Re: [QGIS-Developer] Another (final?) qt6 progress catchup?

[hd via QGIS-Developer]

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:44:27 +1000
Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer  wrote:

> Hi lists,
> 
> I'm thinking it's probably time for another (and perhaps the final?!)
> Qt 6 progress/planning meeting.
> 
> Is anyone else interested?
> 
> Nyall


I am a Fedora / Plasma user who is very, very interested in an answer -
concerning compatibility with Wayland!!!

Good to know it's progressing!!!

Hugh
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Finishing Visual Changelog for export to site

[Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer]

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 17:13, Nyall Dawson  wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, 5:06 pm Richard Duivenvoorde via QGIS-Developer, <
> qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Moved changelog to site:
>>
>> https://qgis.org/en/site/forusers/visualchangelog336/index.html
>
>
Hmm, would it be possible to do the export again? I noticed a few extra
entries were added overnight too, and these aren't present on the site.
(Plus a few wording improvements I made this morning too)..

Nyall



>
>>
>> Do we want the Backports in it?
>> I already removed all the lines:
>> "This feature was developed by `qgis-bot > >`__"
>>
>> But now it is, without context or images, very raw.
>>
>> Same question about the 'Feature: Revert “Restore default metadata from
>> DB”'-like items.
>>
>
> They definitely shouldn't be in there. Something has gone amiss with the
> changelog harvester, I noticed it's put a bunch of entries in overnight
> which weren't even present in 3.36 
>
> Nyall
>
>
>> If we need more time to add stuff, let me know.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Richard Duivenvoorde
>>
>>
>> On 2/23/24 3:40 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde via QGIS-Developer wrote:
>> > Hi Devs,
>> >
>> > As release 3.36 Maidenhead is near...
>> >
>> > Please have a look at https://changelog.qgis.org/en/qgis/version/3.36/
>> >
>> > To fix/polish or add stuff you did or is important to show to users.
>> >
>> > @Andreas: I'll wait for you to add the tables with notable changes,
>> please ping me when done
>> >
>> > Then I will dump it to rst and include it in the website (probably for
>> the last time, as hopefully we will have a new website next release :-)  ).
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance,
>> >
>> > Richard Duivenvoorde
>> > ___
>> > QGIS-Developer mailing list
>> > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>> ___
>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Finishing Visual Changelog for export to site

[Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer]

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, 5:06 pm Richard Duivenvoorde via QGIS-Developer, <
qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Moved changelog to site:
>
> https://qgis.org/en/site/forusers/visualchangelog336/index.html
>
> Do we want the Backports in it?
> I already removed all the lines:
> "This feature was developed by `qgis-bot `__"
>
> But now it is, without context or images, very raw.
>
> Same question about the 'Feature: Revert “Restore default metadata from
> DB”'-like items.
>

They definitely shouldn't be in there. Something has gone amiss with the
changelog harvester, I noticed it's put a bunch of entries in overnight
which weren't even present in 3.36 

Nyall


> If we need more time to add stuff, let me know.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard Duivenvoorde
>
>
> On 2/23/24 3:40 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde via QGIS-Developer wrote:
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> > As release 3.36 Maidenhead is near...
> >
> > Please have a look at https://changelog.qgis.org/en/qgis/version/3.36/
> >
> > To fix/polish or add stuff you did or is important to show to users.
> >
> > @Andreas: I'll wait for you to add the tables with notable changes,
> please ping me when done
> >
> > Then I will dump it to rst and include it in the website (probably for
> the last time, as hopefully we will have a new website next release :-)  ).
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Richard Duivenvoorde
> > ___
> > QGIS-Developer mailing list
> > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Finishing Visual Changelog for export to site

[Richard Duivenvoorde via QGIS-Developer]

Hi,

Moved changelog to site:

https://qgis.org/en/site/forusers/visualchangelog336/index.html

Do we want the Backports in it?
I already removed all the lines:
"This feature was developed by `qgis-bot `__"

But now it is, without context or images, very raw.

Same question about the 'Feature: Revert “Restore default metadata from 
DB”'-like items.

If we need more time to add stuff, let me know.

Regards,

Richard Duivenvoorde


On 2/23/24 3:40 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde via QGIS-Developer wrote:

Hi Devs,

As release 3.36 Maidenhead is near...

Please have a look at https://changelog.qgis.org/en/qgis/version/3.36/

To fix/polish or add stuff you did or is important to show to users.

@Andreas: I'll wait for you to add the tables with notable changes, please ping 
me when done

Then I will dump it to rst and include it in the website (probably for the last 
time, as hopefully we will have a new website next release :-)  ).

Thanks in advance,

Richard Duivenvoorde
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Road Ahead Table is Confusing

[Catania, Luke A ERDC-RDE-GRL-VA CIV via QGIS-Developer]

Great.  Thanks for responding.

From: Andreas Neumann 
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 1:35 AM
To: Catania, Luke A ERDC-RDE-GRL-VA CIV 
Cc: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [QGIS-Developer] Road Ahead Table is Confusing


Hi,

The table is correct, but it is the date when the code is forked/frozen/taken 
for the packaging.

Packaging can take a couple of days. You just need to be patient. It will be 
available soon.

Greetings,

Andreas

On 2024-02-27 01:44, Catania, Luke A ERDC-RDE-GRL-VA CIV via QGIS-Developer 
wrote:

I find the Road Ahead Table confusing.



So does the line



LR/PR


3.36.0


3.34.4




2024-02-23


8


4




indicate that 3.34.4 is the latest LTR release available.  Where is it?  I only 
see 3.34.3 available for download.

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: Blockedhttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developerBlocked
Unsubscribe: 
Blockedhttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developerBlocked


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Road Ahead Table is Confusing

[Andreas Neumann via QGIS-Developer]

Hi,

The table is correct, but it is the date when the code is 
forked/frozen/taken for the packaging.


Packaging can take a couple of days. You just need to be patient. It 
will be available soon.


Greetings,

Andreas

On 2024-02-27 01:44, Catania, Luke A ERDC-RDE-GRL-VA CIV via 
QGIS-Developer wrote:



I find the Road Ahead Table confusing.

So does the line

LR/PR

3.36.0

3.34.4

2024-02-23

8

4

indicate that 3.34.4 is the latest LTR release available.  Where is it? 
 I only see 3.34.3 available for download.

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Access to shapeDigitizeToolBar menu's text

[Catania, Luke A ERDC-RDE-GRL-VA CIV via QGIS-Developer]

Trying to get access to the button menus in shapeDigitizeToolBar.

from qgis.utils import iface

from PyQt5.QtWidgets import QWidgetAction
sdtb = iface.shapeDigitizeToolBar()
i=0
for action_item in sdtb.actions():
i=i+1
print (f"{i}: {action_item}")

This prints:

1: 
2: 
3: 
4: 
5: 

I want to access each button and the menus of the button so I can disable 
certain tools.  I need to get the text associated with the tools so I can key 
on that.

I can't figure out how to get to them from QWidgetAction. I called all the 
methods on QAction that returns a string: data, iconText, statusTip, whatsThis 
and they all return empty strings.  So how are these menus labeled.

Thanks,
Luke
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Road Ahead Table is Confusing

[Catania, Luke A ERDC-RDE-GRL-VA CIV via QGIS-Developer]

I find the Road Ahead Table confusing.

So does the line

LR/PR

3.36.0

3.34.4

2024-02-23

8

4


indicate that 3.34.4 is the latest LTR release available.  Where is it?  I only 
see 3.34.3 available for download.
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Python version in 3.28.x CVEs

[Loïc Bartoletti via QGIS-Developer]

Hi,

There is an issue on Github:

- https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/54491

and a PR in discussion

- https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/56499

All the best,

Loïc

Le 26/02/2024 à 13:00, Samer Kaluf via QGIS-Developer a écrit :


Dear developers,

Just had a small question and hopefully I’m at the right address.

We run Qgis 3.28.5 LTR on some computers and Microsoft Security Center 
seems to be complaining


about the presence of Python.exe version 3.8.5.0 included with 3.28.x 
LTR Qgis installations.


These are the CVE’s linked to this Python version.

I read online that updating the Python for Qgis isn’t just a 
copy/replace action.


I was just wondering if this is known and if there are any plans to 
update Python in future LTR releases ?


Kind regards,

Met vriendelijke groet,

Samer Kaluf
Systeembeheerder ICT
DuoPlus

T (020) 314 4803
E samer.ka...@duoplus.nl

Aanwezig op: ma, di, woe, do, vrij


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe:https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Python version in 3.28.x CVEs

[Etienne Trimaille via QGIS-Developer]

Hi,

Le lun. 26 févr. 2024 à 14:47, Samer Kaluf via QGIS-Developer <
qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> a écrit :

>
>
> We run Qgis 3.28.5 LTR on some computers and Microsoft Security Center
> seems to be complaining
>
> about the presence of Python.exe version 3.8.5.0 included with 3.28.x LTR
> Qgis installations.
>

You can upgrade your version of QGIS 3.28.15. It has already been fixed.
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] GDAL processing algorithms issues due the default output layer extensions weirdly changed

[WhereGroup]

I am 99% that I have not uninstalled any plugins in two profiles where 
this occured and in one of them there is only the GeoCat Bridge plugin 
and in the other the QuickWKT plugin, in addition to the core plugins. 
So I would consider it unlikely to be caused by plugins.


On 26.02.24 08:05, Andrea Giudiceandrea via QGIS-Developer wrote:

Hi all,

Il 26/02/2024 00:23, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
> Hmm, I wonder if it's a plugin changing this setting. I've definitely
> seen plugins before doing unfriendly things like this...

I also suspected that a plugin may be involved, but I was unable to 
find a common plugin in all the reports.


Now it seems to me more likely that it may be the management of the 
settings, after seeing https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/53204 and 
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/53458 precisely relating to the 
DefaultOutputRasterLayerExt and the DefaultOutputVectorLayerExt 
settings and the -1 index.



Il 26/02/2024 01:38, Even Rouault ha scritto:
> For example when using the ".xml" extension as a vector output, you'll
> probably be surprised that the obscure PDS4 vector driver (tabular data
> for planetary datasets) is used!

==> Those settings should actually be deprecated and replaced by 
others that save a GDAL driver name ... plus an extension, because 
the "MapInfo File" driver produces quite different output if you 
chose ".tab" or ".mif" (or the GeoJSONSeq driver that will use 
different separators if you select the ".geojsonl" or ".geojsons" 
extensions)


The problem occurs also when saving the algorithm output to a file, 
instead of a temporary output, and choosing an extension.



Best regards.

Andrea
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


--
Johannes Kröger / GIS-Entwickler/-Berater

*
FOSSGIS Konferenz
20.-23. März 2024 in Hamburg
https://www.fossgis-konferenz.de/2024/

WhereGroup-Beiträge auf der FOSSGIS
https://wheregroup.com/unternehmen/aktuelles/
*

WhereGroup GmbH
c/o KK03 GmbH
Lange Reihe 29
20099 Hamburg
Germany

Tel: +49 (0)228 / 90 90 38 - 36
Fax: +49 (0)228 / 90 90 38 - 11

johannes.kroe...@wheregroup.com
www.wheregroup.com
Geschäftsführer:
Olaf Knopp, Peter Stamm
Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 9885
---

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Python version in 3.28.x CVEs

[Samer Kaluf via QGIS-Developer]

Dear developers,


Just had a small question and hopefully I'm at the right address.

We run Qgis 3.28.5 LTR on some computers and Microsoft Security Center seems to 
be complaining
about the presence of Python.exe version 3.8.5.0 included with 3.28.x LTR Qgis 
installations.

These are the CVE's linked to this Python version.
[cid:image001.png@01DA68B1.FFA69BE0]

I read online that updating the Python for Qgis isn't just a copy/replace 
action.
I was just wondering if this is known and if there are any plans to update 
Python in future LTR releases ?

Kind regards,

Met vriendelijke groet,
Samer Kaluf
Systeembeheerder ICT
DuoPlus
T (020) 314 4803
E samer.ka...@duoplus.nl
Aanwezig op: ma, di, woe, do, vrij

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report

[WhereGroup]

Ha, yeah pragmatism is a very good reason. I've battled with mail 
delivery recently in a much smaller project and it was not fun.


Thanks for all your work, you awesome people!

Cheers, Hannes

PS: To be honest, I get a deja vu, so if I ranted about this (without 
offering help or solutions :} ) before in the past, sorry!


On 22.02.24 15:51, Andreas Neumann wrote:


Hi Johannes and Lova,

The current reality is that the QGIS PSC is using Google 
infrastructure (Google Drive, Google Mail, youtube channels; sometimes 
Google Meet) quite extensively. It wouldn't be so easy to swap things 
out. In the PSC meetings we use JITSI, but for the QGIS Open Day it is 
also Google infrastructure, as it scales better for more users. We 
also use GSOC in order to bring in new developers.


We know that some people don't like our usage of Google services, but 
we also need to be pragmatic. Doing more things ourselves with open 
source tools or other alternatives would be possible, but would mean 
that we can spend less time directly on improving QGIS.


Greetings,
Andreas

On 2024-02-22 15:34, Johannes Kröger via QGIS-Developer wrote:


Hi Lova,

if I understand it right, using smtp.gmail.com *will* send all mails 
via Google. I don't know which SMTP host is currently used.


Looking at the MX records of qgis.org it seems like Google is used 
already anyways so I might be barking up an old and rotten tree. :(


It really should not be any of Google's business when people 
communicate with qgis.org addresses.


Thank you!

Cheers, Hannes

On 19.02.24 06:37, Lova Andriarimalala wrote:


Dear Hannes,

Thanks for your feedback. I appreciate that.

> Does this mean that Gmail will be involved in all those mails?

I apologise for that. Indeed, we propose using smtp.gmail.com as 
EMAIL_HOST instead of smtp to fix the email-sending feature since it 
sometimes goes into the spam folder.


However, I think this won't change the account type because we use 
the same as the current email and keep the part `@qgis.org` unless 
I'm mistaken. But maybe my PR's name doesn't reflect that. For now, 
I will update the PR and convert it to a draft.


> Can't a OSGeo mail account be used instead?

I'm not sure of the answer to this, sorry.

Dear @Tim Sutton , could you please advise 
me on that?Thank you.


Best regards,

Lova

—

Image

*Lova Andriarimalala*

*QGIS Full Stack Developer*

Visit http://kartoza.com  to find out about 
open source:


* Desktop GIS programming services

* Geospatial web development

* GIS Training

* Consulting Services

Office: +261(0)34 09 524 73 

*From: *QGIS-Developer  
 on behalf of 
Johannes Kröger (WhereGroup) via QGIS-Developer 
 

*Date: *Friday, 16 February 2024 at 5:24 PM
*To: *qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org 
 
 

*Subject: *Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report

Hey Lova,

thanks for all your great work!

This caught my eye:

> Use Gmail as the email provider 



Does this mean that Gmail will be involved in all those mails? I 
would be strongly against proactively exposing any data to such a 
company if not absolutely necessary.


Can't a OSGeo mail account be used instead?

It's bad enough that so much mail is already centralized and thus 
available to a single party/company but as long as a user is not 
willingly using Gmail themselves already, it would be great if 
Google (or any other similar third party) was not involved in such 
mails.


Cheers, Hannes

On 16.02.24 13:52, Lova Andriarimalala via QGIS-Developer wrote:

Hello everyone,

I'm starting a new thread because the previous one exceeds the
limit. I've included for you a report which details the progress
made this week on the development of the plugin and feed website.

*New PR for the plugins website:*

  * Use Gmail as the email provider

  * Set media and static path as the same as in production

  * Fix plugin detail rating
: this is a
fix for #354 
  * Add local timezone to XML
: this is a
fix for #353 

*New PRs for the feed website:*

  * Use Gmail as the email provider


Next week, I will try to plan the deployment of some of these
PRs. I will also continue to implement the components developed
by Kontur on the QGIS Feed website.

Have a great weekend,

Lova

—

Image

*Lova Andriarimalala*

*QGIS Full 

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Plugin update

[Régis Haubourg via QGIS-Developer]

Hi Zoltán,
unfortunately no, we can't do anything to take over an unmaintained plugin.

Did you try to contact the authoss by other means than github ? They could
decide to transfer the ownership to a more opened user group so that
benevolent people can maintain it.
If they explicitly stop maintaining this plugin, you can try to make a call
for maintainers in the developper's list and try to set up a way to
maintain this, or try to get funds to implement this feature in QGIS core.

regards,
Régis


Le lun. 26 févr. 2024 à 07:08, Zoltán Siki via QGIS-Developer <
qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> a écrit :

> Dear Developers,
>
> I have made a pull request one and half year ago to the MapSwipeTool
> plugin, but the developer of the plugin didn't do anything with it. I made
> only a minor change in the code, caused by the change in QLine parameters.
> The latest version of the plugin, available from the plugins.qgis.org
> repo is useless, it fails after activation. Some users react to my pull
> request, that it solves the issue (
> https://github.com/lmotta/mapswipetool_plugin/pulls). This plugin is/was
> popular, more than hundred thousand downloads.
> I don't want to take over the development and the maintenance of this
> plugin, just make the workable version available for the users as a new
> version in the plugin repo. Can it be done somehow without being the owner
> of the plugin?
> --
> Thanks,
> Zoltan Siki
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer