Re: [Qgis-user] empty place holder for categorized values?
Ah k, I see its usefulness now! Was recently styling a roads datasets with a couple dozen categories. Definitely helped identify ones I needed to include in some grouping or rule. On Sat, Feb 23, 2019, 01:01 Richard Duivenvoorde, wrote: > On 23/02/2019 07.05, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > > It's a catch all for eventual missing data. These will disappear from > > the map if you remove it > > Yes, I often give it a very big red dot or line, so to show me I miss > rules or categories in my styling. It is easy to hide it. > > Richard > ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Re: [Qgis-user] empty place holder for categorized values?
On 23/02/2019 07.05, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > It's a catch all for eventual missing data. These will disappear from > the map if you remove it Yes, I often give it a very big red dot or line, so to show me I miss rules or categories in my styling. It is easy to hide it. Richard ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Re: [Qgis-user] empty place holder for categorized values?
It's a catch all for eventual missing data. These will disappear from the map if you remove it Cheers. Il 23 febbraio 2019 02:01:28 CET, Lachlan McConnell ha scritto: >Good question, Donovan. After not figuring that out for awhile I just >click off. > >On 23 February 2019 04:44:12 GMT+08:00, Saulteau Don > wrote: >Afternoon everyone! > >I've always been curious why, when styling a vector layer using >categories, >there's an entry at the bottom of the list that is always empty with 0 >features. > >In 3.6 it comes in with the value "all other features". > >Does it serve some purpose that I'm missing? >I often just remove it. > >That got me thinking, is there a default behaviour setting for this so >I >can save myself a click or two? > > >Donovan -- Sorry for being short___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Re: [Qgis-user] empty place holder for categorized values?
Good question, Donovan. After not figuring that out for awhile I just click off. On 23 February 2019 04:44:12 GMT+08:00, Saulteau Don wrote: Afternoon everyone! I've always been curious why, when styling a vector layer using categories, there's an entry at the bottom of the list that is always empty with 0 features. In 3.6 it comes in with the value "all other features". Does it serve some purpose that I'm missing? I often just remove it. That got me thinking, is there a default behaviour setting for this so I can save myself a click or two? Donovan ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
[Qgis-user] empty place holder for categorized values?
Afternoon everyone! I've always been curious why, when styling a vector layer using categories, there's an entry at the bottom of the list that is always empty with 0 features. In 3.6 it comes in with the value "all other features". Does it serve some purpose that I'm missing? I often just remove it. That got me thinking, is there a default behaviour setting for this so I can save myself a click or two? Donovan ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
