erorr when patch --verbose -p1 /tmp/big-concurrency.patch

2001-03-29 Thread Sid Wilroy

--
Patching file `qmail-send.c' using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 262.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 908.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1547.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1555.
1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to qmail-send.c.rej
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff -u qmail-1.03.orig/spawn.c qmail-1.03/spawn.c
|--- qmail-1.03.orig/spawn.c Mon Jun 15 03:53:16 1998
|+++ qmail-1.03/spawn.c  Tue Jul 27 12:25:14 1999
--
Patching file `spawn.c' using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 63.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 73.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 156.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 205.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 241.
1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to spawn.c.rej
Hmm...  Ignoring the trailing garbage.
done


Johan Almqvist wrote:

 * Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010329 19:43]:
  Thus spake Johan Almqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
   I wonder if anyone has written a real "bouncesaying" (qmails bouncesaying
   just exits with an exit code that makes qmail-local do the actual
   bouncing.
  And what is your problem with that?

 I can't manually bounce a message from, say, mutt.

 -Johan
 --
 Johan Almqvist
 http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

   
Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature




Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-11 Thread Federico Edelman Anaya

Martin:
Ok! .. thanks!

U.. It's posible when I apply this change the performance of the machine turn 
slowly?


Martin Volesky wrote:

 On 09/12/00 at 3:21 PM Federico Edelman Anaya wrote:

 A few days ago .. I post on the list many question about
 big-concurrency.patch ...
 
 I was reading other list about Qmail and I get this solution about the
 problem with the FD ..
 
 The solution was:
 
 echo "65536"  /proc/sys/fs/inode-max
 echo "16384"  /proc/sys/fs/file-max
 
 So.. you need to do this every system reboot, I don't know how to make
 this persistent.. anybody have idea or know how to make this persistent?

 Under Liux 2.2.x, the way to make this persistent is to use the sysctl facility.

 add:

 fs.file-max = 16384
 fs.inode-max = 65536

 to the sysctl.conf file in /etc, and it will be loaded up evey time you boot the 
machine.

 Martin Volesky - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CTO - Deijlabs Corporation
 1221 Mackay, Suite 200
 Montreal, Quebec, Canada
 H3G 2H5
 Tel.: 514.399.9930 Fax.: 514.399.1117




Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-11 Thread Martin Volesky

On 11/12/00 at 12:30 PM Federico Edelman Anaya wrote:

Martin:
Ok! .. thanks!

U.. It's posible when I apply this change the performance of the machine turn 
slowly?


Federico,

There is no reason why your system should run any slower because of the 
sysctl.conf
modifications.


Martin Volesky wrote:
 Under Liux 2.2.x, the way to make this persistent is to use the sysctl facility.

 add:

 fs.file-max = 16384
 fs.inode-max = 65536

 to the sysctl.conf file in /etc, and it will be loaded up evey time you boot the 
machine.


Martin Volesky - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CTO - Deijlabs Corporation
1221 Mackay, Suite 200
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
H3G 2H5
Tel.: 514.399.9930 Fax.: 514.399.1117




Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-11 Thread Charles Cazabon

Martin Volesky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 11/12/00 at 12:30 PM Federico Edelman Anaya wrote:
 
 U.. It's posible when I apply this change the performance of the machine
 turn slowly?
 
 There is no reason why your system should run any slower because of the
 sysctl.conf modifications.

At least as compared to having made the changes manually after boot.
However, his system could exhibit poorer interactive response compared to
before modifying the max-files and max-inodes due to the increased load
from qmail.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-11 Thread Martin Volesky


On 11/12/00 at 2:25 PM Charles Cazabon wrote:


At least as compared to having made the changes manually after boot.
However, his system could exhibit poorer interactive response compared to
before modifying the max-files and max-inodes due to the increased load
from qmail.

Charles

Yes Charles, I agree with all your points.

Martin Volesky - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CTO - Deijlabs Corporation
1221 Mackay, Suite 200
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
H3G 2H5
Tel.: 514.399.9930 Fax.: 514.399.1117




Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-10 Thread Martin Volesky


On 09/12/00 at 3:21 PM Federico Edelman Anaya wrote:

A few days ago .. I post on the list many question about
big-concurrency.patch ...

I was reading other list about Qmail and I get this solution about the
problem with the FD ..

The solution was:

echo "65536"  /proc/sys/fs/inode-max
echo "16384"  /proc/sys/fs/file-max

So.. you need to do this every system reboot, I don't know how to make
this persistent.. anybody have idea or know how to make this persistent?

Under Liux 2.2.x, the way to make this persistent is to use the sysctl facility.

add:

fs.file-max = 16384
fs.inode-max = 65536

to the sysctl.conf file in /etc, and it will be loaded up evey time you boot the 
machine.


Martin Volesky - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CTO - Deijlabs Corporation
1221 Mackay, Suite 200
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
H3G 2H5
Tel.: 514.399.9930 Fax.: 514.399.1117




big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-09 Thread Federico Edelman Anaya

A few days ago .. I post on the list many question about
big-concurrency.patch ...

I was reading other list about Qmail and I get this solution about the
problem with the FD ..

This is the log whit error:


Report of Qmailanalog:
- Errors of FD?:
 24  6.36  /bin/sh: /usr/bin/ezmlm-return: Too many open files in
system/
 16 28.13  /bin/sh: /usr/bin/ezmlm-weed: Too many open files in
system/
 92 27.81  /bin/sh: error in loading shared libraries: libc.so.6:
cannot open shared object file: Error 23/
 59 41.43  /bin/sh: error in loading shared libraries: libdl.so.2:
cannot open shared object file: Error 23/
 48 63.30  /bin/sh: error in loading shared libraries:
libncurses.so.5: cannot open shared object file: Error 23/
 58 18.57  /usr/bin/ezmlm-return: error in loading shared libraries:
libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: Error 23/
106 37.99  /usr/bin/ezmlm-return: error in loading shared libraries:
libcrypt.so.1: cannot open shared object file: Error 23/
  4  1.46  /usr/bin/ezmlm-return: error in loading shared libraries:
libm.so.6: cannot open shared object file: Error 23/

- Other error:

851   3182.23  Connected to 200.41.50.10 but connection died. (#4.4.2)/
  1 60.03  Connected to 200.41.50.7 but connection died. (#4.4.2)/
316  12453.57  Connected to 200.41.50.9 but connection died. (#4.4.2)/
  1  0.20  Sorry, I couldn't find any host by that name. (#4.1.2)/
  30.74  bin/qmail-local: error in loading shared libraries:
libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: Error 23/


The solution was:

echo "65536"  /proc/sys/fs/inode-max
echo "16384"  /proc/sys/fs/file-max

So.. you need to do this every system reboot, I don't know how to make
this persistent.. anybody have idea or know how to make this persistent?

Thanks :)




Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-09 Thread Charles Cazabon

Federico Edelman Anaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 The solution was:
 
 echo "65536"  /proc/sys/fs/inode-max
 echo "16384"  /proc/sys/fs/file-max
 
 So.. you need to do this every system reboot, I don't know how to make
 this persistent.. anybody have idea or know how to make this persistent?

This is really more of a Unix/Linux question than anything else.  However,
try adding those two lines to the end of /etc/rc.d/rc.local or your
system's equivalent.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: big-concurrency.patch

2000-12-09 Thread Sean Reifschneider

On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 12:31:16PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
 echo "65536"  /proc/sys/fs/inode-max
 echo "16384"  /proc/sys/fs/file-max

This is really more of a Unix/Linux question than anything else.  However,
try adding those two lines to the end of /etc/rc.d/rc.local or your
system's equivalent.

Also, realize that by default user's are limited to 1024 open files unless
you use ulimit -n to increase it.

Sean
-- 
 It's bad precident for a president to win through illegal influence of
 the ballots and election process.
Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python



Installing big-concurrency.patch

2000-06-26 Thread brianb-qmail


Hi,
What's the correct procedure for installing the big-concurrency patch on a
live system?
Is it just a patch, make, make setup check, restart qmail? Or will it
affect/break anything else?

Thanks,
Brian
--
Brian Baquiran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.baquiran.com/ AIM: bbaquiran 
Work: (632)718   Home: (632)9227123



Re: Installing big-concurrency.patch

2000-06-26 Thread Mark Mentovai

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the correct procedure for installing the big-concurrency patch on a
live system?
Is it just a patch, make, make setup check, restart qmail? Or will it
affect/break anything else?

This advice applies ONLY to the big-concurrency patch (specifically, the one
from www.qmail.org).  Other big-* patches are not quite as forgiving.

I would stop qmail before doing make setup (or moving qmail-send and
qmail-?spawn into place).  qmail-send runs as a daemon that starts
qmail-?spawn, if the running version of qmail-send doesn't speak the same
language as the invokable versions of qmail-?spawn, you could run into some
trouble.  If you're doing a live heavy-duty mission-critical production
server, test out the patch (and your planned patch procedure) on another
server first.

Mark

-- 
Do not reply directly to this e-mail address
-- 
Mark Mentovai
UNIX Engineer
Gillette Global Network




Re: Installing big-concurrency.patch

2000-06-26 Thread Sylwester S. Biernacki

 2000-06-27, at 02:00:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Hi,
 What's the correct procedure for installing the big-concurrency patch on a
 live system?
 Is it just a patch, make, make setup check, restart qmail? Or will it
 affect/break anything else?
I donna know what's in your case but I would first back up /var/qmail
structure (without queue of course) and then trying to put any
patches... i.e. at night :

-- 
cheers,
Sylwester S. Biernacki [EMAIL PROTECTED]