Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject

[aledr]

You should do It in the DNS Server that has your domain zone (master).
Probably your own DNS Server (or is it just a cache server?)

Regards

2007/10/10, Francisco Paco Peralta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The Toaster is running on a dedicated server with an isp.  Do I have to put
> the spf record in my server (I have BIND running) or is this something my
> isp needs to do with his DNS server?
>  Francisco "Paco" Peralta
>
>
> - Original Message 
> From: Tim Mancour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 11:15:19 AM
> Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
>
>
> The following site allows you to test their SPF record against the Email's
> domain - http://www.seoconsultants.com/tools/spf/
> The server's address passes this test so they have probably recently fixed
> there SPF record.
>
>  
>
> From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:48 AM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
>
>
> Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
>
> Hello List,
>
> A customer recently informed me that his emails were getting rejected by my
> server.  I took a look at the smtp logs and found the following (I have
> changed the email address to x's to protect the innocent):
>
> *
> 10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: status: 1/100
> 10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: pid 21603 from 208.205.82.13
> 10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: ok 21603 mail.velocity-med.com:64.182.11.225:25
> :208.205.82.13::58133
> 10-09 15:59:24 CHKUSER accepted sender: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::>
> remote  rcpt <> : sender
> accepted
> 10-09 15:59:24 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(l17xexch3.corp.ad.publix.com)
> from 208.205.82.13. MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 10-09 15:59:24 tcpserver: end 21603 status 0
> 10-09 15:59:24 tcpserver: status: 0/100
> *
>
> Also I did as follows:
> ***
> # cat /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior
> 3
> ***
>
> What do I have to do to allow his emails to get through to me?
>
>  Francisco "Paco" Peralta
>
>
> He can either fix his SPF record, or you can lower the criteria on your
> system for everyone by adjusting to a value listed on the wiki:
> http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spf
>
>
>
--
[ ]'s
Aledr - Alexandre
"OpenSource Solutions for SmallBusiness Problems"

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject

[Francisco Paco Peralta]

The Toaster is running on a dedicated server with an isp.  Do I have to put the 
spf record in my server (I have BIND running) or is this something my isp needs 
to do with his DNS server?
 
Francisco "Paco" Peralta

- Original Message 
From: Tim Mancour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 11:15:19 AM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject




 

The following site allows you to test their SPF record 
against the Email's domain - http://www.seoconsultants.com/tools/spf/

The server's address passes this test so they have probably 
recently fixed there SPF record.

 





From: Jake Vickers 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:48 
AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: 
[qmailtoaster] spf-reject




Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: 

  DIV {
MARGIN:0px;}


  Hello 
  List,

A customer recently informed me that his emails were getting 
  rejected by my server.  I took a look at the smtp logs and found the 
  following (I have changed the email address to x's to protect the 
  innocent):

*
10-09 15:59:23 
  tcpserver: status: 1/100
10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: pid 21603 from 
  208.205.82.13
10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: ok 21603 
  mail.velocity-med.com:64.182.11.225:25 :208.205.82.13::58133
10-09 15:59:24 
  CHKUSER accepted sender: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> 
  remote  rcpt 
  <> : sender accepted
10-09 15:59:24 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: 
  HELO(l17xexch3.corp.ad.publix.com) from 208.205.82.13. MAILFROM:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
10-09 
  15:59:24 tcpserver: end 21603 status 0
10-09 15:59:24 tcpserver: status: 
  0/100
*

Also I did as 
  follows:
***
# cat 
  /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior
3
***

What do I 
  have to do to allow his emails to get through to me?

   
Francisco "Paco" Peralta 
  



He can either fix his SPF record, or you 
can lower the criteria on your system for everyone by adjusting to a value 
listed on the wiki:
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spf

Re: [qmailtoaster] 571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 - chkuser)

[Erik A. Espinoza]

Looks like you may have your CHKUSER recipient limit set too low.

Erik

On 10/10/07, Bayardo Rivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *Hi guys,
>
> I needyour help with this issue. Whe I try to send a message I recevie
> the error:
>
> 571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 - chkuser)
>
> The sender and receipts are in the same domain, same QMToaster  box.
>
> Thanks for your advice.
>
> Bayardo.
>
>
> De:* Administrador del sistema
> *Enviado el:* martes, 09 de octubre de 2007 19:46
> *Para:  * '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> *CC:* '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> *Asunto:* Sin entregar: Asociación Coopal
>
> Algunos de los destinatarios no recibieron su mensaje.
>
>   Asunto:   RV: Asociación Coopal
>   Enviado el:   09/10/2007 19:43
>
> No se puede localizar a los destinatarios siguientes:
>
>   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' en 09/10/2007 19:46
> 571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 -
> chkuser)
>
>   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' en 09/10/2007 19:46
> 571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 -
> chkuser)
>
>   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' en 09/10/2007 19:46
> 571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 -
> chkuser)
>
>   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' en 09/10/2007 19:46
> 571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 -
> chkuser)
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] 571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 - chkuser)

[Bayardo Rivas]

*Hi guys,

I needyour help with this issue. Whe I try to send a message I recevie 
the error:


571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 - chkuser)

The sender and receipts are in the same domain, same QMToaster  box.

Thanks for your advice.

Bayardo.


De:* Administrador del sistema 
*Enviado el:* martes, 09 de octubre de 2007 19:46
*Para:  * '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

*CC:* '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
*Asunto:* Sin entregar: Asociación Coopal

Algunos de los destinatarios no recibieron su mensaje.

 Asunto:   RV: Asociación Coopal
 Enviado el:   09/10/2007 19:43

No se puede localizar a los destinatarios siguientes:

 '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' en 09/10/2007 19:46
   571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 - 
chkuser)


 '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' en 09/10/2007 19:46
   571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 - 
chkuser)


 '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' en 09/10/2007 19:46
   571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 - 
chkuser)


 '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' en 09/10/2007 19:46
   571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 - 
chkuser)



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] QMT-ISO Squirrelmail path problem

[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

I've installed QMT-ISO 1.31 I think it is, and the squirrelmail seems to be a
little broken. It doesn't want to see email in the Inbox even though it says
there is email in there.

This is a default installation. I've tried editing the
/etc/squirrelmail/config.php file to point to INBOX as I found in another
message but this still does not work.

Anyone else having this issue?

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] maildrop.log file

[Jake Vickers]

In the next version of QTPlus, I am adding a script to put maildrop into 
logrotate to (hopefully) stop the issue with people having the file grow 
larger than 2G and stopping mail delivery. Here is the logrotate config 
file I've written so far, but I wanted to check with everyone else to 
see if there's anything I'm missing or that should be added in for 
whatever reason.  No, I have not tried this script yet - I'm not in a 
position to make the change on any of my machines, and to be honest, my 
maildrop.log files are ~8K after a year anyway. SO if you have an 
idea or a way that it should be different, let me know!

Here's the config I've set up so far:

#
# Rotate maildrop's log file
#

/var/log/maildrop/maildrop.log {
   missingok
   nocompress
   create 600 vpopmail vchkpw
   postrotate
   endscript
}



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

RE: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject

[Tim Mancour]

The following site allows you to test their SPF record against the Email's
domain - http://www.seoconsultants.com/tools/spf/
The server's address passes this test so they have probably recently fixed
there SPF record.
 
  _  

From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:48 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject


Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: 

Hello List,

A customer recently informed me that his emails were getting rejected by my
server.  I took a look at the smtp logs and found the following (I have
changed the email address to x's to protect the innocent):

*
10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: status: 1/100
10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: pid 21603 from 208.205.82.13
10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: ok 21603 mail.velocity-med.com:64.182.11.225:25
:208.205.82.13::58133
10-09 15:59:24 CHKUSER accepted sender: from
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
 rcpt <> : sender
accepted
10-09 15:59:24 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(l17xexch3.corp.ad.publix.com)
from 208.205.82.13. MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
10-09 15:59:24 tcpserver: end 21603 status 0
10-09 15:59:24 tcpserver: status: 0/100
*

Also I did as follows:
***
# cat /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior
3
***

What do I have to do to allow his emails to get through to me?

 
Francisco "Paco" Peralta 



He can either fix his SPF record, or you can lower the criteria on your
system for everyone by adjusting to a value listed on the wiki:
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spf

Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject

[Erik A. Espinoza]

The owner of publix.com doesn't want users sending mail that didn't go
through their mail servers, according to the way the MX record is
written.

This user is attempting to talk directly to your mail server and thus
getting rejected, as per the publix.com policy.

"v=spf1 mx a:mail.publix.com mx:mail.publix.com include:listrak.com -all"

Erik

On 10/10/07, Francisco Paco Peralta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello List,
>
> A customer recently informed me that his emails were getting rejected by my
> server.  I took a look at the smtp logs and found the following (I have
> changed the email address to x's to protect the innocent):
>
> *
> 10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: status: 1/100
> 10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: pid 21603 from 208.205.82.13
> 10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: ok 21603 mail.velocity-med.com:64.182.11.225:25
> :208.205.82.13::58133
> 10-09 15:59:24 CHKUSER accepted sender: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::>
> remote 
> rcpt <> : sender accepted
> 10-09 15:59:24 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(l17xexch3.corp.ad.publix.com)
> from 208.205.82.13. MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 10-09 15:59:24 tcpserver: end 21603 status 0
> 10-09 15:59:24 tcpserver: status: 0/100
> *
>
> Also I did as follows:
> ***
> # cat /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior
> 3
> ***
>
> What do I have to do to allow his emails to get through to me?
>  Francisco "Paco" Peralta
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject

[Jake Vickers]

Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:

Hello List,

A customer recently informed me that his emails were getting rejected 
by my server.  I took a look at the smtp logs and found the following 
(I have changed the email address to x's to protect the innocent):


*
10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: status: 1/100
10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: pid 21603 from 208.205.82.13
10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: ok 21603 
mail.velocity-med.com:64.182.11.225:25 :208.205.82.13::58133
10-09 15:59:24 CHKUSER accepted sender: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> 
remote  rcpt <> : 
sender accepted
10-09 15:59:24 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: 
HELO(l17xexch3.corp.ad.publix.com) from 208.205.82.13. 
MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

10-09 15:59:24 tcpserver: end 21603 status 0
10-09 15:59:24 tcpserver: status: 0/100
*

Also I did as follows:
***
# cat /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior
3
***

What do I have to do to allow his emails to get through to me?
 
Francisco "Paco" Peralta




He can either fix his SPF record, or you can lower the criteria on your 
system for everyone by adjusting to a value listed on the wiki:

http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spf



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[qmailtoaster] spf-reject

[Francisco Paco Peralta]

Hello List,

A customer recently informed me that his emails were getting rejected by my 
server.  I took a look at the smtp logs and found the following (I have changed 
the email address to x's to protect the innocent):

*
10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: status: 1/100
10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: pid 21603 from 208.205.82.13
10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: ok 21603 mail.velocity-med.com:64.182.11.225:25 
:208.205.82.13::58133
10-09 15:59:24 CHKUSER accepted sender: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
 rcpt <> : sender accepted
10-09 15:59:24 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(l17xexch3.corp.ad.publix.com) from 
208.205.82.13. MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
10-09 15:59:24 tcpserver: end 21603 status 0
10-09 15:59:24 tcpserver: status: 0/100
*

Also I did as follows:
***
# cat /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior
3
***

What do I have to do to allow his emails to get through to me?
 
Francisco "Paco" Peralta