[qmailtoaster] Please any one can help me to get Installation Guides for qmail on centos 5

[Ahmed Shareef]

Please any one can help me to get Installation Guides for qmail on centos 5



Thanks

Shareef

RE: [qmailtoaster] qmailctl stat

[Phil Leinhauser]

It would appear that your install missed all of the modules during install
except Squirrelmail.  Make sure you run the Deps script.  This will make
sure you have all of the dependencies.   I would bet that's what you missed.
Then rerun the install.  Watch as the modules each install.  Toward the end
of each module you'll see a line with "RETURN CODE=" and a number.  Anything
OTHER than 0 means you had errors in the installation of that module.  Look
above the return for a message saying something about a missing file or
dependency.  

 

  _  

From: Richard Lopez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 5:54 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailctl stat

 

Only :

 


squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.6

 

2007/6/25, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 

Richard Lopez wrote: 



I have made all the steps to install in Centos5 but in the last steps do not
execute the command: 

 

qmailctl stat 

 

 

and it appears: 

 

 

- bash: qmailctl: command not found 

 

In which it leaves from the installation I could have failed  ? 

What does "rpm -qa | grep toaster" show?
 




 

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailctl stat

[Jake Vickers]

Richard Lopez wrote:

Only :
 


squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.6


You're missing everything. Go back through and try the installation again.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailctl stat

[Richard Lopez]

Only :


squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.6


2007/6/25, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


Richard Lopez wrote:

 I have made all the steps to install in Centos5 but in the last steps do
> not execute the command:
>
> qmailctl stat
>
>
> and it appears:
>
>
> - bash: qmailctl: command not found
>
> In which it leaves from the installation I could have failed  ?
>
What does "rpm -qa | grep toaster" show?

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailctl stat

[Jake Vickers]

Richard Lopez wrote:


I have made all the steps to install in Centos5 but in the last
steps do not execute the command:
 
qmailctl stat
 
 
and it appears:
 
 
- bash: qmailctl: command not found
 
In which it leaves from the installation I could have failed  ?



What does "rpm -qa | grep toaster" show?


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[qmailtoaster] No encuentra qmailctl

[Richard Lopez]

He hecho todos los pasos para instalar en Centos5 pero en los ultimos pasos
no ejecuta el comando :

qmailctl stat

y aparece:

-bash: qmailctl: command not found

En que parte de la instalacion pude haber fallado o cual debo revizar?

[qmailtoaster] qmailctl stat

[Richard Lopez]

I have made all the steps to install in Centos5 but in the last steps do
not execute the command:

qmailctl stat


and it appears:


- bash: qmailctl: command not found

In which it leaves from the installation I could have failed  ?

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp RDJ warning

[slamp slamp]

since openprotect has been mentioned here, i just have a quick
question. does spamassassin  need to be restarted after an sa-update?
how do we check automatically if spamassassin -D --lint did not
produce any errors? I do not want to restart spamassassin
automatiically if there were any errors.

On 6/25/07, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

Or you could stop using RDJ and subscribe OpenProtect

http://saupdates.openprotect.com/

They have a base stand of SARE recomended rules so it's pretty much the ones
I was using in RDJ, if you need anymore just dld them and place them in
/etc/mail/spamassasin/

A M

2007/6/25, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >:
> Steve Ingraham wrote:
> >> -
> > This is the first week since the attack on Rules Du Jour that I did not
> > get the error messages mentioned above.  I have a cron job set up to
> > pull new jobs from RDJ for each Sunday night.  I usually get an email
> > message stating that the rules were updated.  I did not get that message
> > either.  So I have nothing telling me that the rules were updated and
> > nothing telling me there were any errors.  Is there any information on
> > what may be going on with RDJ?  I cannot determine if I have a problem
> > or not.  Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
> >
> You can run it from the command line and watch for errors. Chances are
> good that if you didn't get anything, then nothing is wrong.
> The rules from there are updated very infrequently, with updates coming
> every 6 months or so.
>
>
>



--
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

[Dan McAllister]

I am guessing that you have 172.25.13 programmed with a 24-bit netmask?
(check your /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth* files -- or the
appropriate files for your distribution). A 24-bit netmask looks like:
255.255.255.0.

If you're NOT specifying a netmask, then you're getting a 16-bit
netmask (because of the 172 in your address). If that is the case, try
specifying your tcp.smtp rule as:
172.25.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

Hope this helps...

Dan




Dan McAllister, President

 

IT4SOHO, LLC

2171 Wrens Way

Clearwater, FL 33761

 

877-IT4SOHO: Toll Free

727-647-7646 In Pinellas

813-464-2093 In Hillsborough

727-507-9435 Fax Only





Jack D. Martin Jr. wrote:

  This is what I put in:

172.25.13.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

I looked at the Server Log and I got this:

@400046800bef11b26b1c tcpserver: pid 32374 from 65.77.22.250
@400046800bef11b8200c tcpserver: ok 32374
proliant1.magicwisp.com:65.77.22.242:25 :65.77.22.250::54847
@400046800bef2463ecf4 CHKUSER accepted sender: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
unknown:65.77.22.250> rcpt <> : sender accepted
@400046800bef2d8a8be4 CHKUSER rejected relaying: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
unknown:65.77.22.250> rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
client not allowed to relay
@400046800bf02dffbfcc tcpserver: end 32374 status 0


I changed the it to 65.77.22.250:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""  Still would not work.
What should the  tcp.smtp say?  

-Original Message-
From: Natalio Gatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 12:52 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

On 6/25/07, Jack D. Martin Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  
  



I used the method described by Natalio below  - and it works, as long 
as I am sending emails to my own domain.  If the PC in question sends 
to something off of my domain I get this in the logs:


@4000467fe78c00c4a1e4 new msg 2283211
@4000467fe78c00c4f7d4 info msg 2283211: bytes 2386 from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 11453 uid 48 @4000467fe78c0248fbdc 
starting delivery 174: msg 2283211 to remote 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@4000467fe78c024926d4 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60 
@4000467fe79204c9f1cc delivery 174: failure:
User_and_password_not_set,_continuing_without_authentication./65.77.22
.242_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_553_sorry,_that_domain
_isn't_in_my_list_of_allowed_rcpthosts_(#5.5.3_-_chkuser)/Giving_up_on
_65.77.22.242./

@4000467fe79205af44d4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
@4000467fe79206d43cd4 bounce msg 2283211 qp 11457 
@4000467fe79206d45ffc end msg 2283211

Any ideas?


  
  It seems that your old server isn't relaying your new server.
Did you config tcp.smtp with RELAYCLIENT="" in your old server?

Natalio

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  

RE: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

[Jack D. Martin Jr.]

The new server is 172.25.13.2 (natted behind 65.77.22.250).  I setup
username and password - and it worked!! Natalio you are awesome!

-Original Message-
From: Natalio Gatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 1:54 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

And 65.77.22.250 is the IP of your new server?

An other test you can make is to enable authentication in you smtproutes.
Check the wiki again, and add user&pass to your forward route in your new
server.

Natalio.

On 6/25/07, Jack D. Martin Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is what I put in:
>
> 172.25.13.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>
> I looked at the Server Log and I got this:
>
> @400046800bef11b26b1c tcpserver: pid 32374 from 65.77.22.250 
> @400046800bef11b8200c tcpserver: ok 32374
> proliant1.magicwisp.com:65.77.22.242:25 :65.77.22.250::54847
> @400046800bef2463ecf4 CHKUSER accepted sender: from 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
>  rcpt <> : sender accepted
> @400046800bef2d8a8be4 CHKUSER rejected relaying: from 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
>  rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:
> client not allowed to relay
> @400046800bf02dffbfcc tcpserver: end 32374 status 0
>
>
> I changed the it to 65.77.22.250:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""  Still would not
work.
> What should the  tcp.smtp say?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Natalio Gatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 12:52 PM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???
>
> On 6/25/07, Jack D. Martin Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I used the method described by Natalio below  - and it works, as 
> > long as I am sending emails to my own domain.  If the PC in question 
> > sends to something off of my domain I get this in the logs:
> >
> >
> > @4000467fe78c00c4a1e4 new msg 2283211
> > @4000467fe78c00c4f7d4 info msg 2283211: bytes 2386 from 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 11453 uid 48 @4000467fe78c0248fbdc 
> > starting delivery 174: msg 2283211 to remote 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > @4000467fe78c024926d4 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60 
> > @4000467fe79204c9f1cc delivery 174: failure:
> > User_and_password_not_set,_continuing_without_authentication./65.77.
> > 22 
> > .242_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_553_sorry,_that_doma
> > in 
> > _isn't_in_my_list_of_allowed_rcpthosts_(#5.5.3_-_chkuser)/Giving_up_
> > on
> > _65.77.22.242./
> >
> > @4000467fe79205af44d4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
> > @4000467fe79206d43cd4 bounce msg 2283211 qp 11457 
> > @4000467fe79206d45ffc end msg 2283211
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> It seems that your old server isn't relaying your new server.
> Did you config tcp.smtp with RELAYCLIENT="" in your old server?
>
> Natalio
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

[Natalio Gatti]

And 65.77.22.250 is the IP of your new server?

An other test you can make is to enable authentication in you
smtproutes. Check the wiki again, and add user&pass to your forward
route in your new server.

Natalio.

On 6/25/07, Jack D. Martin Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

This is what I put in:

172.25.13.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

I looked at the Server Log and I got this:

@400046800bef11b26b1c tcpserver: pid 32374 from 65.77.22.250
@400046800bef11b8200c tcpserver: ok 32374
proliant1.magicwisp.com:65.77.22.242:25 :65.77.22.250::54847
@400046800bef2463ecf4 CHKUSER accepted sender: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
 rcpt <> : sender accepted
@400046800bef2d8a8be4 CHKUSER rejected relaying: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
 rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
client not allowed to relay
@400046800bf02dffbfcc tcpserver: end 32374 status 0


I changed the it to 65.77.22.250:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""  Still would not work.
What should the  tcp.smtp say?

-Original Message-
From: Natalio Gatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 12:52 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

On 6/25/07, Jack D. Martin Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I used the method described by Natalio below  - and it works, as long
> as I am sending emails to my own domain.  If the PC in question sends
> to something off of my domain I get this in the logs:
>
>
> @4000467fe78c00c4a1e4 new msg 2283211
> @4000467fe78c00c4f7d4 info msg 2283211: bytes 2386 from
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 11453 uid 48 @4000467fe78c0248fbdc
> starting delivery 174: msg 2283211 to remote
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> @4000467fe78c024926d4 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60
> @4000467fe79204c9f1cc delivery 174: failure:
> User_and_password_not_set,_continuing_without_authentication./65.77.22
> .242_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_553_sorry,_that_domain
> _isn't_in_my_list_of_allowed_rcpthosts_(#5.5.3_-_chkuser)/Giving_up_on
> _65.77.22.242./
>
> @4000467fe79205af44d4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
> @4000467fe79206d43cd4 bounce msg 2283211 qp 11457
> @4000467fe79206d45ffc end msg 2283211
>
> Any ideas?
>
It seems that your old server isn't relaying your new server.
Did you config tcp.smtp with RELAYCLIENT="" in your old server?

Natalio

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

[Jack D. Martin Jr.]

No I did - qmailctl cdb

I understand it does the same thing - am I correct? 

-Original Message-
From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 1:52 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

Did you do 'service qmail cdb'

Erik

On 6/25/07, Jack D. Martin Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is what I put in:
>
> 172.25.13.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>
> I looked at the Server Log and I got this:
>
> @400046800bef11b26b1c tcpserver: pid 32374 from 65.77.22.250 
> @400046800bef11b8200c tcpserver: ok 32374
> proliant1.magicwisp.com:65.77.22.242:25 :65.77.22.250::54847
> @400046800bef2463ecf4 CHKUSER accepted sender: from 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
>  rcpt <> : sender accepted
> @400046800bef2d8a8be4 CHKUSER rejected relaying: from 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
>  rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:
> client not allowed to relay
> @400046800bf02dffbfcc tcpserver: end 32374 status 0
>
>
> I changed the it to 65.77.22.250:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""  Still would not
work.
> What should the  tcp.smtp say?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Natalio Gatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 12:52 PM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???
>
> On 6/25/07, Jack D. Martin Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I used the method described by Natalio below  - and it works, as 
> > long as I am sending emails to my own domain.  If the PC in question 
> > sends to something off of my domain I get this in the logs:
> >
> >
> > @4000467fe78c00c4a1e4 new msg 2283211
> > @4000467fe78c00c4f7d4 info msg 2283211: bytes 2386 from 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 11453 uid 48 @4000467fe78c0248fbdc 
> > starting delivery 174: msg 2283211 to remote 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > @4000467fe78c024926d4 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60 
> > @4000467fe79204c9f1cc delivery 174: failure:
> > User_and_password_not_set,_continuing_without_authentication./65.77.
> > 22 
> > .242_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_553_sorry,_that_doma
> > in 
> > _isn't_in_my_list_of_allowed_rcpthosts_(#5.5.3_-_chkuser)/Giving_up_
> > on
> > _65.77.22.242./
> >
> > @4000467fe79205af44d4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
> > @4000467fe79206d43cd4 bounce msg 2283211 qp 11457 
> > @4000467fe79206d45ffc end msg 2283211
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> It seems that your old server isn't relaying your new server.
> Did you config tcp.smtp with RELAYCLIENT="" in your old server?
>
> Natalio
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

[Erik A. Espinoza]

Did you do 'service qmail cdb'

Erik

On 6/25/07, Jack D. Martin Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

This is what I put in:

172.25.13.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

I looked at the Server Log and I got this:

@400046800bef11b26b1c tcpserver: pid 32374 from 65.77.22.250
@400046800bef11b8200c tcpserver: ok 32374
proliant1.magicwisp.com:65.77.22.242:25 :65.77.22.250::54847
@400046800bef2463ecf4 CHKUSER accepted sender: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
 rcpt <> : sender accepted
@400046800bef2d8a8be4 CHKUSER rejected relaying: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
 rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
client not allowed to relay
@400046800bf02dffbfcc tcpserver: end 32374 status 0


I changed the it to 65.77.22.250:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""  Still would not work.
What should the  tcp.smtp say?

-Original Message-
From: Natalio Gatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 12:52 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

On 6/25/07, Jack D. Martin Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I used the method described by Natalio below  - and it works, as long
> as I am sending emails to my own domain.  If the PC in question sends
> to something off of my domain I get this in the logs:
>
>
> @4000467fe78c00c4a1e4 new msg 2283211
> @4000467fe78c00c4f7d4 info msg 2283211: bytes 2386 from
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 11453 uid 48 @4000467fe78c0248fbdc
> starting delivery 174: msg 2283211 to remote
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> @4000467fe78c024926d4 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60
> @4000467fe79204c9f1cc delivery 174: failure:
> User_and_password_not_set,_continuing_without_authentication./65.77.22
> .242_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_553_sorry,_that_domain
> _isn't_in_my_list_of_allowed_rcpthosts_(#5.5.3_-_chkuser)/Giving_up_on
> _65.77.22.242./
>
> @4000467fe79205af44d4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
> @4000467fe79206d43cd4 bounce msg 2283211 qp 11457
> @4000467fe79206d45ffc end msg 2283211
>
> Any ideas?
>
It seems that your old server isn't relaying your new server.
Did you config tcp.smtp with RELAYCLIENT="" in your old server?

Natalio

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

[Jack D. Martin Jr.]

This is what I put in:

172.25.13.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

I looked at the Server Log and I got this:

@400046800bef11b26b1c tcpserver: pid 32374 from 65.77.22.250
@400046800bef11b8200c tcpserver: ok 32374
proliant1.magicwisp.com:65.77.22.242:25 :65.77.22.250::54847
@400046800bef2463ecf4 CHKUSER accepted sender: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
 rcpt <> : sender accepted
@400046800bef2d8a8be4 CHKUSER rejected relaying: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
 rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
client not allowed to relay
@400046800bf02dffbfcc tcpserver: end 32374 status 0


I changed the it to 65.77.22.250:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""  Still would not work.
What should the  tcp.smtp say?  

-Original Message-
From: Natalio Gatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 12:52 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

On 6/25/07, Jack D. Martin Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I used the method described by Natalio below  - and it works, as long 
> as I am sending emails to my own domain.  If the PC in question sends 
> to something off of my domain I get this in the logs:
>
>
> @4000467fe78c00c4a1e4 new msg 2283211
> @4000467fe78c00c4f7d4 info msg 2283211: bytes 2386 from 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 11453 uid 48 @4000467fe78c0248fbdc 
> starting delivery 174: msg 2283211 to remote 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> @4000467fe78c024926d4 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60 
> @4000467fe79204c9f1cc delivery 174: failure:
> User_and_password_not_set,_continuing_without_authentication./65.77.22
> .242_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_553_sorry,_that_domain
> _isn't_in_my_list_of_allowed_rcpthosts_(#5.5.3_-_chkuser)/Giving_up_on
> _65.77.22.242./
>
> @4000467fe79205af44d4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
> @4000467fe79206d43cd4 bounce msg 2283211 qp 11457 
> @4000467fe79206d45ffc end msg 2283211
>
> Any ideas?
>
It seems that your old server isn't relaying your new server.
Did you config tcp.smtp with RELAYCLIENT="" in your old server?

Natalio

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp RDJ warning

[A M]

Hi,

Or you could stop using RDJ and subscribe OpenProtect

http://saupdates.openprotect.com/

They have a base stand of SARE recomended rules so it's pretty much the ones
I was using in RDJ, if you need anymore just dld them and place them in
/etc/mail/spamassasin/

A M

2007/6/25, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


Steve Ingraham wrote:
>> -
> This is the first week since the attack on Rules Du Jour that I did not
> get the error messages mentioned above.  I have a cron job set up to
> pull new jobs from RDJ for each Sunday night.  I usually get an email
> message stating that the rules were updated.  I did not get that message
> either.  So I have nothing telling me that the rules were updated and
> nothing telling me there were any errors.  Is there any information on
> what may be going on with RDJ?  I cannot determine if I have a problem
> or not.  Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
>
You can run it from the command line and watch for errors. Chances are
good that if you didn't get anything, then nothing is wrong.
The rules from there are updated very infrequently, with updates coming
every 6 months or so.






--
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

[Natalio Gatti]

On 6/25/07, Jack D. Martin Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:





I used the method described by Natalio below  - and it works, as long as I
am sending emails to my own domain.  If the PC in question sends to
something off of my domain I get this in the logs:


@4000467fe78c00c4a1e4 new msg 2283211
@4000467fe78c00c4f7d4 info msg 2283211: bytes 2386 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 11453 uid 48
@4000467fe78c0248fbdc starting delivery 174: msg 2283211 to remote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@4000467fe78c024926d4 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60
@4000467fe79204c9f1cc delivery 174: failure:
User_and_password_not_set,_continuing_without_authentication./65.77.22.242_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_553_sorry,_that_domain_isn't_in_my_list_of_allowed_rcpthosts_(#5.5.3_-_chkuser)/Giving_up_on_65.77.22.242./

@4000467fe79205af44d4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
@4000467fe79206d43cd4 bounce msg 2283211 qp 11457
@4000467fe79206d45ffc end msg 2283211

Any ideas?


It seems that your old server isn't relaying your new server.
Did you config tcp.smtp with RELAYCLIENT="" in your old server?

Natalio

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] SPAMDYKE and SPAMASSASSIN

[Manny]

thanks
- Original Message - 
From: "davide bozzelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SPAMDYKE and SPAMASSASSIN



Manny ha scritto:
Had anyone tried installing spamdyke in a qmailtoaster box ? does it 
require removing spamassasin or its ok to run it both ?
 
thanks

Manny
Spamdyke is not a content filter, so it does not depend from 
spamassassin at all .
To be more precisely, spamassassin will be called from simscan as 
qmail-queue replacement, or simply BEFORE qmail-queue.


Spamdyke is called from tcpserver, during smtp conversation , just 
before qmail-smtpd .
Is to be intended as replacement of rblsmtpd , but could also coexsists 
with it .


So the answer is: yes , both of them could be run at the same time.


Have fun,
Davide

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] How to setup QMTP

[Bill Kwok]

Hi all,

I am thinking of using QMTP to send /receive email between our 2 company
email servers.


  1. Does QMTP cause any conflict with the current qmt?
  2. How do I setup QMTP?  Should I add the following line (or
  something simiar)  to my SMTP run script?
 tcpserver -x /etc/qmqp.cdb -u 7770 -g 2108 0 628
  /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qmqpd &
  3. Does 628 a standard port for QMTP communicateion?
  4. Do I need to tell qmt that which server should use QMTP instead of
  SMTP?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Bill

RE: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

[Jack D. Martin Jr.]

I used the method described by Natalio below  - and it works, as long as I
am sending emails to my own domain.  If the PC in question sends to
something off of my domain I get this in the logs:


@4000467fe78c00c4a1e4 new msg 2283211
@4000467fe78c00c4f7d4 info msg 2283211: bytes 2386 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 11453 uid 48
@4000467fe78c0248fbdc starting delivery 174: msg 2283211 to remote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@4000467fe78c024926d4 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60
@4000467fe79204c9f1cc delivery 174: failure:
User_and_password_not_set,_continuing_without_authentication./65.77.22.242_d
oes_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_553_sorry,_that_domain_isn't_in_my
_list_of_allowed_rcpthosts_(#5.5.3_-_chkuser)/Giving_up_on_65.77.22.242./
@4000467fe79205af44d4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
@4000467fe79206d43cd4 bounce msg 2283211 qp 11457
@4000467fe79206d45ffc end msg 2283211

Any ideas?


-Original Message-
From: Jack D. Martin Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:20 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???


I will build this tonite and see how it works - thanks for the help!!!  I
will reply tomorrow and tell  you how it went.

-Original Message-
From: Natalio Gatti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:17 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Use Qmail???

On 6/11/07, Jack D. Martin Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So no need for Bind to even be on the new machine - then it will send 
> all emails to whatever domain using the main qmail server.  Let me see 
> if I have this right.  In new box I edit /var/qmail/control/smtproutes 
> and add just this line:
>
> :10.1.1.1
>
>
> Where 10.1.1.1 is the mailserver IP.  Is there nothing that would go 
> before that?  I am assuming since there is nothing before the colon - 
> the new box will send all email to that server for relay.  Is that
correct?
>
Exactly. If you don't want to forward all mail, yo should specify which
domain(s) you want to forward:

somedomain.com:10.1.1.1

If the new box is receiving mails from other hosts, you should create there
domain in /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts, or they will be banned.

Natalio.






-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] QMT-ISO-1.3.0

[Jake Vickers]

QMT-ISO-1.3.0 has been released.  Major changes are that it's now 
updated for the latest Cent4.5 packages. I also fixed a minor issue with 
the QmailToaster-Plus downloading and installation since the web address 
had changed.

It's up and available for download at http://qmtiso.com
Enjoy!


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] retain a copy of rejected messages?

[Brent Gardner]

A M wrote:

You can compile simscan with quarantine support. This means messages won't
be reject, but quarantined.



Thanks for that.  I'm researching it now.

Brent Gardner



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] PKZIP compression

[Alberto Maffini]

Hi all, this is my first post and first of all I wanto to make my best wishes 
for all your work.

Now my problem.

I have several attachements in ZIP format. The files are creates with pkzip 
inflate feature. Qmail Toaster don't let me send a message with this 
attachements because is not able to decompress it. Is there any way to disable 
ZIP scanning ? 

Thanks

Alberto Maffini

mobile +39.348.3677402

Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250
Sesto San Giovanni (MI)
Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608
http://www.sylcomed.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp RDJ warning

[Jake Vickers]

Steve Ingraham wrote:

-

This is the first week since the attack on Rules Du Jour that I did not
get the error messages mentioned above.  I have a cron job set up to
pull new jobs from RDJ for each Sunday night.  I usually get an email
message stating that the rules were updated.  I did not get that message
either.  So I have nothing telling me that the rules were updated and
nothing telling me there were any errors.  Is there any information on
what may be going on with RDJ?  I cannot determine if I have a problem
or not.  Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
  
You can run it from the command line and watch for errors. Chances are 
good that if you didn't get anything, then nothing is wrong.
The rules from there are updated very infrequently, with updates coming 
every 6 months or so.




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] QTP-0.2.11-1.3.14

[Per Qvindesland]

Cool as I said the server room has a side room with a cooler in, in
typical south african standard it's always filled up so any time :) I
can leave your wife to join mine which loves to travel, I am quite
content to stick around the local beach pub during night time :)

Regards
Per Qvindesland

Jake Vickers wrote:
> Per Qvindesland wrote:
>> Ill second that anytime, also if anyone is coming to South Africa then
>> give me a heads up, especially to the extremely warm south coast, we
>> could check the log files in my server room while consuming a few
>> beers :-)
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Per Qvindesland
>>
>> Jim Shupert, Jr. wrote:
>>  
>>> jake ,
>>> and all
>>>
>>> I have zero to add to this particular discussion  to remedy this thing.
>>> But I did want to give a word that ... maybe does not happen often
>>> enough.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Thank you to you and ... all the rest ( and you know who you R ) smart
>>> and hard working cats who are helping to make
>>> things better.  Many of us appreciate it very much , basically we (
>>> and we know who we are )  could never do it.
>>> We , a lucky to have you and you all.
>>>
>>> have a great day..
>>> ( and while traviling in Ohio, if you need a friend in Cincinnati
>>> , give a shout )
>>> 
> Thanks guys. I'll speak for everyone else who contributes and say that
> it's nice to get a thanks every once in a while.
> I'd like to stop and say hello; I don't think my schedule will permit,
> though. I'm hitting the ground in Ohio at 10:29am, where my client
> will be picking me up to take me to their office in Cleveland, and
> then I'll be leaving again at 7:02pm to fly back to Orlando, FL. Not a
> whole lot of time, but it should be a pretty easy job. Quick setup of
> an Asterisk system, file server, and a firewall. It's a lawyer firm,
> so they can get pretty cheap when they're paying expenses. No hotel,
> no car, etc. They did wait a day too long on setting a time to be
> there, so the only seat left was first class.  But, gotta pay the
> bills, right?
> Thanks again! (And my wife would LOVE to visit South Africa Maybe
> for vacation next year.)
>




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

RE: [qmailtoaster] qtp RDJ warning

[Steve Ingraham]

> -Original Message-
> From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 1:22 PM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp RDJ warning
> 
> 
> dnk wrote:
> > I started getting (maybe my bad and just started noticing) 
> this error
> > showing up...
> >
> > What is the best way to resolve (with qtp in mind)?
> >
> >
> > ***WARNING***: spamassassin --lint failed.
> >
> > Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
> >
> > Rollback command is:  mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin/tripwire.cf
> > /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf.2; mv -f 
> > /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/tripwire.cf.20070624-1036 
> > /etc/mail/spamassassin/tripwire.cf;
> >
> >
> > Lint output: [14861] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
> > 
> >
> > [14861] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:  > HTTP-EQUIV="Pragma" CONTENT="no-cache">
> >
> > [14861] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:  > HTTP-EQUIV="Expires" CONTENT="-1">
> >
> > [14861] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: 
> >
> > [14861] warn: lint: 4 issues detected, please rerun with 
> debug enabled
> > for more information
> >
> Tripwire has been depreciated.  It's best to just remove that 
> from your 
> /etc/rulesdujour/config file. That will fix the errors. This has been 
> removed in the new version.
> I may move to sa-update in the future of QTP. It seems that 
> it won out 
> over RDJ as far as the Spamassassin community supporting it. Thanks.
> 
This is the first week since the attack on Rules Du Jour that I did not
get the error messages mentioned above.  I have a cron job set up to
pull new jobs from RDJ for each Sunday night.  I usually get an email
message stating that the rules were updated.  I did not get that message
either.  So I have nothing telling me that the rules were updated and
nothing telling me there were any errors.  Is there any information on
what may be going on with RDJ?  I cannot determine if I have a problem
or not.  Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.

Steve

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] QTP-0.2.11-1.3.14

[Harry Zink]

Hi Jake,

Thanks for clarifying - have a good trip, and thanks for all you're  
doing.


Harry


On Jun 25, 2007, at 5:07 AM, Jake Vickers wrote:


Harry Zink wrote:

Jake,

You seem to not be aware of the severity (to a point) of the  
problem, and the ease of fixing it - essentially, the text file  
giving the chronology of installation of the packages is  
incorrect, causing a number of errors on the qtp-newmodel script,  
and essentially making it near impossible to execute an upgrade.  
All that needs to be changed is the text file on the website  
providing the order of execution of the RPMs (the list is  
currently, incorrectly, alphabetized, instead of the proper order).


Thus, as far as I can tell, the script itself does not need much  
changing, just the file it depends on.
I do understand Harry. I have no control over the current.txt file  
or it's generation, and really don't want to invest a lot of time  
into the qtp-newmodel script.  I've asked Nick to restructure the  
current.txt file, and I am toying with the idea of having the qtp- 
newmodel script download the current.txt file then reorganize it in  
the correct order.  If I go this route, this may take a little  
while. I'll be flying to Ohio for work on Wednesday, and then to  
North Carolina on Thursday. I'll try and work on it some more  
during the flights, but I won't promise anything.
Thanks for the info and suggestions though.  I do take them into  
consideration!


---
George E. Nichols
"The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment  
an incredible miracle."

Re: [qmailtoaster] QTP-0.2.11-1.3.14

[Jake Vickers]

Per Qvindesland wrote:

Ill second that anytime, also if anyone is coming to South Africa then
give me a heads up, especially to the extremely warm south coast, we
could check the log files in my server room while consuming a few beers :-)

Kind regards
Per Qvindesland

Jim Shupert, Jr. wrote:
  

jake ,
and all

I have zero to add to this particular discussion  to remedy this thing.
But I did want to give a word that ... maybe does not happen often
enough.

Thank you.

Thank you to you and ... all the rest ( and you know who you R ) smart
and hard working cats who are helping to make
things better.  Many of us appreciate it very much , basically we (
and we know who we are )  could never do it.
We , a lucky to have you and you all.

have a great day..
( and while traviling in Ohio, if you need a friend in Cincinnati
, give a shout )

Thanks guys. I'll speak for everyone else who contributes and say that 
it's nice to get a thanks every once in a while.
I'd like to stop and say hello; I don't think my schedule will permit, 
though. I'm hitting the ground in Ohio at 10:29am, where my client will 
be picking me up to take me to their office in Cleveland, and then I'll 
be leaving again at 7:02pm to fly back to Orlando, FL. Not a whole lot 
of time, but it should be a pretty easy job. Quick setup of an Asterisk 
system, file server, and a firewall. It's a lawyer firm, so they can get 
pretty cheap when they're paying expenses. No hotel, no car, etc. They 
did wait a day too long on setting a time to be there, so the only seat 
left was first class.  But, gotta pay the bills, right?
Thanks again! (And my wife would LOVE to visit South Africa Maybe 
for vacation next year.)




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] QTP-0.2.11-1.3.14

[Per Qvindesland]

Ill second that anytime, also if anyone is coming to South Africa then
give me a heads up, especially to the extremely warm south coast, we
could check the log files in my server room while consuming a few beers :-)

Kind regards
Per Qvindesland

Jim Shupert, Jr. wrote:
> jake ,
> and all
>
> I have zero to add to this particular discussion  to remedy this thing.
> But I did want to give a word that ... maybe does not happen often
> enough.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Thank you to you and ... all the rest ( and you know who you R ) smart
> and hard working cats who are helping to make
> things better.  Many of us appreciate it very much , basically we (
> and we know who we are )  could never do it.
> We , a lucky to have you and you all.
>
> have a great day..
> ( and while traviling in Ohio, if you need a friend in Cincinnati
> , give a shout )
>
> regards
>
> jims
>
>
>
> -
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] QTP-0.2.11-1.3.14

[Jim Shupert, Jr.]

jake ,
and all

I have zero to add to this particular discussion  to remedy this thing.
But I did want to give a word that ... maybe does not happen often enough.

Thank you.

Thank you to you and ... all the rest ( and you know who you R ) smart and 
hard working cats who are helping to make
things better.  Many of us appreciate it very much , basically we ( and we 
know who we are )  could never do it.

We , a lucky to have you and you all.

have a great day..
( and while traviling in Ohio, if you need a friend in Cincinnati , give 
a shout )


regards

jims



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] pyzor error

[A M]

Hi,

I get pyzor error in the logs from time to time and when repoting. (patches
are applied)
I looks to me as the error comes from a fail to reach server error in pyzor
before timeout
kicks in SA. Apparently sometimes the servers respond with connection
refused or something.

A M

2007/6/25, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


PakOgah wrote:
> I hv add pyzor on SA and when I check on spamd log, I found this error
>
> warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error
>
> try googling, and found this
> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4580
>
> and I tried to patch pyzor with patches from here
> http://antispam.imp.ch/08-opensource.html?lng=0
>
> and still I get the same error..
> does any of you has pyzor installed and experience the same error??
> how to solve it?
>
> it seems pyzor wasn't maintain anymore...
> does anybody has succesfully integrate razor
> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/razor/) with SA?
> does it have any problem?
> can you share your razor install howto w/ SA on qt?
I'm looking at my configs and logs, an realized that I turned off Pyzor
last November. Probably for the same error. I've turned it back on, ran
"pyzor discover", and am watching my logs to see if the error comes back
up. I'll let you know more if I find anything out.





--
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] pyzor error

[Jake Vickers]

PakOgah wrote:

I hv add pyzor on SA and when I check on spamd log, I found this error

warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error

try googling, and found this
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4580

and I tried to patch pyzor with patches from here
http://antispam.imp.ch/08-opensource.html?lng=0

and still I get the same error..
does any of you has pyzor installed and experience the same error??
how to solve it?

it seems pyzor wasn't maintain anymore...
does anybody has succesfully integrate razor 
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/razor/) with SA?

does it have any problem?
can you share your razor install howto w/ SA on qt?
I'm looking at my configs and logs, an realized that I turned off Pyzor 
last November. Probably for the same error. I've turned it back on, ran 
"pyzor discover", and am watching my logs to see if the error comes back 
up. I'll let you know more if I find anything out.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] pyzor error

[Jake Vickers]

PakOgah wrote:

I hv add pyzor on SA and when I check on spamd log, I found this error

warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error

try googling, and found this
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4580

and I tried to patch pyzor with patches from here
http://antispam.imp.ch/08-opensource.html?lng=0

and still I get the same error..
does any of you has pyzor installed and experience the same error??
how to solve it?

it seems pyzor wasn't maintain anymore...
does anybody has succesfully integrate razor 
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/razor/) with SA?

does it have any problem?
can you share your razor install howto w/ SA on qt?

I know razor not Opensource/free but atleast it was maintained
thx
I just looked, and I've been getting the same error as well. Never even 
noticed it before.  I'll try and ask on the Pyzor mailing list to see if 
anyone has a suggestion.




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] QTP-0.2.11-1.3.14

[Jake Vickers]

Harry Zink wrote:

Jake,

You seem to not be aware of the severity (to a point) of the problem, 
and the ease of fixing it - essentially, the text file giving the 
chronology of installation of the packages is incorrect, causing a 
number of errors on the qtp-newmodel script, and essentially making it 
near impossible to execute an upgrade. All that needs to be changed is 
the text file on the website providing the order of execution of the 
RPMs (the list is currently, incorrectly, alphabetized, instead of the 
proper order).


Thus, as far as I can tell, the script itself does not need much 
changing, just the file it depends on.
I do understand Harry. I have no control over the current.txt file or 
it's generation, and really don't want to invest a lot of time into the 
qtp-newmodel script.  I've asked Nick to restructure the current.txt 
file, and I am toying with the idea of having the qtp-newmodel script 
download the current.txt file then reorganize it in the correct order.  
If I go this route, this may take a little while. I'll be flying to Ohio 
for work on Wednesday, and then to North Carolina on Thursday. I'll try 
and work on it some more during the flights, but I won't promise anything.
Thanks for the info and suggestions though.  I do take them into 
consideration!


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-spp

[PakOgah]

Mark Samples wrote:

Greetings,

Has anyone on this list had experience utilizing the qmail-spp setup?
If so, would you care to share your experience(s)?
  
qmail-spp seems has a lot of plugins. but I am afraid those plugins 
overlapping with current qt features
likeauthrequired : Forces SMTP authentication it also available 
on qt by adding line


export REQUIRE_AUTH=1

on your supervise/smtp/run



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] pyzor error

[PakOgah]

I hv add pyzor on SA and when I check on spamd log, I found this error

warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error

try googling, and found this
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4580

and I tried to patch pyzor with patches from here
http://antispam.imp.ch/08-opensource.html?lng=0

and still I get the same error..
does any of you has pyzor installed and experience the same error??
how to solve it?

it seems pyzor wasn't maintain anymore...
does anybody has succesfully integrate razor 
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/razor/) with SA?

does it have any problem?
can you share your razor install howto w/ SA on qt?

I know razor not Opensource/free but atleast it was maintained
thx

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] SPAMDYKE and SPAMASSASSIN

[davide bozzelli]

Manny ha scritto:
Had anyone tried installing spamdyke in a qmailtoaster box ? does it 
require removing spamassasin or its ok to run it both ?
 
thanks

Manny
Spamdyke is not a content filter, so it does not depend from 
spamassassin at all .
To be more precisely, spamassassin will be called from simscan as 
qmail-queue replacement, or simply BEFORE qmail-queue.


Spamdyke is called from tcpserver, during smtp conversation , just 
before qmail-smtpd .
Is to be intended as replacement of rblsmtpd , but could also coexsists 
with it .


So the answer is: yes , both of them could be run at the same time.


Have fun,
Davide

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin-toaster-3.2.1 Failed dependencies

[Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH]

In my patched qmail-toaster Version for OSS I have the following line added to 
the spec file some time ago:

Requires: perl-Digest-SHA1 perl-HTML-Parser perl-Net-DNS perl-libwww-perl 
perl-IO-Zlib procmail

This seems to work.

Best regards,
Johannes 




Harry Zink schrieb:

Ditto here, on all counts of what you experienced as well.

Harry


--


|-
|  weberhofer GmbH   | Johannes Weberhofer
|  information technologies
|  Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3
|--->>


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]