Re: is dovecot fine for qmail-ldap

2007-03-18 Thread Jimmy Brake

Hi,

I am no expert on qmail-ldap or dovecot, but if I understand the systems 
correctly qmail-ldap's native clustering functionality is more 
functional than using docecot which is a designed to create clustering 
functionality where none existed before. We presently have our cluster 
configured to have a single qmail-ldap server on the edge that acts as 
our anti-spam filter(qscand+spamassassin+clamav) and proxy to rest of 
our cluster. The imap connections, pop connections and smtp(qsmtp) all 
work as expected, we only have a few hundred email boxes but most are in 
the 3000+ messages and 2gigs+ mailbox size.


Jimmy Brake



Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas wrote:

Hello, i have seen some good reviews about dovecot and trying to  
migrate some sites that currently use courier-imap, so far the  
problem that I have found is with quotas, on dovecot are in kbytes  
and qmail-ldap use them in bytes besides that seems that everything  
to work well, but i would like to know if some one has experience  
with dovecot and qmail-ldap and if is a good option for a site with  
more than 1000 users using an average mailbox size of 50Mb with no  
more than 5 folders.


regards.





is dovecot fine for qmail-ldap

2007-03-17 Thread Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas
Hello, i have seen some good reviews about dovecot and trying to  
migrate some sites that currently use courier-imap, so far the  
problem that I have found is with quotas, on dovecot are in kbytes  
and qmail-ldap use them in bytes besides that seems that everything  
to work well, but i would like to know if some one has experience  
with dovecot and qmail-ldap and if is a good option for a site with  
more than 1000 users using an average mailbox size of 50Mb with no  
more than 5 folders.


regards.


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part