qmail and mailing list of Real Audio attachments

1999-01-21 Thread cfm 


Has anyone had experience with qmail and the sending of large attachments
like Real Audio to mailing lists 500 or so recipients?  Other than the 
huge bandwidth suck am I likely to run into anything other than the 
usual MUA confusion?

Some mailing list software gets really confused.  How about ezmlm?

Thanks,

cfm

-- 

Christopher F. Miller, Publisher[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MaineStreet Communications, Inc208 Portland Road, Gray, ME  04039
1.207.657.5078  (MTRF 3-5pm)http://www.maine.com/

Re: qmail and mailing list of Real Audio attachments

1999-01-21 Thread Mark Delany 

I can't think of any reason why either ezmlm or qmail would get confused by 
large outbound mails. Additionally, I've never seen any of them get confused 
by large mails either.


Regards.

At 06:25 PM 1/21/99 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Has anyone had experience with qmail and the sending of large attachments
like Real Audio to mailing lists 500 or so recipients?  Other than the 
huge bandwidth suck am I likely to run into anything other than the 
usual MUA confusion?

Some mailing list software gets really confused.  How about ezmlm?

Thanks,

cfm

-- 

Christopher F. Miller, Publisher[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MaineStreet Communications, Inc208 Portland Road, Gray, ME  04039
1.207.657.5078  (MTRF 3-5pm)http://www.maine.com/

Re: qmail and mailing list of Real Audio attachments

1999-01-21 Thread Sam 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 Has anyone had experience with qmail and the sending of large attachments
 like Real Audio to mailing lists 500 or so recipients?  Other than the 
 huge bandwidth suck am I likely to run into anything other than the 
 usual MUA confusion?
 
 Some mailing list software gets really confused.  How about ezmlm?

Generally, as long as you feed all the addresses to a single qmail-inject,
a bandwidth suck is all you should expect.