Re: Qmail remote process never drops problem
Nope, the response from those machine machine are pretty good, these qmail connections are just never dead. the is really confusing though. On Tue, 29 May 2001 17:19:18 + "Nick (Keith) Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Wang wrote: > > > > Hi , Guys, > > > > I have a qmail server with very heavy load, and I noticed recently my > > qmail server have a bunch of outbound connection to some domains like > > outblaze.com, and the email send to their mail server , the tcp process > > state after become "ESTABLISHED" then seems never drops. I am > > wondering if there is anybody have similar problem and how you solved it. > > > > Thanks a lot! > > Is it possible that data is still being sent at this time, perhaps at slow > speeds? What are the contents of the databytes (and the DATABYTES > environment variable for that matter), timeoutconnnect, and timeoutremote > control files? > > -- > Keith > Network Engineer > Triton Technologies, Inc. > 1-800-837-4253
Re: Qmail remote process never drops problem
My qmail is running on Redhat 6.2 On 29 May 2001 02:07:23 + "Mark Delany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which OS? Not Solaris < 2.8? > > On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 06:53:38PM -0700, Eric Wang allegedly wrote: > > Hi , Guys, > > > > I have a qmail server with very heavy load, and I noticed recently my > > qmail server have a bunch of outbound connection to some domains like > > outblaze.com, and the email send to their mail server , the tcp process > > state after become "ESTABLISHED" then seems never drops. I am > > wondering if there is anybody have similar problem and how you solved it. > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > > > > > > > >
Qmail remote process never drops problem
Hi , Guys, I have a qmail server with very heavy load, and I noticed recently my qmail server have a bunch of outbound connection to some domains like outblaze.com, and the email send to their mail server , the tcp process state after become "ESTABLISHED" then seems never drops. I am wondering if there is anybody have similar problem and how you solved it. Thanks a lot!
Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?
So, do u use the external viru scan software? or only the qmail-scan defaut? Which external viru scanner r u using? how big is the difference both on speed and secutiy? On Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:34:35 +0100 "Einar Bordewich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend > this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers > with 512MB each. > Also running the QMAILQUEUE patch with no problems. > > Here are the viruses trapped since 23/08/2000 15:30:48, and I must say that > this solution is doing it's job. > > 230virus TROJ_NAVIDAD.A > 202virus VBS_LOVELETTR.AS > 58virus TROJ_MTX.A > 53virus VBS_KAKWORM.A > 33virus TROJ_HYBRIS.B > 23virus VBS_LOVELETTER-O > 22virus VBS_COLOMBIA > 21virus TROJ_PRETTY_PARK > 19virus PE_CIH > 18virus TROJ_SKA > 15virus PE_MTX.A > 13virus W97M_ETHAN.A > 13Possibly a misdisinfected virus > 12 Love Letter Virus/Trojan > 12virus VBS_STAGES.A > 10Joke program > 7virus W97M_THUS > 6virus JOKE_WOW > 6virus JOKE_FLIPPED > 5virus JOKE_RABBIT > 5virus JOKE_CURSOR.A > 5the W97M/Thus.gen virus !!! > 4virus JOKE_GESCHENK > 4virus JOKE_BUTTONS > 4the WScript/Kak.worm virus !!! > 3virus WM_CAP > 3virus W97M_MARKER > 3virus TROJ_HYBRIS.D > 3the JS/Kak@M virus !!! > 2 Joke/Win-Wobble > 2 Joke/Cokegift > 2virus W97M_WRENCH.E > 2virus W97M_OCARD.A > 2virus W97M_CLASS.Q > 2virus TROJ_SHOCKWAVE.A > 2virus O97M_TRISTATE > 2virus JOKE_SMALLPEN > 2virus JOKE_POINTER.A > 2virus JOKE_KNIJPME > 2virus JOKE_32 > 2the JS/Kak.worm virus !!! > 1 Happy99 Trojan > 1virus X97M_LAROUX.JH > 1virus X97M_LAROUX.BU > 1virus WM_MENTAL.A > 1virus W97M_TITCH.A > 1virus W97M_THUS.I > 1virus W97M_SELIUQ.B > 1virus W97M_SATELLITE > 1virus W97M_PRI.B > 1virus W97M_Generic > 1virus W97M_CLASS.QA > 1virus W97M_CHACK > 1virus W97M_BDOC2X > 1virus W97M_A_OPEY_03 > 1virus TROJ_COCED.240 > 1virus JOKE_FREIBIER.B > 1virus JOKE_DEL_WINDOWS > 1the W97M/Nalp.gen virus !!! > 1the W95/MTX@M virus !!! > 1the W32/Pretty.worm.gen virus !!! > 1the W32/MTX@M virus !!! > 1the BackDoor-HO.cli trojan !!! > > > > -- > > IDG New MediaEinar Bordewich > Development Manager Phone: +47 2336 1420 > E-Mail: eibo(at)newmedia.no > >
Should I try the Qmail-scanner?
Hi, guys I am thinking to apply the Qmail-scanner to block the virus attachement, but I am wondering if this thing is a stable and efficient add-on and worth to have a try, because for our production mail and mail list server the stability and efficiency is extremely high demand. Any suggestion and experience are highly appreciated. Thanks!
Re: Oversize DNS Patch
why don't need anymore? On Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:06:17 -0500 (EST) Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Lo writes: > > Hi, > > > > Do I still need the Oversize DNS Patch? > > No. > > -- > -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com > Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | > 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | This space for rent > Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX |
How maybe times qmail will retry send the bounce email?
Hi guys, I don't very understand the qmail delivery procedure. I got couple questions. If a email bounced back, how offen the qmail will try to send it again? try how many times? and how long the qmail will give up? If qmail give up, how it process the bounced email? delete it from queue and forward it to Mail-daemon@localhost? Can we control the retry interval and the longest waiting time? Is it possible qmail forget a mail in the queue? if so, how can we dump it out? my qmail yesterday sunddenly sent a 2-week-old local domain email to a co-worker. this really bother some people, Thanks for help.
Some emails in my queue delayed more than 2 weeks, help?
Hi, I am newbie of qmail, but I noticed some emails in my qmail server queue have been there more than 2 weeks. I found some useful tools to check the delayed email in the queue from the qmail homepage, but I have no idea how I can force qmail deliver them right away or backup and delete them from queue. Any help will be appreciated. Regards, Eric
