Re: Machine names in message headers

2001-07-30 Thread JT

Check the Hostname of the machine itself.. Qmail pulls the machine name from
the machine not from DNS

--JT
- Original Message -
From: John Portwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 8:19 AM
Subject: Machine names in message headers


From any e-mail I send through our server:

Received: (qmail 20807 invoked by uid 0); 30 Jul 2001 15:08:06 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by pluto2001.office.internal with
qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4121. . Clean. Processed in 0.193495
secs); 30 Jul 2001 15:08:06 -
Received: from unknown (HELO doc2) (10.0.0.22)
  by pluto.office.internal with SMTP; 30 Jul 2001 15:08:06 -


When qmail delivers the mail, the machine name shouldn't be
'pluto2001.office.internal' it should be 'pluto.office.internal'. pluto2001
was the name of the machine while it was in 'test' phase, and has been
removed from all DNS, hosts etc. Why does qmail still think it's called
that? And why does it change?



Regards,
John






Re: Selective Relaying Problem

2001-07-27 Thread JT

goto /etc/tcprules.d
edit qmail-smtpd

read 'man tcprules' on how to use tcprules

Once you make the appropiate edits you want to do the following.

from the tcprules.d directory

tcprules qmail-smtpd.cdb qmail-smtpd.tmp qmail-smtpd

If it gives you a command/file not found then tcprules isn't aliased so
execute it like this

/usr/local/bin/tcprules qmail-smtpd.cdb qmail-smtpd.tmp qmail-smtpd

After that restart qmail-smtpd which is gennerally

/etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail-smtpd.init restart

--JT
- Original Message -
From: Scott Zielsdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Qmail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:21 AM
Subject: RE: Selective Relaying Problem


I send this reply back to the responder and forgot to email it to the list.

###
 How are you starting qmail-smtpd? (ie the tcpserver line).

Out of the run file in /service/qmail-smtp. Here is the paste of the file:

#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -l 0 -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c $MAXSMTPD
\
-u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
21


This is being called from qmailctl inside the case statement svc -u
/service/qmail-smtp.

 And what instructions did you follow to setup qmail?
 (www.lifewithqmail.org - recommended reading. No - ESSENTIAL reading.)
 or the INSTALL doc? If you followed the INSTALL doc, try re-installing
 qmail by following the lifewithqmail doc. In any case, answer the
 first question and we'll see what we can do...

The install was done by a highly paid Linux/Qmail Consultant - who is
stumped, which
is cold comfort to me. I have questioned him at length on install procedures
and
he swears to have followed the INSTALL doc to a T. He has been knowledgable
on
other projects and I do have a good amount of faith in him and his work and
while he
does have reason to cover his butt because of his fees, I don't believe he
is.

#

I am faced with the prospect of re-installation which I will do myself this
time - but
I would rather not have to if there was some other solution.

However, on the subject of re-installation, and forgive me because I have
not researched
this in the archives, do I need to de-install qmail before reinstalling or
can I simply overwrite it?

And another newbie type question: I checked out GNUS's homepage. I am a
slave to Outlook. I
would like to break the bonds but, uh, I didn't see anything about a release
for NT Server.
Is there one? How do I get it?

Thanks,

Scott Zielsdorf
Senior Technical Support Consultant
Computer Instruments IVR Solutions Support Group






Re: Sublist (Was: Virus-infected listmembers)

2001-07-27 Thread JT

ROFL!!!

I couldn't agree more.. I think it hilarious myself that people want to
blame the MUA when generally it the people and not the particular software
or OS they are using and everyone might think I'm an *ss for saying this but
... If your stupid enough to even download the attachments let alone opening
them without taking _some_kinda_ precautions then they almost deserve to by
infested by any such virus just so they can learn the hard way

Anyways that's my two cents on this whole thing ...  Now I'm gona sit back
and watch the mirad of replies this message will generate.

--JT
- Original Message -
From: Virginia Chism [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:32 AM
Subject: RE: Sublist (Was: Virus-infected listmembers)


 -Original Message-
 From: John Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:37 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Sublist (Was: Virus-infected listmembers)

 i couldn't agree more... i got over 300 copies of that damned virus, yet
 remain unaffected... why? because 'i'm smarter than the average
 bear, boo boo!'

I'm unaffected as well, but NOT because I am smarter than anybody, I just
manage to pay attention and NEVER download attachments!

I also find it entertaining to watch all the traffic the spammers inspire.
25+ copies of the virus on this list alone, nearly 80 virus reports from 2
broken reporting entities (yes, I kept track just for fun), and maybe 150
email griping about same!  Not to mention the myriad email requests for
information on the best antivirus software to use.


 i use windows because (and only because) i cannot do the interface design
 for end-users of windows without walking in their shoes (and i
 love photoshop!)

I'm in the same boat with all the bookkeeping and office stuff that I have
to deal with constantly on the W machine and the server stuck in the dungeon
in the back office.  I telnet to it often, but find it just easier to use
the MS product close at hand.  And, ditto about photoshop.  It is a winner!






Re: Sublist (Was: Virus-infected listmembers)

2001-07-27 Thread JT

I think it's over a hundred already for this week isn't it?

--JT
- Original Message - 
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Virginia Chism [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: Sublist (Was: Virus-infected listmembers)






Re: Sublist (Was: Virus-infected listmembers)

2001-07-27 Thread JT

Bow, point taken

--JT
- Original Message -
From: David Talkington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: Sublist (Was: Virus-infected listmembers)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

JT wrote:

... If your stupid enough to even download the attachments let alone
opening
them without taking _some_kinda_ precautions then they almost deserve to by
infested by any such virus just so they can learn the hard way

Except that the networks whose resources users will clog with this
tough-love approach are not usually their own.  I can agree with you
in the case of garden variety system viruses, but internet worms
affect the innocent, educated, and overworked.

- -d

- --
David Talkington
http://www.spotnet.org

PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/dt000823.asc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iQEVAwUBO2HYMb1ZYOtSwT+tAQGayAf6AuXVZdp1JpfyPGXMC5uFYXjGOeXtcdZo
nOZf2o3Z8/s3Epexu8bFcSSzB1tcKUUwjRZdkaXI4Tt7MTTAkxVIUasTAVZC5Su9
bk6cv35UpYsd72tife6By3gnTJouaf8wxA2JVkIG3yH54e0Y8AFoMMS8h19I0Fst
zYm6m9EtPzk0TNp4RbN92jBH1ZVPEcqGu7Dgk4XlAaZtHJJxleIWQveW/X6RYF+W
WyzXyJ4OL/k/k+TbTPu0EKiwYNSu8gsq1EQNE83nagcHc2ni9HYnlZ4KlSUI92TN
XgHbWbJ+yWENcwGKkBjwJD6VMRibdU7eLEO6ZcwrrTvTcLhEXzeE8w==
=w/oK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-






Re: bonussouzaramos (Virus removed)

2001-07-25 Thread JT

I've been getting mass virus alerts all day from a number of email from a
number of administrator's ...

Prodigy to just name a few!!!

The attachment(s) that came with the following mail received
was deleted by MailScan.


**
==
The Mail came from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Mail recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject of the Mail   : [vmailmgr] TNT-Tweaki
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The following attachments were deleted:
Attachment: TNT-TWEAKI_P_U_V2_6_1_SN_ZIP.COM
==

Use  MailScan on  your  EMail Servers  for maximum protection
from Internet-borne viruses.
***


I saw the email address and was amazed... That account is still sending out
viruses right now.. Just recieved 2 more from that address.

--JT


- Original Message -
From: Jon Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: bonussouzaramos (Virus removed)


Kind of ironic this being sent to a qmail list.

Hope Wilson isn't a mail administrator somewhere.

Jon

On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Wilson wrote:

 Hi! How are you?

 I send you this file in order to have your advice

 See you later. Thanks