Re: I get timeouts
hi On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 05:20:01PM +0200, Moritz Schmitt wrote: @40003b470951237673fc tcpserver: status: 0/0 @40003b470d051a494944 tcpserver: status: 0/0 @40003b470dc910d0310c tcpserver: status: 0/0 I don't understand it but it doesn't look too evil, doesn't it? afaik it does.. it says zero of max. zero connections. so you told tcpserver to server a maximum of 0 connections... MAXSMTPD='cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming' whats in that file? (you should prolly have something like 20 in there) are the ' backticks (`)? greetz hope it helps Flavio -- http://no-way.org/~fcu/
Re: IsoQlog problems
hi multilog rotates the logfiles after 100k per default. the isoqlogappend script only runs when the log rotates, so isoqlog has nothing to process if you call it before the log rotated. HUP'ing the log process actually rotates the log, so svc -h it before you run isoqlog and it should work. you could change the ssize parameter for multilog aswell, but somewhere in the isoqlog documentation it says, that this would break isoqlog... greetz hope it helps Flavio On Tue, 29 May 2001 09:39:45 -0400 Gary MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have isoqlog running consistantly? I have worked on this for quite awhile and think I have it narrowed down to the fact that I don't get enough traffic to make the ../send/current log file grow over 100k. Let me explain: I have installed isoqlog on several servers from very low to very high traffic. The high traffic sites seem to work fine, the low traffic sites don't work at all, and the medium traffic sites work once in awhile. (Sounds like the three bears story right?) Anyway, with all the testing I've done, it seems to be related to the ../send/current file not getting big enough. I have setup qmail using the LWQ doc and multilog. The author suggested I use splogger instead of multilog, but the LWQ doc says not to do that since it slows everything down. Since I only have trouble on the low traffic sites, would switching to splogger be a big problem? Where is this magic number of 100k for multilog? Can it be changed? - Gary -- http://no-way.org/~fcu/
Re: Single SMTP out server
hi just make a file 'smtproutes' in /var/qmail/control with :ipofmailserver as content on all the webservers. greetz hope it helps Flavio On Thu, 31 May 2001 09:29:38 -0500 Brian Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We use PHP for our web site(s). It has the mail() function which uses standard sendmail to send out mail. We have qmail installed on all of our web servers nodes. In addition we have a mail server running qmail of course. What I would like to do is have qmail on all servers except the the mail server relay their mail through the mail server instead of sending it themselves. Is this possible with qmail? Brian Moon -- dealnews.com, Inc. Makers of dealnews dealmac http://dealnews.com/ | http://dealmac.com/ -- http://no-way.org/~fcu/
Re: IsoQlog problems
hi multilog rotates the logfiles after 100k per default. the isoqlogappend script only runs when the log rotates, so isoqlog has nothing to process if you call it before the log rotated. HUP'ing the log process actually rotates the log, so svc -h it before you run isoqlog and it should work. you could change the ssize parameter for multilog aswell, but somewhere in the isoqlog documentation it says, that this would break isoqlog... greetz hope it helps Flavio On Tue, 29 May 2001 09:39:45 -0400 Gary MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have isoqlog running consistantly? I have worked on this for quite awhile and think I have it narrowed down to the fact that I don't get enough traffic to make the ../send/current log file grow over 100k. Let me explain: I have installed isoqlog on several servers from very low to very high traffic. The high traffic sites seem to work fine, the low traffic sites don't work at all, and the medium traffic sites work once in awhile. (Sounds like the three bears story right?) Anyway, with all the testing I've done, it seems to be related to the ../send/current file not getting big enough. I have setup qmail using the LWQ doc and multilog. The author suggested I use splogger instead of multilog, but the LWQ doc says not to do that since it slows everything down. Since I only have trouble on the low traffic sites, would switching to splogger be a big problem? Where is this magic number of 100k for multilog? Can it be changed? - Gary -- http://no-way.org/~fcu/
