[ql-users] Menu_rext

2004-08-02 Thread SMSQ - Jochen Merz
Tarquin Mills wrote:
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Michael Berger wrote:
Completely agree. Having the configuration information within the 
executable file itself is a messy and error prone thing.
Why's that? What's error prone about this? And once you're used to
this, it's actually a piece of cake. Level 2 is especially nice
because it can update new versions of an application to the old
configuration. Very convenient.
Anyway, sorry for the dumb question, but isn't both Menu_rext and
MenuConfig provided on the QPC disc? I might be wrong, I don't put the
disc contents together and haven't seen an original disc in ages, but
I thought this was the case.
Menu_rext is not on the Q60 support discs for the same reasons, so I need
a copy to. Has there ever been a version of Sernet for non QL computers
and is there enough documentation in the public domain for anybody to 
write one?
Well, Menu_rext is not freeware, to start with. Everybody is welcome
to bundle it with his product for a small royalty fee. This is how it
was in the past, and this will even apply to brandnew products like QDT.
Nobody has approached me to have it bundled on the Q40/Q60 support 
disks, so it is no surprise it is not on there...
but everybody is welcome to ask!

And yes, it was not originally on the QPC disk as QPC did not have
Level 2 right from the start, if I remember correctly. And when it
had been implemented by Marcel, I simply forgot to add it.
Mind you, all of the QPC customers seem to have other products
containing menu, as there was not a single complaint over the years.
I remember very well that at this time, QPC1 was also on the disk
and it was completely full - we had to remove stuff.
Probably about time to deliver QPC2 on CD...
Jochen


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: [ql-users] Menu_rext

2004-08-02 Thread Derek Stewart
As Jochen says MENU_REXT is not free, but is supplied with QD and other programs. 

MENU_REXT is supplied on the Q60 Software Package, which royalties are paid for the 
software inclusion. 

The Q60 and Q40 support disks never had MENU_REXT supplied for that reason. 

Why not do like I did and buy MENU_REXT out right and then get all the documentation 
to support all the great features of MENU_REXT. 

Read past issues of QL Today for documentation on SERNET and how to set up the 
network... is it worth another article I wonder or is the subject all articled out.

Derek

On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 12:58:04 +0200
SMSQ - Jochen Merz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Tarquin Mills wrote:
 
  Marcel Kilgus wrote:
  
 Michael Berger wrote:
 
 Completely agree. Having the configuration information within the 
 executable file itself is a messy and error prone thing.
 
 Why's that? What's error prone about this? And once you're used to
 this, it's actually a piece of cake. Level 2 is especially nice
 because it can update new versions of an application to the old
 configuration. Very convenient.
 
 Anyway, sorry for the dumb question, but isn't both Menu_rext and
 MenuConfig provided on the QPC disc? I might be wrong, I don't put the
 disc contents together and haven't seen an original disc in ages, but
 I thought this was the case.
  
  Menu_rext is not on the Q60 support discs for the same reasons, so I need
  a copy to. Has there ever been a version of Sernet for non QL computers
  and is there enough documentation in the public domain for anybody to 
  write one?
 
 Well, Menu_rext is not freeware, to start with. Everybody is welcome
 to bundle it with his product for a small royalty fee. This is how it
 was in the past, and this will even apply to brandnew products like QDT.
 
 Nobody has approached me to have it bundled on the Q40/Q60 support 
 disks, so it is no surprise it is not on there...
 but everybody is welcome to ask!
 
 And yes, it was not originally on the QPC disk as QPC did not have
 Level 2 right from the start, if I remember correctly. And when it
 had been implemented by Marcel, I simply forgot to add it.
 Mind you, all of the QPC customers seem to have other products
 containing menu, as there was not a single complaint over the years.
 
 I remember very well that at this time, QPC1 was also on the disk
 and it was completely full - we had to remove stuff.
 Probably about time to deliver QPC2 on CD...
 
 Jochen
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: [ql-users] QL Network link QL -- PC possible?

2004-08-02 Thread Michael Berger
- Original Message - 
From: Derek Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QL Network link QL -- PC possible?


On QPC2 using SER2

10 BAUD 2,9600
20 LRESPR SERNET_SER2_REXT
30 SNET 1
40 SERNET : REMark Sernet file server

On QL using SER2

10 LRESPR SIMSER_REXT
20 BAUD 9600
30 LRESPR SERNET_SER2_REXT
40 SNET 2


MB: from that listings I pick one thing up: the SERNET job (file server)
must be only invoked on exactly one of both machines, is that right?
When I follow these instructions and afterwards use the JOBS command I see
on the QL only the sernet slave process and on the QPC both the sernet slave
process and a process named SERNET V2.22

Still did not get the whole thing up and running, wonder if my cable is ok.
and the SERNET process shows a priority of   s126   - guess if it is
suspended, something is going wrong?

Cheers,

Michael



Now do DIR S1_WIN1_ which give to a directory listing of QPC2 WIN1.


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: [ql-users] QL Network link QL -- PC possible?

2004-08-02 Thread Derek Stewart
Michael,

The SERNET job invoked by the SERNET keywor is the Sernet file server. Which ideally 
should be only issued on one machine, but you can have more than more server, but the 
Sernet system could get confused. 

The problem maybe the cable, as the SERNET files I sent you all work on my systems. 

Email the details of your cable to me and I will try and sort out the problem. 

Derek

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:40:33 +0200
Michael Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 - Original Message - 
 From: Derek Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 7:06 PM
 Subject: Re: [ql-users] QL Network link QL -- PC possible?
 
 
 On QPC2 using SER2
 
 10 BAUD 2,9600
 20 LRESPR SERNET_SER2_REXT
 30 SNET 1
 40 SERNET : REMark Sernet file server
 
 On QL using SER2
 
 10 LRESPR SIMSER_REXT
 20 BAUD 9600
 30 LRESPR SERNET_SER2_REXT
 40 SNET 2
 
 
 MB: from that listings I pick one thing up: the SERNET job (file server)
 must be only invoked on exactly one of both machines, is that right?
 When I follow these instructions and afterwards use the JOBS command I see
 on the QL only the sernet slave process and on the QPC both the sernet slave
 process and a process named SERNET V2.22
 
 Still did not get the whole thing up and running, wonder if my cable is ok.
 and the SERNET process shows a priority of   s126   - guess if it is
 suspended, something is going wrong?
 
 Cheers,
 
 Michael
 
 
 
 Now do DIR S1_WIN1_ which give to a directory listing of QPC2 WIN1.
 
 
 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: [ql-users] QL Network link QL -- PC possible?

2004-08-02 Thread Dilwyn Jones
  that explains a lot! ...  of course I could not execute MenuConfig ...
  because I unzipped it under Windows! So QDOS has no chance to recognize
it
  as an executable. That is BTW one of my major problems at the moment: I
do
  not yet have a working UNZIP prog under QDOS. Which prg / version is
most
  recommended?

 There's a standard info-zip version available in the different QL
 software archives. It's self-extracting after using LRESPR.

 Marcel
Jonathan Hudson maintains the QDOS version of ZIP and UNZIP. The primary
source is www.daria.co.uk (Jonathan's site)

If you want to try to recreate MenuConfig's dataspace, my copy has dataspace
of 10240 bytes (10KB)

--
Dilwyn Jones


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: [ql-users] self explaining software

2004-08-02 Thread Dilwyn Jones
 it is funny but to some extent I am a guinea pig for this aspect ... and I
 must admit self-documentation is really one of the weak points of QDOS and
 its successors!
 QDOS may be far superior to MSDOS, but it lacks the What's this?
concept:
 whenever in MSDOS I do not know how to use a certain command I can query
 some help using the /? option. So for instance with dir /? I get a
listing
 of possible commands.
This shouldn't be too difficult to do. Write a basic extension called HELP -
if it has no parameters, gives a list of commands it knows about, if it has
one string (or possibly name) parameter, looks up either in its inbuilt help
text file or the configured help file name for the help corresponding to
that string.

I'm sure there's a program or three out there to do this, though at the
moment I can't think what the packages are called. Trouble is, SuperBASIC,
SBASIC and the various toolkit extensions have so many keywords the help
files might fill an unexpanded QL perhaps!

Dilwyn Jones

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: [ql-users] Menu_rext

2004-08-02 Thread Dilwyn Jones
 I remember very well that at this time, QPC1 was also on the disk
 and it was completely full - we had to remove stuff.
 Probably about time to deliver QPC2 on CD...

 Jochen
I haven't sold that many copies of my software recently, but apart from the
CD compilations, only one request for software on CD.

--
Dilwyn Jones

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: [ql-users] self explaining software

2004-08-02 Thread RWAPSoftware
 
 
In a message dated 02/08/2004 21:04:49 GMT Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 it  is funny but to some extent I am a guinea pig for this aspect ... and  I
 must admit self-documentation is really one of the weak points of  QDOS and
 its successors!
 QDOS may be far superior to MSDOS,  but it lacks the What's this?
concept:
 whenever in MSDOS I do not  know how to use a certain command I can query
 some help using the /?  option. So for instance with dir /? I get a
listing
 of possible  commands.
This shouldn't be too difficult to do. Write a basic extension  called HELP -
if it has no parameters, gives a list of commands it knows  about, if it has
one string (or possibly name) parameter, looks up either  in its inbuilt help
text file or the configured help file name for the help  corresponding to
that string.

I'm sure there's a program or three  out there to do this, though at the
moment I can't think what the packages  are called. Trouble is, SuperBASIC,
SBASIC and the various toolkit  extensions have so many keywords the help
files might fill an unexpanded QL  perhaps!



Why maybe you have been thinking about the HELP keyword which I wrote  many 
years and appears in the Quanta library (and maybe your PD library I  forget), 
or of course, there is now Q-Help from myself
 
Quick plug over.
 
--
Rich  Mellor 
RWAP Services
35 Chantry Croft, Kinsley, Pontefract, West  Yorkshire, WF9 5JH
TEL: 01977 610509
Visit our website at  URL:http://www.rwapsoftware.co.uk

Stuck with ordinary dial up  internet connection ?? 
Read our review of internet accelerators and  broadband at:
URL:  http://www.rwapadventures.com/Services/reviews.html

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm