[qmailtoaster] Local mailserver mx backup on the same machine
Hi all, I'm trying to setup the following: mail1 mail2 | | | | ---|-- | nfs server on the nfs server I export: /var/qmail/control /var/qmail/users /home/vpopmail/domains at the DNS level (mx setup) I have domain a.com 10 mail1 domain a.com 30 mail2 domain b.com 10 mail2 domain b.com 30 mail1 domain c.com 10 client_mail_server domain c.com 30 mail2 When, at domain c.com, the client_mail_server is down all mail I received is refused with: failure: Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-preference_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local._(#5.4.6)/ the b.com domain is in the /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts The idea was to have to servers that would deliver both local and perform as MX Backup for each other, and spreading the load, but when the first mx server is not local, things break. Any thoughts on why? Thank you *Sérgio Rosa *AWD Serviços Internet *Consultor* Site: Email: Telm*. * http://www.awd.pt https://www.awd.ptsergior...@awd.pt (+351) 91 348 9195 [image: undefined] https://www.facebook.com/pages/AWD-Arquitectura-Web-e-Design/184497498235106
[qmailtoaster] Re: Mail issue
On 03/31/2012 10:28 PM, Délsio Cabá wrote: Hi, #reject-empty-rdns #reject-ip-in-cc-rdns reject-missing-sender-mx #reject-unresolvable-rdns These 3 that you have commented out are quite effective filters. I would use empty and unresolvable filters unquestionably. I believe gmail does this as well, although I'm not positive on that. ip-in-cc is a reportedly a little more specialized. IIRC Sam mentioned that this may not be as appropriate in (non-US) settings, although I'm not convinced. I use it and don't have a problem receiving international emails, although I don't receive a lot of them. -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Mail issue
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Délsio Cabá del...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This is my config file: dns-blacklist-entry=sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org dns-blacklist-entry=ix.dnsbl.manitu.net dns-blacklist-entry=cbl.abuseat.org dns-blacklist-entry=spamrbl.imp.ch dns-blacklist-entry=b.barracudacentral.org graylist-level=always graylist-dir=/var/spamdyke/graylist graylist-max-secs=5356800 graylist-min-secs=280 greeting-delay-secs=0 idle-timeout-secs=60 ip-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_ip ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_keywords ip-in-rdns-keyword-whitelist-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_keywords ip-whitelist-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_ip local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/morercpthosts log-level=info log-target=SYSLOG max-recipients=50 #policy-url=http://my.policy.explanation.url/ rdns-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_rdns rdns-whitelist-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_rdns recipient-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_recipients recipient-whitelist-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_recipients #reject-empty-rdns #reject-ip-in-cc-rdns reject-missing-sender-mx #reject-unresolvable-rdns sender-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_senders sender-whitelist-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_senders tls-certificate-file=/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem tls-level=smtp On 31 March 2012 23:18, Carlos Herrera Polo carlos.herrerap...@gmail.com wrote: Can you send spamdyke's config file ? 2012/3/31, Délsio Cabá del...@gmail.com: Hi, I I am also struggling with some spam on my server. I got one from the ip 91.227.36.144. None of the major RBL's have that IP blacklisted. So the email got through. Passing SPF check, Sgaylisting and RBL. More and more spammers are now finding ways to pass this RBL checks by sending emails from random IP's. I had to lower spamassassin from 9 to 7 now. Hope it helps Cheers On 31 March 2012 09:53, Bharath Chari qmailtoas...@arachnis.com wrote: On Saturday 31 March 2012 12:27 PM, rajeshrudramani wrote: Hi, In my mail id getting spam mail from different airttel ips. how to block the mails and series of ip. Please guide me. Aren't you running an RBL check? Most of this spam will be from dynamic IPs. Airtel, unfortunately is amongst the top 5 spambot networks in the world. Bharath --**--** - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group ( www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! --**--** - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscribe@** qmailtoaster.com qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-help@** qmailtoaster.com qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com -- Enviado desde mi dispositivo móvil - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group ( www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com In reply to Bharat Chari's statement Airtel, unfortunately is amongst the top 5 spambot networks in the world. I agree. But I would not lay the entire blame on Airtel alone. The reason so many spambots are hosted on these networks is the low and could not care 2 hoots about my machine being infected attitude of users that leads to this. Educating users to be proactive about protecting their computing environment (mostly one dominant OS) from infiltration and hijack is a must. Major Indian ISP's such as Airtel should also participate in the efforts to take down the command and control centers of these spambot networks. -- Khan Md. Ashraf Chennai India
[qmailtoaster] Re: Mail issue
On 04/01/2012 08:43 AM, Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote: In reply to Bharat Chari's statement Airtel, unfortunately is amongst the top 5 spambot networks in the world. I agree. But I would not lay the entire blame on Airtel alone. The reason so many spambots are hosted on these networks is the low and could not care 2 hoots about my machine being infected attitude of users that leads to this. Educating users to be proactive about protecting their computing environment (mostly one dominant OS) from infiltration and hijack is a must. Major Indian ISP's such as Airtel should also participate in the efforts to take down the command and control centers of these spambot networks. Perhaps someone should attempt to persuade Airtel to block outbound port 25 traffic from their dhcp and/or residential subscribers that's not destined to their smtp servers. This is what Cox (cable) and Centurylink (DSL) both do in this area. I think doing so goes a long way toward thwarting infected machines. Personally, I use a perimeter firewall to block any outbound port 25 traffic that doesn't originate from my QMT host. This keeps unauthorized email from going out on an IP address which also services user internet access. -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mail issue
On 04/01/2012 09:07 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 04/01/2012 08:43 AM, Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote: In reply to Bharat Chari's statement "Airtel, unfortunately is amongst the top 5 spambot networks in the world". I agree. But I would not lay the entire blame on Airtel alone. The reason so many spambots are hosted on these networks is the low and could not care 2 hoots about my machine being infected attitude of users that leads to this. Educating users to be proactive about protecting their computing environment (mostly one dominant OS) from infiltration and hijack is a must. Major Indian ISP's such as Airtel should also participate in the efforts to take down the command and control centers of these spambot networks. Perhaps someone should attempt to persuade Airtel to block outbound port 25 traffic from their dhcp and/or residential subscribers that's not destined to their smtp servers. This is what Cox (cable) and Centurylink (DSL) both do in this area. I think doing so goes a long way toward thwarting infected machines. Personally, I use a perimeter firewall to block any outbound port 25 traffic that doesn't originate from my QMT host. This keeps unauthorized email from going out on an IP address which also services user internet access. This is way beyond the scope of the average user. My father for instance could never on his own block port 25 traffic. He use to have a Windows box and recently upgraded. I built him a Linux box and it seems to have stopped any Malware problems he was having. --
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mail issue
I must agree that the options: #reject-empty-rdns #reject-ip-in-cc-rdns reject-missing-sender-mx #reject-unresolvable-rdns are very useful for blocking spam, but unfortunately I keep having complains from some clients that emails were not coming in. I fould out that some mail server don't even have reverse Ip configured and others have but the reverse name had not A Records. So I decided to disable reject-empty-rdns and reject-unresolvable-rdns. As for reject-ip-in-cc-rdns I really don't any advantage to have this enabled. So I rely only in RBL. What's the differente between dns-blacklist-entry=sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org and dns-blacklist-entry=sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org and check-dnsrbl= sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org ? Any other suggestions? On 1 April 2012 18:26, Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com wrote: On 04/01/2012 09:07 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 04/01/2012 08:43 AM, Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote: In reply to Bharat Chari's statement Airtel, unfortunately is amongst the top 5 spambot networks in the world. I agree. But I would not lay the entire blame on Airtel alone. The reason so many spambots are hosted on these networks is the low and could not care 2 hoots about my machine being infected attitude of users that leads to this. Educating users to be proactive about protecting their computing environment (mostly one dominant OS) from infiltration and hijack is a must. Major Indian ISP's such as Airtel should also participate in the efforts to take down the command and control centers of these spambot networks. Perhaps someone should attempt to persuade Airtel to block outbound port 25 traffic from their dhcp and/or residential subscribers that's not destined to their smtp servers. This is what Cox (cable) and Centurylink (DSL) both do in this area. I think doing so goes a long way toward thwarting infected machines. Personally, I use a perimeter firewall to block any outbound port 25 traffic that doesn't originate from my QMT host. This keeps unauthorized email from going out on an IP address which also services user internet access. This is way beyond the scope of the average user. My father for instance could never on his own block port 25 traffic. He use to have a Windows box and recently upgraded. I built him a Linux box and it seems to have stopped any Malware problems he was having. -- cj's_sig.png
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Questions on setting for the special e-mailaccount
I'm not following closely this thread, but I'm listening something odd. For each define like CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_10 there is also in chkuser.c #if defined CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_10 (user-s[x] != CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_10) #endif So, just adding another define in chkuser_setting.h is a waste of time, if you don't change chkuser.c too. Tonino P.S. I feel this check should not be used anymore, because as of today strange characters are widely used in email addresses. Il 31/03/2012 09:27, q...@foxitsoftware.com ha scritto: update. Hi Eric, I try the following steps,please help to check if it is OK. 1)vim /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/qmail-1.03/chkuser_settings.h 2)add #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_11 ''' and #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_11 ''' /* * If you need more additional characters to be accepted within sender address * uncomment one of the following #define and edit the character value. * Be careful to use '*' (single hiphen) and NOT * (double hiphen) around the * wanted char. * * Remember: '#' and '+' are accepted by CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_SRS * */ #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_1 '$' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_2 '%' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_3 '/' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_4 '?' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_5 '*' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_6 '^' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_7 '~' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_8 '' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_9 '#' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_10 '=' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_11 ''' /* * If you need more additional characters to be accepted within rcpt address * uncomment one of the following #define and edit the character value. * Be careful to use '*' (single hiphen) and NOT * (double hiphen) around the * wanted char. * * Remember: '#' and '+' are accepted by CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_SRS * */ #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_1 '$' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_2 '%' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_3 '/' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_4 '?' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_5 '*' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_6 '^' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_7 '~' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_8 '' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_9 '#' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_10 '=' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_11 ''' 3) rpmbuild -bb --with fedora_1164 qmail-toaster.spec ---it is ok Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.x86_64 Wrote: /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.x86_64.rpm Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9XekqK + umask 022 + cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd qmail-1.03 + '[' -n /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.x86_64 -a /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.x86_64 '!=' / ']' + rm -rf /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.x86_64 + '[' -d /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/qmail-1.03 ']' + rm -rf /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/qmail-1.03 + exit 0 4) [root@demo6 x86_64]# rpm -Uvh --replacefiles --replacepkgs qmail-*.rpm Preparing...### [100%] Adding qmailtoaster users and groups. groupadd: group 'nofiles' already exists groupadd: group 'qmail' already exists 1:qmail-toaster warning: /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem created as /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem.rpmnew ### [ 50%] Creating queue/lock/trigger named pipe. Compiling badmimetypes. Compiling badloadertypes. Making tlsserverciphers. Linking tlsserverciphers to tlsclientciphers. Making dh_keys. Generating RSA private key, 512 bit long modulus ... e is 65537 (0x10001) Generating DH parameters, 512 bit long safe prime, generator 2 This is going to take a long time .+...+.++*++*++*++*++*++* Generating DH parameters, 1024 bit long safe prime, generator 2 This is going to take a long time ..++++..+..++*++*++* 2:qmail-pop3d-toaster### [100%] Regards 2012-03-31 q...@foxitsoftware.com *???:* q...@foxitsoftware.com *:* 2012-03-31 14:53:24 *???:* qmailtoaster-list *??:* *??:* Re: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Questions on setting for the special e-mailaccount Hi Eric, I try the following steps,please help to check if it is OK. 1)vim /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/qmail-1.03/chkuser_settings.h 2)add #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_11 ''' /* * If you need more additional characters to be accepted within sender address * uncomment one of the
[qmailtoaster] Re: Mail issue
On 04/01/2012 10:55 AM, Délsio Cabá wrote: I must agree that the options: #reject-empty-rdns #reject-ip-in-cc-rdns reject-missing-sender-mx #reject-unresolvable-rdns are very useful for blocking spam, but unfortunately I keep having complains from some clients that emails were not coming in. I fould out that some mail server don't even have reverse Ip configured and others have but the reverse name had not A Records. So I decided to disable reject-empty-rdns and reject-unresolvable-rdns. I haven't seen that many that are misconfigured. In some cases the domain has moved to another host which is not quite configured correctly yet. I ask my customers for the domain(s) that are being blocked, and explain to them that gmail is blocking email from that domain as well. Then I attempt to contact the admin and let them know what the problem is, and whitelist the domain in spamdyke. I'm simply not willing to forgo the advantages these filters give everyone else due to a few lame brained mail admins. To each his own though. So I rely only in RBL. What's the differente between dns-blacklist-entry=sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org http://sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org and dns-blacklist-entry=sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org http://sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org and |check-dnsrbl=|sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org http://sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org ? Check with spamhaus.org on that. They have several lists. -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] Re: Questions on setting for the special e-mailaccount
Tonino, What is the way that you recommend turning off this function? Thanks. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 04/01/2012 11:05 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: I'm not following closely this thread, but I'm listening something odd. For each define like CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_10 there is also in chkuser.c #if defined CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_10 (user-s[x] != CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_10) #endif So, just adding another define in chkuser_setting.h is a waste of time, if you don't change chkuser.c too. Tonino P.S. I feel this check should not be used anymore, because as of today strange characters are widely used in email addresses. Il 31/03/2012 09:27, q...@foxitsoftware.com ha scritto: update. Hi Eric, I try the following steps,please help to check if it is OK. 1)vim /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/qmail-1.03/chkuser_settings.h 2)add #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_11 ''' and #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_11 ''' /* * If you need more additional characters to be accepted within sender address * uncomment one of the following #define and edit the character value. * Be careful to use '*' (single hiphen) and NOT * (double hiphen) around the * wanted char. * * Remember: '#' and '+' are accepted by CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_SRS * */ #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_1 '$' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_2 '%' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_3 '/' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_4 '?' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_5 '*' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_6 '^' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_7 '~' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_8 '' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_9 '#' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_10 '=' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_11 ''' /* * If you need more additional characters to be accepted within rcpt address * uncomment one of the following #define and edit the character value. * Be careful to use '*' (single hiphen) and NOT * (double hiphen) around the * wanted char. * * Remember: '#' and '+' are accepted by CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_SRS * */ #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_1 '$' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_2 '%' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_3 '/' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_4 '?' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_5 '*' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_6 '^' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_7 '~' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_8 '' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_9 '#' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_10 '=' #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_11 ''' 3) rpmbuild -bb --with fedora_1164 qmail-toaster.spec ---it is ok Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.x86_64 Wrote: /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.x86_64.rpm Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9XekqK + umask 022 + cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd qmail-1.03 + '[' -n /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.x86_64 -a /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.x86_64 '!=' / ']' + rm -rf /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.x86_64 + '[' -d /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/qmail-1.03 ']' + rm -rf /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/qmail-1.03 + exit 0 4) [root@demo6 x86_64]# rpm -Uvh --replacefiles --replacepkgs qmail-*.rpm Preparing...### [100%] Adding qmailtoaster users and groups. groupadd: group 'nofiles' already exists groupadd: group 'qmail' already exists 1:qmail-toaster warning: /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem created as /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem.rpmnew ### [ 50%] Creating queue/lock/trigger named pipe. Compiling badmimetypes. Compiling badloadertypes. Making tlsserverciphers. Linking tlsserverciphers to tlsclientciphers. Making dh_keys. Generating RSA private key, 512 bit long modulus ... e is 65537 (0x10001) Generating DH parameters, 512 bit long safe prime, generator 2 This is going to take a long time .+...+.++*++*++*++*++*++* Generating DH parameters, 1024 bit long safe prime, generator 2 This is going to take a long time ..++++..+..++*++*++* 2:qmail-pop3d-toaster### [100%] Regards 2012-03-31 q...@foxitsoftware.com *发件人：* q...@foxitsoftware.com *发送时间：* 2012-03-31 14:53:24 *收件人：* qmailtoaster-list *抄送：* *主题：* Re: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Questions on setting for the special e-mailaccount Hi Eric, I try the following steps,please help to check if it is OK. 1)vim /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/qmail-1.03/chkuser_settings.h 2)add
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mail issue
On Monday 02 April 2012 04:55 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 04/01/2012 10:55 AM, Délsio Cabá wrote: I must agree that the options: #reject-empty-rdns #reject-ip-in-cc-rdns reject-missing-sender-mx #reject-unresolvable-rdns are very useful for blocking spam, but unfortunately I keep having complains from some clients that emails were not coming in. I fould out that some mail server don't even have reverse Ip configured and others have but the reverse name had not A Records. So I decided to disable reject-empty-rdns and reject-unresolvable-rdns. I haven't seen that many that are misconfigured. In some cases the domain has moved to another host which is not quite configured correctly yet. I ask my customers for the domain(s) that are being blocked, and explain to them that gmail is blocking email from that domain as well. Then I attempt to contact the admin and let them know what the problem is, and whitelist the domain in spamdyke. I'm simply not willing to forgo the advantages these filters give everyone else due to a few lame brained mail admins. To each his own though. So I rely only in RBL. What's the differente between dns-blacklist-entry=sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org http://sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org and dns-blacklist-entry=sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org http://sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org and |check-dnsrbl=|sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org http://sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org ? Check with spamhaus.org on that. They have several lists. Coming back to Rajesh's original problem, I don't think he's using the spamhaus zen blocklist. Because airtel has clearly listed their dynamic IP blocks as not suitable for smtp in the PBL. I use zen and none of the Airtel dynamic IP spambots get through to me. http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL243394 shows one of their IP blocks Bharath - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
