Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report

[Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer]

Hi,If possible, can we place all 3 models in a “group” or “project?” Each model depends on the other one but currently, they must be upload one at a time.  That could be a good improvement to the server.Good luck!Nicolas CadieuxLe 7 déc. 2023 à 21:57, Lova Andriarimalala  a écrit :







Dear Nicolas Cadieux,
 
I apologize for the delay and appreciate your patience. We are actively addressing the issue to enhance both the efficiency of the model feature and the reliability of the backup system. We will
 notify you as soon as you can proceed with re-uploading.
 
Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. 
 
Best regards,
Lova
 


—

 
Lova Andriarimalala
QGIS Full Stack Developer
Visit http://kartoza.com to
 find out about open source:
* Desktop GIS programming services
* Geospatial web development
* GIS Training
* Consulting Services
Office: +261(0)34
 09 524 73
 


 
 
 
 



From:
Nicolas Cadieux 
Date: Sunday, 3 December 2023 at 3:40 AM
To: Lova Andriarimalala 
Cc: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org 
Subject: Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report

Hi,

Any news on when I can upload?


Keep up the good work!

Nicolas Cadieux






Le 30 nov. 2023 à 05:45, Lova Andriarimalala via QGIS-Developer  a écrit :




 
Hello everyone,
 
The PR regarding the soft requirements (non-blocking warning) for the plugin license is now merged and deployed.
 
Best regards.
Lova


—



 
Lova Andriarimalala
QGIS Full Stack Developer
Visit http://kartoza.com to
 find out about open source:
* Desktop GIS programming services
* Geospatial web development
* GIS Training
* Consulting Services
Office: +261(0)34
 09 524 73
 


 
 
 



From:
Lova Andriarimalala 
Date: Monday, 27 November 2023 at 4:34 PM
To: Julien Moura , qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org 
Subject: Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report

Dear Julien,
 
I've created a new PR for this fix
here. Please feel free to ask or add comments if you have any concerns about it.
 
Best regards.
 


—



 
Lova Andriarimalala
QGIS Full Stack Developer
Visit http://kartoza.com to
 find out about open source:
* Desktop GIS programming services
* Geospatial web development
* GIS Training
* Consulting Services
Office: +261(0)34
 09 524 73
 


 
 
 



From:
Lova Andriarimalala 
Date: Monday, 27 November 2023 at 4:12 PM
To: Julien Moura , qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org 
Subject: Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report

Dear Julien,
 
It is a pleasure for me to work on the project.
I’ve created a 
QEP that summarizes this discussion. As suggested, I think we can go forward with the
 non-blocking warning for now and implement licensing requirements on schedule. I'll be creating a documented PR for this fix shortly.
 
Best regards,
Lova


—



 
Lova Andriarimalala
QGIS Full Stack Developer
Visit http://kartoza.com to
 find out about open source:
* Desktop GIS programming services
* Geospatial web development
* GIS Training
* Consulting Services
Office: +261(0)34
 09 524 73
 


 
 
 
 



From:
QGIS-Developer  on behalf of Julien Moura via QGIS-Developer 
Date: Monday, 27 November 2023 at 2:41 PM
To: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org 
Subject: Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report

Hello,
Thanks again for the technical work and improving the workflow. 
+1 for the lazy consensus on non breaking changes.
Regarding the license topic:
+1 for the metadata field with a spdx license. But take care, it's not so easy to a have an exhaustive list. Maybe we should move to the PyPi classifiers since plugins are Python packages and there is already a work on maintaining a metadata ecosystem, including
 tooling to check it (pip install packaging).
Are we okay with the step back to only a non-blocking warning?
Regards

On 27/11/2023 10:50, Lova Andriarimalala via QGIS-Developer wrote:


Hello everyone,
 
Thank you all. 
It's truly an honor to work on this project.
I will begin by utilizing QEP to create a QEP that summarizes this discussion and going forward with the suggestion to make the license file recommended for now.
 
I have reviewed the tickets in the backlog and will evaluate their size. If I come across anything that I don't understand, I will add comments to seek clarification.
 
Best regards,
Lova
 
 


—



 
Lova Andriarimalala
QGIS Full Stack Developer
Visit http://kartoza.com to
 find out about open source:
* Desktop GIS programming services
* Geospatial web development
* GIS Training
* Consulting Services
Office: +261(0)34
 09 524 73
 


 
 



From:
QGIS-Developer 
 on behalf of Matthias Kuhn via QGIS-Developer 
Date: Monday, 27 November 2023 at 12:24 PM
To: Tim Sutton 
Cc: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org

Subject: Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report


Hi Tim,

 


For the workflow, that sounds great, thanks a lot!


I agree only breaking changes should go "the long way" and for simple fixes and improvements we should just get them done with low overhead.


Going forward with a small QE

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report

[Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer]

Hi,Any news on when I can upload?Keep up the good work!Nicolas CadieuxLe 30 nov. 2023 à 05:45, Lova Andriarimalala via QGIS-Developer  a écrit :







Hello everyone,
 
The PR regarding the soft requirements (non-blocking warning) for the plugin license is now merged and deployed.
 
Best regards.
Lova


—

 
Lova Andriarimalala
QGIS Full Stack Developer
Visit http://kartoza.com to
 find out about open source:
* Desktop GIS programming services
* Geospatial web development
* GIS Training
* Consulting Services
Office: +261(0)34
 09 524 73
 


 
 
 



From:
Lova Andriarimalala 
Date: Monday, 27 November 2023 at 4:34 PM
To: Julien Moura , qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org 
Subject: Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report

Dear Julien,
 
I've created a new PR for this fix
here. Please feel free to ask or add comments if you have any concerns about it.
 
Best regards.
 


—

 
Lova Andriarimalala
QGIS Full Stack Developer
Visit http://kartoza.com to
 find out about open source:
* Desktop GIS programming services
* Geospatial web development
* GIS Training
* Consulting Services
Office: +261(0)34
 09 524 73
 


 
 
 



From:
Lova Andriarimalala 
Date: Monday, 27 November 2023 at 4:12 PM
To: Julien Moura , qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org 
Subject: Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report

Dear Julien,
 
It is a pleasure for me to work on the project.
I’ve created a 
QEP that summarizes this discussion. As suggested, I think we can go forward with the non-blocking warning for now and implement licensing requirements on schedule. I'll be creating a documented PR for this fix shortly.
 
Best regards,
Lova


—

 
Lova Andriarimalala
QGIS Full Stack Developer
Visit http://kartoza.com to
 find out about open source:
* Desktop GIS programming services
* Geospatial web development
* GIS Training
* Consulting Services
Office: +261(0)34
 09 524 73
 


 
 
 
 



From:
QGIS-Developer  on behalf of Julien Moura via QGIS-Developer 
Date: Monday, 27 November 2023 at 2:41 PM
To: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org 
Subject: Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report

Hello,
Thanks again for the technical work and improving the workflow. 
+1 for the lazy consensus on non breaking changes.
Regarding the license topic:
+1 for the metadata field with a spdx license. But take care, it's not so easy to a have an exhaustive list. Maybe we should move to the PyPi classifiers since plugins are Python packages and there is already a work on maintaining a metadata ecosystem, including
 tooling to check it (pip install packaging).
Are we okay with the step back to only a non-blocking warning?
Regards

On 27/11/2023 10:50, Lova Andriarimalala via QGIS-Developer wrote:


Hello everyone,
 
Thank you all. 
It's truly an honor to work on this project.
I will begin by utilizing QEP to create a QEP that summarizes this discussion and going forward with the suggestion to make the license file recommended for now.
 
I have reviewed the tickets in the backlog and will evaluate their size. If I come across anything that I don't understand, I will add comments to seek clarification.
 
Best regards,
Lova
 
 


—

 
Lova Andriarimalala
QGIS Full Stack Developer
Visit http://kartoza.com to
 find out about open source:
* Desktop GIS programming services
* Geospatial web development
* GIS Training
* Consulting Services
Office: +261(0)34
 09 524 73
 


 
 



From:
QGIS-Developer 
 on behalf of Matthias Kuhn via QGIS-Developer

Date: Monday, 27 November 2023 at 12:24 PM
To: Tim Sutton 
Cc: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org

Subject: Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Full Stack Web Developer Report


Hi Tim,

 


For the workflow, that sounds great, thanks a lot!


I agree only breaking changes should go "the long way" and for simple fixes and improvements we should just get them done with low overhead.


Going forward with a small QEP for the license sounds very good.



Regarding the metadata, I would suggest we use the ids from
https://spdx.org/licenses/.


So for the usual QGIS plugin case, that would be


 


    license=GPL-2.0-or-later


 



On another note, I just added a couple of tickets to the backlog, I am not able to estimate the size of them, so if they are too complicated, just don't prioritize them.


 


Thank you and best regards


Matthias


 


On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:15 AM Tim Sutton  wrote:





Hi all


 


On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 1:32 AM Nyall Dawson  wrote:




On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 00:19, Tim Sutton via QGIS-Developer  wrote:
>
> @Matthias Kuhn and @Julien Moura I fixed the permissions, the board for Lova is public now. Please feel free to add items to the backlog and mark them as priority as needed.  I also asked Lova to try to work through all the old issues and fix / close them
 as appropriate so we can try to get the number of tickets down to a small number.

 


Tim/Lova, thanks for your outstanding efforts and commitm

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Dropping "render" checkbox from status bar

[Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer]

Hi,

Still useful on my side when rendering very heavy stuff and then decide to zoom 
to another part of the map… 

Nicolas Cadieux

> Le 15 oct. 2023 à 15:30, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer 
>  a écrit :
> 
> Hi list,
> 
> Question: are there still any valid use cases for the "render"
> checkbox in the status bar? It's been around forever, and DID have a
> strong use case when map rendering used to block the QGIS interface.
> But is there any reason to keep this around in modern QGIS versions?
> 
> Nyall
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Planned support for JPEG XL?

[Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer]

Salut,Au pire, tu peux accéder à la compression directement via gdal.  J’ai des scripts python qui pourrait être facilement modifié.  Tu me le dira si jamais tu as besoin de ça.Nicolas CadieuxLe 13 juin 2023 à 21:12, Bourdon, Jean-François (DIF) via QGIS-Developer  a écrit :









Hi all,
 
According to GDAL’s website, GDAL has support for JPEG XL compression since 3.6.0 but only when built against
libjxl. Considering that QGIS now uses GDAL 3.7, I was wondering if there was any plan to include it with the libjxl library in the future. Having tried the compression algorithm, it’s performance is impressive
 and I can’t wait stop using a proprietary ECW compression for our big mosaics!
 
Thanks!
 
 
Jean-François Bourdon, ing.f.
Analyste en télédétection
Direction des inventaires forestiers
Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts
5700, 4e Avenue Ouest, local A-108
Québec (Québec) G1H 6R1
Téléphone : 418 627-8669, poste 704304
jean-francois.bour...@mrnf.gouv.qc.ca

mrnf.gouv.qc.ca
 




___QGIS-Developer mailing listQGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.orgList info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developerUnsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Models waiting review since March the 10th

[Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer]

Hi,Thank you very much.  I do appreciate you stepping in and solving this problem.  I was been insistant because I had a QGIS day video on YouTube trending very well but no one could download the models (the subject of the video).  Part of the problem was created by me as I removed my old models and tried to upload new ones  instead of simply “updating” the models. I imagine that an “update” would not need the same approval system?Anyways, It would be nice to have a email address on the site so that we know exactly who takes care of model approvals.  Currently, we only see at the bottom of the site who is the web site creator without really knowing if they also help with the model approval. Thank you very much for your dedication to this project. Nicolas CadieuxLe 4 avr. 2023 à 11:33, Tim Sutton  a écrit :Dear NicolasA huge apology for the delay in reviewing your models. Thanks to Alessandro for stepping in here.RegardsTimOn Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 9:40 PM Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer <qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:Hi everyone,

Sorry to bother you but I have been trying to upload a model to the
QGIS web site for the last month. I have sent multiple email to the
developers group, logged a report  (Qgis model review unattended
#1141), sent an email to the site developer but without any response.
What can I do? Who can I contact to get my upgraded models approved?

Thanks
Nicolas

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:03 PM Nicolas Cadieux
<njacadieux.git...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I Changed the itOpen email address.
>
> Le 2023-03-23 à 11:59 a.m., Nicolas Cadieux a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have 3 models waiting to be reviewed since March the 10th
> > (https://plugins.qgis.org/models/unapproved/).  Is anyone responsible
> > for reviewing the models? These are updates from 3 previous models but
> > since the original had been deleted, the 3 models are no longer
> > available to the public. I added the site developers to the email in
> > case they have information also.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Nicolas Cadieux
> >
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-- --​Tim SuttonKartoza Co-FounderVisit http://kartoza.com to find out about open source: * Desktop GIS programming services * Geospatial web development* GIS Training* Consulting ServicesTim is a member of the QGIS Project Steering Committee---
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Models waiting review since March the 10th

[Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer]

Hi everyone,

Sorry to bother you but I have been trying to upload a model to the
QGIS web site for the last month. I have sent multiple email to the
developers group, logged a report  (Qgis model review unattended
#1141), sent an email to the site developer but without any response.
What can I do? Who can I contact to get my upgraded models approved?

Thanks
Nicolas

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:03 PM Nicolas Cadieux
 wrote:
>
> I Changed the itOpen email address.
>
> Le 2023-03-23 à 11:59 a.m., Nicolas Cadieux a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have 3 models waiting to be reviewed since March the 10th
> > (https://plugins.qgis.org/models/unapproved/).  Is anyone responsible
> > for reviewing the models? These are updates from 3 previous models but
> > since the original had been deleted, the 3 models are no longer
> > available to the public. I added the site developers to the email in
> > case they have information also.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Nicolas Cadieux
> >
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Models waiting review since March the 10th

[Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer]

I Changed the itOpen email address.

Le 2023-03-23 à 11:59 a.m., Nicolas Cadieux a écrit :

Hi,

I have 3 models waiting to be reviewed since March the 10th 
(https://plugins.qgis.org/models/unapproved/).  Is anyone responsible 
for reviewing the models? These are updates from 3 previous models but 
since the original had been deleted, the 3 models are no longer 
available to the public. I added the site developers to the email in 
case they have information also.


Thanks

Nicolas Cadieux


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Models waiting review since March the 10th

[Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer]

Hi,

I have 3 models waiting to be reviewed since March the 10th 
(https://plugins.qgis.org/models/unapproved/).  Is anyone responsible 
for reviewing the models? These are updates from 3 previous models but 
since the original had been deleted, the 3 models are no longer 
available to the public. I added the site developers to the email in 
case they have information also.


Thanks

Nicolas Cadieux

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] updating a model on the site

[Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer]

Hi,
Does anyone know who approves the models?  I have 3 models waiting to be 
approved and I was hoping we could get them online asap as my presentation 
video at the last QGIS day is working well on YouTube.
Nicolas

Envoyé de mon iPad

> Le 10 mars 2023 à 14:28, Anita Graser  a écrit :
> 
> 
> That's great. Thank you for the update, Nicolas.
> 
> Regards,
> Anita
> 
>> On Friday, 10. March 2023 19:12:26 (+01:00), Nicolas Cadieux wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I played a bit with the site.  There is indeed an icon for deleting models 
>> and uploading new models which is what I did.  My new models are waiting 
>> approval.  I noticed at the end a « modify » button next to the delete 
>> button.  You first need to select the model first before seeing those 
>> options.  « Modify » would probably have been easier, would have probably 
>> skipped the approval part and would have probably kept the download count.  
>> 
>> When all else fails… read the instructions I guess!
>> 
>> Thanks Anita,
>> Nicolas
>> 
>> Envoyé de mon iPad
>> 
>>>> Le 5 mars 2023 à 11:22, Anita Graser  a écrit :
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi Nicolas,
>>> 
>>> Since there have been no answers so far, it seems like nobody has tried
>>> this before.
>>> 
>>> In the footer of https://plugins.qgis.org/models it reads that Alessandro
>>> Pasotti and Kartoza have developed the hub web app. Maybe they can point us
>>> at the relevant source code sections or answer directly.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Anita
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Friday, 24. February 2023 20:29:53 (+01:00), Nicolas Cadieux via
>>> QGIS-Developer wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I have a 3 models that have been improved (Fix Directional Network,
>>>> Check Geometries, model 1 of 3.)  and fixed. I presented today at the
>>>> QGIS OpenDay.
>>>> 
>>>> I had to remove the "Snap to anchor nodes (single layer only)" as it
>>>> was creating invalid geometries in QGIS 3.28.2-Firenze on Windows 11.
>>>> 
>>>> I am not sure exactly how to upload the new models? I see the upload
>>>> button but I am wondering what will happen to the old ones? Will they
>>>> be removed by someone managing the site?  Can we have multiple
>>>> versions of the model as I am using the new repair geometry tools
>>>> unavailable before 3.28? Is it possible to modify a models'
>>>> description myself or must I send and email somewhere?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Nicolas Cadieux
>>>> ___
>>>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>>>> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
>>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Anita Graser
>>> Home: http://anitagraser.com
>>> Twitter: @underdarkgis
>>> Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Anita Graser
> Home: http://anitagraser.com
> Twitter: @underdarkgis
> Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org 
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] updating a model on the site

[Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer]

Hi,

I played a bit with the site.  There is indeed an icon for deleting models and 
uploading new models which is what I did.  My new models are waiting approval.  
I noticed at the end a « modify » button next to the delete button.  You first 
need to select the model first before seeing those options.  « Modify » would 
probably have been easier, would have probably skipped the approval part and 
would have probably kept the download count.  

When all else fails… read the instructions I guess!

Thanks Anita,
Nicolas

Envoyé de mon iPad

> Le 5 mars 2023 à 11:22, Anita Graser  a écrit :
> 
> 
> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> Since there have been no answers so far, it seems like nobody has tried
> this before.
> 
> In the footer of https://plugins.qgis.org/models it reads that Alessandro
> Pasotti and Kartoza have developed the hub web app. Maybe they can point us
> at the relevant source code sections or answer directly.
> 
> Regards,
> Anita
> 
> 
> 
> On Friday, 24. February 2023 20:29:53 (+01:00), Nicolas Cadieux via
> QGIS-Developer wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > I have a 3 models that have been improved (Fix Directional Network,
> > Check Geometries, model 1 of 3.)  and fixed. I presented today at the
> > QGIS OpenDay.
> >
> > I had to remove the "Snap to anchor nodes (single layer only)" as it
> > was creating invalid geometries in QGIS 3.28.2-Firenze on Windows 11.
> >
> > I am not sure exactly how to upload the new models? I see the upload
> > button but I am wondering what will happen to the old ones? Will they
> > be removed by someone managing the site?  Can we have multiple
> > versions of the model as I am using the new repair geometry tools
> > unavailable before 3.28? Is it possible to modify a models'
> > description myself or must I send and email somewhere?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Nicolas Cadieux
> > ___
> > QGIS-Developer mailing list
> > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >
> 
> --
> Anita Graser
> Home: http://anitagraser.com
> Twitter: @underdarkgis
> Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] updating a model on the site

[Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer]

Thanks!
I will check that out!

Nicolas Cadieux
https://gitlab.com/njacadieux

> Le 5 mars 2023 à 11:22, Anita Graser  a écrit :
> 
> 
> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> Since there have been no answers so far, it seems like nobody has tried
> this before.
> 
> In the footer of https://plugins.qgis.org/models it reads that Alessandro
> Pasotti and Kartoza have developed the hub web app. Maybe they can point us
> at the relevant source code sections or answer directly.
> 
> Regards,
> Anita
> 
> 
> 
> On Friday, 24. February 2023 20:29:53 (+01:00), Nicolas Cadieux via
> QGIS-Developer wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > I have a 3 models that have been improved (Fix Directional Network,
> > Check Geometries, model 1 of 3.)  and fixed. I presented today at the
> > QGIS OpenDay.
> >
> > I had to remove the "Snap to anchor nodes (single layer only)" as it
> > was creating invalid geometries in QGIS 3.28.2-Firenze on Windows 11.
> >
> > I am not sure exactly how to upload the new models? I see the upload
> > button but I am wondering what will happen to the old ones? Will they
> > be removed by someone managing the site?  Can we have multiple
> > versions of the model as I am using the new repair geometry tools
> > unavailable before 3.28? Is it possible to modify a models'
> > description myself or must I send and email somewhere?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Nicolas Cadieux
> > ___
> > QGIS-Developer mailing list
> > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >
> 
> --
> Anita Graser
> Home: http://anitagraser.com
> Twitter: @underdarkgis
> Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] updating a model on the site

[Nicolas Cadieux via QGIS-Developer]

Hi,
I have a 3 models that have been improved (Fix Directional Network,
Check Geometries, model 1 of 3.)  and fixed. I presented today at the
QGIS OpenDay.

I had to remove the "Snap to anchor nodes (single layer only)" as it
was creating invalid geometries in QGIS 3.28.2-Firenze on Windows 11.

I am not sure exactly how to upload the new models? I see the upload
button but I am wondering what will happen to the old ones? Will they
be removed by someone managing the site?  Can we have multiple
versions of the model as I am using the new repair geometry tools
unavailable before 3.28? Is it possible to modify a models'
description myself or must I send and email somewhere?

Thanks
Nicolas Cadieux
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer