Re: [Ql-Users] What's the official method to queue text in to another job's CON channel?

2011-07-16 Thread gdgqler

On 15 Jul 2011, at 20:38, Martyn Hill wrote:

 
 (Thanks to George as well - extending the Turbo commands would be another 
 solution.)

Really COMMAND_LINE does need updating to take account of daughter BASICs. 
Perhaps the ID of an SBASIC channel could be allowed as an optional parameter. 
Watch this space.

George
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] What's the official method to queue text in toanother job's CON channel?

2011-07-16 Thread Dilwyn Jones


- Original Message - 
From: gdgqler gdgq...@gmail.com

To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] What's the official method to queue text in 
toanother job's CON channel?






On 15 Jul 2011, at 20:38, Martyn Hill wrote:



(Thanks to George as well - extending the Turbo commands would be 
another solution.)


Really COMMAND_LINE does need updating to take account of daughter 
BASICs. Perhaps the ID of an SBASIC channel could be allowed as an 
optional parameter. Watch this space.


George
Good idea, although without a parameter it should default to the 
existing behaviour?


Dilwyn Jones 




___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] What's the official method to queue text in toanother job's CON channel?

2011-07-16 Thread gdgqler

On 16 Jul 2011, at 10:23, Dilwyn Jones wrote:

 
 
 
 
 On 15 Jul 2011, at 20:38, Martyn Hill wrote:
 
 
 (Thanks to George as well - extending the Turbo commands would be another 
 solution.)
 
 Really COMMAND_LINE does need updating to take account of daughter BASICs. 
 Perhaps the ID of an SBASIC channel could be allowed as an optional 
 parameter. Watch this space.
 
 George
 Good idea, although without a parameter it should default to the existing 
 behaviour?

Yes. 

George
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm