[qmailtoaster] Re: '451 4.4.0 DNS temporary failure

2013-08-28 Thread Eric Shubert

Is the error is gone now?

--
-Eric 'shubes'

On 08/27/2013 09:23 PM, Linux wrote:

/etc/resolve.conf
search domain.com
nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 127.0.0.1

but now i install pdns and change it as,
#search domain.com
#nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 127.0.0.1


Regards,

Vivek Patil
system admin


-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 8:35 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: '451 4.4.0 DNS temporary failure

On 08/27/2013 05:04 AM, Linux wrote:

Server error: '451 4.4.0 DNS temporary failure (chkuser)'

Can I apply

# yum install pdns-recursor

# service pdns-recursor start

# chkconfig pdns-recursor on

Then change /etc/resolv.conf to be:

nameserver 127.0.0.1

Regards,

Vivek Patil

system admin



You can.
What does your /etc/resolv.conf file presently contain?






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



[qmailtoaster] SPF, DKIM, and now DMARC... a discussion?

2013-08-28 Thread Dan McAllister
Ok, so off-list I've been having this conversation with about 3 other 
QMT users about SPF  QMT.  Throughout the discussion, we've talked 
about SPF handling of both INBOUND mail (the 
/var/qmail/control/spfbehavior setting which controls how we process 
other people's SPF records) -and- OUTBOUND mail (the DNS SPF records 
that tell other people how to handle OUR SPF records).


It will come as no surprise to most, but I have some opinions on these 
-- opinions that it was suggested that I share with this group for 
discussion;


1) Inbound SPF Mail Processing
 - Although admittedly reported by others, I have very seldom had 
issues with QMT processing of SPF records - and when I did, it was 
usually a DNS error, not a processing one.
Still, I agree with Eric that it should be more of a simscan or 
spamdyke setting than a QMail setting. Be that as it may, I still trust 
and rely on SPF for minimal SPAM control.
NOTE: If simscan and/or spamdyke were to take on SPF, they should 
also include the DMARC specs as well.
 - Because I haven't had the problems others have reported (maybe 
because I use BIND9?), I use a value of *3 (yes, THREE)* in the 
*/var/qmail/control/spfbehavior* file
   This means that, if a sender has an SPF record and it says to 
/hard-fail/ unless the rules are met, then by golly, I reject 
non-compliant messages!
   However, many (/perhaps even most/?) SPF records are published with 
a SOFT-FAIL option (~all), so those soft-fails are still permitted through
   Domains that have NO SPF record, invalid SPF records, or whose DNS 
lookups fail are also allowed


2) Outbound SPF Mail Processing (a lot more discussion on this one, I 
suppose)
 - There are plenty of HOWTO's for this one, but *I* prefer to do the 
following [using YOUR domain(s) instead of domain.com]:
 a) Create a TXT record for *spf.domain.com *(and, if supported, a 
duplicate SPF record) that reads


   v=spf1 ip4:x.x.x.x *?all*

 Repeating the ip4 parts for each IP address that your legitimate 
MTAs may reside
 While this seems like an EXTRA step, it will help greatly if, 
later on, you decide to host multiple domains on your server.
 Why? because if you make each domain a stand-alone SPF record, 
then when your ISP forces you to change your IP address, you have to 
make the change in each and every one of your hosted domains' SPF 
records with the spf.domain.com TXT (and/or SPF) record, you can 
include the spf record from your domain to their domain and change 
multiple domains simultaneously.
 Next, what's with the *?all *at the end? This creates a neutral 
result for anything that doesn't match the rules so far -- this means 
that if there is a problem with the include, no pass/fail is set at all. 
This way, the domain in which you use the include is free to use 
additional includes and to set their own fail policy (~all or -all).


 b) So, as alluded to above, the next step is to create TXT (and SPF) 
records for your actual domain(s) that show:


   v=spf1 *include:spf.domain.com -all*

 The include part should make sense now -- but many people question 
why I use -all (instead of ~all) and the answer for me is simple... 
I know what I'm doing! LOL! The ~all setting is SUPPOSED to be used 
while you're testing SPF settings. With the ~all, a mail server (MTA) 
receiving a message from my domain is supposed to note that there is an 
error, but let the message pass (unless configured to fail on soft-fail 
codes as well)... that's essentially not even using SPF! With the -all, 
I'm telling the likes of Yahoo!, Gmail, etc. that if it says its from my 
domain, and it isn't from one of MY servers, then kick it back -- it 
must be bogus.
 As some of you know, I host quite a bit of email (enough that I 
now have 3 separate mail servers, each with their own domain lists!)... 
some of the clients on those mail servers pay extra for MessageLabs 
(Symantec) to do extra SPAM and AV checking (more than simscan  
spamdyke)... in doing so, all I have to do for those domains is use the 
appropriate include:spf.messagelabs.com type statement and I can 
redirect their mail to the appropriate (or receive their mail from the 
appropriate) set of servers. In these cases, their SPF records look like:


   v=spf1 *include:spf.it4soho.com include:spf.messagelabs.com -all*


 c) The final step takes me back to DNS again... and the newbie to 
the SPAM fighting arcade: DMARC (see DMARC.org)
 NOTE: Because DKIM in QMT is essentially break prone (as-in it 
often fails -- especially for mail from other QMT hosts -- even when all 
outside tests say things are good), I choose to implement DKIM in a 
TESTING mode. This isn't important here, except to explain why DKIM is 
noted in my DMARC record the way that it is
 ASIDE: If anyone wants to discuss the merits, demerits of DKIM, 
I'm happy to do so -- I just found that it was broken too often, so I 
removed it from my configs


 DMARC is relatively 

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: How to remove cached and buffer memory in Centos server

2013-08-28 Thread ChandranManikandan
Hi All,
Use Dns Yes is already commented in this file. But still am seeing this
message.
Can you help me.


On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:

 On 08/27/2013 08:26 AM, Dan McAllister wrote:

 On 8/27/2013 10:35 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:

 I just did this, but I'm sorry to say that it didn't solve my problem
 entirely. After a few tests, it appears that every other login is
 quick, and every other login has a delay (20 seconds or so). Seems
 persistent in that regard (I did a dozen or so tests).

 Perhaps a nss config issue?

 Thanks.
 (P.S. I'm aging here!) ;)



 Eric -- I thought you were running COS5???


 This one in particular is COS5. I'm (slowly) getting things migrated to
 COS6 because it runs a *lot* better as a KVM (on Proxmox). As soon as I get
 a certain samba issue ironed out (anyone know about changing the host name
 on a PDC?), I'll be tackling QMT on COS6.

  In COS6, there is another set of SSHd configs whose default was changed:
 *GSSAPI*


 Like the reverse DNS lookup, you want to TURN OFF this feature:
 Change to:
 *GSSAPIAuthentication no*

   (The other GSSAPI settings don't matter much if you're not permitting
 AUTH)

 To my understanding, the GSSAPI functionality is an alternative way of
 securing your connection for a password-less connection (vs. auth keys)
 that uses a Kerberos-type auth scheme no thanks... :)


 Somehow I had GSSAPIAuthentication turned on. I've no idea when/how/why
 that happened. I turned it off, and *voila*, no more delays!

 Thanks Dan! You're the bomb-diggity!


 --
 -Eric 'shubes'



 --**--**-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 qmailtoaster-list-unsubscribe@**qmailtoaster.comqmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: 
 qmailtoaster-list-help@**qmailtoaster.comqmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




-- 
*Thanks  Best Regards,
Manikandan.C
*


[qmailtoaster] Re: How to remove cached and buffer memory in Centos server

2013-08-28 Thread Eric Shubert

The commented lines indicate the default values.

You need an uncommented line:
UseDNS no

You also need:
GSSAPIAuthentication no

Once you've made those changes, you need to restart sshd:
# service sshd restart

--
-Eric 'shubes'

On 08/28/2013 07:18 PM, ChandranManikandan wrote:

Hi All,
Use Dns Yes is already commented in this file. But still am seeing this
message.
Can you help me.


On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
mailto:e...@shubes.net wrote:

On 08/27/2013 08:26 AM, Dan McAllister wrote:

On 8/27/2013 10:35 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:

I just did this, but I'm sorry to say that it didn't solve
my problem
entirely. After a few tests, it appears that every other
login is
quick, and every other login has a delay (20 seconds or so).
Seems
persistent in that regard (I did a dozen or so tests).

Perhaps a nss config issue?

Thanks.
(P.S. I'm aging here!) ;)



Eric -- I thought you were running COS5???


This one in particular is COS5. I'm (slowly) getting things migrated
to COS6 because it runs a *lot* better as a KVM (on Proxmox). As
soon as I get a certain samba issue ironed out (anyone know about
changing the host name on a PDC?), I'll be tackling QMT on COS6.

In COS6, there is another set of SSHd configs whose default was
changed:
*GSSAPI*


Like the reverse DNS lookup, you want to TURN OFF this feature:
Change to:
*GSSAPIAuthentication no*

   (The other GSSAPI settings don't matter much if you're not
permitting
AUTH)

To my understanding, the GSSAPI functionality is an alternative
way of
securing your connection for a password-less connection (vs.
auth keys)
that uses a Kerberos-type auth scheme no thanks... :)


Somehow I had GSSAPIAuthentication turned on. I've no idea
when/how/why that happened. I turned it off, and *voila*, no more
delays!

Thanks Dan! You're the bomb-diggity!


--
-Eric 'shubes'



--__--__-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscribe@__qmailtoaster.com
mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-help@__qmailtoaster.com
mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




--
*/Thanks  Best Regards,
Manikandan.C
/*




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mailer -daemon failure notice

2013-08-28 Thread ChandranManikandan
Hi All,
Again i received below message when we send email to any one and getting
bounce with unwanted emails are showing also.
I have to mention other thing. Am using outgoing server other smtp server.
Is any problem occur from outgoing smtp server. Please help me. Below All
ip and email address is not ours.

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.panasiagroup.net.
I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced!

jk...@stsinspect.com:
User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
jk...@stsinspect.com 72.167.238.29 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 552 5.2.0 H1Dm1m00r2XfecZ011DoK1 IB212 msg rejected as
spam

harms...@supanet.com:
User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
harms...@supanet.com 213.40.180.222 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 550-This message contains a virus or other harmful content
550 (Sanesecurity.Spam.ldb.59.UNOFFICIAL)

--- Below this line is the original bounce.

Return-Path: 
Received: (qmail 21062 invoked for bounce); 28 Aug 2013 15:27:45 -
Date: 28 Aug 2013 15:27:45 -
From: mailer-dae...@mail.panasiagroup.net
To: ravindran.recruiter+caf_=ravi=panasiagroup@gmail.com
Subject: failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.panasiagroup.net.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

ear...@familyaccess.net:
Sorry, I couldn't find a mail exchanger or IP address. (#5.4.4)

itcpubli...@flashmail.com:
User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
173.194.79.27 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does
not exist. Please try
550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or
550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at
550 5.1.1 
http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=6596hb3si7063498pac.65
- gsmtp Giving up on 173.194.79.27.

cmo...@filmgraphics.com:
User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
173.194.79.27 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does
not exist. Please try
550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or
550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at
550 5.1.1 
http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=6596bo2si6500759pbb.44
- gsmtp Giving up on 173.194.79.27.

c...@farbeduciel.com:
User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
66.39.2.47 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 c...@farbeduciel.com: Recipient address
rejected: Access denied Giving up on 66.39.2.47.

home...@fastwebnet.it:
User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
home...@fastwebnet.it 85.18.95.16 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 554 Message refused

hannu.sydanm...@fi.abb.com:
User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
129.35.204.80 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 Denied by policy.
Giving up on 129.35.204.80.

joshcot...@familyfed.org:
User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
67.227.135.108 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 No Such User Here
Giving up on 67.227.135.108.

gringo...@fastmail.fm:
User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
66.111.4.71 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 552 5.7.1 gringo...@fastmail.fm: Recipient address
rejected: User has been over quota for  1 week, email rejected Giving up
on 66.111.4.71.

leonlthur...@fairview.org:
User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
leonlthur...@fairview.org 208.84.65.44 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 550 5.1.1 User Unknown - Please check the email address
and try again. Otherwise, please contact the person and verify the address
is correct

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: ravindran.recruiter+caf_=ravi=panasiagroup@gmail.com
Received: (qmail 20726 invoked by uid 89); 28 Aug 2013 15:27:21 -
Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 20651, pid: 20709, t: 0.4102s
 scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.97.8/m:54/d:17761 spam: 3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
mail.panasiagroup.net
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=10.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,EMPTY_MESSAGE,FREEMAIL_FROM,LOTS_OF_MONEY,
MONEY_FORM_SHORT,RDNS_NONE,T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT autolearn=no version=3.3.2
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-ob0-f177.google.com) (209.85.214.177)
  by mail.panasiagroup.net with (RC4-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 28 Aug 2013
15:27:21 -
Received-SPF: pass (mail.panasiagroup.net: SPF record at _
netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender)
Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id f8so6742190obp.8
for r...@panasiagroup.net; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 08:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.60.115.164 with SMTP id 

[qmailtoaster] Some emails are going to spam or junk box to some recipients

2013-08-28 Thread ChandranManikandan
Hi All,
Still am facing this kind of issue some emails are going to spam and junk
box in recipient email boxes.
Can you please help me this.

-- 
*Thanks  Best Regards,
Manikandan.C
*


[qmailtoaster] My Email clients are hanging and disconnected frequently

2013-08-28 Thread ChandranManikandan
Hi All,
I am using Qmailtoaster with courier imap and my total mailboxes is around
100. Some email mailbox is very large from 10 to 15 GB.
At a time all users accessing emails from outlook or thunderbird or
squirrelmail email client. My server is hosting in our Main office.
Problem is if main office 20 users accessing emails through outlook still
they are facing hang and disconnected frequently. Same issue face in our
branch office also.
When they switch from inbox to any other folder hanging and not able to see
the mails.

Am planning to migrate from courier to dovecot. If i migrate my above query
will solved or still do i face this issue. or do i need to change settings
in courier imapd config file.


I want to solve this issue permanently.

My server config is 500GB and 10 GB RAM and our main office internet speed
is upload and download 30 MB Fibre optic broadband. Centos 5.7. 32 Bit.

Kindly help me any one,
-- 
*Thanks  Best Regards,
Manikandan.C
*
*System Admin*


Re: [qmailtoaster] My Email clients are hanging and disconnected frequently

2013-08-28 Thread cj yother

  
  
We need an autoresponder for this question...convert to Dovecot.
Instructions on the wiki.
On 08/28/2013 09:51 PM,
  ChandranManikandan wrote:


  Hi All,
I am using Qmailtoaster with courier imap and my total
  mailboxes is around 100. Some email mailbox is very large from
  10 to 15 GB.
At a time all users accessing emails from outlook or
  thunderbird or squirrelmail email client. My server is hosting
  in our Main office.
Problem is if main office 20 users accessing emails through
  outlook still they are facing hang and disconnected
  frequently. Same issue face in our branch office also.
When they switch from inbox to any other folder hanging and
  not able to see the mails.


Am planning to migrate from courier to dovecot. If i
  migrate my above query will solved or still do i face this
  issue. or do i need to change settings in courier imapd config
  file.
  

  
  
  
  I want to solve this issue permanently.
  
  
  My server config is 500GB and 10 GB RAM and our main
office internet speed is upload and download 30 MB Fibre
optic broadband. Centos 5.7. 32 Bit.
  
  
  Kindly help me any one,
  -- 
  Thanks  Best Regards,
Manikandan.C
  

System Admin
  


-- 
  
  



RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: '451 4.4.0 DNS temporary failure

2013-08-28 Thread Linux
Yes it solved.

Regards,

Vivek Patil
system admin


-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 8:18 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: '451 4.4.0 DNS temporary failure

Is the error is gone now?

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

On 08/27/2013 09:23 PM, Linux wrote:
 /etc/resolve.conf
 search domain.com
 nameserver 8.8.8.8
 nameserver 127.0.0.1

 but now i install pdns and change it as,
 #search domain.com
 #nameserver 8.8.8.8
 nameserver 127.0.0.1


 Regards,

 Vivek Patil
 system admin


 -Original Message-
 From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 8:35 PM
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: '451 4.4.0 DNS temporary failure

 On 08/27/2013 05:04 AM, Linux wrote:
 Server error: '451 4.4.0 DNS temporary failure (chkuser)'

 Can I apply

 # yum install pdns-recursor

 # service pdns-recursor start

 # chkconfig pdns-recursor on

 Then change /etc/resolv.conf to be:

 nameserver 127.0.0.1

 Regards,

 Vivek Patil

 system admin


 You can.
 What does your /etc/resolv.conf file presently contain?





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



Re: [qmailtoaster] My Email clients are hanging and disconnected frequently

2013-08-28 Thread Edwin Casimero

  
  
Aside from converting to dovecot for
  IMAP, I also use JFS instead of EXT3.
  
  I do not think EXT3 is up to the task anymore.
  
  Are you on any RAID?
  
  Best wishes,
  Edwin
  
  On Thursday, 29 August, 2013 12:53 PM, cj yother wrote:


  
  We need an autoresponder for this question...convert to Dovecot.
  Instructions on the wiki.
  On 08/28/2013 09:51 PM,
ChandranManikandan wrote:
  
  
Hi All,
  I am using Qmailtoaster with courier imap and my total
mailboxes is around 100. Some email mailbox is very large
from 10 to 15 GB.
  At a time all users accessing emails from outlook or
thunderbird or squirrelmail email client. My server is
hosting in our Main office.
  Problem is if main office 20 users accessing emails
through outlook still they are facing hang and disconnected
frequently. Same issue face in our branch office also.
  When they switch from inbox to any other folder hanging
and not able to see the mails.
  
  
  Am planning to migrate from courier to dovecot. If i
migrate my above query will solved or still do i face this
issue. or do i need to change settings in courier imapd
config file.
 



I want to solve this issue permanently.


My server config is 500GB and 10 GB RAM and our main
  office internet speed is upload and download 30 MB Fibre
  optic broadband. Centos 5.7. 32 Bit.


Kindly help me any one,
-- 
Thanks  Best Regards,
  Manikandan.C
 
  System Admin

  
  
  -- 



  



[qmailtoaster] 571 sorry, you are violating our security policies

2013-08-28 Thread Linux
Team,

 

when I sent the mail in my domain user from my same domain email id, I got
an error,

571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 - chkuser)

 

when I checked in qcontrol I found an error,

delivery 1678: deferral: write_failed_errno_=_28/system_error/

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Vivek Patil

system admin