Re: Pine for Maildir
tc lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i never cared for mutt either, although i never spent a huge amount of time trying to figure it out. my main issue with it is that i could never get it to sort my inbox properly (just normal sorting - by arrival time - how the files in the maildir are already sorted). it could be due to me having tried old version of mutt. set sort=threads set sort_aux=date-received If you don't care for the threading behavior, try: set sort=date-received -- occasional realignment [EMAIL PROTECTED] (michael handler) sometimesnecessary washington, dc
RE: Pine for Maildir
Great notes on getting the newest pine working with Maildir. One thing I noticed when I set mine up: you wrote: NOTE: Apparently, you must set inbox-path as an absolute path (which means you can't set it to ~/Maildir because pine doesn't seem to recognize ~/ as /home/$USER/). For me it was the opposite. "/home/$USER/Maildir" did not work whereas "~/Maildir" did -- even for root. I have no idea why it is opposite for us, but its just something to consider and "one for the archives" as you say. ;-) To make the change global for all users I added this to my /usr/local/lib/pine.conf.fixed: ##Qmail Maildir Support## inbox-path="~/Maildir/" Thanks, -davidu - You can set inbox-path for pine globally by editing /etc/pine.conf or you can force your users to use that inbox-path by editing /etc/pine.conf.fixed i've never used pine with imap, so i'm not sure how that works. Well, I've been devoting a couple of hours to understanding courier-imap in all of its intracacies and I'd say that your method is loads simpler yet just as reliable. -tcl. By the way, for those of you trying to obtain a copy of the file pine-maildir-4.33 to patch pine with, I realize Larrson's site is down so I have an alternate copy up at http://unix-web.triton.net/~ennui/pine-maildir-4.33 To apply the patch, just copy the file into the directory you extracted pine into and do `patch -p1 pine-maildir-4.33' -- Keith Network Engineer Triton Technologies, Inc.
Re: Pine for Maildir
Actually, last I checked those patches don't work with the newest pine sources. In this case RTFM'ing wouldn't help now would it. Perhaps he should have asked the list; oh wait he did. did I say the patches work on the latest pine version ? umm... nope. if he's so eager to have the latest version with maildir (which it doesn't support it by default) maybe he's ambitious in modifying it to suit his needs :-X -davidu -- Stefan Laudat CCNA CCAI - "- I think my men can take care of one little penguin. - No Mr. Gates, your men are already dead."
Re: Pine for Maildir
Stefan Laudat wrote: there are patches for pine Maildir access, please rtfm at www.qmail.org I've tested that and worked a couple of months ago. I am working on this issue right now. What it's boiled down to has been my installing the courier-imap package with the intent of having Pine access that. I've patched pine's source code with Mattias Larsson's pine-maildir-4.33 patch; but couldn't figure out how to configure Pine to access the Maildirs (namely due to lack of documentation on Larsson's patch, and his site seems to be down as well). I would be interested to hear of the patch you used and the configuration adjustments you made to Pine. By the way, I must say that I do not care for mutt. The interface is rather dirty (I don't mean its aesthetics) and the configuration rather cryptic. Maybe I just didn't devote enough time to it? Anyways, it's not a viable option. -- Keith Network Engineer Triton Technologies, Inc.
Re: Pine for Maildir
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote: Stefan Laudat wrote: there are patches for pine Maildir access, please rtfm at www.qmail.org I've tested that and worked a couple of months ago. I am working on this issue right now. What it's boiled down to has been my installing the courier-imap package with the intent of having Pine access that. I've patched pine's source code with Mattias Larsson's pine-maildir-4.33 patch; but couldn't figure out how to configure Pine to access the Maildirs (namely due to lack of documentation on Larsson's patch, and his site seems to be down as well). I would be interested to hear of the patch you used and the configuration adjustments you made to Pine. By the way, I must say that I do not care for mutt. The interface is rather dirty (I don't mean its aesthetics) and the configuration rather cryptic. Maybe I just didn't devote enough time to it? Anyways, it's not a viable option. i use that same patch for pine 4.33. it appears to work much better than whatever i was using before. something with pine 4.10 i think. in pine's config i simply set inbox-path to the string: $MAIL /etc/profile.d/qmail.sh exists to set $MAIL (and $MAILDROP) properly. that profile file came with Bruce Guenter's qmail rpms (http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail+patches/). typically $MAIL would look like: /home/user/Maildir/ (with the trailing slash). i've never used pine with imap, so i'm not sure how that works. i never cared for mutt either, although i never spent a huge amount of time trying to figure it out. my main issue with it is that i could never get it to sort my inbox properly (just normal sorting - by arrival time - how the files in the maildir are already sorted). it could be due to me having tried old version of mutt. -tcl.
Re: Pine for Maildir
tc lewis wrote: i use that same patch for pine 4.33. it appears to work much better than whatever i was using before. something with pine 4.10 i think. in pine's config i simply set inbox-path to the string: $MAIL /etc/profile.d/qmail.sh exists to set $MAIL (and $MAILDROP) properly. that profile file came with Bruce Guenter's qmail rpms (http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail+patches/). typically $MAIL would look like: /home/user/Maildir/ (with the trailing slash). *chuckles* Sure enough, that worked. It even moves read messages from ~/Maildir/new to ~/Maildir/cur. Ah well. A little more info on this (for the archives if not for anyone presently dealing with it): - My $MAIL environment variable is not set because I did not use those particular RPMs for the install. To set it for your users, check out /etc/profile (just set the line with MAIL="/some/path/here" to MAIL="/home/$USER/Maildir"). NOTE: Apparently, you must set inbox-path as an absolute path (which means you can't set it to ~/Maildir because pine doesn't seem to recognize ~/ as /home/$USER/). This, obviously, will make root's Maildir inaccessible on 99% of Linux systems, to solve this, either make a symlink from /home/root to /root (or whatever root's home directory is) or make a /root/.pinerc file with the line inbox-path=/root/Maildir - You can set inbox-path for pine globally by editing /etc/pine.conf or you can force your users to use that inbox-path by editing /etc/pine.conf.fixed i've never used pine with imap, so i'm not sure how that works. Well, I've been devoting a couple of hours to understanding courier-imap in all of its intracacies and I'd say that your method is loads simpler yet just as reliable. -tcl. By the way, for those of you trying to obtain a copy of the file pine-maildir-4.33 to patch pine with, I realize Larrson's site is down so I have an alternate copy up at http://unix-web.triton.net/~ennui/pine-maildir-4.33 To apply the patch, just copy the file into the directory you extracted pine into and do `patch -p1 pine-maildir-4.33' -- Keith Network Engineer Triton Technologies, Inc.
Pine for Maildir
I'm looking for a version of Pine that will read messages from Maildir directly, rather than moving them to 'mail'. Anyone know of any? Thanks, Steven
Re: Pine for Maildir
--- Steven Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking for a version of Pine that will read messages from Maildir directly, rather than moving them to 'mail'. Anyone know of any? Thanks, Steven To my knowledge, pine does not directly read Maildir formatted mailboxes. If your server runs an IMAP service, you can get pine to read mail via IMAP. If you want a text based email client that reads Maildir formatted mailboxes, use mutt. Ive never used it, so I dont have a recommendation as to its usefulness, but Ive seen posts raving about it. === Al __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Re: Pine for Maildir
there are patches for pine Maildir access, please rtfm at www.qmail.org I've tested that and worked a couple of months ago. On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:49:37PM -0700, Al Sparks wrote: --- Steven Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking for a version of Pine that will read messages from Maildir directly, rather than moving them to 'mail'. Anyone know of any? Thanks, Steven To my knowledge, pine does not directly read Maildir formatted mailboxes. If your server runs an IMAP service, you can get pine to read mail via IMAP. If you want a text based email client that reads Maildir formatted mailboxes, use mutt. I?ve never used it, so I don?t have a recommendation as to it?s usefulness, but I?ve seen posts raving about it. === Al __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ -- Stefan Laudat CCNA CCAI - "- I think my men can take care of one little penguin. - No Mr. Gates, your men are already dead."
Re: Pine for Maildir
The RedHat RPM of pine is patched to support Maildirs. --Pete On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Stefan Laudat wrote: there are patches for pine Maildir access, please rtfm at www.qmail.org I've tested that and worked a couple of months ago. On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:49:37PM -0700, Al Sparks wrote: --- Steven Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking for a version of Pine that will read messages from Maildir directly, rather than moving them to 'mail'. Anyone know of any? Thanks, Steven To my knowledge, pine does not directly read Maildir formatted mailboxes. If your server runs an IMAP service, you can get pine to read mail via IMAP. If you want a text based email client that reads Maildir formatted mailboxes, use mutt. I?ve never used it, so I don?t have a recommendation as to it?s usefulness, but I?ve seen posts raving about it. === Al __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ -- Stefan Laudat CCNA CCAI - "- I think my men can take care of one little penguin. - No Mr. Gates, your men are already dead."
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
Just to stick in another random opinion: I've been pretty pine die hard for almost 3 years now. I tried out mutt about a month ago, and just couldn't make the switch. Went back to pine and Mailbox, despite personally preferring Maildir. Tried it again about 3 days ago due to peer pressure and disgust with Mailbox format - and something clicked. I'd now recommend it to anyone that wants MUA Maildir support, regardless whether or not they are a pine fan. It only took about an hour to make it do everything I was used to in pine - and the stuff I couldn't reprogram my fingers to do (x is for expunge, dammit!) I just re-binded. Very slick. And the pgp support... delicious. :D (Now if I could only figure out how to color code tagged messages...) OK, on your advice I will look into mutt and give it a whirl, but god knows I have better things to do with my time than evaluate MUA's. Give it a serious hour of your time. You won't be disappointed. -- Mahlon Smith InternetCDS http://www.internetcds.com
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:32:29AM +, James R Grinter wrote: But, it doesn't matter - Pine does IMAP right? (Isn't that it's real reason for existence?) So hook your Maildirs up with IMAP, and point Pine at that. Seems pretty simple to me. How about this: Use a non-crappy, open source e-mail client instead? no need to tell me - (for the record I've never ever used Pine, though I think I did compile it for someone else once.) but for people to complain that they want to use it, but that it doesn't natively support Maildir which they also want to use, is just madness. James.
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
"Pavel Kankovsky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Adam McKenna wrote: The author of PINE flat out refuses to support Maildir. Umm...doesn't it sound familiar? ;) But, it doesn't matter - Pine does IMAP right? (Isn't that it's real reason for existence?) So hook your Maildirs up with IMAP, and point Pine at that. Seems pretty simple to me. James.
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:32:29AM +, James R Grinter wrote: But, it doesn't matter - Pine does IMAP right? (Isn't that it's real reason for existence?) So hook your Maildirs up with IMAP, and point Pine at that. Seems pretty simple to me. How about this: Use a non-crappy, open source e-mail client instead? --Adam
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
But, it doesn't matter - Pine does IMAP right? (Isn't that it's real reason for existence?) So hook your Maildirs up with IMAP, and point Pine at that. Seems pretty simple to me. How about this: Use a non-crappy, open source e-mail client instead? --Adam And what MUA is that? I am happy that RedHat, despite all the people who hate them, distributes PINE patched to work with Maildirs. PINE may be limited, but it sure is useful as a quick and dirty console-base MUA. I figured out how to use in in about 3 minutes without having to RTFM. I have to admit that I am sick of _yet_another_non_GPL_free_software_license_, with every college having to advertise "our students/faculty did something remotely usefull", but it works, and it is free enough for most purposes. But as I said, if I am missing some great GPL MUA, pray tell... --Pete Written using PINE, telnet'ed in from a remote location to my ISP
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
Peter Cavender [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: PINE may be limited, but it sure is useful as a quick and dirty console-base MUA. I figured out how to use in in about 3 minutes without having to RTFM. If you've ever had to deal with the code, dirty is definitely an accurate description. But as I said, if I am missing some great GPL MUA, pray tell... mutt is pretty popular and is what we now recommend over Pine for anyone willing to change. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
PINE may be limited, but it sure is useful as a quick and dirty console-base MUA. I figured out how to use in in about 3 minutes without having to RTFM. If you've ever had to deal with the code, dirty is definitely an accurate description. Well, yes. I once tried to hack just pico, and gave up in disgust. weemacs??? OK, on your advice I will look into mutt and give it a whirl, but god knows I have better things to do with my time than evaluate MUA's. But then I can't be closed mindedThanks. --Pete
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 03:03:38AM -0500, tc lewis wrote: plus the whole idiotic self-quoting thing on the top of mutt's web page, and some other stuff on the web pages, just makes me think that the author is an idiot. but that's certainly not very objective reasoning. This is coming from someone who doesn't know what capitalization is. But you can't please them all, right? this is the absolute worst argument i've ever heard in my entire life. don't ever email me again. Dish it but can't take it. for now i'm still using an old pine with the maildir patch, as that mutt date interpretation thing simply makes it impossible for me to use. Like I said I've had no problems in this area except when the message itself was flawed. Are you sure you are using Mutt properly? no, i'm not sure. i've been talking about this in private messages with someone else. i'm not sure that my use of mutt is perfect, altho i have no idea what i could possibly be messing up. nevertheless, if i have to mess around with it that much for it to be coherent for me to use, it's not the proper tool for me. to each his own. RTFM, and *plonk*
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Adam McKenna wrote: The author of PINE flat out refuses to support Maildir. Umm...doesn't it sound familiar? ;) --Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ] "Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."
[OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 10:42:11PM -, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote: In discusion - regard to Maildir versus mailbox question - for promoting Maidir were is useful to encourage pine authors to adapting the pine program for directly work with Maildir fromat. maybe you find this useful, I don't. So contact the pine authors. Pine, as I think, is most popular software in Unix for mail reading/writing. pine is a security nightmare AFAIK. If the new version were able to support Maildir without to install additional patch, the Maildir also qmail would be more popular and thus more functional :-) a) I as many others don't care about pine b) qmail is _very_ functional, can't see any dependency to pine c) popularity isn't always the best goal Mutt - in my opinion is to "raw" and the all energy should gonna Maildir format to gain for it the "pine team". Maybe you just don't spend enough effort to understand mutt, but I won't start a MUA discussion here. If you want pine to support Maildirs natively (mutt does btw) contact the pine authors, this is _ways_ OT here. -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
Hello Maybe you just don't spend enough effort to understand mutt, but I won't This is the good opportunity to make functionality of Mutt better. I let to see to much porblems and this is reason, that I don't use Mutt with plesure. Piotr --- Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [http://www.am.torun.pl/~pekasz]
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 12:12:55AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: Maybe you just don't spend enough effort to understand mutt, but I won't start a MUA discussion here. If you want pine to support Maildirs natively (mutt does btw) contact the pine authors, this is _ways_ OT here. The author of PINE flat out refuses to support Maildir. --Adam
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:45:31PM +, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote: Hello Maybe you just don't spend enough effort to understand mutt, but I won't This is the good opportunity to make functionality of Mutt better. I let to see to much porblems and this is reason, that I don't use Mutt with plesure. Are you using babelfish to make your posts? Just wondering. Mutt is pretty intuitive. Not quite as intuitive as pine, but it should only take a few days for most pine users to make the switch. --Adam
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
i've had lots of problems with mutt concerned its sorting. i've consistently seen mutt think messages from november 28th interpreted as being from january 4th, 2002, as an example. weird things like that. that's simply unacceptable to me. plus the whole idiotic self-quoting thing on the top of mutt's web page, and some other stuff on the web pages, just makes me think that the author is an idiot. but that's certainly not very objective reasoning. old redhat releases of pine included a patch for maildir support. however, pine is _extremely_ inefficient when it comes to large mailboxes (maildirs, i should say). get a few thousand messages in one, and pine will annoy you something awful. it seems to try to rebuild the message list in a box from scratch repeatedly every time certain operations are performed, or a timeout is met. very, very frustrating. for now i'm still using an old pine with the maildir patch, as that mutt date interpretation thing simply makes it impossible for me to use. i started writing my own mua that will probably be very, very minimal in features, just so i can avoid these stupid yet horrendous problems. i haven't done much with it recently, however, so who knows when it will be usable. pine's license is also kind of...not cool. but then again, people using qmail probably aren't very license-religious. chuckle. so shrug, lose-lose situation. -tcl.
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir
* Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:45:31PM +, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote: This is the good opportunity to make functionality of Mutt better. I let to see to much porblems and this is reason, that I don't use Mutt with plesure. Are you using babelfish to make your posts? Just wondering. Nope. The Dialectizer with the "Polish impersonator of the Swedish Cook(tm) module(R)". Mutt is pretty intuitive. U... Nope. It lacks a --luser-gui switch. But then again, who cares? Not quite as intuitive as pine, but it should only take a few days for most pine users to make the switch. # muttrc.Pine 1.0 by Daniel Gonzlez Gasull # Feedback is welcome. Email: gasull[at]usa.net # http://gasull.home.ml.org # # This file contains commands to change the keybindings in Mutt to be # similar to those of PINE 3.96. -- Robin S. Socha http://socha.net/
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
Hello take a few days for most pine users to make the switch. I will not say, that mutt is not-useful, but it could be better :-) For me - the first problem is how make, that the sent mail shall be placed in sent folder - Neverless it don't me simple :-( and I have to less time to sacrificate more time. I will say only, that the softwares provided for users (not for UNIX administrators) should be really simple to use! Maybe the exapmples of Muttrc files or especiall WWW on subject Mutt can help. I will say in my post, I will help no criticize to present the viewpoint of peoples, who are users no admins. It seems to be important how the software see the others, who don't aspirate to be qmail list subscribers! Piotr --- Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [http://www.am.torun.pl/~pekasz]
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:24:05 -0500 (EST), Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: P I will not say, that mutt is not-useful, but it could be better :-) For P me - the first problem is how make, that the sent mail shall be placed P in sent folder. If you want a copy of all your sent messages, I'd use qmail for that instead of relying on anything else. Assuming your userid is "pekasz", have your MUA add a header to outgoing messages: Bcc: pekasz-bcc Create ~/.qmail-bcc holding the following line: | (preline /bin/cat; echo) $HOME/mail/sentmail This way, you get a copy of the message as it was seen by qmail. I've been using this method for quite some time with no problems. Since I use procmail to handle filtering, I also save portions of outgoing message headers in case I lose someone's address: % cat ~/.qmail-header | (preline formail -XFrom: -XSubject: -XDate: -XTo: -XCc: -XMessage-ID: ; echo) $HOME/mail/SENT.`/bin/date +%Yw%W` (all on one line, of course). -- Karl Vogel[EMAIL PROTECTED] ASC/YCOA, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USA Never criticize a man till you've walked a mile in his shoes. That way, you'll be a mile away from him and have his shoes as well. --Peter Salzman
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 09:56:27PM -0500, Karl Vogel wrote: On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:24:05 -0500 (EST), Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: P I will not say, that mutt is not-useful, but it could be better :-) For P me - the first problem is how make, that the sent mail shall be placed P in sent folder. set record=+sent The sample Muttrc file is pretty good reading. Regards.
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 08:02:51PM -0500, tc lewis wrote: i've had lots of problems with mutt concerned its sorting. i've consistently seen mutt think messages from november 28th interpreted as being from january 4th, 2002, as an example. weird things like that. that's simply unacceptable to me. When sorting by date mutt only barfs when the date header is messed up. Are you sure the date headers in those messages are standards compliant? plus the whole idiotic self-quoting thing on the top of mutt's web page, and some other stuff on the web pages, just makes me think that the author is an idiot. but that's certainly not very objective reasoning. This is coming from someone who doesn't know what capitalization is. But you can't please them all, right? for now i'm still using an old pine with the maildir patch, as that mutt date interpretation thing simply makes it impossible for me to use. Like I said I've had no problems in this area except when the message itself was flawed. Are you sure you are using Mutt properly?
Re: [OT] pine and Maildir (was: Maildir versus malibox)
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Alex Pennace wrote: On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 08:02:51PM -0500, tc lewis wrote: i've had lots of problems with mutt concerned its sorting. i've consistently seen mutt think messages from november 28th interpreted as being from january 4th, 2002, as an example. weird things like that. that's simply unacceptable to me. When sorting by date mutt only barfs when the date header is messed up. Are you sure the date headers in those messages are standards compliant? i would much rather simply sort by the mailbox. which i've tried. and it still gets messed up. why on earth do muas think they're smarter than mtas? whatever. but i was using an old version of mutt so who knows? plus the whole idiotic self-quoting thing on the top of mutt's web page, and some other stuff on the web pages, just makes me think that the author is an idiot. but that's certainly not very objective reasoning. This is coming from someone who doesn't know what capitalization is. But you can't please them all, right? this is the absolute worst argument i've ever heard in my entire life. don't ever email me again. for now i'm still using an old pine with the maildir patch, as that mutt date interpretation thing simply makes it impossible for me to use. Like I said I've had no problems in this area except when the message itself was flawed. Are you sure you are using Mutt properly? no, i'm not sure. i've been talking about this in private messages with someone else. i'm not sure that my use of mutt is perfect, altho i have no idea what i could possibly be messing up. nevertheless, if i have to mess around with it that much for it to be coherent for me to use, it's not the proper tool for me. to each his own. -tcl.
pine and maildir
It seems I am behind: I just noticed that pine-4.21 supports maildir. Or is it just the version RH made? Thx Mate
pine and maildir(2)
I see now, that RH applies the maildir patch and another one called maildirfix. The maildir patch is Mattias Larsson's. Mate
Re: Pine and Maildir support
Try ftp://158.195.33.220/pub/pine/, the pine-4.20-maildir.patch should be the one. The rest are older patches included in this one. Don't use the -sk.patch, it translates most of pine texts into Slovak, wouldn't be of much use I'd say. -- jozef :-) Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
Pine and Maildir support
I've D/Led the c-client for Pine and followed the directions. The problem is that it simply doesn't compile with pine4.21 and the latest stable GCC. Is there anywhere I can D/L an already patched source? All the links that I found in the archives seemed to have dissapeard. I prefer a version of pine 4.0 I'm running solaris 7 with qmail 1.03 and gcc-2.8.1 *Sigh* I wish people would just learn to like mutt and be done with it. If you have a tar ball of a patched source I'd really appreciate it. TIA Aaron
pine and maildir
I have been distributing the c-client library patch from my website (http://www.flounder.net/qmail/) for quite a while now. My question is, has anyone updated this patch so that it works with the newest version of pine? Is anyone willing to? The current patch works on pine 3.96, which is a rather old version. As a secondary note, is UW planning on adding Maildir support to pine at any time? It would seem that this would be a worthwhile feature. --Adam
