Re: qmail problem

2001-01-29 Thread Dave Sill

"NDSoftware" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Why when a send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with my account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in Outlook or The Bat!, i receveid this message in
double ?

What's in antivirus' .qmail file? What Do The Logs Say? (tm)

-Dave



RE: qmail problem

2001-01-29 Thread NDSoftware

The logs say only for one message !

Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751
USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A

-Original Message-
From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 7:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: qmail problem


"NDSoftware" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Why when a send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with my account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in Outlook or The Bat!, i receveid this message
in
double ?

What's in antivirus' .qmail file? What Do The Logs Say? (tm)

-Dave




RE: qmail problem

2001-01-29 Thread Dave Sill

"NDSoftware" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The logs say only for one message !

OK, but I'd still like to see a sample. And you never answered by
other question:

What's in antivirus' .qmail file?

-Dave



Re: qmail problem

2001-01-29 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:25:25PM +0100, NDSoftware wrote:
 The logs say only for one message !

I don't think so. What do the logs say?

(we are not asking for your interpretation. We are asking for logfile
excerpts).

Greetz, Peter.



Re: qmail problem

2001-01-29 Thread Markus Stumpf

On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:25:25PM +0100, NDSoftware wrote:
 The logs say only for one message !

And the headers of the emails please.
Possibly the MUA does a Fcc and as the mail is to yourself you end up
with two copies, a local saved one and a sent and received one.

\Maex




RE: qmail problem

2001-01-29 Thread NDSoftware

Mail1:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 2389 invoked by uid 503); 29 Jan 2001 19:17:26 -
Received: from unknown (HELO billy) (193.253.221.190)
  by ns207.ovh.net with SMTP; 29 Jan 2001 19:17:26 -
From: "NDSoftware" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:13:14 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal

Mail2:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 2389 invoked by uid 503); 29 Jan 2001 19:17:26 -
Received: from unknown (HELO billy) (193.253.221.190)
  by ns207.ovh.net with SMTP; 29 Jan 2001 19:17:26 -
From: "NDSoftware" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:13:14 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal



Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751
USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A

-Original Message-
From: Markus Stumpf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 8:02 PM
To: NDSoftware
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: qmail problem


On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:25:25PM +0100, NDSoftware wrote:
 The logs say only for one message !

And the headers of the emails please.
Possibly the MUA does a Fcc and as the mail is to yourself you end up
with two copies, a local saved one and a sent and received one.

\Maex





Re: qmail problem ?

2001-01-20 Thread Henning Brauer

On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:41:01PM +0100, NDSoftware wrote:
 What is qmail concurrency ?
 It's normal ?

aie, yes. read the manual... 

-- 
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany



Re: qmail problem ?

2001-01-20 Thread Clemens Hermann

Am 20.01.2001 um 23:41:01 schrieb NDSoftware:

Hi Nicolas

 What is qmail concurrency ?

it is a non-standard control file introduced in LifeWithQmail. It is
used in the tcpserver call. It specifies the maximum numbers of the
qmail-smtpd processes that can run simultaniously. If not specified 
the default is 40.
Simply said it is the maximum number of smtp-connections that
can be made to your server.

Hopefully this helped

/ch



Re: qmail problem ?

2001-01-20 Thread Henning Brauer

On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 01:09:35AM +0100, Clemens Hermann wrote: 
  What is qmail concurrency ?
 it is a non-standard control file 

wrong. there are concurrencylocal and concurrencyremote, both standard
control files.

 It specifies the maximum numbers of the
 qmail-smtpd processes that can run simultaniously. 

wrong. concurrenylocal affects qmail-lspawn (and therefore qmail-local),
concurrencaremote affects qmail-rspawn (and therefore qmail-remote).

 If not specified 
 the default is 40.

wrong. default for local and remote is 20 each.

 Simply said it is the maximum number of smtp-connections that
 can be made to your server.

wrong wrong wrong. the concurrencies are for DELIVERIES, not for inbound
connections.

 Hopefully this helped

aehh...


-- 
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany



Re: qmail problem ?

2001-01-20 Thread Clemens Hermann

Am 21.01.2001 um 00:19:14 schrieb Henning Brauer:

Hi Henning,

   What is qmail concurrency ?
  it is a non-standard control file 
 
 wrong. there are concurrencylocal and concurrencyremote, both standard
 control files.

sorry, I mixed up concurrency and concurrencyincomming. Taken this, at
least the other answers were correct ;-)

I did not use this myself, I just tried to proved some little help to
Nicolas and - now he got it, thanks to you ;-)

good n8

/ch



Re: Qmail problem

2000-08-01 Thread Sylwester S. Biernacki

FCP Wong wrote:

 Hi guys, I had just set up qmail for testing and I keep receiving this
 email send to the root user
 : --- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Cron Daemon)
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Cron root@hamer/sbin/rmmod -as
 X-Cron-Env: SHELL=/bin/sh
 X-Cron-Env: HOME=/root
 X-Cron-Env: PATH=/usr/bin:/bin
 X-Cron-Env: LOGNAME=root rmmod: QM_MODULES: Function not
 implemented rmmod: Function not implemented
 rmmod: QM_MODULES: Function not
 implemented I checked the root
 crontab and nothing was being run there... anybody have any idea what
 is this? Currently mails I send to the server are not successfully
 delivered either but this is another problem I guess and I just
 haven't had the time to debug that. ThanksWong

yeah look at /etc/cron.* and /etc/crontab
you've got RedHat/Mandrake Linux right ?

greetZ
S.




Re: qmail problem

2000-05-24 Thread Petr Novotny

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 24 May 00, at 13:21, kapil sharma wrote:

 df -i shows the following output:
 
 FilesystemInodes   IUsed   IFree IUse% Mounted on
 /dev/sda1 128520   12460  116060   10% /
 /dev/sda8 256512   12727  2437855% /opt
 /dev/sda9 193152 103  1930490% /reg
 /dev/sda63035520  179700 28558206% /users
 /dev/sda10193152   47255  145897   24% /usr
 /dev/sda3 128520  128520   0  100% /var
 /dev/sda7 384768  85  3846830% /var/log
 
 All the inodes are finished.

So that is your problem.

 There is no news server running on this
 server. I think all the inodes are finished because of email queue.

Please find out first if it really is qmail-queue; I can't imagine that 
(unless there's a bug, or a DoS attack against your qmail) the 
queue eats up all 128k inodes and only 171MB of disk space. (I 
would think you have a zillion zero-size files in your /var.)


Generally, you have two options:
1. Find out who's eating the inodes. Fix that process. Delete the 
spurious (zero-sized) files.
2. Backup your /var. Reformat it with more inodes. Restore from 
backup. Run queue-fix (available at www.qmail.org).

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html

iQA/AwUBOSt8rVMwP8g7qbw/EQJwDQCgy8EWoUxQy3+EU8xUMVztzLRpCx0AoMXk
4HbbIInjLshIMuM1IbWAmUnq
=dqbj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.antek.cz
PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F
-- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk.
 [Tom Waits]



Re: qmail problem

2000-05-24 Thread kapil

Hi,
I have checked the disk usage and found that /var/qmail/queue has taken
158 MB of disk space. Now how to delete the email queue and restart
qmail. Please help


kapil




Re: qmail problem

2000-05-24 Thread Petr Novotny

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 24 May 00, at 14:08, kapil wrote:

 I have checked the disk usage and found that /var/qmail/queue has
 taken 158 MB of disk space.

But has it taken the inodes? _That_ is the question.

 Now how to delete the email queue and
 restart qmail.

If you're sure that deleting the queue helps, do the following:
1. Stop qmail
2. rm -rf /var/qmail/queue
3. cd /usr/src/qmail (or wherever your qmail sources are)
4. make setup check
5. Start qmail.

(Alternative: Delete all file in /var/qmail/queue _except_ the files in 
/var/qmail/queue/lock.)


But I certainly think that FIRST your should find out who ate all 
your inodes and why; I think that couldn't happen by chance - 
that's either a bug or a denial-of-service attack.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html

iQA/AwUBOSuIuVMwP8g7qbw/EQL51gCfeQuK6HUxdoKmlD2jiZ9fsAzyH7QAn0LY
+a1bh8Dup0Riapd+8b12Bj6e
=yUnh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.antek.cz
PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F
-- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk.
 [Tom Waits]



Re: qmail problem

2000-05-23 Thread Petr Novotny

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 23 May 00, at 17:39, kapil sharma wrote:

 Hi,
 I am having some strange problem. When ever I am sending mail from
 local
 
 to local
 user

How are you doing that?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html

iQA/AwUBOSpmHFMwP8g7qbw/EQJqpACgpUAYE03aTn0q9wqlCI9xUBVUI08AoJeV
W2U9zL+aAyHTVT5mxZUv5s5r
=CKPT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.antek.cz
PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F
-- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk.
 [Tom Waits]



Re: qmail problem

2000-05-20 Thread Brent R . Matzelle

What email client are you running?  Most clients (Netscape, Outlook, Kmail)
allow you to specify your email address.  


On Fri, 19 May 2000, kapil sharma wrote:
 Hi,
 I am having some strange problem. When ever I am sending mail from local
 to local
 user then it is adding the domain name for 2 time in from address:
 for example: If i will send  a mail from" [EMAIL PROTECTED]" to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
 then
 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" will get a mail with from address as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]@foo.com".
 Please
 help?
 
 kapil
-- 
http://www.matzelle.net



Re: qmail problem quitting

2000-02-24 Thread Paul Jarc

Miguel Sarmiento writes:
 If [...] qmail does not start or gets kill for some reason, then if
 I login su and start the script manually (i.e. scriptqmail start)
 qmail does start but if I logout puff! qmail exits.
...
 the faq mentions that if upon rebooting qmail exits to use the NOHUP to
 start it (although this is if you run supervise).

That note applies regardless of whether you use supervise, I think.
It certainly sounds like nohup may solve your problem.  Have you tried
it?  Use this in your startup script: nohup /var/qmail/rc 


paul



Re: Qmail problem

1999-07-31 Thread Steve Vertigan

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

When I create a mail with qmail-inject, I can't log on to 
qmail-pop3d to retrieve
it from the network, I get a 'no socket' error.

In qmail's documentation, the pop3 port is always specified as "pop3", however in 
Redhat port 110 is
actually referred to as "pop-3", you either want to add pop3 to your etc/services file 
or change the
tcpserver invocation.

Regards,
--Steve



RE: qmail problem

1999-06-19 Thread Anonymous




The 
user you want to be to set up the qmail files is alias

Assuming you have created an alias user (and all the other required qmail 
users)

su 
alias
cd alias
touch .qmail-postmaster
touch .qmail-mailer-daemon
touch .qmail-root

If you 
decide to use Maildirs eventually each of those .qmail files must contain the 
line ./Maildir/ and you must have created the Maildir directory using the 
maildirmake executable that is in /var/qmail/bin

Ironically, I have installed using the RPM and I cannot perform the 
command su alias because the alias user has no shell specified, I don't know why 
it was set that way.

Alex 
Miller

-Original Message-From: Radu Malica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Saturday, June 19, 1999 3:22 PMTo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: qmail problem
I' ve installed RedHat 6 and Qmail. I followed strictly 
the instructions there and i have some problems with ~alias/ directory 
permissions and .qmail files in there. Some files in bin/ were installed 
with root owner. Is this okay? I can't manage to do a thing with the ~alias 
directory. i wanted that user news' mail to be forwarded to joker on local 
machine, i created ~alias/.qmail-news and wrote in that file 'joker'. 
Nothing happens. I get some errors like : Could not chdir Maildir. cannot 
write to /var/qmail/alias permission denied

Please help me


Re: qmail problem

1999-06-19 Thread Russ Allbery

Alex Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Assuming you have created an alias user (and all the other required
 qmail users)

 su alias
 cd alias
 touch .qmail-postmaster
 touch .qmail-mailer-daemon
 touch .qmail-root

It works just fine to have root own the files in ~alias.

 Ironically, I have installed using the RPM and I cannot perform the
 command su alias because the alias user has no shell specified, I don't
 know why it was set that way.

Because alias is a special user and probably shouldn't own any files or
have a valid shell.  There's no reason for it to.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/