Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options
On 21-07-16 09:05, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >> https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/user_manual/processing/3rdParty.html#configuring-external-applications > I noticed google often brings up links to old documentation pages. > > Would it be hard to print a warning on top of documentation pages for > old versions with links to the latest and greatest version? (Or even > better/besides this somehow tweak google into directly displaying the > links to the latest by default). Mmm, we do not 'build' the old ones anymore, they just stay 'online'. But I think we should decide which ones we want to keep online anyway, and then redirect the links to the old version. For example 1.8 docs... do we still want that online (Sourcepole QGIS is not based on 1.8 anymore is it?)/ Same with 2.6... I think this should be redirected to 2.8 version. For 2.8 (old stable docs) we can create a javascript thingie which injects some html with links I think, because we put that in the page-template and rebuild 2.8 Same for 2.14 and testing... Older versions: more work as I'm not sure if they still 'build' with current tool chain... you would have to touch every html file there... Richard ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options
On 21/07/16 08:56, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: > On 21-07-16 07:02, Victor Olaya wrote: >> Johanna >> >> This is the documentation for configuring 3rd party applications >> >> https://docs.qgis.org/2.6/en/docs/user_manual/processing/3rdParty.html#configuring-external-applications >> >> Please, if you have some time and can help updating, let us know. >> Contributions to that doc will be very welcome > fyi: > > https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/user_manual/processing/3rdParty.html#configuring-external-applications I noticed google often brings up links to old documentation pages. Would it be hard to print a warning on top of documentation pages for old versions with links to the latest and greatest version? (Or even better/besides this somehow tweak google into directly displaying the links to the latest by default). Sorry for the hijacking the thread. > is the latest and greatest version of that. If you click on the 'fix me' > button in the footer of that page, you can add text then, without a need > to build. See "A Step By Step Contribution" for instructions on that: > > https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/documentation_guidelines/first_contribution.html > > Regards, > > Richard > > > > ___ > Qgis-user mailing list > Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options
On 21-07-16 07:02, Victor Olaya wrote: > Johanna > > This is the documentation for configuring 3rd party applications > > https://docs.qgis.org/2.6/en/docs/user_manual/processing/3rdParty.html#configuring-external-applications > > Please, if you have some time and can help updating, let us know. > Contributions to that doc will be very welcome fyi: https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/user_manual/processing/3rdParty.html#configuring-external-applications is the latest and greatest version of that. If you click on the 'fix me' button in the footer of that page, you can add text then, without a need to build. See "A Step By Step Contribution" for instructions on that: https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/documentation_guidelines/first_contribution.html Regards, Richard ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options
Thank you Victor, I will finish my Masters in October. I will be free to assist after that. Promise. ___ Johanna Botman GIS / Assets Officer Griffith City Council Ph: 02 6962 8168 From: Victor Olaya <vola...@gmail.com> To: Johanna Botman <johanna.bot...@griffith.nsw.gov.au> Cc: "Neumann, Andreas" <a.neum...@carto.net>, Johanna Botman <joha...@jbotman.com>, qgis-user <qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org> Date: 21/07/2016 03:02 PM Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options Johanna This is the documentation for configuring 3rd party applications https://docs.qgis.org/2.6/en/docs/user_manual/processing/3rdParty.html#configuring-external-applications Please, if you have some time and can help updating, let us know. Contributions to that doc will be very welcome Thanks 2016-07-21 0:17 GMT+02:00 Johanna Botman < johanna.bot...@griffith.nsw.gov.au>: Hi Andreas, Thank you for your response, and I think that your 'other' question is valid. I will see what I can do about that. But my other point is that there is very little documentation about what settings 'should' be applied to enable these providers. That makes it hard for users who want to get on with their work if they have to spend hours researching and experimenting. And, I've been around for long enough to know that I shouldn't whinge without thinking about volunteering to do that work myself. I am not in a position to raise my hand for that just yet. But you may see that before the end of the year. ___ Johanna Botman GIS / Assets Officer Griffith City Council Ph: 02 6962 8168 Inactive hide details for "Neumann, Andreas" ---20/07/2016 07:34:20 PM---Hi Johanna, Orfeo Toolbox (photogrammetry software) i"Neumann, Andreas" ---20/07/2016 07:34:20 PM---Hi Johanna, Orfeo Toolbox (photogrammetry software) is quite specialized and is not From: "Neumann, Andreas" <a.neum...@carto.net> To: Johanna Botman <joha...@jbotman.com> Cc: 'Johanna Botman' <johanna.bot...@griffith.nsw.gov.au>, qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org Date: 20/07/2016 07:34 PM Subject: RE: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options Hi Johanna, Orfeo Toolbox (photogrammetry software) is quite specialized and is not part of the standard QGIS distribution. I also have no experience with it and can't help. GRASS is different - it's a general purpose GIS and should work well with QGIS. What are you struggling with regarding GRASS? - The other question is: are you (I mean your Windows user account) a long-time QGIS user who upgraded from older versions? If yes, it can mean that some "out-of-the-box" settings don't apply, since you already have settings and they won't get overwritten (people wouldn't like that). So to judge things, it may be interesting to try from a new Windows user account and test if things work fine for a new and clean user account. You could then compare the settings and copy them over to the production user who upgraded from older QGIS. Andreas On 2016-07-20 10:45, Johanna Botman wrote: Hi Andreas, I was having specific issues with Orfeo Toolbox and GRASS. I'm running QGIS 2.14.1. I work where I have no permissions on my PC, so I struggle with basic read/write. My IT unit don't like installing via OSGeo – so that doesn't help either. Johanna From: Neumann, Andreas [mailto:a.neum...@carto.net] Sent: Wednesday, 20 July 2016 5:13 PM To: Johanna Botman <johanna.bot...@griffith.nsw.gov.au> Cc: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options Hi Johanna, Which provider are you talking about? You have to understand that Processing is an open and extensible system - many providers can't be shipped with QGIS, because they are very domain-specific and would bloat QGIS or because of licensing issues. Hence they need to be installed and configured separately. However, processing providers that are shipped along with QGIS, such as GDAL/OGR/Postgis/GRASS/Saga should work out of the box and I agree with you, it shouldn't require extra configuration ideally. So what provider are you talking about? Greetings, Andreas On 2016-07-20 01:39, Johanna Botman wrote: Hi All, I always struggle with the Options in Processing when I try to insert the correct path for a Provider. Is there anywhere that there is some documentation about what those settings should be? I do realise that these come from a variety of sources and may vary from installation to installation. But isn't it time that QGIS moved away from users needing to know the intricacies of each installation? Why can't QGIS work straight out from the installation by now? I want to be getting on with my GIS work and analysis
Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options
Johanna This is the documentation for configuring 3rd party applications https://docs.qgis.org/2.6/en/docs/user_manual/processing/3rdParty.html#configuring-external-applications Please, if you have some time and can help updating, let us know. Contributions to that doc will be very welcome Thanks 2016-07-21 0:17 GMT+02:00 Johanna Botman <johanna.bot...@griffith.nsw.gov.au >: > Hi Andreas, > > Thank you for your response, and I think that your 'other' question is > valid. I will see what I can do about that. > > But my other point is that there is very little documentation about what > settings 'should' be applied to enable these providers. That makes it hard > for users who want to get on with their work if they have to spend hours > researching and experimenting. > > And, I've been around for long enough to know that I shouldn't whinge > without thinking about volunteering to do that work myself. I am not in a > position to raise my hand for that just yet. But you may see that before > the end of the year. > > ___ > Johanna Botman > GIS / Assets Officer > > > Griffith City Council > Ph: 02 6962 8168 > > [image: Inactive hide details for "Neumann, Andreas" ---20/07/2016 > 07:34:20 PM---Hi Johanna, Orfeo Toolbox (photogrammetry software) i]"Neumann, > Andreas" ---20/07/2016 07:34:20 PM---Hi Johanna, Orfeo Toolbox > (photogrammetry software) is quite specialized and is not > > From: "Neumann, Andreas" <a.neum...@carto.net> > To: Johanna Botman <joha...@jbotman.com> > Cc: 'Johanna Botman' <johanna.bot...@griffith.nsw.gov.au>, > qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org > Date: 20/07/2016 07:34 PM > Subject: RE: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options > -- > > > > Hi Johanna, > > Orfeo Toolbox (photogrammetry software) is quite specialized and is not > part of the standard QGIS distribution. I also have no experience with it > and can't help. > > GRASS is different - it's a general purpose GIS and should work well with > QGIS. What are you struggling with regarding GRASS? > > - > > The other question is: are you (I mean your Windows user account) a > long-time QGIS user who upgraded from older versions? If yes, it can mean > that some "out-of-the-box" settings don't apply, since you already have > settings and they won't get overwritten (people wouldn't like that). So to > judge things, it may be interesting to try from a new Windows user account > and test if things work fine for a new and clean user account. You could > then compare the settings and copy them over to the production user who > upgraded from older QGIS. > > Andreas > > On 2016-07-20 10:45, Johanna Botman wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > > > I was having specific issues with Orfeo Toolbox and GRASS. I'm running > QGIS 2.14.1. > > > > I work where I have no permissions on my PC, so I struggle with basic > read/write. My IT unit don't like installing via OSGeo – so that doesn't > help either. > > > > Johanna > > > > *From:* Neumann, Andreas [mailto:a.neum...@carto.net <a.neum...@carto.net>] > > * Sent:* Wednesday, 20 July 2016 5:13 PM > * To:* Johanna Botman <johanna.bot...@griffith.nsw.gov.au> > * Cc:* qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org > * Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options > > > > Hi Johanna, > > Which provider are you talking about? > > You have to understand that Processing is an open and extensible system - > many providers can't be shipped with QGIS, because they are very > domain-specific and would bloat QGIS or because of licensing issues. Hence > they need to be installed and configured separately. > > However, processing providers that are shipped along with QGIS, such as > GDAL/OGR/Postgis/GRASS/Saga should work out of the box and I agree with > you, it shouldn't require extra configuration ideally. So what provider are > you talking about? > > Greetings, > Andreas > > On 2016-07-20 01:39, Johanna Botman wrote: > > Hi All, > > I always struggle with the Options in Processing when I try to insert the > correct path for a Provider. Is there anywhere that there is some > documentation about what those settings should be? > > I do realise that these come from a variety of sources and may vary from > installation to installation. But isn't it time that QGIS moved away from > users needing to know the intricacies of each installation? Why can't QGIS > work straight out from the installation by now? I want to be getting on > with my GIS work and analysis of data. I don't need to know about the > details of the entrails, do I? > > And yes, I am a Windows use
Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options
Hi Andreas, Thank you for your response, and I think that your 'other' question is valid. I will see what I can do about that. But my other point is that there is very little documentation about what settings 'should' be applied to enable these providers. That makes it hard for users who want to get on with their work if they have to spend hours researching and experimenting. And, I've been around for long enough to know that I shouldn't whinge without thinking about volunteering to do that work myself. I am not in a position to raise my hand for that just yet. But you may see that before the end of the year. ___ Johanna Botman GIS / Assets Officer Griffith City Council Ph: 02 6962 8168 From: "Neumann, Andreas" <a.neum...@carto.net> To: Johanna Botman <joha...@jbotman.com> Cc: 'Johanna Botman' <johanna.bot...@griffith.nsw.gov.au>, qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org Date: 20/07/2016 07:34 PM Subject: RE: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options Hi Johanna, Orfeo Toolbox (photogrammetry software) is quite specialized and is not part of the standard QGIS distribution. I also have no experience with it and can't help. GRASS is different - it's a general purpose GIS and should work well with QGIS. What are you struggling with regarding GRASS? - The other question is: are you (I mean your Windows user account) a long-time QGIS user who upgraded from older versions? If yes, it can mean that some "out-of-the-box" settings don't apply, since you already have settings and they won't get overwritten (people wouldn't like that). So to judge things, it may be interesting to try from a new Windows user account and test if things work fine for a new and clean user account. You could then compare the settings and copy them over to the production user who upgraded from older QGIS. Andreas On 2016-07-20 10:45, Johanna Botman wrote: Hi Andreas, I was having specific issues with Orfeo Toolbox and GRASS. I'm running QGIS 2.14.1. I work where I have no permissions on my PC, so I struggle with basic read/write. My IT unit don't like installing via OSGeo – so that doesn't help either. Johanna From: Neumann, Andreas [mailto:a.neum...@carto.net] Sent: Wednesday, 20 July 2016 5:13 PM To: Johanna Botman <johanna.bot...@griffith.nsw.gov.au> Cc: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options Hi Johanna, Which provider are you talking about? You have to understand that Processing is an open and extensible system - many providers can't be shipped with QGIS, because they are very domain-specific and would bloat QGIS or because of licensing issues. Hence they need to be installed and configured separately. However, processing providers that are shipped along with QGIS, such as GDAL/OGR/Postgis/GRASS/Saga should work out of the box and I agree with you, it shouldn't require extra configuration ideally. So what provider are you talking about? Greetings, Andreas On 2016-07-20 01:39, Johanna Botman wrote: Hi All, I always struggle with the Options in Processing when I try to insert the correct path for a Provider. Is there anywhere that there is some documentation about what those settings should be? I do realise that these come from a variety of sources and may vary from installation to installation. But isn't it time that QGIS moved away from users needing to know the intricacies of each installation? Why can't QGIS work straight out from the installation by now? I want to be getting on with my GIS work and analysis of data. I don't need to know about the details of the entrails, do I? And yes, I am a Windows user and I am quite happy with being provided with an .exe file that just installs everything I need. ___ Johanna Botman GIS / Assets Officer Griffith City Council Ph: 02 6962 8168 This e-mail, together with any attachments, is for the exclusive and confidential use of the addressee(s). Confidentiality is not waived if you are not the intended recipient. Any other distribution, use of, or reproduction without prior written consent is strictly prohibited. Views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual, except where specifically stated otherwise. If this e-mail has been sent to you in error, please delete the e-mail completely and immediately from your system. Although reasonable precautions are taken, Griffith City Council does not warrant or guarantee this message to be free of errors, interference, viruses or similar malicious code and does not accept liability for any consequences to the recipient opening or using this email or attachments. This email was scanned and cleared by MailMarshal, Sophos & Kaspersky AV ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: h
Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options
Hi Johanna, Orfeo Toolbox (photogrammetry software) is quite specialized and is not part of the standard QGIS distribution. I also have no experience with it and can't help. GRASS is different - it's a general purpose GIS and should work well with QGIS. What are you struggling with regarding GRASS? - The other question is: are you (I mean your Windows user account) a long-time QGIS user who upgraded from older versions? If yes, it can mean that some "out-of-the-box" settings don't apply, since you already have settings and they won't get overwritten (people wouldn't like that). So to judge things, it may be interesting to try from a new Windows user account and test if things work fine for a new and clean user account. You could then compare the settings and copy them over to the production user who upgraded from older QGIS. Andreas On 2016-07-20 10:45, Johanna Botman wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > I was having specific issues with Orfeo Toolbox and GRASS. I'm running QGIS > 2.14.1. > > I work where I have no permissions on my PC, so I struggle with basic > read/write. My IT unit don't like installing via OSGeo - so that doesn't help > either. > > Johanna > > FROM: Neumann, Andreas [mailto:a.neum...@carto.net] > SENT: Wednesday, 20 July 2016 5:13 PM > TO: Johanna Botman <johanna.bot...@griffith.nsw.gov.au> > CC: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org > SUBJECT: Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options > > Hi Johanna, > > Which provider are you talking about? > > You have to understand that Processing is an open and extensible system - > many providers can't be shipped with QGIS, because they are very > domain-specific and would bloat QGIS or because of licensing issues. Hence > they need to be installed and configured separately. > > However, processing providers that are shipped along with QGIS, such as > GDAL/OGR/Postgis/GRASS/Saga should work out of the box and I agree with you, > it shouldn't require extra configuration ideally. So what provider are you > talking about? > > Greetings, > Andreas > > On 2016-07-20 01:39, Johanna Botman wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I always struggle with the Options in Processing when I try to insert the >> correct path for a Provider. Is there anywhere that there is some >> documentation about what those settings should be? >> >> I do realise that these come from a variety of sources and may vary from >> installation to installation. But isn't it time that QGIS moved away from >> users needing to know the intricacies of each installation? Why can't QGIS >> work straight out from the installation by now? I want to be getting on with >> my GIS work and analysis of data. I don't need to know about the details of >> the entrails, do I? >> >> And yes, I am a Windows user and I am quite happy with being provided with >> an .exe file that just installs everything I need. >> >> >> >> ___ >> Johanna Botman >> GIS / Assets Officer >> >> Griffith City Council >> Ph: 02 6962 8168 >> >> - >> >> This e-mail, together with any attachments, is for the exclusive and >> confidential use of the addressee(s). Confidentiality is not waived if you >> are not the intended recipient. Any other distribution, use of, or >> reproduction without prior written consent is strictly prohibited. >> >> Views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual, except where >> specifically stated otherwise. If this e-mail has been sent to you in error, >> please delete the e-mail completely and immediately from your system. >> Although reasonable precautions are taken, Griffith City Council does not >> warrant or guarantee this message to be free of errors, interference, >> viruses or similar malicious code and does not accept liability for any >> consequences to the recipient opening or using this email or attachments. >> >> This email was scanned and cleared by MailMarshal, Sophos & Kaspersky AV >> >> - >> >> ___ >> Qgis-user mailing list >> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org >> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options
Hi Andreas, I was having specific issues with Orfeo Toolbox and GRASS. I’m running QGIS 2.14.1. I work where I have no permissions on my PC, so I struggle with basic read/write. My IT unit don’t like installing via OSGeo – so that doesn’t help either. Johanna From: Neumann, Andreas [mailto:a.neum...@carto.net] Sent: Wednesday, 20 July 2016 5:13 PM To: Johanna Botman <johanna.bot...@griffith.nsw.gov.au> Cc: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options Hi Johanna, Which provider are you talking about? You have to understand that Processing is an open and extensible system - many providers can't be shipped with QGIS, because they are very domain-specific and would bloat QGIS or because of licensing issues. Hence they need to be installed and configured separately. However, processing providers that are shipped along with QGIS, such as GDAL/OGR/Postgis/GRASS/Saga should work out of the box and I agree with you, it shouldn't require extra configuration ideally. So what provider are you talking about? Greetings, Andreas On 2016-07-20 01:39, Johanna Botman wrote: Hi All, I always struggle with the Options in Processing when I try to insert the correct path for a Provider. Is there anywhere that there is some documentation about what those settings should be? I do realise that these come from a variety of sources and may vary from installation to installation. But isn't it time that QGIS moved away from users needing to know the intricacies of each installation? Why can't QGIS work straight out from the installation by now? I want to be getting on with my GIS work and analysis of data. I don't need to know about the details of the entrails, do I? And yes, I am a Windows user and I am quite happy with being provided with an .exe file that just installs everything I need. ___ Johanna Botman GIS / Assets Officer Griffith City Council Ph: 02 6962 8168 _ This e-mail, together with any attachments, is for the exclusive and confidential use of the addressee(s). Confidentiality is not waived if you are not the intended recipient. Any other distribution, use of, or reproduction without prior written consent is strictly prohibited. Views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual, except where specifically stated otherwise. If this e-mail has been sent to you in error, please delete the e-mail completely and immediately from your system. Although reasonable precautions are taken, Griffith City Council does not warrant or guarantee this message to be free of errors, interference, viruses or similar malicious code and does not accept liability for any consequences to the recipient opening or using this email or attachments. This email was scanned and cleared by MailMarshal, Sophos & Kaspersky AV _ ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Re: [Qgis-user] issues with Processing Options
Hi Johanna, Which provider are you talking about? You have to understand that Processing is an open and extensible system - many providers can't be shipped with QGIS, because they are very domain-specific and would bloat QGIS or because of licensing issues. Hence they need to be installed and configured separately. However, processing providers that are shipped along with QGIS, such as GDAL/OGR/Postgis/GRASS/Saga should work out of the box and I agree with you, it shouldn't require extra configuration ideally. So what provider are you talking about? Greetings, Andreas On 2016-07-20 01:39, Johanna Botman wrote: > Hi All, > > I always struggle with the Options in Processing when I try to insert the > correct path for a Provider. Is there anywhere that there is some > documentation about what those settings should be? > > I do realise that these come from a variety of sources and may vary from > installation to installation. But isn't it time that QGIS moved away from > users needing to know the intricacies of each installation? Why can't QGIS > work straight out from the installation by now? I want to be getting on with > my GIS work and analysis of data. I don't need to know about the details of > the entrails, do I? > > And yes, I am a Windows user and I am quite happy with being provided with an > .exe file that just installs everything I need. > > > > ___ > Johanna Botman > GIS / Assets Officer > > Griffith City Council > Ph: 02 6962 8168 > > - > This e-mail, together with any attachments, is for the exclusive and > confidential use of the addressee(s). Confidentiality is not waived if you > are not the intended recipient. Any other distribution, use of, or > reproduction without prior written consent is strictly prohibited. > > Views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual, except where > specifically stated otherwise. If this e-mail has been sent to you in error, > please delete the e-mail completely and immediately from your system. > Although reasonable precautions are taken, Griffith City Council does not > warrant or guarantee this message to be free of errors, interference, viruses > or similar malicious code and does not accept liability for any consequences > to the recipient opening or using this email or attachments. > > This email was scanned and cleared by MailMarshal, Sophos & Kaspersky AV > > - > > ___ > Qgis-user mailing list > Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user ___ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
