Re: [QGIS-Developer] gdal 3.1 in OSGeo4W/QGIS 3.14?

[Björn Harrtell]

I'm also very interested in any information regarding getting GDAL 3.1 into
stable builds and/or what is possibly blocking it.

Made https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/37384 some time ago which is
perhaps not the place to ask/track it.

Den mån 22 juni 2020 kl 21:21 skrev Peet Whittaker :

> Is there a plan / timeframe for when GDAL 3.1 will be incorporated into
> QGIS? Currently GDAL 3.0 is quite a problem for us due to
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/34993
>
> Peet W
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] issue move to gh stalled

[Björn Harrtell]

2016-08-29 22:43 GMT+02:00 Matthias Kuhn <matth...@opengis.ch>:

> Hi Richard,
>
> On 08/29/2016 09:47 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
> > On 29-08-16 21:07, Björn Harrtell wrote:
> >> Seems to exist a comprehensive tool to migrate Redmine issues to GitLab
> >> issues:
> >> https://github.com/oasiswork/redmine-gitlab-migrator
> >>
> >> I'm willing to give it a shot (or two..)
> >
> > FYI: we are currently running:
> >
> > Redmine 1.0.3.stable (MySQL)
> >
> > the github project above says >=1.3
> >
> > while it is ok if you try out something, also note we have like (20
> > comments to push to Github...).
>
> Just two comments:
>
> * I think he was talking about GitLab
>

Yep, I'm responsible for the experimental deployment of GitLab that Vincent
mentioned before. I wasn't aware a migration was beeing worked on and that
GitHub is the current target, sorry for jumping in uninformed in this
thread.

I agree that having a free service taking care of infrastructure and
security issues is a nice thing, but I also think that what is free today
might not be free tomorrow and it's good to at least have a plan for that
day. For instance, the throttling REST API that GitHub offers does not only
make migration to GitHub difficult it will also affect an eventual
migration *from* GitHub.

I've only put a small amount of effort to deploy GitLab at this point and
while I'm willing to do more I agree it should involve more than one person
and need a clear motivation from involved parties to defend the effort
required to maintain it properly.


> * The new GitHub API allows pushing by issue rather than comment. So
> that brings it down to ~16000 requests.
>
> >
> > IF we succeed with the move to latest Redmine first, you will have a
> > newer version from which it is maybe(?) easier to migrate anyway.
> >
> > our experience was that the xml received from Redmine did just not
> > contain all info we wanted to take over. That is why we first exported
> > all info to a Sqlite db and tried with that one.
>
> Do you have a list of what needs be taken over?
>
> Regards
> Matthias
>
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Qgis-developer mailing list
> > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] issue move to gh stalled

[Björn Harrtell]

2016-08-30 8:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Duivenvoorde :

> On 29-08-16 22:43, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>
> > * I think he was talking about GitLab
>
> Ah oops, sorry. The work stays the same probably :-(


It does seem like a difficult task, but with GitLab you do not have to use
a throttled REST API to manipulate it, potentially it's possible to write
directly to its PostgreSQL database.


> > * The new GitHub API allows pushing by issue rather than comment. So
> > that brings it down to ~16000 requests.
>
> Those throtteling api is pretty frustrating to use. It took me hours to
> only try to match Redmine users to Github users! Doing 1000 requests...
> waiting... etc etc
>
> > Do you have a list of what needs be taken over?
>
> Well, the goal was "do not loose any information", so yes:
>
> - Everything :-)
>
> Meaning: comments, attachments, labels, users (to be matched/checked
> first), commits etc etc
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] issue move to gh stalled

[Björn Harrtell]

Seems to exist a comprehensive tool to migrate Redmine issues to GitLab
issues:
https://github.com/oasiswork/redmine-gitlab-migrator

I'm willing to give it a shot (or two..)

/Björn

2016-08-29 20:54 GMT+02:00 Tim Sutton :

> Hi
>
> On 29 Aug 2016, at 5:07 PM, Greg Troxel  wrote:
>
>
> Sandro Santilli  writes:
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 03:37:37PM +0200, Luigi Pirelli wrote:
>
> I tried again... before logging to osgeo wiki to be sure about my
> credentials... and than to osgeo gitlab, but... no way :(
>
>
> Note that the OSGeo Wiki does *NOT* use the LDAP credentials.
> What you could try is logging into a trac instance (where you could
> report the issue), or into Gogs (https://git.osgeo.org/gogs)
>
>
> FWIW, I have had an osgeo account (trac for postgis etc.) for a long
> time, and I was able to log into the gitlab instance.
>
> Also, with respect to migration, I think free software orgs self-hosting
> is a good thing, but using gitlab hosting seems nice because it's free
> software (unlike github) and most importabtly because gitlab is said to
> have export/import so one has the option to switch to self-hosting
> later.
>
>
> Thanks Greg and others who have commented on this thread. I would just
> mention again that the discussion of hosting platforms is moot without an
> accompanying offer to  migrate our issue database to the new platform
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
> —
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Tim Sutton*
>
> *Co-founder:* Kartoza
> *Project chair:* QGIS.org 
>
> Visit http://kartoza.com to find out about open source:
>
> Desktop GIS programming services
> Geospatial web development
> GIS Training
> Consulting Services
>
> *Skype*: timlinux
> *IRC:* timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
>
> Kartoza is a merger between Linfiniti and Afrispatial
>
>
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer