Re: Strange problem with header of outoing mails
Hi, On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 07:23:49PM +0200, Stefan Paletta wrote: | Try leaving out the -f option to preline. Your uucp uplink needs a From | line, I suppose. hmm, now i get this: --- cut here --- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 16 21:06:03 1999 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Sun, 16 May 1999 21:06:03 +0200 Received: from unlisys.snafu.de ([194.64.64.23] helo=mail.unlisys.net) by www.inx.de with smtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 10j6Ec-0001au-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 May 1999 21:06:02 +0200 Received: by mail.unlisys.net (Smail3.2.0.96inx) id m10j6Ec-00vEroC; Sun, 16 May 1999 21:06:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 7706 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 1999 19:09:04 - Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 21:09:04 +0200 From: Kaspar Landsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test --- cut here --- Looks a bit better but i'm still unsure whether replies sent to me using the above Return-path would arrive correctly. Would they? :) Bye, Kasi -- Kaspar Landsberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
qmail uucp problem (both rmailĀ“s)
Standard error output was: Btw, i tried to get a log output from the qmail-rmail version. But altho LOGFILE was defined in it, it didnt create the file and it didnt log anything. Except this uucp issue everything works great. :) If you have any hints about what to do or where to look, please let me know. Thanks, Kasi -- Kaspar Landsberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Queue only and UUCP
Hi all, i know how to tell qmail that all outgoing mail should be sent out via UUCP to some UUCP peer. And i know how to tell qmail to run in "queue only" mode, ie. by default queueing all mails in a directory first and let the user send them out in a package manually (with serialmail). Now my question is: Do those 2 methods work together too? And, if not, how do i tell qmail to run in a UUCP queue only mode? (All mails first get queued for UUCP deliverage and then i will tell qmail manually to deliver them to my UUCP uplink). Please CC: me your answers too since i am not yet on the list (i first have to get the whole thing running ;). TIA, Kasi -- Kaspar Landsberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]