Frank Tegtmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> If the TMDA-bounces would be marked somehow (inserted header or
> something like that) they could be sorted out from the double
> bounces. For that tmda-filter would have to inject a self made
> bounce message and use a result code of 99 instead of 100.  It's a
> little more complicated but would heavily increase my acceptance of
> TMDA (speaking as postmaster, of course).

[copying the qmail list on this one to solicit a wider audience]

I'm willing to entertain this because I also want the ability to add a
"Reply-To" header to bounce messages containing the valid tagged
address so that legitimate senders can reply more easily to bounces.
While I'm there I could add a second header distinguishing the bounce
as TMDA generated.

But the question is how to best implement this.  Is there an "easy"
way to add custom headers to qmail bounce messages?  I'd like to avoid
duplicating qmail-send's bounce generation code.  This could get
complicated having to take into account qmail-control settings like
`bouncefrom', `bouncehost' and stuff.

Any suggestions?

--
(TMDA - http://tmda.sourceforge.net/)
(A qmail-based SPAM reduction system)

Reply via email to