2/...
>
> Nyall
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



-- 
Luigi Pirelli

**
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
* Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
* GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
* Mastering QGIS 2nd Edition:
*
https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/mastering-qgis-second-edition
* Hire me: http://goo.gl/BYRQKg
**
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Raster 'Save As' in 2.99 - missing *Map View Extent'

[Lene Fischer]

Hi
Trying to use ‘Save As’ in 2.99 (Coderevision 
b59bd94e87)

In 2.18 there are a button ‘Map View Extent’ which is Excellent when I save 
from a WMS layer. But it´s gone ??

Anywhere else to look for a view extent ?

Regards


Lene Fischer
Associate Professor

University of Copenhagen
Department of Geoscience and Natural Resource Management
Forest and Landscape College
Nødebovej 77a
3480 Fredensborg
Denmark


MOB +45 40115084
l...@ign.ku.dk

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Heatmap renderer - speed up possible ?

[kimaidou]

Hi,

I have juste seen this blog post
https://bl.ocks.org/rpgove/210f679b1087b517ce654b717e8247ac

I know nothing about this kind of algs, nore about the QGIS rendering
internals, but I thought it could be a possible way to speed up the heatmap
renderer ?

Just passing the info ;)

Regards
Michaël
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] mirroring qgis.org repos

[Richard Duivenvoorde]

Ok, (more) clear :-)

Easiest (for me now) is if you could use this url:
https://qgis.org/ubuntugis/

The (letsencrypt) certificate there is valid for
qgis.org (going via cache)
version.qgis.org (NOT going via cache)
and download.qgis.org (not even a DNS entry)

So IF
https://qgis.org/ubuntugis/
gives cloudflare/certificate problems,
you could use
https://version.qgis.org/ubuntugis/

Note that 144.76.174.102 will be the ip address for the upcoming future.
It is not that we will change back to the other one.

If all this is not working, I could add ubuntu.qgis.org to the
certificate too (and probably debian.qgis.org then too???)

Let me know what you preference is.

Regards,

Richard


On 02-01-18 14:58, Bernhard Ströbl wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> thank you for your answer. Our goal is the same as two years ago: We
> want to mirror the repo locally, i.e. we want to see all the files.
> 
> This command currently works:
> debmirror --dist=xenial --section=main --arch=i386,amd64 --cleanup
> --host=144.76.174.102 --root=ubuntugis-ltr --method=http --rsync-extra=none
> 
> BUT:
> 1) if the IP changes we will have to call again
> 2) if http is shut off we cannot access via https because the SSL
> certificate does not contain the address 144.76.174.102 (certificate
> verification fails)
> 
> regards
> Bernhard
> 
> 
> Am 02.01.2018 um 14:01 schrieb Richard Duivenvoorde:
>>
>> Hi Bernhard,
>>
>> Can you provide some more information on what you exactly want to see?
>>
>> http://ubuntu.qgis.org ?
>>
>> That one was still pointing to our old server (which since... I think 3
>> weeks does not have a webserver running anymore).
>>
>> I let it point to our new qgis2 server now (144.76.174.102).
>> (note that this one is NOT being cached by cloudflare, so I doubt it is
>> 'the same problem' as earlier)
>>
>> And I see now:
>> http://ubuntu.qgis.org/ubuntugis/
>> which is a repo.
>>
>> Fixed like this?
>>
>> Sorry for the inconvenience.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Richard Duivenvoorde
>>
>>
>> On 02-01-18 09:20, Bernhard Ströbl wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I wish everybody a good start in 2018!
>>>
>>> We have -again- a problem mirroring the QGIS repos locally, see [1]. The
>>> ubuntu subdomain is not accessible anymore and going directly to
>>> qgis.org results in the same error as two years ago.
>>>
>>> best regards
>>>
>>> Bernhard
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2016-January/041107.html
>>>
>>>
>>> __ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus
>>> signature database 16667 (20180102) __
>>>
>>> The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>>> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>>
>>
>> __ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus
>> signature database 16669 (20180102) __
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
> 
> 

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3D: Fails with large DTM image

[C Hamilton]

Awesome!!!  It worksGreat job.

Calvin

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 6:08 AM, Martin Dobias  wrote:

> Hi Calvin
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:41 PM, C Hamilton 
> wrote:
> > Martin,
> >
> > Thanks. That is the issue. I'm sure the 3D support is going to
> continuously
> > evolve and get better and hopefully sometime in the near future it will
> > handle no-data values. In the meantime I will use your suggestion of
> > remapping the no-data values.
>
> Just a quick followup: the issue with no-data value should be fixed
> now in the nightly builds - please feel free to test again.
>
> Regards
> Martin
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] mirroring qgis.org repos

[Jürgen E . Fischer]

Hi Bernhard,

On Tue, 02. Jan 2018 at 09:20:07 +0100, Bernhard Ströbl wrote:
> We have -again- a problem mirroring the QGIS repos locally, see [1]. The
> ubuntu subdomain is not accessible anymore and going directly to qgis.org
> results in the same error as two years ago.

qgis.org is the domain.  ubuntu.qgis.org was just one of the catch alls.


Jürgen

-- 
Jürgen E. Fischer   norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31
Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13  Fax. +49-4931-918175-50
Software Engineer   D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de
QGIS release manager (PSC)  GermanyIRC: jef on FreeNode


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] mirroring qgis.org repos

[Bernhard Ströbl]

Hi Richard,

thank you for your answer. Our goal is the same as two years ago: We 
want to mirror the repo locally, i.e. we want to see all the files.


This command currently works:
debmirror --dist=xenial --section=main --arch=i386,amd64 --cleanup 
--host=144.76.174.102 --root=ubuntugis-ltr --method=http --rsync-extra=none


BUT:
1) if the IP changes we will have to call again
2) if http is shut off we cannot access via https because the SSL 
certificate does not contain the address 144.76.174.102 (certificate 
verification fails)


regards
Bernhard


Am 02.01.2018 um 14:01 schrieb Richard Duivenvoorde:


Hi Bernhard,

Can you provide some more information on what you exactly want to see?

http://ubuntu.qgis.org ?

That one was still pointing to our old server (which since... I think 3
weeks does not have a webserver running anymore).

I let it point to our new qgis2 server now (144.76.174.102).
(note that this one is NOT being cached by cloudflare, so I doubt it is
'the same problem' as earlier)

And I see now:
http://ubuntu.qgis.org/ubuntugis/
which is a repo.

Fixed like this?

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Regards,

Richard Duivenvoorde


On 02-01-18 09:20, Bernhard Ströbl wrote:


Hi,
I wish everybody a good start in 2018!

We have -again- a problem mirroring the QGIS repos locally, see [1]. The
ubuntu subdomain is not accessible anymore and going directly to
qgis.org results in the same error as two years ago.

best regards

Bernhard

[1]
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2016-January/041107.html


__ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus
signature database 16667 (20180102) __

The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer




__ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature 
database 16669 (20180102) __

The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com





--
Bernhard Ströbl
Anwendungsbetreuer GIS

Kommunale Immobilien Jena
Am Anger 26
07743 Jena

Tel.: 03641 49- 5190
E-Mail: bernhard.stro...@jena.de
Internet: www.kij.de


Kommunale Immobilien Jena
Eigenbetrieb der Stadt Jena
Werkleiter: Karl-Hermann Kliewe


__ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature 
database 16669 (20180102) __

The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] mirroring qgis.org repos

[Richard Duivenvoorde]

Hi Bernhard,

Can you provide some more information on what you exactly want to see?

http://ubuntu.qgis.org ?

That one was still pointing to our old server (which since... I think 3
weeks does not have a webserver running anymore).

I let it point to our new qgis2 server now (144.76.174.102).
(note that this one is NOT being cached by cloudflare, so I doubt it is
'the same problem' as earlier)

And I see now:
http://ubuntu.qgis.org/ubuntugis/
which is a repo.

Fixed like this?

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Regards,

Richard Duivenvoorde


On 02-01-18 09:20, Bernhard Ströbl wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I wish everybody a good start in 2018!
> 
> We have -again- a problem mirroring the QGIS repos locally, see [1]. The
> ubuntu subdomain is not accessible anymore and going directly to
> qgis.org results in the same error as two years ago.
> 
> best regards
> 
> Bernhard
> 
> [1]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2016-January/041107.html
> 
> 
> __ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus
> signature database 16667 (20180102) __
> 
> The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3D: Fails with large DTM image

[Martin Dobias]

Hi Calvin

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:41 PM, C Hamilton  wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Thanks. That is the issue. I'm sure the 3D support is going to continuously
> evolve and get better and hopefully sometime in the near future it will
> handle no-data values. In the meantime I will use your suggestion of
> remapping the no-data values.

Just a quick followup: the issue with no-data value should be fixed
now in the nightly builds - please feel free to test again.

Regards
Martin
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

[Nyall Dawson]

On 2 January 2018 at 19:54, Mathieu Pellerin  wrote:
>
> +1 to set a release date for the last week of January. That'll give us 2 
> weeks of freeze period (assuming the vote turns out not to extend the soft 
> freeze) which can be used to focus on fixes only. The soft freeze period saw 
> a nice set of fixes too, which was nice.
>

I'm in favour of hard freezing this time (assuming we can get those
last couple of PRs reviewed quickly and merged).

But I'm against setting a hard deadline for the final release yet.
That said truth is that IMO 3.0 still feels very buggy, and there's
lots of open high priority regressions against it. I think we've got
two options:

1. Move to a regular "are we ready for final release?" vote

or

2. Just decide that 3.0.0 will have bugs, and that we should "release
early, release often" and hope that we stabilise things quickly for
3.0.1/3.0.2/...

Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

[Mathieu Pellerin]

+1 to set a release date for the last week of January. That'll give us 2
weeks of freeze period (assuming the vote turns out not to extend the soft
freeze) which can be used to focus on fixes only. The soft freeze period
saw a nice set of fixes too, which was nice.



On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Nathan Woodrow  wrote:

> I think we really need some more bug fixing time.  I noticed all the
> layouts stuff from Nyall is now there but given the large amount of work
> more time would be good IMO.
>
> - Nathan
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Tim Sutton  wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> For my part I think we can go ahead and set a date for the freeze (e.g.
>> Friday) - Etienne still needs to commit the last metadata serialisation
>> stuff but he has kindly come back from leave for a day to finish that.
>> Stephané wanted to merge the OGC filters stuff which is fine for me.
>>
>> Do we want  have some additional bug fix only time before we make the
>> actual release - perhaps targeting the release for the end of Jan? I
>> haven't looked in detail what blocking issues there are but from Mac point
>> of view the GRASS processing tools still don’t work which is a bit of a
>> blocker IMHO.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> On 02 Jan 2018, at 11:31, Paolo Cavallini  wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> for the first time, a good part of developers are uncertain about the
>> need to postpone the freeze. IMHO it is better to discuss about his in
>> the list. From my point of view, we should postpone it only if there is
>> a real, strong necessity, which does not seem the case now.
>> Opinions?
>> All the best.
>> --
>> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
>> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
>> https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
>> ___
>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>>
>> —
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Tim Sutton*
>>
>> *Co-founder:* Kartoza
>> *Project chair:* QGIS.org
>>
>> Visit http://kartoza.com to find out about open source:
>>
>> Desktop GIS programming services
>> Geospatial web development
>> GIS Training
>> Consulting Services
>>
>> *Skype*: timlinux
>> *IRC:* timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
>>
>>
>> ___
>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>
>
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

[Nathan Woodrow]

I think we really need some more bug fixing time.  I noticed all the
layouts stuff from Nyall is now there but given the large amount of work
more time would be good IMO.

- Nathan

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Tim Sutton  wrote:

> Hi
>
> For my part I think we can go ahead and set a date for the freeze (e.g.
> Friday) - Etienne still needs to commit the last metadata serialisation
> stuff but he has kindly come back from leave for a day to finish that.
> Stephané wanted to merge the OGC filters stuff which is fine for me.
>
> Do we want  have some additional bug fix only time before we make the
> actual release - perhaps targeting the release for the end of Jan? I
> haven't looked in detail what blocking issues there are but from Mac point
> of view the GRASS processing tools still don’t work which is a bit of a
> blocker IMHO.
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
>
> On 02 Jan 2018, at 11:31, Paolo Cavallini  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> for the first time, a good part of developers are uncertain about the
> need to postpone the freeze. IMHO it is better to discuss about his in
> the list. From my point of view, we should postpone it only if there is
> a real, strong necessity, which does not seem the case now.
> Opinions?
> All the best.
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
> https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
> —
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Tim Sutton*
>
> *Co-founder:* Kartoza
> *Project chair:* QGIS.org
>
> Visit http://kartoza.com to find out about open source:
>
> Desktop GIS programming services
> Geospatial web development
> GIS Training
> Consulting Services
>
> *Skype*: timlinux
> *IRC:* timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
>
>
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

[Tim Sutton]

Hi

For my part I think we can go ahead and set a date for the freeze (e.g. Friday) 
- Etienne still needs to commit the last metadata serialisation stuff but he 
has kindly come back from leave for a day to finish that. Stephané wanted to 
merge the OGC filters stuff which is fine for me. 

Do we want  have some additional bug fix only time before we make the actual 
release - perhaps targeting the release for the end of Jan? I haven't looked in 
detail what blocking issues there are but from Mac point of view the GRASS 
processing tools still don’t work which is a bit of a blocker IMHO.

Regards

Tim

> On 02 Jan 2018, at 11:31, Paolo Cavallini  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> for the first time, a good part of developers are uncertain about the
> need to postpone the freeze. IMHO it is better to discuss about his in
> the list. From my point of view, we should postpone it only if there is
> a real, strong necessity, which does not seem the case now.
> Opinions?
> All the best.
> -- 
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
> https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

—







Tim Sutton

Co-founder: Kartoza
Project chair: QGIS.org

Visit http://kartoza.com  to find out about open source:

Desktop GIS programming services
Geospatial web development
GIS Training
Consulting Services

Skype: timlinux 
IRC: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

[Paolo Cavallini]

Hi all,
for the first time, a good part of developers are uncertain about the
need to postpone the freeze. IMHO it is better to discuss about his in
the list. From my point of view, we should postpone it only if there is
a real, strong necessity, which does not seem the case now.
Opinions?
All the best.
-- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] mirroring qgis.org repos

[Bernhard Ströbl]

Hi,
I wish everybody a good start in 2018!

We have -again- a problem mirroring the QGIS repos locally, see [1]. The 
ubuntu subdomain is not accessible anymore and going directly to 
qgis.org results in the same error as two years ago.


best regards

Bernhard

[1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2016-January/041107.html


__ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature 
database 16667 (20180102) __

The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer