Re: [ql-users] RESET in SMSQE
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wolfgang mühlegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wolfgang Lenerz schrieb: > > > > > Does anyone use it? > > > > It definitey works here,and I use it. > > Wolfgang > > i use it too > > wolfgang mühlegger I use it and it works fine with smsq/e 3. But it did not work with 2.x versions on my Q40. Michael Grunditz ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, François Van Emelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes Wolfgang Lenerz schreef: No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE. Wolfgang Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE I thought we would get the latest version of Sernet with each new version of SMSQE. It seems I was wrong about that. This would be a good idea but I never get any updates of it. -- Roy Wood Q Branch. 20 Locks Hill, Portslade, Sussex.BN41 2LB Tel: +44 (0) 1273 386030fax: +44 (0) 1273 430501 sktpe : royqbranch web : www.qbranch.demon.co.uk ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
[ql-users] QL Today Indexes
Thanks to Brian Kemmett, I have added a set of index files for QL Today volumes 5-8 onto my website. This adds to the existing indexes for volumes 1-4. These are available in both plain text and Word .DOC file versions for you to print off. The web page address is: http://homepages.tesco.net/dilwyn.jones/qltoday/qltoday.html Dilwyn Jones dilwyn DOT jones AT tesco DOT net -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 22/02/2005 ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited
wolfgang mühlegger schreef: Wolfgang Lenerz schrieb: On 23 Feb 2005 at 20:07, François Van Emelen wrote: No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE. Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE ?? I didn't even know that! Wolfgang :-) then look at your qpc2 - program disk :-)) wolfgang Thanks. Your reply saves me a few hours of browsing my 'QL-today' piles. François Van Emelen ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited
That explains why I thought that it was part of SMSQE Arnould > >>Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE > > > > ?? > > I didn't even know that! > > Wolfgang > > > > > :-) then look at your qpc2 - program disk :-)) > > wolfgang WebMail / Magic OnLine http://www.magic.fr ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited
Wolfgang Lenerz schrieb: On 23 Feb 2005 at 20:07, François Van Emelen wrote: (...) No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE. Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE ?? I didn't even know that! Wolfgang www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm :-) then look at your qpc2 - program disk :-)) wolfgang ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited
On 23 Feb 2005 at 20:07, François Van Emelen wrote: (...) > > No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE. > > > Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE ?? I didn't even know that! Wolfgang www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited
Wolfgang Lenerz schreef: No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE. Wolfgang Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE I thought we would get the latest version of Sernet with each new version of SMSQE. It seems I was wrong about that. Thanks François Van Emelen ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] RESET in SMSQE
Wolfgang Lenerz schrieb: Does anyone use it? It definitey works here,and I use it. Wolfgang i use it too wolfgang mühlegger ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited
On 23 Feb 2005 at 17:42, François Van Emelen wrote: (...) . I suppose you are referring to a more recent one, > probably available with the next version of SMSQE? No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE. Wolfgang www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited
François Van Emelen wrote: > Thanks for the info, but SNET_BAD%,SNET_RETRIES%, > SNET_CONNECT%,SNET_STATION%, SNET_TEST%(X) are not present in my > version (2.25). I suppose you are referring to a more recent one, > probably available with the next version of SMSQE? The version in my disc is 3.01. However, I have no idea about the history of it, whether it's fit for release, whether it has been released or anything else about it. I am in NO way affiliated with SerNet. Marcel ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited
Marcel Kilgus schreef: François Van Emelen wrote: Here they are: SBAD%, In my sources it's called SNET_BAD% and returns the number of bad packets. SRES%, In current versions this is called SNET_RETRIES% and returns the number of retries done. SNET_C%, > This is probably SNET_CONNECT% now, which returns whether it is connected or not. SNET_N%. No idea. Probably SNET_STATION%, which returns the current station number. There's also SNET_TEST%(X) which returns whether station X is up or not. Marcel Thanks for the info, but SNET_BAD%,SNET_RETRIES%, SNET_CONNECT%,SNET_STATION%, SNET_TEST%(X) are not present in my version (2.25). I suppose you are referring to a more recent one, probably available with the next version of SMSQE? François Van Emelen ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] RESET in SMSQE
On 23 Feb 2005 at 10:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The code for the keyword RESET in SMSQE seems to close all channels and then > perform the assembler instruction RESET. () It definitely works here. It doesn't do what you say. > Why has RESET not been reprogrammed? As a general rule, concerning SMSQE; the answer to such a question would be : Because you didn't do it. Does anyone use it? It definitey works here,and I use it. Wolfgang www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] RESET in SMSQE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The code for the keyword RESET in SMSQE seems to close all channels > and then perform the assembler instruction RESET. Hmm no, in my sources it doesn't (smsq_sbas_procs_reset_asm/ smsq_smsq_reset_asm). It branches to the same place CTRL+ALT+SHIFT+TAB jumps to. > Why has RESET not been reprogrammed? Does anyone use it? Do you have another tool that replaces the SMSQ/E RESET command? Marcel ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
[ql-users] RESET in SMSQE
The code for the keyword RESET in SMSQE seems to close all channels and then perform the assembler instruction RESET. This assembler instruction sets the (supervisor) stack equal to the first long word in ram and sets the PC to the second long word in ram. Unfortunately for those who have LRESPRd their versions of SMSQE on the Q40/60 this will not have the desired effect. The first five bytes of ram contain the length of a string (3) and the three bytes of the string (RES). The second long word of ram is not a good place to branch to. First of all the address is odd (not a good omen) and secondly there is no program there. At least that is what I surmised. To test this I actually typed RESET followed by ENTER and - the machine (Q60) stopped. Why has RESET not been reprogrammed? Does anyone use it? George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited
François Van Emelen wrote: > Here they are: SBAD%, In my sources it's called SNET_BAD% and returns the number of bad packets. > SRES%, In current versions this is called SNET_RETRIES% and returns the number of retries done. > SNET_C%, This is probably SNET_CONNECT% now, which returns whether it is connected or not. > SNET_N%. No idea. Probably SNET_STATION%, which returns the current station number. There's also SNET_TEST%(X) which returns whether station X is up or not. Marcel ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] Quite quiet
Per Witte wrote: > Nice and quiet around here for a change .. Then along came Per ;-))) Everyone too busy digging themselves out of snow perhaps. It's lovely around here, not much snow on the low ground but the mountains and hills are like a scene from Christmas cards! How lucky I am to have a scene like this through my office window... And even luckier to have a QPC2 on this machine (sorry, desperately struggling to get back on topic) -- Dilwyn Jones ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited
François Van Emelen wrote: > While updating my 'Sbasic keywords list' I discovered some new > functions related to SERNET. > Here they are: SBAD%,SRES%,SNET_C%,SNET_N%. > What do these names stand for, what about their syntax? > Any idea where I can find some explanation about them? > François Van Emelen Bernd Reinhardt was the last person working on Sernet AFAIK. Hopefully, he's listening to this list (or someone else knows it) as I haven't got his email address with me in work. -- Dilwyn Jones ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
[ql-users] SERNET revisited
Hi all, While updating my 'Sbasic keywords list' I discovered some new functions related to SERNET. Here they are: SBAD%,SRES%,SNET_C%,SNET_N%. What do these names stand for, what about their syntax? Any idea where I can find some explanation about them? François Van Emelen ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm