Re: [Qgis-user] Enhancement Requests: Enhanced Map Tips
If this enhancement could be added to the labels too (with always a good labels placement...), it would be perfect :-) Le jeudi 06 novembre 2008 à 19:34 +0100, Agustin Lobo a écrit : I comment on the one on Enhanced Map Tips. I actually would add the ability of drawing a simple plot, for example to display reflectance values across bands or time series of vegetation index a la Envi. Not sure if this should be a different ticket. BTW, priority minor: annoyance or enhancement should not be split in two different categories? I mean that an enhancement could not be of minor priority, and certainly not similar to a minor annoyance. Agus -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:58:50 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Qgis-user] Enhancement Requests: Field Support in Print Composet and Enhanced Map Tips To: qgis-user qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Hi QGIS Developers and Users, I just added two enhancement requests: Enhanced Map Tips through Macro Language/Operators (https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/1386) and Field Support for Print Composer (https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/1385) I would like others to comment if these features would be useful and how they could be implemented. I assigned the latter to Marco Hugentobler, since he is working on the print composer. Andreas -- Andreas Neumann Böschacherstrasse 6, CH-8624 Grüt/Gossau, Switzerland Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Web: * http://www.carto.net/ (Carto and SVG resources) * http://www.carto.net/neumann/ (personal page) * http://www.svgopen.org/ (SVG Open Conference) * http://www.geofoto.ch/ (Georeferenced Photos of Switzerland) -- Lionel Roubeyrie chargé d'études LIMAIR - La Surveillance de l'Air en Limousin http://www.limair.asso.fr ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Priority levels for enhancements (was Re: [Qgis-user] Enhancement Requests: Enhanced Map Tips)
Probably for this particular case, but, in general, the 2 categories should not be the same. For example, adding support for ECW and MrSid files is not a minor enhancement. It's actually a major enhancement from a user's perspective. I mean that not all enhancements have to be considered of minor priority. Agus Tim Sutton wrote: Hi On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 19:34 +0100, Agustin Lobo wrote: .../... BTW, priority minor: annoyance or enhancement should not be split in two different categories? I mean that an enhancement could not be of minor priority, and certainly not similar to a minor annoyance. Historically we had many more priority levels but the problem is then people dont know how to choose between them and the data contained in that field essentially becomes meaningless. In essence an enhancement or annoyance priority should be used for cases where the functionality of QGIS isn't critically impaired (e.g. crashing / corrupting data / showing incorrect results) but could be improved in some way. I believe that is a good fit for this ticket. -- Dr. Agustin Lobo Institut de Ciencies de la Terra Jaume Almera (CSIC) LLuis Sole Sabaris s/n 08028 Barcelona Spain Tel. 34 934095410 Fax. 34 934110012 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ija.csic.es/gt/obster ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Re: [Qgis-user] Enhancement Requests: Enhanced Map Tips
Hi Augustin, Thank you for commenting on the Map Tips enhancement proposal. I guess your proposal deserves a separate enhancement request because it may be too different. But depending how the QGIS developers are trying to solve the map tips enhancement problem (if they do at all), it may be possible to use the solution as a base to solve your request further on, too. Andreas Agustin Lobo wrote: I comment on the one on Enhanced Map Tips. I actually would add the ability of drawing a simple plot, for example to display reflectance values across bands or time series of vegetation index a la Envi. Not sure if this should be a different ticket. BTW, priority minor: annoyance or enhancement should not be split in two different categories? I mean that an enhancement could not be of minor priority, and certainly not similar to a minor annoyance. Agus -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:58:50 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Qgis-user] Enhancement Requests: Field Support in Print Composet and Enhanced Map Tips To: qgis-user qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Hi QGIS Developers and Users, I just added two enhancement requests: Enhanced Map Tips through Macro Language/Operators (https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/1386) and Field Support for Print Composer (https://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/1385) I would like others to comment if these features would be useful and how they could be implemented. I assigned the latter to Marco Hugentobler, since he is working on the print composer. Andreas -- Andreas Neumann Böschacherstrasse 6, CH-8624 Grüt/Gossau, Switzerland Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Web: * http://www.carto.net/ (Carto and SVG resources) * http://www.carto.net/neumann/ (personal page) * http://www.svgopen.org/ (SVG Open Conference) * http://www.geofoto.ch/ (Georeferenced Photos of Switzerland) ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Re: [Qgis-user] Enhancement Requests: Enhanced Map Tips
Hi On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 19:34 +0100, Agustin Lobo wrote: I comment on the one on Enhanced Map Tips. I actually would add the ability of drawing a simple plot, for example to display reflectance values across bands or time series of vegetation index a la Envi. Not sure if this should be a different ticket. I would like to see this too one day... BTW, priority minor: annoyance or enhancement should not be split in two different categories? I mean that an enhancement could not be of minor priority, and certainly not similar to a minor annoyance. Historically we had many more priority levels but the problem is then people dont know how to choose between them and the data contained in that field essentially becomes meaningless. In essence an enhancement or annoyance priority should be used for cases where the functionality of QGIS isn't critically impaired (e.g. crashing / corrupting data / showing incorrect results) but could be improved in some way. I believe that is a good fit for this ticket. 8-snip- Regards -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release Manager) == Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about: * QGIS programming services * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans * FOSS Consulting Support Services Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net == signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
