[Qgis-user] Qgis on eeepc 901 (ubuntu-eee) 2nd round: K.O.
Too bad. Just have installed with synaptic and when I run qgis from the terminal I get: Error reading Icon resources from: /home/share/qgis/themes/default/ Quiting... -- Dr. Agustin Lobo Institut de Ciencies de la Terra "Jaume Almera" (CSIC) LLuis Sole Sabaris s/n 08028 Barcelona Spain Tel. 34 934095410 Fax. 34 934110012 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ija.csic.es/gt/obster ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Re: AW: [Qgis-user] Qgis on eeepc 901: 2nd round
Thanks, I've selected qgis, python-qgis and qgis-plugin-grass, should I select any of the libqgis*0.11 files that have not been automatically selected? As this is a tiny machine, I rather keep it siple (I'm actually not sure of keeping the grass plugin) Agus Hugentobler Marco wrote: Hi Agustin, The packages are compiled with compiler opimisation turned on. So I don't expect speed improvements with self-compiled binaries. In terms of storage efficiency, it may be an advantage that by compiling yourself you can only include what you need (e.g. grass, postgis, gsl, expat, georeferencer, gpx, wfs are optional). Regards, Marco -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag von Agustin Lobo Gesendet: Fr 19.09.2008 10:48 An: qgis-user Betreff: [Qgis-user] Qgis on eeepc 901: 2nd round Hi! After solving few problems related to the OS (Xandros vs ubuntu-) thanks to the kind help of many people, I'm now about trying to install QGIS on the eeepc 901 running ubuntu-eee instead of its original Xandros (I'll tell why in a future and more comprehensive message). Before starting (this afternoon), one question: In terms of efficiency of the resulting QGIS, is it better that I compile myself on the eee-pc or would I get similar performance by installing the ubuntu binaries? In other words, does it pay in terms of efficiency the (for me considerable) complexity of compiling myself? Note that this is a tiny machine, thus any improvement could be important in the long term, so I'm kind of resigned myself to the involved task of compiling if you think that I ought to. Thanks Agus -- Dr. Agustin Lobo Institut de Ciencies de la Terra "Jaume Almera" (CSIC) LLuis Sole Sabaris s/n 08028 Barcelona Spain Tel. 34 934095410 Fax. 34 934110012 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ija.csic.es/gt/obster ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
[Qgis-user] Untranslateable strings
Half a year ago I made an effort of cleaning up HTML-markup from strings that need to be translated. Since then, many strings has reverted to HTML-markup, making translation a real pain. Please, developers, check your .ui files for HTML-markup, that's where the problem lies. Apparently, saving in QT designer adds markup by default. Hey, Jef, can't we do a script? ;-) Magnus ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
AW: [Qgis-user] Qgis on eeepc 901: 2nd round
Hi Agustin, The packages are compiled with compiler opimisation turned on. So I don't expect speed improvements with self-compiled binaries. In terms of storage efficiency, it may be an advantage that by compiling yourself you can only include what you need (e.g. grass, postgis, gsl, expat, georeferencer, gpx, wfs are optional). Regards, Marco -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag von Agustin Lobo Gesendet: Fr 19.09.2008 10:48 An: qgis-user Betreff: [Qgis-user] Qgis on eeepc 901: 2nd round Hi! After solving few problems related to the OS (Xandros vs ubuntu-) thanks to the kind help of many people, I'm now about trying to install QGIS on the eeepc 901 running ubuntu-eee instead of its original Xandros (I'll tell why in a future and more comprehensive message). Before starting (this afternoon), one question: In terms of efficiency of the resulting QGIS, is it better that I compile myself on the eee-pc or would I get similar performance by installing the ubuntu binaries? In other words, does it pay in terms of efficiency the (for me considerable) complexity of compiling myself? Note that this is a tiny machine, thus any improvement could be important in the long term, so I'm kind of resigned myself to the involved task of compiling if you think that I ought to. Thanks Agus -- Dr. Agustin Lobo Institut de Ciencies de la Terra "Jaume Almera" (CSIC) LLuis Sole Sabaris s/n 08028 Barcelona Spain Tel. 34 934095410 Fax. 34 934110012 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ija.csic.es/gt/obster ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
[Qgis-user] Qgis on eeepc 901: 2nd round
Hi! After solving few problems related to the OS (Xandros vs ubuntu-) thanks to the kind help of many people, I'm now about trying to install QGIS on the eeepc 901 running ubuntu-eee instead of its original Xandros (I'll tell why in a future and more comprehensive message). Before starting (this afternoon), one question: In terms of efficiency of the resulting QGIS, is it better that I compile myself on the eee-pc or would I get similar performance by installing the ubuntu binaries? In other words, does it pay in terms of efficiency the (for me considerable) complexity of compiling myself? Note that this is a tiny machine, thus any improvement could be important in the long term, so I'm kind of resigned myself to the involved task of compiling if you think that I ought to. Thanks Agus -- Dr. Agustin Lobo Institut de Ciencies de la Terra "Jaume Almera" (CSIC) LLuis Sole Sabaris s/n 08028 Barcelona Spain Tel. 34 934095410 Fax. 34 934110012 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ija.csic.es/gt/obster ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
