Re: Sublist (Was: Virus-infected listmembers)
Wilson most definitely is the problem How can it be still sending virii for over 24 hours? Wilson is a goon On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Robin S. Socha wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 09:54:53PM -0400, Steve Reed wrote: > > I think it would be very considerate of the list members if > > whoever runs this mailing list would PLEASE wake up and ban the > > living daylights out of Wilson and his barrage of viruses. > > What for? Wilson isn't the problem. The problem is that we're not in > 92 anymore. What I'd like to see is a sublist that drops anything that > isn't ASCII only and also everything that is sent with Windos MUAs. > For the fun of it, I just killed everything that said Outlook > (Express), Eudora, Pegasus and Webmail for the last month. Trust me, > the list suddenly became good. > > Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], could we have a sublist? I'm sure a lot of > people would host it. I would. Prettyplease? >
Re: Someone please BAN Spammers
Yeah filters etc are all good but the traffic is till hitting your server. On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Jeff Palmer wrote: > > > Can someone please BAN those annoying spam, and dumb Exchange > > > Scanmailprograms ? > > > > > > This is getting unacceptable! - The list is unusable. > > > > Certainly not. Get a better mail client. > > > > Hey Drew, Just out of sheer wonder..How is a mail client going to > stop the mails from coming in? Granted a few well placed filters would be > a good start.. but the fact remains the emails still come in. > > Wouldn't a statement like "use filters" be better than "get a better mail > client" Seems to me the mail client is doing the job it was designed to > do. The person GOT the mails, and then was able to SEND mail to the list > complaining about the mail he/she got. Sounds like the MUA did it's job. > A filter is what he/she needs to rid themselves of the spammage. > > > my .02 cents. (who ever said a zero has no value?) > > Jeff Palmer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: Virus-infected listmembers
Wilson is going to start costing me cash. I am in Australia on a cable service and have to pay 28c per MB Jon Booth On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Kitabjian, Dave wrote: > Is there a really, really good reason why folks like "Wison" and others that > have sent 25 viruses to the qmail list in the last 18 hours are not being > removed from this mailing list? > > Dave > > > -Original Message- > > From: Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 6:01 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject:EMAIL SCAN:VIRUS ALERT! IN ATTACHMENT~CDRD083 > > > > Attachment file : CDRD083d.com > > Virus name : W32/SirCam@MM > > Action taken: Moved... > > > > > > > > Hi! How are you? > > > > I send you this file in order to have your advice > > > > See you later. Thanks > > << File: ATT34209.ATT >> >
Re: LUCROS_JUNHO
Thats 13 virus worms you've mailed to god knows how many people on this list. Unplug your pc from the net and fix it. Jon On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Wilson wrote: > Hi! How are you? > > I send you this file in order to have your advice > > See you later. Thanks >
Re: bonussouzaramos (Virus removed)
Kind of ironic this being sent to a qmail list. Hope Wilson isn't a mail administrator somewhere. Jon On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Wilson wrote: > Hi! How are you? > > I send you this file in order to have your advice > > See you later. Thanks >
Re: Qmail SMTP timing out.
Server is most likely unable to do a reverse DNS lookup on those clients. Jon On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Grant wrote: > Qmail has been working perfectly up until yesterday. What I did was: > > echo 10485760 > /var/qmail/control/databytes and restarted qmail. > > While this is nothing major, ever since yesterday _some_ clients have been > reporting timeouts on sending emails. > > I telnet from the clients machine to port 25 of the mail server and I get > nothing. Whereas if I telnet locally to port 25 I get: > > Trying 127.0.0.1... > Connected to localhost.localdomain. > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 webster.conprojan.com.au ESMTP > > ps auwwx shows: > > root 29681 0.0 0.1 1124 92 ?S11:58 0:00 svscan > root 29682 0.0 0.0 1088 52 ?S11:58 0:00 supervise > qmail-send > root 29683 0.0 0.0 1088 52 ?S11:58 0:00 supervise > log > root 29684 0.0 0.0 1088 52 ?S11:58 0:00 supervise > qmail-smtpd > root 29685 0.0 0.0 1088 52 ?S11:58 0:00 supervise > log > qmails 29686 0.0 0.3 1140 240 ?S11:58 0:01 qmail-send > qmaill 29687 0.0 0.0 11000 ?SW 11:58 0:00 [multilog] > root 29688 0.0 0.0 1152 60 ?S11:58 0:00 > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -H -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u id -u qmaild -g id > -g qmaild 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd > qmaill 29689 0.0 0.4 1104 264 ?S11:58 0:00 > /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail > root 29692 0.0 0.1 1100 72 ?S11:58 0:00 > qmail-lspawn ./Maildir > qmailr 29693 0.0 0.1 1100 100 ?S11:58 0:00 > qmail-rspawn > qmailq 29694 0.0 0.1 1092 92 ?S11:58 0:00 qmail-clean > > It suggests to be a resolving issue. But I haven't changed anything else > except for databytes. >
Re: long delays when sending mail
The Linux box needs to be able to do reverse lookups on the windows IP addresses. Trap for new players of which I am one. Jon
Re: Long connect times
OK I have set up reverse DNS and it works great. The reason I was hesitant to set it up was I was using my ISPs DNS to resolve not my local but I am now forwarding from my local to theirs Thanks Jon Booth On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Russell Nelson wrote: > Jon Booth writes: > > Hi all, > > I am using QMail with xinetd. It takes ages for a PC internally (allowed > > to relay) to connect to the server. Outside servers can connect instantly. > > Where should I look to diagnose this problem > > Reverse DNS for your internal hosts. It's not optional. > > -- > -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com > Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | > 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | #exclude > Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | >
Re: Long connect times
That would make sense. How can I stop it from doing reverse lookups? Its not practical from me to set up reverse DNS for these internal IPs. Thanks Jon On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, [iso-8859-1] Jörgen Persson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:39:06PM +1000, Jon Booth wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am using QMail with xinetd. It takes ages for a PC internally (allowed > > to relay) to connect to the server. Outside servers can connect instantly. > > Where should I look to diagnose this problem > > > I'm not familiar with xinetd but it might be configured to do reversed > DNS lookups for incoming connections. It will most probably delay the > connection if it can't do that properly. > > By the way, tcpserver[1] is the prefered internet daemon for qmail. > > > Jörgen > > [1] http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html >
Long connect times
Hi all, I am using QMail with xinetd. It takes ages for a PC internally (allowed to relay) to connect to the server. Outside servers can connect instantly. Where should I look to diagnose this problem Thanks for any help Jon Booth Lucid Logic Pty. Ltd. http://www.lucidlogic.com +61 3 9853 7452 +61 412 767 030
Outgoing problem
Hi All I am getting strange bounces. Qmail seems to append "" to the end of the domain (see below) Anyone know why? Any help greatly appreciated Jon Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.lucidlogic.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]"">: Sorry, I couldn't find any host named lucidlogic.com"". (#5.1.2)
