Re: Life with qmail smtp daemontools

2001-08-14 Thread John Groseclose

At 8:01 PM +0200 8/14/01, Eric Persson wrote:

I cant find any info on what those /service/qmail-send and
/service/qmail-smtpd should be, I tried to symlink them to the files in
/var/qmail/bin that has the same names, but it seems like
/service/qmail-send and /service/qmail-smtpd should be directories.

Can anyone point me in the right direction?

Go back and re-read Life with Qmail. This is covered extensively in 
the section on /var/qmail/supervise/ and symlinking the 
subdirectories to /service/, aka 2.8.2.2. The supervise scripts.
-- 
John Groseclose
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: disallowing certain remote recipients

2001-07-20 Thread John Groseclose

At 11:38 AM -0500 7/20/01, Joshua Nichols wrote:
Hey all--

I've searched the archives and not found a solution that seems to solve the
following problem:

I have a box (lwq + qmail-verh basically) that runs a number of opt in
lists.  Recently, a user sent a bunch of UCE, and though that problem has
been solved, I'd like to be able to enforce the request of those who
complained and asked to never receive another email from us.

Because I anticipate other users breaking their TOS at some point in the
future, I'd like to be able to block certain outbound addresses at the
qmail-send or qmail-remote level.  Ideally, I would have a control file that
listed addresses and wildcards that this box would refuse to send mail to.
That is, if [EMAIL PROTECTED] requests that our service not allow
sending to his domain, I could put that restriction on the box, regardless
of whether [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscribes to one of these lists, or is
added against her will or whatnot.

Try the badrcptto patch or the spamcontrol patch, either of which 
will check against the envelope recipient and refuse to accept the 
message. Alternately, nullroute all of the MX's for the domain in 
question.
-- 
John Groseclose
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



NetGear, was Re: I get timeouts

2001-07-10 Thread John Groseclose

At 1:22 AM +0200 7/11/01, Henning Brauer wrote:

The Realtek cards and in special the netgear ones are pure crap, but I'm not
aware about such problems with them.

The original revision of the NetGear cards apparently used a real 
tulip driver - I had two of the original cards, and two of the later 
ones (FA310TX) and the older ones work flawlessly, while the later 
ones do all kinds of bizarre things.
-- 
John Groseclose
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: LWQ question..cjk

2001-07-03 Thread John Groseclose

At 6:24 PM +0300 7/3/01, Constantine Koulis wrote:

THAT MEANS THAT FOR EVERY VIRTUAL USER I HAVE TO DO MAILDIRMAKE
and what is SKELETON?

Not at all. It means you have to create a Maildir in /etc/skel, which 
is the reference directory for useradd to create new user 
directories. Then, every time you run a useradd, it'll use a copy of 
/etc/skel to create their new user directory, with the files set to 
be owned by the new user.

Files and directories like Maildir and public_html (assuming you want 
your users to have web pages) can be put in /etc/skel to reduce your 
workload when creating users. Are you the primary administator for 
that machine?

man useradd explains this fairly well.
-- 
John Groseclose
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TELEVISION

2001-06-29 Thread John Groseclose

At 4:51 PM -0700 6/29/01, James Stevens wrote:
Oh gawd.. No we get spam.. laugh

--JT
- Original Message -
From: James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 4:45 PM
Subject: AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TELEVISION


  AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TELEVISON
  Dear Friend and Future Millionaire-
  AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TELEVISION:

Looks like another one didn't read the FAQ... spamming a list of 
people who're probably *really* sick of dealing with spammers has to 
be one of the dumber stunts I've seen on this list.

Not you, James. The other James. The MMF Spammer.
-- 
John Groseclose
[EMAIL PROTECTED]