RE: [SPAM] RE: [Qgis-user] Public Repository for plugins...

2009-06-16 Thread Sampson, David

 I don't want to speak on behalf of the community, I just came across what I 
figured would work for the central repo and kinda matches typical; open source 
projects that facilitate the three options.

Cheers

> -Original Message-
> From: qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org 
> [mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Borys Jurgiel
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 09:44
> To: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [SPAM] RE: [Qgis-user] Public Repository for plugins...
> 
> Tuesday 16 of June 2009 15:03:11 Sampson, David napisał(a):
> > 
> >  Just as I am going through a pseudo code exercise of  release.py I 
> > see three
> cases.
> > 
> > 1. Current and previous stable versions 
>   VERSION
> > 2. A Beta version is is being tested an on its way to 
> stable.   BETA
> > 3. An unstable snapshot of the development trunk
>   ALPHA
> > 
> > If we assume that most new feature development is done in 
> the branches 
> > and
> merged to trunk, then trunk should not be all the harry and 
> trashy. The branches would be way to unstable.
> > 
> > This way then regular users can try unstable and beta 
> version of the 
> > plugins
> wihtout needing to get into SVN carnage.
> > 
> > For now I will call trunk snapshots BETA
> > 
> > Just some thoughts.
> 
> So do we want to have three levels? The present 
> "experimental" tagging style is related to the fact that many 
> authors just release either plugins considerable as stable, 
> or just some concepts. But if we are going to develop more 
> complicated plugins (and it seems we are), there is a reason 
> to do more precise tagging, of course
> 
> 
> ___
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> 
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


Re: [SPAM] RE: [Qgis-user] Public Repository for plugins...

2009-06-16 Thread Borys Jurgiel
Tuesday 16 of June 2009 15:03:11 Sampson, David napisał(a):
> 
>  Just as I am going through a pseudo code exercise of  release.py I see three 
cases.
> 
> 1. Current and previous stable versions   VERSION
> 2. A Beta version is is being tested an on its way to stable. BETA
> 3. An unstable snapshot of the development trunk  ALPHA
> 
> If we assume that most new feature development is done in the branches and 
merged to trunk, then trunk should not be all the harry and trashy. The 
branches 
would be way to unstable.
> 
> This way then regular users can try unstable and beta version of the plugins 
wihtout needing to get into SVN carnage.
> 
> For now I will call trunk snapshots BETA
> 
> Just some thoughts.

So do we want to have three levels? The present "experimental" tagging style is 
related to the fact that many authors just release either plugins considerable 
as stable, or just some concepts. But if we are going to develop more 
complicated plugins (and it seems we are), there is a reason to do more precise 
tagging, of course


___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


Re: [SPAM] RE: [Qgis-user] Public Repository for plugins...

2009-06-16 Thread Borys Jurgiel
Tuesday 16 of June 2009 15:18:37 Sampson, David napisał(a):
> 
> For a community plugin repo I assume that multiple authors might be involved 
in the development of a plugin
> 
> For the element... Someone
> 
> Can this be a comman separated value.

sure

> I am thinking of automaticaly generating this from an AUTHORS.txt file
> 
> Also, is there an e-mail optio we can add or 

Not yet, but is definitely essential! Sometimes it's really hard to contact the 
author, as email is not included even to source files.

We can add a tag  or include emails to the  tag. The latter 
option is better for multiple authors as I think. 

So let's allow both solutions. Installer will both handle the  tag and 
parse everything looking like an email from the .

Of course this could be also an easy pray for spamers, so we need to find the 
best way to format email address.

> what about a URL to an AUTHORS file?

The main blocker is free space in Installer window ;) If authors are ready to 
provide more info (screenshots, longer descriptions, changelogs), we can make 
Installer more verbose and implement a big browser for pretty formatted 
metadata.
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user