Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-03-08 Thread Blumentrath, Stefan
Cool! Thank`s so much for this!

> FYI - Turns out option 3 eventuated and I needed this feature for my own 
> work. It's now in the current master version!

___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-03-08 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 9 February 2016 at 07:19, Nyall Dawson  wrote:

> Well, the reality is that there's a very limited number of ways in which new
> features get implemented in QGIS:
>
> 1. Write it yourself. (Requires knowledge of QGIS source and c++)
>
> 2. Pay someone else to write it for you (requires money)
>
> 3. Wait for someone else to write/pay for it (requires patience and hope
> that your request is something someone else really needs)
>
> 4. Try to convince someone to donate their work/free time to do it for you
> (requires super levels of negotiating and finding the magic words to say to
> developers on irc/email/etc, or a project which is sufficiently interesting
> to attract a developer's attention regardless.)
>
> I don't think there's any other ways code gets added to QGIS.
>

FYI - Turns out option 3 eventuated and I needed this feature for my
own work. It's now in the current master version!

Nyall
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-09 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Il 09/02/2016 08:19, Chris Berens ha scritto:
> If there was a simple template to fill in, which calculated the relative
> cost of the FOSS presence in one's organisation over time that might be
> useful to motivate for a development budget.  Free has little value to
> those who don't use the tools directly.

Thanks all for your thoughts. I agree that we should make it more simple
for people and organization to fund specific efforts, and crowdfunding
proved a simple and effective way to do so.
IMHO we should put more prominently, possibly within qgis itself, an
explanation on which crowdfunding projects are currently available, and
how to fund them.
All the best.

-- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-09 Thread Richard Duivenvoorde
On 08-02-16 22:06, Blumentrath, Stefan wrote:
> Hi Nyall, Richard, and Andreas,
> On your list, Nyall, I would add Crowd funding as a fifth (and quite
> popular) way of getting things into QGIS. And of course all fife can be
> mixed to some extent...

@Nyall: good idea to do a write up! Besides on your blog, maybe we can
write a thorough page on the website to and make that very prominent. So
a link to that (translated) page could be the 'standard reply' for us?
And that page then has your points, but also makes it very clear that a
project as QGIS also needs hands, time and effort from it's *users* too.

> Anyway, keep up with your good work regardless if paid or voluntary. As
> I see it, the mix is what makes the project successful...

My main point is that QGIS started (and still is) a volunteering
project. And to give users rather not so nuanced replies like: "plz pay
for this feature if you can" is not the message that I think we should
sent to the world.

I'm OK off course with sponsoring and hiring good developers to add
something to QGIS, but it is the tone that makes the musique (in french
it sounds better :-) ).

Andreas (thanks for this!) sent me a link to this article:
https://mako.cc/writing/funding_volunteers/funding_volunteers.html
which (at least to me) hits exactly the right spot. Plz all read it!

As a community we should try to stay friendly, open and correct. No need
to act like a business, as I hope/think a healthy community is in the
end stronger then a business.

Regards & thanks,

Richard

___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-08 Thread Chris Berens
If there was a simple template to fill in, which calculated the relative
cost of the FOSS presence in one's organisation over time that might be
useful to motivate for a development budget.  Free has little value to
those who don't use the tools directly.

Chris Berens, GISc
www.mapland.co.za
+27 (0)82 567 9322

On 9 February 2016 at 09:01, Neumann, Andreas  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I also think that a list of potential ways to support the QGIS project
> (both with time/voluntary work or financial) would be useful, with updates
> from time to time.
>
> Stefan, thanks for clarifying that NINA is a private organization. And
> yes, crowd funding is also a good way to support new features, esp. for
> larger efforts or feature wishes one cannot finance from within a single
> organization.
>
> One idea with the goal of minimizing bureaucracy when trying to fund
> smaller features from time to time is to buy an hourly pool (say 25, 50 or
> 100 hours) at the QGIS developer/supporter of your choice. I did that at my
> previous employer and could then flexibly use this hourly pool to get
> either support or trigger smaller fixes and developments.
>
> Andreas
>
> On 2016-02-08 23:01, Blumentrath, Stefan wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> Indeed, for us enterprise users a nice collection/overview of reasons for
> working with and paying for FOSS (including a howto) could be really
> helpful when discussing with decision makers.
>
> I remember Paolo had a post in that direction:
> https://faunaliagis.wordpress.com/2013/09/15/6-reasons-to-pay-for-open-source-software/
>
> A critical point might also be that it can be simply more easy, to use
> money on proprietary software. You have probably only one local dealer, you
> get a price and you know more or less what you get for your money. Once you
> made your decision on a software, sat aside your annual license fees and
> accepted that this has to be payed, things go more or less automatically...
> With the legal entity, QGIS is maybe on a good way there. I could also
> imagine, that the grouping the many feature requests into (crowd) fundable
> packages might be helpful. In some cases the gentle push from a starting
> crowd funding activity (or when it is about to end) can be enough to make
> people to use some money...
>
> Cheers
> Stefan
>
> Good point. I keep meaning to write this up properly at some stage as a
> blog post, so keep the suggestions coming. I think it'd be useful to have
> all > this stuff outlined and explained so that people can make informed
> decisions about the best way to get their requests fulfilled.
>
> Nyall
>
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-08 Thread Neumann, Andreas
 

Hi all, 

I also think that a list of potential ways to support the QGIS project
(both with time/voluntary work or financial) would be useful, with
updates from time to time. 

Stefan, thanks for clarifying that NINA is a private organization. And
yes, crowd funding is also a good way to support new features, esp. for
larger efforts or feature wishes one cannot finance from within a single
organization. 

One idea with the goal of minimizing bureaucracy when trying to fund
smaller features from time to time is to buy an hourly pool (say 25, 50
or 100 hours) at the QGIS developer/supporter of your choice. I did that
at my previous employer and could then flexibly use this hourly pool to
get either support or trigger smaller fixes and developments. 

Andreas 

On 2016-02-08 23:01, Blumentrath, Stefan wrote: 

> Hi again,
> 
> Indeed, for us enterprise users a nice collection/overview of reasons for 
> working with and paying for FOSS (including a howto) could be really helpful 
> when discussing with decision makers.
> 
> I remember Paolo had a post in that direction: 
> https://faunaliagis.wordpress.com/2013/09/15/6-reasons-to-pay-for-open-source-software/
> 
> A critical point might also be that it can be simply more easy, to use money 
> on proprietary software. You have probably only one local dealer, you get a 
> price and you know more or less what you get for your money. Once you made 
> your decision on a software, sat aside your annual license fees and accepted 
> that this has to be payed, things go more or less automatically... With the 
> legal entity, QGIS is maybe on a good way there. I could also imagine, that 
> the grouping the many feature requests into (crowd) fundable packages might 
> be helpful. In some cases the gentle push from a starting crowd funding 
> activity (or when it is about to end) can be enough to make people to use 
> some money...
> 
> Cheers
> Stefan
> 
>> Good point. I keep meaning to write this up properly at some stage as a blog 
>> post, so keep the suggestions coming. I think it'd be useful to have all > 
>> this stuff outlined and explained so that people can make informed decisions 
>> about the best way to get their requests fulfilled.
>> 
>> Nyall
> 
> ___
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

  ___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-08 Thread Blumentrath, Stefan
Hi again,

Indeed, for us enterprise users a nice collection/overview of reasons for 
working with and paying for FOSS (including a howto) could be really helpful 
when discussing with decision makers.

I remember Paolo had a post in that direction: 
https://faunaliagis.wordpress.com/2013/09/15/6-reasons-to-pay-for-open-source-software/

A critical point might also be that it can be simply more easy, to use money on 
proprietary software. You have probably only one local dealer, you get a price 
and you know more or less what you get for your money. Once you made your 
decision on a software, sat aside your annual license fees and accepted that 
this has to be payed, things go more or less automatically... With the legal 
entity, QGIS is maybe on a good way there. I could also imagine, that the 
grouping the many feature requests into (crowd) fundable packages might be 
helpful. In some cases the gentle push from a starting crowd funding activity 
(or when it is about to end) can be enough to make people to use some money...

Cheers
Stefan

> Good point. I keep meaning to write this up properly at some stage as a blog 
> post, so keep the suggestions coming. I think it'd be useful to have all > 
> this stuff outlined and explained so that people can make informed decisions 
> about the best way to get their requests fulfilled.
> 
> Nyall


___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-08 Thread Blumentrath, Stefan
Hi Nyall, Richard, and Andreas,

For me it is all fine if you give the hint on funding, just like Andreas did, 
knowing whom he is talking to. And I think he has a lot of valid points in his 
answer.

Unfortunately, it is not always that simple, even for people using QGIS in 
bigger organizations, to mobilize money for things they like to see implemented 
(believe me, I wish it was)...

On your list, Nyall, I would add Crowd funding as a fifth (and quite popular) 
way of getting things into QGIS. And of course all fife can be mixed to some 
extent...

Anyway, keep up with your good work regardless if paid or voluntary. As I see 
it, the mix is what makes the project successful...

Cheers
Stefan



From: Qgis-user [mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Nyall 
Dawson
Sent: 8. februar 2016 21:20
To: Richard Duivenvoorde 
Cc: qgis-user 
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default


On 9 Feb 2016 12:47 AM, "Richard Duivenvoorde" 
mailto:rdmaili...@duif.net>> wrote:
>
> On 08-02-16 14:37, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> >
> > If this important to you - please consider sponsoring a dev to implement
> > this. It can't be very complicated to implement.
>
> Can we please(!) stop saying this all the time. I still hope(d) that
> QGIS is a project where people work on a more or less idealistic way on
> QGIS.

Well, the reality is that there's a very limited number of ways in which new 
features get implemented in QGIS:

1. Write it yourself. (Requires knowledge of QGIS source and c++)

2. Pay someone else to write it for you (requires money)

3. Wait for someone else to write/pay for it (requires patience and hope that 
your request is something someone else really needs)

4. Try to convince someone to donate their work/free time to do it for you 
(requires super levels of negotiating and finding the magic words to say to 
developers on irc/email/etc, or a project which is sufficiently interesting to 
attract a developer's attention regardless.)

I don't think there's any other ways code gets added to QGIS.

(Note that I'm *not* discounting all the non development volunteer/paid QGIS 
work, I'm just referring to how features can get added.)

Given this, I think it's fine to direct people who request stuff to the most 
direct and reliable way to make changes happen - option 2 above. Just saying 
"file a feature request" alone isn't all that helpful (it's effectively options 
3 or 4 above). It's also very helpful to also let them know how they can make 
these changes happen quickly.

Nyall

>
> Regards,
>
> Richard
> ___
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org>
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-08 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 9 February 2016 at 08:06, Blumentrath, Stefan
 wrote:
> Hi Nyall, Richard, and Andreas,
>
>
>
> For me it is all fine if you give the hint on funding, just like Andreas
> did, knowing whom he is talking to. And I think he has a lot of valid points
> in his answer.
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, it is not always that simple, even for people using QGIS in
> bigger organizations, to mobilize money for things they like to see
> implemented (believe me, I wish it was)...

Oh, I totally understand. I work in government too and have first-hand
experience with this!

>
> On your list, Nyall, I would add Crowd funding as a fifth (and quite
> popular) way of getting things into QGIS. And of course all fife can be
> mixed to some extent...

Good point. I keep meaning to write this up properly at some stage as
a blog post, so keep the suggestions coming. I think it'd be useful to
have all this stuff outlined and explained so that people can make
informed decisions about the best way to get their requests fulfilled.

Nyall





>
>
>
> Anyway, keep up with your good work regardless if paid or voluntary. As I
> see it, the mix is what makes the project successful...
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Qgis-user [mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of
> Nyall Dawson
> Sent: 8. februar 2016 21:20
> To: Richard Duivenvoorde 
> Cc: qgis-user 
> Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default
>
>
>
>
> On 9 Feb 2016 12:47 AM, "Richard Duivenvoorde" <
> rdmaili...@duif.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 08-02-16 14:37, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>> >
>> > If this important to you - please consider sponsoring a dev to implement
>> > this. It can't be very complicated to implement.
>>
>> Can we please(!) stop saying this all the time. I still hope(d) that
>> QGIS is a project where people work on a more or less idealistic way on
>> QGIS.
>
> Well, the reality is that there's a very limited number of ways in which new
> features get implemented in QGIS:
>
> 1. Write it yourself. (Requires knowledge of QGIS source and c++)
>
> 2. Pay someone else to write it for you (requires money)
>
> 3. Wait for someone else to write/pay for it (requires patience and hope
> that your request is something someone else really needs)
>
> 4. Try to convince someone to donate their work/free time to do it for you
> (requires super levels of negotiating and finding the magic words to say to
> developers on irc/email/etc, or a project which is sufficiently interesting
> to attract a developer's attention regardless.)
>
> I don't think there's any other ways code gets added to QGIS.
>
> (Note that I'm *not* discounting all the non development volunteer/paid QGIS
> work, I'm just referring to how features can get added.)
>
> Given this, I think it's fine to direct people who request stuff to the most
> direct and reliable way to make changes happen - option 2 above. Just saying
> "file a feature request" alone isn't all that helpful (it's effectively
> options 3 or 4 above). It's also very helpful to also let them know how they
> can make these changes happen quickly.
>
> Nyall
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Richard
>> ___
>> Qgis-user mailing list
>> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
>> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-08 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 9 Feb 2016 12:47 AM, "Richard Duivenvoorde"  wrote:
>
> On 08-02-16 14:37, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> >
> > If this important to you - please consider sponsoring a dev to implement
> > this. It can't be very complicated to implement.
>
> Can we please(!) stop saying this all the time. I still hope(d) that
> QGIS is a project where people work on a more or less idealistic way on
> QGIS.

Well, the reality is that there's a very limited number of ways in which
new features get implemented in QGIS:

1. Write it yourself. (Requires knowledge of QGIS source and c++)

2. Pay someone else to write it for you (requires money)

3. Wait for someone else to write/pay for it (requires patience and hope
that your request is something someone else really needs)

4. Try to convince someone to donate their work/free time to do it for you
(requires super levels of negotiating and finding the magic words to say to
developers on irc/email/etc, or a project which is sufficiently interesting
to attract a developer's attention regardless.)

I don't think there's any other ways code gets added to QGIS.

(Note that I'm *not* discounting all the non development volunteer/paid
QGIS work, I'm just referring to how features can get added.)

Given this, I think it's fine to direct people who request stuff to the
most direct and reliable way to make changes happen - option 2 above. Just
saying "file a feature request" alone isn't all that helpful (it's
effectively options 3 or 4 above). It's also very helpful to also let them
know how they can make these changes happen quickly.

Nyall

>
> Regards,
>
> Richard
> ___
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-08 Thread DelazJ
Hi,
Andreas, I understand your point and agreed with you now that it's clear
you know Stefan.

But like Richard, I also get uncomfortable with such an assertion.
I've already been told such a thing (twice actually). Though my company
doesn't (can't?) finance any improvement in QGIS, I already spend time on
bug reporting and doc writing. And when you're then told because you are
asking for a bug fixing, "if you want it done just pay it", it sounds like
any other contribution you might have done has no real value.
Though I agree developers need money to improve QGIS, we should also better
value time spent by volunteers.

Regards



2016-02-08 15:12 GMT+01:00 Neumann, Andreas :

> Hi Richard,
>
> There 1300! open feature requests in our bug queue. These features don't
> get implemented by accident or on a voluntary basis (maybe some do). We
> have to be realistic. If we want to have good progress, we better start
> sponsoring features!
>
> I am not asking a poor guy from a development country to privately invest
> into QGIS, but a government organization from one of the richest countries
> in the world. I also happen to work for a gov agency (on province level in
> Switzerland). I know that these organizations have enough money to invest
> into such software - they also pay thousands/millions of Euros in licensing
> fees for proprietary software. And by using OpenSource software they save a
> lot and gain flexibility - and they can influence how the software they use
> gets developed. I personally think, these organizations even have an
> obligation to give something back to the OpenSource software they use!
>
> Don't you think that it is quite ok to politely ask such organizations to
> contribute a little bit financially for features they have an interest in?
> If there are many such organizations contributing together, we all profit
> from each other - and the ones who cannot afford to contribute can still
> use it as well. I have no problem with that.
>
> How do you think other OpenSource gets developed? Linux, LibreOffice,
> Firefox, Apache, Postgres, Postgis, etc, etc. - do you think this all
> happens solely from voluntary contributors?
>
> Already in 2010 75% of the contributions in the Linux kernel were
> contributed by paid developers:
> http://apcmag.com/linux-now-75-corporate.htm/ I think it is safe to
> assume that this figure is even higher in 2015. Do you think all of these
> paid devs and the organizations who sponsor them are evil?
>
> Andreas
>
> On 2016-02-08 14:46, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
>
> On 08-02-16 14:37, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
>
> If this important to you - please consider sponsoring a dev to implement
> this. It can't be very complicated to implement.
>
>
> Can we please(!) stop saying this all the time. I still hope(d) that
> QGIS is a project where people work on a more or less idealistic way on
> QGIS.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard
> ___
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-08 Thread Neumann, Andreas
 

Hi Richard, 

There 1300! open feature requests in our bug queue. These features don't
get implemented by accident or on a voluntary basis (maybe some do). We
have to be realistic. If we want to have good progress, we better start
sponsoring features! 

I am not asking a poor guy from a development country to privately
invest into QGIS, but a government organization from one of the richest
countries in the world. I also happen to work for a gov agency (on
province level in Switzerland). I know that these organizations have
enough money to invest into such software - they also pay
thousands/millions of Euros in licensing fees for proprietary software.
And by using OpenSource software they save a lot and gain flexibility -
and they can influence how the software they use gets developed. I
personally think, these organizations even have an obligation to give
something back to the OpenSource software they use! 

Don't you think that it is quite ok to politely ask such organizations
to contribute a little bit financially for features they have an
interest in? If there are many such organizations contributing together,
we all profit from each other - and the ones who cannot afford to
contribute can still use it as well. I have no problem with that. 

How do you think other OpenSource gets developed? Linux, LibreOffice,
Firefox, Apache, Postgres, Postgis, etc, etc. - do you think this all
happens solely from voluntary contributors? 

Already in 2010 75% of the contributions in the Linux kernel were
contributed by paid developers:
http://apcmag.com/linux-now-75-corporate.htm/ I think it is safe to
assume that this figure is even higher in 2015. Do you think all of
these paid devs and the organizations who sponsor them are evil? 

Andreas 

On 2016-02-08 14:46, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: 

> On 08-02-16 14:37, Andreas Neumann wrote: 
> 
>> If this important to you - please consider sponsoring a dev to implement
>> this. It can't be very complicated to implement.
> 
> Can we please(!) stop saying this all the time. I still hope(d) that
> QGIS is a project where people work on a more or less idealistic way on
> QGIS.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Richard
> ___
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

  ___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-08 Thread Richard Duivenvoorde
On 08-02-16 14:37, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> 
> If this important to you - please consider sponsoring a dev to implement
> this. It can't be very complicated to implement.

Can we please(!) stop saying this all the time. I still hope(d) that
QGIS is a project where people work on a more or less idealistic way on
QGIS.

Regards,

Richard
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-08 Thread Andreas Neumann

Hi Stefan,

I think it would be a useful setting to have "per layer".

The QEP you mention is primarily about making the fields settings tab 
easier to use / splitting it up in two separate tabs. Perhaps it would 
be more useful to open a feature request for that (if none exists so 
far) than adding it to the QEP - which seems to deal with different issues.


If this important to you - please consider sponsoring a dev to implement 
this. It can't be very complicated to implement.


For the next QGIS release we will also contract with Matthias to do 
several enhancements to transactions/relations, forms and widgets. I can 
send you more details if you are interested.


Andreas

On 08.02.2016 14:12, Blumentrath, Stefan wrote:


Hi Andreas,

Thanks for your answer!

My use case is using QGIS as DB frontend where also non-spatial layers 
have to be edited and editing does not necessarily start with a 
geometry...


Would you consider having such a setting a relevant enhancement? If 
so, should I open an enhancement ticket or add a comment to Matthias`s 
“Fields and Forms redesign”: 
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/37


Cheers

Stefan

*From:*Qgis-user [mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf 
Of *Andreas Neumann

*Sent:* 8. februar 2016 14:00
*To:* qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
*Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

Hi Stefan,

I don't know such a setting. And no - you did not overlook it.

The only tool that opens the form view by default is the identify tool 
- if the checkbox is enabled that opens the form if there only one 
target. But then you can't easily switch to the table view.$


Andreas

On 08.02.2016 13:19, Blumentrath, Stefan wrote:

Hi,

Is there a setting where I can specify that an attribute table
should be opened in form view by default?

I tried searched both Layer properties and Setting options but did
not find anything. Did I simply overlook it?

Cheers

Stefan




___

Qgis-user mailing list

Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org>

List info:http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Unsubscribe:http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user



___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-08 Thread Blumentrath, Stefan
Hi Andreas,

Thanks for your answer!

My use case is using QGIS as DB frontend where also non-spatial layers have to 
be edited and editing does not necessarily start with a geometry...
Would you consider having such a setting a relevant enhancement? If so, should 
I open an enhancement ticket or add a comment to Matthias`s “Fields and Forms 
redesign”: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/37

Cheers
Stefan



From: Qgis-user [mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Andreas 
Neumann
Sent: 8. februar 2016 14:00
To: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

Hi Stefan,

I don't know such a setting. And no - you did not overlook it.

The only tool that opens the form view by default is the identify tool - if the 
checkbox is enabled that opens the form if there only one target. But then you 
can't easily switch to the table view.$

Andreas
On 08.02.2016 13:19, Blumentrath, Stefan wrote:
Hi,

Is there a setting where I can specify that an attribute table should be opened 
in form view by default?
I tried searched both Layer properties and Setting options but did not find 
anything. Did I simply overlook it?

Cheers
Stefan





___

Qgis-user mailing list

Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org>

List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-08 Thread Andreas Neumann

Hi Stefan,

I don't know such a setting. And no - you did not overlook it.

The only tool that opens the form view by default is the identify tool - 
if the checkbox is enabled that opens the form if there only one target. 
But then you can't easily switch to the table view.$


Andreas

On 08.02.2016 13:19, Blumentrath, Stefan wrote:


Hi,

Is there a setting where I can specify that an attribute table should 
be opened in form view by default?


I tried searched both Layer properties and Setting options but did not 
find anything. Did I simply overlook it?


Cheers

Stefan



___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

[Qgis-user] Open attribute table in form view by default

2016-02-08 Thread Blumentrath, Stefan
Hi,

Is there a setting where I can specify that an attribute table should be opened 
in form view by default?
I tried searched both Layer properties and Setting options but did not find 
anything. Did I simply overlook it?

Cheers
Stefan

___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user