unsubcribe
-Original Message-From: Rajesh Arora [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:15 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: unsubcribe unsubcribe
RE: AT LEAST ONE OF YOU HAD THE BRAINS.....
Stupid HTML email guy. Tell him like it is Peter -Original Message- From: Peter van Dijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AT LEAST ONE OF YOU HAD THE BRAINS. On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 07:45:51PM +0100, Rembrandt Lensink wrote: RNL.Q_Q.Now after a week, atleast One of you autists had the brains to inform me that many of my messages went straight to some Yahoo Newsgroup. No Thank You ! Peter, JIJ had mij als landgenoot, best eens via een directe e-mail mogen waarschuwen. Believe me dear reader of this unfortunate matter, I`m no member , no visitor and I have no ambitions to enter your Group. I feel pretty screwed by your haughty attitude.End Of Line. Oh, great, a personal attack in my own language. And I don't even see what I did wrong. Translation of the dutch part: 'Peter, YOU as a country-mate, could have warned me for this in a direct mail!'. Jeez. As if I know. As if I care. Rembrandt, get a life. Even moreso, get out of ours. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is just a couple keypresses away. Loser. Greetz, Peter.
RE: AT LEAST ONE OF YOU HAD THE BRAINS.....
hey guys, this is another subject, but could any of you suggest a different text web browser other than Lynx? -Original Message- From: Rob Hines Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AT LEAST ONE OF YOU HAD THE BRAINS. Haughty? Nah, we've never been haughty. Rude, inconsiderate, intolerant, and arrogant, but never haughty. Sheesh. Peter van Dijk wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 07:45:51PM +0100, Rembrandt Lensink wrote: RNL.Q_Q.Now after a week, atleast One of you autists had the brains to inform me that many of my messages went straight to some Yahoo Newsgroup. No Thank You ! Peter, JIJ had mij als landgenoot, best eens via een directe e-mail mogen waarschuwen. Believe me dear reader of this unfortunate matter, I`m no member , no visitor and I have no ambitions to enter your Group. I feel pretty screwed by your haughty attitude.End Of Line. Oh, great, a personal attack in my own language. And I don't even see what I did wrong. Translation of the dutch part: 'Peter, YOU as a country-mate, could have warned me for this in a direct mail!'. Jeez. As if I know. As if I care. Rembrandt, get a life. Even moreso, get out of ours. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is just a couple keypresses away. Loser. Greetz, Peter. -- Rob Hines Jr. System Administrator
Qmail slow!
I sound like a caveman in my subject line! whoa! Anyways I have a FreeBSD machine running qmail (but is not running DNS, I am running DNS on another machine) for some reason, whenever you send email , it doesnt get delivered for atleast 6 hours. Am I not setting something correclty?
RE: Qmail slow!
thanks! umm.. I am trying to look at the logs. I cant find them. Where are they? I will run qmail and see -Original Message- From: Harald Hanche-Olsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 12:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Qmail slow! + Uwe Ohse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | Otherwise you might want to provide more information. Including log file entries! Does it show failed delivery attempts? What happens when you run qmail-qread or qmail-qstat? - Harald
RE: Qmail slow!
Ohman, this stinks. $orry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_.._(#5.1.2) this is what I get in my maillog. I am not running DNS on this particular machine. -Original Message- From: Harald Hanche-Olsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 12:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Qmail slow! + Uwe Ohse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | Otherwise you might want to provide more information. Including log file entries! Does it show failed delivery attempts? What happens when you run qmail-qread or qmail-qstat? - Harald
