Re: doubts about re-compile

2001-01-30 Thread J.J.Gallardo

Jose AP Celestino escribió:

> Yeah, right Alex.
>
> make
> = stop qmail =
> cp qmail-pop3d /var/qmail/bin
> chown root:qmail /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d
> = start qmail =

Done. All succesfully. Thanks to Jose and Alex Kramarov (also Peter van Dijk)




Re: doubts about re-compile

2001-01-29 Thread J.J.Gallardo

Jose AP Celestino escribió:

> Is qmail-pop3d.c the only file affected by the patch?

I don't know. Is there a way to know it?

> If so why don't you cd the qmail source tree, apply the patch and then:
> make
> and copy the qmail-pop3d to /var/qmail/bin ?

I hope. Thanks




Re: doubts about re-compile

2001-01-29 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:33:28PM +0100, J.J.Gallardo wrote:
> This is a doubt about the best way to compile again qmail:
> 
> I have my system running qmail perfectly, but some days ago i discovered
> that qmail has not the patch that "Scott Moorhouse" re-wrote to solve
> the problem with the "Netscape's download indicator doesn't progress".
> The file involved is "qmail-pop3d.c". I have tried to compile the file
> (alone) with the patch apliayed, but may be the file has some
> dependencies with another files ( I cannot run  "cc or gcc" over the
> file) and so, we have to re-compile all the qmail distribution.
> 
> Can I compile "qmail" in another machine and later move and/or copy only
> /var/qmail/bin/*?
> That's my best option cause only stop the server a minute at the time of
> day i wish, but i would like to know others opinions about this.

You can just
- apply the patch
- 'make'
- copy qmail-pop3d to /var/qmail/bin (you might need to shutdown pop3
  for a second to do so)

qmail-pop3d is the only program affected by this patch.

Greetz, Peter.



Re: Re: doubts about re-compile

2001-01-29 Thread Jose AP Celestino

Yeah, right Alex.

make
= stop qmail =
cp qmail-pop3d /var/qmail/bin
chown root:qmail /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d
= start qmail =

FIN.

On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 06:54:58PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote:
> from my experience, the easiest way to effectively kill you server (for some time, 
>until you solve the problem) is to do just what is proposed by Jose below, and to 
>forget to set the right permissions and ownership for the copied file.
> 

-- 
Jose AP Celestino  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  || SAPO / PT Multimedia
Administração de Sistemas / Operações || http://www.sapo.pt
--
A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems.
-- P. Erdos



Re: Re: doubts about re-compile

2001-01-29 Thread Alex Kramarov








  
  


  
from my experience, the easiest way to effectively kill you 
server (for some time, until you solve it) is to do just what is 
proposed by Jose below, and to forget to set the right permissions 
and ownership for the copied file.
 
---Original 
Message---
 

From: Jose AP Celestino 

Date: Monday, January 
29, 2001 06:45:34 PM
To: J.J.Gallardo 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: doubts 
    about re-compile
 Is qmail-pop3d.c the only file affected by the 
patch?If so why don't you cd the qmail source tree, apply 
the patch and then:makeand copy the qmail-pop3d to 
/var/qmail/bin ?Best regards.On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 
04:33:28PM +0100, J.J.Gallardo wrote:> This is a doubt about 
the best way to compile again qmail:> > I have my 
system running qmail perfectly, but some days ago i 
discovered> that qmail has not the patch that "Scott 
Moorhouse" re-wrote to solve> the problem with the 
"Netscape's download indicator doesn't progress".> The file 
involved is "qmail-pop3d.c". I have tried to compile the 
file> (alone) with the patch apliayed, but may be the file 
has some> dependencies with another files ( I cannot run "cc 
or gcc" over the> file) and so, we have to re-compile all the 
qmail distribution.> -- Jose AP Celestino 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || SAPO / PT MultimediaAdministração de 
Sistemas / Operações || 
http://www.sapo.pt--Only 
wimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their important stuff 
on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)-- Linus 
Torvalds, about his failing hard drive on 
linux.cs.helsinki.fi

  

  
  








	
	
	
	
	
	
	





__IncrediMail - Email has finally 
evolved - Click 
Here



Re: doubts about re-compile

2001-01-29 Thread Jose AP Celestino

Is qmail-pop3d.c the only file affected by the patch?

If so why don't you cd the qmail source tree, apply the patch and then:

make

and copy the qmail-pop3d to /var/qmail/bin ?

Best regards.

On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:33:28PM +0100, J.J.Gallardo wrote:
> This is a doubt about the best way to compile again qmail:
> 
> I have my system running qmail perfectly, but some days ago i discovered
> that qmail has not the patch that "Scott Moorhouse" re-wrote to solve
> the problem with the "Netscape's download indicator doesn't progress".
> The file involved is "qmail-pop3d.c". I have tried to compile the file
> (alone) with the patch apliayed, but may be the file has some
> dependencies with another files ( I cannot run  "cc or gcc" over the
> file) and so, we have to re-compile all the qmail distribution.
> 

-- 
Jose AP Celestino  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  || SAPO / PT Multimedia
Administração de Sistemas / Operações || http://www.sapo.pt
--
Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their important stuff 
on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)
-- Linus Torvalds, about his failing hard drive on linux.cs.helsinki.fi