Re: Login problems with courier-imap
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 09:31:09AM +0900, Kristina wrote: I have courier-imap compiled correctly on Solaris7 but when I try to login I get, "Connection closed by foreign host.". In the syslog I only get, " imaplogin: Connection, ip=[127.0.0.1]" When I give the correct username and password I get the "connection closed" error. When I enter a wrong username andpassword I do get the expected "Login incorrect" errorwhich means imap is authenticating. Any hints would be great. Please note that I have not made any configuration changes to imap following compilation. Perhaps imap requires some configuration in some files??? Yes it does, you need to edit one or two entries in imapd.config, in particular you need to set ADDRESS to your real IP address. -- Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/
Re: Login problems with courier-imap
Thankyou. I have changed the IP Address in imapd.config but I still get the same "connection closed" error when I login to imap. Besides IP Address, what else needs to be changed in imapd.config to get it up and running? Any hints would be great, Kristina At 09:09 00/04/26 +0100, you wrote: On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 09:31:09AM +0900, Kristina wrote: I have courier-imap compiled correctly on Solaris7 but when I try to login I get, "Connection closed by foreign host.". In the syslog I only get, " imaplogin: Connection, ip=[127.0.0.1]" When I give the correct username and password I get the "connection clos ed" error. When I enter a wrong username andpassword I do get the expected "Login incorrect" errorwhich means imap is authenticating. Any hints would be great. Please note that I have not made any configuration changes to imap following compilation. Perhaps imap requires some configuration in some files??? Yes it does, you need to edit one or two entries in imapd.config, in particular you need to set ADDRESS to your real IP address. -- Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/
qmail Digest 26 Apr 2000 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 983
qmail Digest 26 Apr 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 983 Topics (messages 40598 through 40646): Error at vpopmail 40598 by: Irwan Hadi 40633 by: Ken Jones Re: Recipient MTA is rejecting bounces 40599 by: Yusuf Goolamabbas 40600 by: Petr Novotny 40616 by: Bruno Wolff III 40635 by: Russ Allbery Qmail privacy 40601 by: Kent Nilsen 40611 by: Bob Rogers 40617 by: John D. Mitchell 40623 by: Dave Sill 40626 by: Andre Oppermann 40631 by: John D. Mitchell Vpopmail error - No Mailbox 40602 by: snowcrash 40621 by: Ken Jones Re: request for GNU (not djb) install info 40603 by: Joost van Baal webfrontend for .qmail editing 40604 by: Robert Sander Re: Qmail behind firewall question 40605 by: Vincent Danen 40607 by: Vincent Danen 40608 by: Vincent Danen pop3 error 40606 by: Madhav DNS setup 40609 by: Steve Peace 40610 by: Bob Rogers Thanks, eric RE: queue-fix 1.4 won't compile on IRIX6.5.3m 40612 by: John McCoy, Jr Redirection help!! 40613 by: jpatrick.writeme.com Re: ezmlm response] 40614 by: rvz Re: Qmail IMAP AND Pop3 recomendations 40615 by: Scott Gifford Re: sendfail 40618 by: Kai MacTane removing name from distribution list 40619 by: Vladislav.Valikhovsky.acs-gsg.com Re: Internet mail 40620 by: R.Ilker Gokhan 40622 by: Dave Sill 40624 by: R.Ilker Gokhan Re: install-help! 40625 by: Dave Sill Re: temporary failure warning message 40627 by: Dave Sill 40634 by: Rogerio Brito 40636 by: Russ Allbery 40637 by: Peter Samuel Re: Messages lost in queue? 40628 by: Dave Sill Re: system start script 40629 by: Dave Sill Re: some doubts in qmail 40630 by: Dave Sill setup of local delivery 40632 by: Mikhail Kuzminsky Login problems with courier-imap 40638 by: Kristina 40640 by: Andre Oppermann 40644 by: Kristina 40645 by: Chris Green 40646 by: Kristina Re: How do I enable user nobody to use qmail-inject? 40639 by: Charles Werbick Lotus Notes and qmail 40641 by: John White chopped messages 40642 by: John Conover 40643 by: Peter Samuel Administrivia: To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To bug my human owner, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I got this error by checking mail at vpopmail +OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] +OK -ERR aack, child crashed What this mean then ?, how to fix it ? this only happened when I use username, and not username@domain. but I;ve update the /vpopmail/users as the FAQ said. Thanks in advance ;) --- AFLHI 058009990407128029/089802---(102598//991024) Irwan Hadi wrote: I got this error by checking mail at vpopmail +OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] +OK -ERR aack, child crashed What this mean then ?, how to fix it ? this only happened when I use username, and not username@domain. but I;ve update the /vpopmail/users as the FAQ said. Thanks in advance ;) --- AFLHI 058009990407128029/089802---(102598//991024) make sure your tcpserver for pop is running as root. ken jones inter7 A bounce message bounced. When this happens, qmail generates a double-bounce and tries to send it to the local postmaster address. It uses the completely invalid envelope sender "#@[]" to ensure that double-bounces can't then bounce again and generate mail loops. You apparently are forwarding postmaster mail to another system which is doing resolveable name checks on envelope senders, and doesn't like qmail's special double-bounce sender. That is true, However I changed the forwarding to another system which doesn't do resolveable name checks and yet the messages are continuing to go the old system. (I changed /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster) and restarted qmail. Is this appropiate ? What are the alternatives to clear these messages from the queue Also, Do people see the benifit in doing resolvable name checks. Doesn't it hurt in the above scenario Thanks, Yusuf -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25 Apr 00, at 19:36, Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote: That is true, However I changed the forwarding to another system which doesn't do resolveable name checks and yet the messages are continuing to go the old system. (I changed /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster) and restarted qmail. Is this appropiate ? Unless your /var/qmail/control/doublebounceto says other than postmaster, this is appropriate. However, that doesn't clear the messages that have already been forwarded from postmaster to elsewhere. What are the alternatives to clear these messages from the
Qmail installation on FreeBSD 4 following LWQ didn't work out
Hello, I just attempted to install qmail on a FreeBSD 4 box following LWQ (which did always work for my SuSE Linux boxes). I installed qmail, daemontools and ucspi-tcp using the respective ports but when I try root@beta 14:20:58 /etc/init.d # qmail start # (I put it there as I couldn't find another init.d dir on FreeBSD) I just Starting qmail: svscan. env: root@beta 14:21:02 /etc/init.d # svscan: No such file or directory (now the system is blocked until I hit ^C). Where has svscan gone? Is the port perhaps broken (meaning: should I do make deinstall and attempt to install the packages manually, ignoring all advice that FreeBSD people are giving)? Best regards, Gabriel
to get qmail system administrators name in the LOG file
Dear all, As we know that the Qmail delivers the delivery failure report(ie,bounced back mail)to the sender thru qmail-send program. But in the logs I dont get the name of MAILER-DAEMON/SYSTEM-ADMIN , but I simply get a BLANK name (ie, no from ID). How can I modify this so that in the logs I should get MY SYSTEM-ADMINISTRATOR name instead of BLANK name. Can anyone pls suggest regarding this. Thanks in Advance, Rgds, RAVI.V.R
HELP: Can't send via Mail.app on NeXT
I had an open mail-relay with an older version of sendmail, and got qmail installed on my system. Now, I can send mail from pine, but not from Mail.app. I can't get any help locally, so I'm hoping someone can help me sort this out. When I send from Mail.app, I get replies from the mailer-daemon like this: Hi. This is the qmail-send program at hotspur.psych.yorku.ca. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. Georges Monette [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, I couldn't find any host named mathstat.yorku.ca. (#5.1.2) Does this message number give any clue to what is wrong? I can send email OK via pine, so qmail-send is working, but not from the NeXT Mail.app GUI mail program, which is so much easier than pine. In the Mail.app preferences, the Mailer is set to /usr/lib/sendmail which is symlinked to qmail: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root 23 Apr 6 22:20 /usr/lib/sendmail - /var/qmail/bin/sendmail*@ Can anyone tell me what to try or where to look to figure this out? thanks, Michael Friendly Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NeXTmail OK) Psychology Dept York University Voice: 416 736-5115 Fax: 416 736-5814 4700 Keele Streethttp://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/friendly.html Toronto, ONT M3J 1P3 CANADA
Q: ETRN + Qmail
Hi there, someone of our customers was asking for ETRN support but i haven´ t seen anything about it on qmail docs nor other sources. It seems there are different views about ETRN and its possible dis-/advantages. As most/lots providers are paid by a time based fee so maybe they have no reason so save time to their customer. However, the main pro for ETRN would be for dial-up connections that host its own mail servers on their side. I only found a (seems to be) outdated website for »ETRN for qmail 0.1f, 1998« but nothing else. Anyone who can tell me more or hint me some more URLs/Sources about ETRN and/or ETRN and qmail? Or there are some reasons not to use ETRN? Any hints are welcome! Regards Anton Pirnat -- this mesage is shareware, please register! Geesh.. am i under 10 typos per line now?
Re: Qmail installation on FreeBSD 4 following LWQ didn't work out
On Wed 2000-04-26 (14:21), Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: I just attempted to install qmail on a FreeBSD 4 box following LWQ (which did always work for my SuSE Linux boxes). I installed qmail, daemontools and ucspi-tcp using the respective ports but when I try root@beta 14:20:58 /etc/init.d # qmail start # (I put it there as I couldn't find another init.d dir on FreeBSD) I just Starting qmail: svscan. env: root@beta 14:21:02 /etc/init.d # svscan: No such file or directory The FreeBSD daemontools port is at version 0.53 (which doesn't have svscan). Because of the changes in program names and so forth, the previous maintainer got a bit irritated and didn't upgrade it. I'm currently responsible for upgrading it. (if anyone has some wrapper scripts that emulate the old commands, now is the time to pipe up *grin*) and attempt to install the packages manually, ignoring all advice that FreeBSD people are giving)? If you're unable to wait a day or two, it won't kill you if you install it manually. I should get around to upgrading it tomorrow, if not in the next few hours. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Alpha Geek, Sunesi Clinical Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QMAIL 1.03 SMTP antispam filter patch
Hello, I am currently testing out the QMAIL 1.03 SMTP antispam filter patch - http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/5799/qmail-uce.html - and was wondering if anyone else has tried it or heard anything about it. Also, the README says to run "patch qmail-uce/qmail-uce.diff", but when I do I get the following message: # patch qmail-uce/qmail-uce.diff can't find file to patch at input line 4 Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -- |diff -r -U 3 ../qmail-1.03.orig/Makefile ./Makefile |--- ../qmail-1.03.orig/MakefileMon Jun 15 06:53:16 1998 |+++ ./Makefile Tue May 4 21:44:10 1999 -- File to patch: Line 4 of qmail-uce.diff says "@@ -797,7 +797,7 @@". I am running Redhat 6.1 - does anyone know what I need to go to get this to work? Thanks! -Laura
Re: Qmail installation on FreeBSD 4 following LWQ didn't work out
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: [...] svscan: No such file or directory If you install daemontools according to the instructions, svscan will be in /usr/local/bin, or where you specified it to be (conf-home). [...] ignoring all advice that FreeBSD people are giving)? If you installed it as a package svscan might be somewhere else, or, as in you case, not there at all due to an old version. DJB has made it easy to grab the latest version and follow some very simple installation instructions. I've installed daemontools a couple of times now, on FreeBSD and other platforms, and never felt any need for a package. What are the specific arguments against doing this on FreeBSD? Mads
'anonymous' problem
Sorry, removed that message by accident.
It is this piece of code that does it:
mailuser = env_get("QMAILUSER");
if (!mailuser) mailuser = env_get("MAILUSER");
if (!mailuser) mailuser = env_get("USER");
if (!mailuser) mailuser = env_get("LOGNAME");
if (!mailuser) mailuser = "anonymous";
in qmail-inject.c.
Hope that clears it up.
Greetz, Peter.
--
Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/madly in love/pretending coder
|
| 'C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot;
| C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off.'
| Bjarne Stroustrup, Inventor of C++
Re: QMAIL 1.03 SMTP antispam filter patch
At 15:23 26.4.2000, Laura Donovan wrote: Hello, I am currently testing out the QMAIL 1.03 SMTP antispam filter patch - http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/5799/qmail-uce.html - and was wondering if anyone else has tried it or heard anything about it. Also, the README says to run "patch qmail-uce/qmail-uce.diff", but when I do I get the following message: # patch qmail-uce/qmail-uce.diff can't find file to patch at input line 4 Make sure you're in the qmail source code directory when you try to apply the patch... Will __ "I was going to be a Neo-Deconstructivist, but Mom wouldn't let me..." multimedia laboratorium [EMAIL PROTECTED] institut fuer informatik(pgp id)F703D035 der universitaet zuerich(office) +41 1 635 4346 winterthurerstr. 190(fax)+41 1 635 6809 ch-8057 zuerich (mobile) +41 76 372 0913 switzerland www.ifi.unizh.ch/~harris __
Re: queue-fix 1.4 won't compile on IRIX6.5.3m
At 21:50 24.4.2000, John McCoy, Jr wrote: I've been trying to figure this one out with no luck. When compiling queue-fix it gives the following error: ./makelib str.a str_len.o str_diff.o str_diffn.o str_cpy.o \ str_chr.o str_rchr.o str_start.o byte_chr.o byte_rchr.o \ byte_diff.o byte_copy.o byte_cr.o byte_zero.o ./load queue-fix fifo.o fs.a stralloc.a getln.a open.a error.a \ substdio.a alloc.a str.a ld32: Segmentation fault. Removing output file... *** Error code 1 (bu21) Looks to me like you're trying to use the SGI linker to link gcc object files. Make sure you have put gcc into any relevant makefiles or configuration files (conf-ld?). If you use ld (the default) it will simply call the system linker, which is the MIPSPro ld32 linker. Will __ "I was going to be a Neo-Deconstructivist, but Mom wouldn't let me..." multimedia laboratorium [EMAIL PROTECTED] institut fuer informatik(pgp id)F703D035 der universitaet zuerich(office) +41 1 635 4346 winterthurerstr. 190(fax)+41 1 635 6809 ch-8057 zuerich (mobile) +41 76 372 0913 switzerland www.ifi.unizh.ch/~harris __
Re: AutoTURN ISP?
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 07:06:13AM -0700, Glenn Strauss wrote: My primary MX is currently on the end of a DSL line with a static IP, but when that goes down, I'll have a dynamic IP on the end of a dial-up line (so SMTP ETRN is out). In this case the AutoTURN is no option for you, as with the standard setup you still need a static IP address. However, maybe someone wrote a system similar to "SMTP after POP" that does "SMTP-send after POP". \Maex -- SpaceNet GmbH | http://www.Space.Net/ | Stress is when you wake Research Development| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | up screaming and you Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Tel: +49 (89) 32356-0| realize you haven't D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 | fallen asleep yet.
Re: AutoTURN ISP?
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 06:45:40PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote: On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 07:06:13AM -0700, Glenn Strauss wrote: My primary MX is currently on the end of a DSL line with a static IP, but when that goes down, I'll have a dynamic IP on the end of a dial-up line (so SMTP ETRN is out). In this case the AutoTURN is no option for you, as with the standard setup you still need a static IP address. However, maybe someone wrote a system similar to "SMTP after POP" that does "SMTP-send after POP". I have implemented (but not tested yet ;) this as part of my virtual-domain checkpassword replacement. It's not opensource (yet), unfortunately. Greetz, Peter. -- Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/madly in love/pretending coder | | 'C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; | C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off.' | Bjarne Stroustrup, Inventor of C++
Re: Q: ETRN + Qmail
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 02:43:47PM +, Anton Pirnat wrote:
Just found some more about »serialmail« on DJB´s site.. It eems to be
some like ETRN and a bunch more.. Maybe this works, if not i put my
puters to the trash (hey, i was kidding ;)..
Maybe this is of interest to you.
Besides the instructions that come with the serialmail package I use a
slightly different approach.
We don't save the "ETRN" messages associated with an IP but with a
domain name and use the follwing lines as a wrapper for qmail-smtpd:
#!/bin/sh
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
exec /dev/null /dev/null 21
[ ! -z "$ETRN" ] {
( /var/qmail/bin/sm-etrn $ETRN /dev/null /dev/null 21 )
}
In the cdb file for tcpserver we use e.g.
195.30.1.54:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",ETRN="lagrange.space.net"
195.30.1.100:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",ETRN="lagrange.space.net"
Thus also other IP adresses can trigger delivery for "lagrange.space.net".
This is useful if customers can't trigger the delivery from the host
their mail server is running on.
The sm-etrn script utilizes a file called "RELAYHOST" in the store
directory of the domain to get the name/IP address of the mail exchanger
to use and also uses this file (with flock'ing) to determine whether
there is already a delivery to this host in process.
\Maex
--
SpaceNet GmbH | http://www.Space.Net/ | Stress is when you wake
Research Development| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | up screaming and you
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Tel: +49 (89) 32356-0| realize you haven't
D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 | fallen asleep yet.
Re: Qmail installation on FreeBSD 4 following LWQ didn't work out
On Wed 2000-04-26 (17:35), Mads E Eilertsen wrote: I've installed daemontools a couple of times now, on FreeBSD and other platforms, and never felt any need for a package. What are the specific arguments against doing this on FreeBSD? Like on most other platforms - it makes it harder for some people to manage their installed software. Some people have grown up always installing their own stuff, and other have arrived and always used packages - neither are any more correct. FreeBSD ports basically contain patches to the original pristeen distribution file which are necessary to get that software to perform correctly on FreeBSD - much like you'd have to do manually to port something. This doesn't apply to well-behaved applications, like qmail, but those applications are still in ports, just without patches. It just makes it easier for lots of people to install software if you do it the same way all the time, and all the hard porting work is done for you already. With Debian, for example, they have a very powerful package dependency system, and simple commands to upgrade all installed packages to the latest version. Lots of people seem to like it. So, the argument against it is that you might not be able to manage that application as easily if you did it yourself. But only if that applies to you. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Hacker In Chief, Sunesi Clinical Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet mail
Title: RE: Internet mail Thank you again Dave. It works fine. But I have some more question about qmail. In the following case, if domain name is test.com and QmailA's hostname is deneme.test.com, does username must be @deneme.test.com or does it may be @test.com? if yes how can i set? because when i have sent a mail ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from any client that is using QmailA. QmailA is trying to forward to QmailB. However user1 is belong to QmailA. Sorry my broken English.. Ilker G. -Original Message- From: R.Ilker Gokhan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 8:20 PM To: 'Dave Sill' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Internet mail Thank you very much for reply... i will try immediately.. see you Ilker G. -Original Message- From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 8:14 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Internet mail R.Ilker Gokhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Help me please1 I'll try. Ok. I am changing my question. I assume I have two Qmail server. user name QmailA hostname QmailB hostname [EMAIL PROTECTED]deneme.test.comdeneme2.test.com internet I want to set if deneme.test.com receive a request e-mail to internet (for example [EMAIL PROTECTED]) it forwards to deneme2.test.com. How can I set this configuration? You have two qmail hosts: deneme.test.com and deneme2.test.com. Users submit mail to deneme.test.com. If the mail is not for a local recipient, you want it forwarded to deneme2.test.com? If that's right, set up deneme.test.com with the usual control files, then create control/smtproutes with the following: :deneme2.test.com That says deliver all remote mail to deneme2.test.com. -Dave
Re: suse and qmail
Neil Blakey-Milner writes: Are they allowed to package qmail? Of course. Anyone is, as long as they obey Dan's conditions. -- -russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | "Ask not what your country 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | can force other people to Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | do for you..." -Perry M.
Re: temporary failure warning message
Quoting Russell Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Chris Hardie writes: Unfortunately, that link appears to be broken. Brian Wightman, please pick up the nearest courtesy phone. It's also temporarily available as http://www.qmail.org/qmail_bounce-0.0alpha6.tar.gz . If Brian doesn't show up too soon, I'll change the link to point to my server. I'm pretty sure I remember seeing a post from Brian some time back where he stated he was no longer working on the notifier. He asked for volunteers to pick up the slack, I think. Aaron
Compilation errors
hi folks, I'm not sure if this has been asked before, but searching the FAQs didn't produce anything, so I assume it could be new. I'm trying to compile qMail on our RedHat 6.2 server and have downloaded all the necessary files for qMail to be compiled and take over sendmail. However, whenever I try to compile either of the modules and qMail itself, I get a rather similar message for all... after typing 'make setup check': bash# cd qmail*bash# make setup check( ( ./compile tryvfork.c ./load tryvfork ) /dev/null \21 \ cat fork.h2 || cat fork.h1 ) fork.hrm -f tryvfork.o tryvfork./compile qmail-local.cqmail-local.c: In function `main':qmail-local.c:448: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'./compile qmail.c./compile quote.c./compile now.c./compile gfrom.c./compile myctime.c./compile slurpclose.c./compile case_diffb.c./compile case_diffs.c./compile case_lowerb.c./compile case_lowers.c./compile case_starts.c./makelib case.a case_diffb.o case_diffs.o case_lowerb.o \case_lowers.o case_starts.o./compile getln.c./compile getln2.c./makelib getln.a getln.o getln2.o./compile subgetopt.c./compile sgetopt.c./makelib getopt.a subgetopt.o sgetopt.o./compile sig_alarm.cIn file included from /usr/include/signal.h:300, from sig_alarm.c:1:/usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28: asm/sigcontext.h: No such file ordirectorymake: *** [sig_alarm.o] Error 1 I already have all the GNU C compilers installed on the server. Anyone has any ideas why?
messages sent to msglog??
hi, i use a RH 6.1 and i have installed qmail in one machine using rpms from "bruceg-qmail+patches" and it is working fine. but when i send mails i see a delivery made to msglog (also i am unable to find where this is stored) i don't want to keep a copy of the mails sent. so how do i disable it. thanks in advance madhav following is the log of a message sent to the user admin from msk. Apr 27 10:21:49 server1 qmail: 956811109.956421 new msg 1179 Apr 27 10:21:49 server1 qmail: 956811109.959523 info msg 1179: bytes 562 from m [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 1096 uid 104 Apr 27 10:21:49 server1 qmail: 956811109.966473 starting delivery 10: msg 1179 t o local [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 27 10:21:49 server1 qmail: 956811109.966605 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 Apr 27 10:21:49 server1 qmail: 956811109.966704 starting delivery 11: msg 1179 t o local [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 27 10:21:49 server1 qmail: 956811109.966791 status: local 2/10 remote 0/20 Apr 27 10:21:50 server1 qmail: 95680.005985 delivery 10: success: did_0+0+0/ Apr 27 10:21:50 server1 qmail: 95680.008519 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 Apr 27 10:21:50 server1 qmail: 95680.022083 delivery 11: success: did_1+0+0/ Apr 27 10:21:50 server1 qmail: 95680.025899 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 Apr 27 10:21:50 server1 qmail: 95680.039822 end msg 1179 Apr 27 10:22:59 server1 pop3d: 956811179.747342 tcpserver: status: 1/20 Apr 27 10:22:59 server1 pop3d: 956811179.749922 tcpserver: pid 1101 from 172.16. 31.72 Apr 27 10:22:59 server1 pop3d: 956811179.753880 tcpserver: ok 1101 :10.1.10.25:1 10 :172.16.31.72::4410 Apr 27 10:23:00 server1 pop3d: 956811180.091642 tcpserver: end 1101 status 256 Apr 27 10:23:00 server1 pop3d: 956811180.093858 tcpserver: status: 0/20
selective forwarding.
Hi, I am currently setting up a qmail email server that will soon become part of a distributed system of servers. I have a couple of questions about things I am having trouble with. The servers are going to be of the form server1.mydomain.com server2.mydomain.com and so on email sent to an address at mydomain.com will be alliased to the correct server e.g [EMAIL PROTECTED]- [EMAIL PROTECTED] all the seperate servers, server1, server2 and so on will have MX records for mydomain.com and will have access to a synced aliases file. How do I get this aliasing file to work? This system is not yet ready, so at the moment I just want to catch certain addresses that come through addressed to mydomain.com but let others continue on to the real mydomain.com. Is this possible? Thanks, Colin
