Re: [qmailtoaster] install/update webmail responsive roudcube??

2017-09-04 Thread Remo Mattei 
Qmail does not care about roundcube!

Sent from my iPad

> On Sep 4, 2017, at 2:05 PM, Giuseppe Perna  wrote:
> 
> Hello, i have this pakage installed and work fine.
> 
>  #rpm -qa qmail*
> qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15
> qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.11-1.3.4
> qmailtoaster-plus-0.3.0-1.4.4
> qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.15
> qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.3
> 
> i wont upgrade my roundcube webmail for responsive feauter, is it possible?
> 
> thanks
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

[qmailtoaster] install/update webmail responsive roudcube??

2017-09-04 Thread Giuseppe Perna 
Hello, i have this pakage installed and work fine.

 #rpm -qa qmail*
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15
qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.11-1.3.4
qmailtoaster-plus-0.3.0-1.4.4
qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.15
qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.3

i wont upgrade my roundcube webmail for responsive feauter, is it possible?

thanks

Re: Fwd: Re: [qmailtoaster] qq soft reject errors on high load

2017-09-04 Thread Rajesh M 
eric

i did not yet simulate it using your script

these are errors in my live production server during peak hours today and there 
were mails with and without attachments.

the max processes i got was 47 only.

rajesh


- Original Message -
From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 11:19:35 -0600
Subject:

Did you hit it with email containing attachments as well?


On 9/4/2017 10:58 AM, Rajesh M wrote:
> eric
>
> the max i saw was 47 connections using the shell script you gave me.
>
> there were a few errors related to qq soft reject but they got delivered.
>
> rajesh
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Sent: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 12:35:14 -0600
> Subject:
>
> Rajesh,
>
> I'm still not sure the process limit is being reached.
>
> I'm testing a COS6/QMT server now and haven't been able to bring about
> 'qq soft reject' or failure of any sort. I'm hitting it with email using
> a delivery script from two servers with attachment size of 320KB.
>
> try the script below (psmem) to monitor:
>
> 
>
> #!/bin/bash
> ps -C $1 -O rss | gawk '{ count ++; sum += $2 }; END {count --; print
> "Number of processes =",count; print "Memory usage per process
> =",sum/1024/count, "MB"; print "Total memory usage =", sum/1024, "MB" ;};'
>
> 
>
> # chmod 755 psmem
>
> # watch -n 1 ./psmem simscan
>
>
> Not sure I should change anything until we figure out what's going on.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> On 9/2/2017 12:03 PM, Rajesh M wrote:
>> eric
>>
>> i could not get the bash script working with either of the two options. 
>> still gives error
>>line 23: `return-limits': not a valid identifier.
>>
>>
>>
>> can the limits issue in simscan be fixed ?
>>
>> thanks,
>> rajesh
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
>> To:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> Sent: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 23:46:15 -0600
>> Subject:
>>
>> Rajesh,
>>
>> It has something to do with #!/bin/bash or #!/bin/sh.
>>
>> At top of script, when I use #!/bin/sh I get the same error you do, but
>> when I use #!/bin/bash script works fine.
>>
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>> On 9/1/2017 11:07 PM, Rajesh M wrote:
>>> eric
>>>
>>> 1) is their any resolution for this issue ?
>>>
>>> 2) if i run the script it throws error as such
>>> .
>>> /limits.sh: line 23: `return-limits': not a valid identifier
>>>
>>> #!/bin/bash
>>> if [ "$#" -ne "1" ]; then
>>>   echo ""
>>>   echo -e "\033[01;32mLimit checker\033[00m"
>>>   echo -e "\033[01;37mUsage:\033[01;33m $0 process_name\033[00m"
>>>   echo ""
>>>   exit 0
>>> fi
>>>
>>> return-limits(){
>>>   for process in $@; do
>>>  process_pids=`ps -C $process -o pid --no-headers | cut -d " " -f 2`
>>>
>>>  if [ -z $@ ]; then
>>> echo "[no $process running]"
>>>  else
>>> for pid in $process_pids; do
>>>echo "[$process #$pid -- limits]"
>>>cat /proc/$pid/limits
>>>  done
>>>  fi
>>>   done
>>> }
>>> return-limits $1
>>>
>>> rajesh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
>>> To:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>>> Sent: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 17:28:40 -0600
>>> Subject:
>>>
>>> I sent myself a large file so that I could examine simscan with the
>>> below script (limits.sh). Here's the output:
>>>
>>> [root@pet105 simscan-1.4.0]# ./limits simscan
>>> [simscan #31535 -- limits]
>>> Limit   
>>>    
>>>    
>>>    
>>>    
>>>    
>>>    Soft Limit 
>>>    
>>>    
>>>     Hard 
>>> Limit   
>>>    
>>>    
>>>   Units
>>> Max cpu time   
>>>    
>>>    
>>>    
>>>   unlimited unlimited 
>>>    
>>>    
>>>   

Re: Fwd: Re: [qmailtoaster] qq soft reject errors on high load

2017-09-04 Thread Rajesh M 
eric

i got 3 types of errors like earlier.

failure to fork, ripmime
and  /var/qmail/simscan/1simscan: check_spam had an error ret: -1

what exactly would be  /var/qmail/simscan/1simscan ... there is no such file

do want me to send you a few of my log files directly to your email id ?

rajesh

- Original Message -
From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 11:19:04 -0600
Subject:

What kind of qq soft reject errors were there? Failure to fork or ripmime?


On 9/4/2017 10:58 AM, Rajesh M wrote:
> eric
>
> the max i saw was 47 connections using the shell script you gave me.
>
> there were a few errors related to qq soft reject but they got delivered.
>
> rajesh
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Sent: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 12:35:14 -0600
> Subject:
>
> Rajesh,
>
> I'm still not sure the process limit is being reached.
>
> I'm testing a COS6/QMT server now and haven't been able to bring about
> 'qq soft reject' or failure of any sort. I'm hitting it with email using
> a delivery script from two servers with attachment size of 320KB.
>
> try the script below (psmem) to monitor:
>
> 
>
> #!/bin/bash
> ps -C $1 -O rss | gawk '{ count ++; sum += $2 }; END {count --; print
> "Number of processes =",count; print "Memory usage per process
> =",sum/1024/count, "MB"; print "Total memory usage =", sum/1024, "MB" ;};'
>
> 
>
> # chmod 755 psmem
>
> # watch -n 1 ./psmem simscan
>
>
> Not sure I should change anything until we figure out what's going on.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> On 9/2/2017 12:03 PM, Rajesh M wrote:
>> eric
>>
>> i could not get the bash script working with either of the two options. 
>> still gives error
>>line 23: `return-limits': not a valid identifier.
>>
>>
>>
>> can the limits issue in simscan be fixed ?
>>
>> thanks,
>> rajesh
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
>> To:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> Sent: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 23:46:15 -0600
>> Subject:
>>
>> Rajesh,
>>
>> It has something to do with #!/bin/bash or #!/bin/sh.
>>
>> At top of script, when I use #!/bin/sh I get the same error you do, but
>> when I use #!/bin/bash script works fine.
>>
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>> On 9/1/2017 11:07 PM, Rajesh M wrote:
>>> eric
>>>
>>> 1) is their any resolution for this issue ?
>>>
>>> 2) if i run the script it throws error as such
>>> .
>>> /limits.sh: line 23: `return-limits': not a valid identifier
>>>
>>> #!/bin/bash
>>> if [ "$#" -ne "1" ]; then
>>>   echo ""
>>>   echo -e "\033[01;32mLimit checker\033[00m"
>>>   echo -e "\033[01;37mUsage:\033[01;33m $0 process_name\033[00m"
>>>   echo ""
>>>   exit 0
>>> fi
>>>
>>> return-limits(){
>>>   for process in $@; do
>>>  process_pids=`ps -C $process -o pid --no-headers | cut -d " " -f 2`
>>>
>>>  if [ -z $@ ]; then
>>> echo "[no $process running]"
>>>  else
>>> for pid in $process_pids; do
>>>echo "[$process #$pid -- limits]"
>>>cat /proc/$pid/limits
>>>  done
>>>  fi
>>>   done
>>> }
>>> return-limits $1
>>>
>>> rajesh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
>>> To:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>>> Sent: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 17:28:40 -0600
>>> Subject:
>>>
>>> I sent myself a large file so that I could examine simscan with the
>>> below script (limits.sh). Here's the output:
>>>
>>> [root@pet105 simscan-1.4.0]# ./limits simscan
>>> [simscan #31535 -- limits]
>>> Limit   
>>>    
>>>    
>>>    
>>>    
>>>    
>>>    Soft Limit 
>>>    
>>>    
>>>     Hard 
>>> Limit   
>>>    
>>>    
>>>   Units
>>> Max cpu time   
>>>    
>>>    
>>>    
>>>   unlimited unlimited 
>>>    
>>>  

RE: Fwd: Re: [qmailtoaster] qq soft reject errors on high load

2017-09-04 Thread Rajesh M 
eric

the max i saw was 47 connections using the shell script you gave me.

there were a few errors related to qq soft reject but they got delivered.

rajesh



- Original Message -
From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 12:35:14 -0600
Subject:

Rajesh,

I'm still not sure the process limit is being reached.

I'm testing a COS6/QMT server now and haven't been able to bring about
'qq soft reject' or failure of any sort. I'm hitting it with email using
a delivery script from two servers with attachment size of 320KB.

try the script below (psmem) to monitor:



#!/bin/bash
ps -C $1 -O rss | gawk '{ count ++; sum += $2 }; END {count --; print
"Number of processes =",count; print "Memory usage per process
=",sum/1024/count, "MB"; print "Total memory usage =", sum/1024, "MB" ;};'



# chmod 755 psmem

# watch -n 1 ./psmem simscan


Not sure I should change anything until we figure out what's going on.

Eric



On 9/2/2017 12:03 PM, Rajesh M wrote:
> eric
>
> i could not get the bash script working with either of the two options. still 
> gives error
>   line 23: `return-limits': not a valid identifier.
>
>
>
> can the limits issue in simscan be fixed ?
>
> thanks,
> rajesh
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
> To:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Sent: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 23:46:15 -0600
> Subject:
>
> Rajesh,
>
> It has something to do with #!/bin/bash or #!/bin/sh.
>
> At top of script, when I use #!/bin/sh I get the same error you do, but
> when I use #!/bin/bash script works fine.
>
>
> Eric
>
>
> On 9/1/2017 11:07 PM, Rajesh M wrote:
>> eric
>>
>> 1) is their any resolution for this issue ?
>>
>> 2) if i run the script it throws error as such
>> .
>> /limits.sh: line 23: `return-limits': not a valid identifier
>>
>> #!/bin/bash
>> if [ "$#" -ne "1" ]; then
>>  echo ""
>>  echo -e "\033[01;32mLimit checker\033[00m"
>>  echo -e "\033[01;37mUsage:\033[01;33m $0 process_name\033[00m"
>>  echo ""
>>  exit 0
>> fi
>>
>> return-limits(){
>>  for process in $@; do
>> process_pids=`ps -C $process -o pid --no-headers | cut -d " " -f 2`
>>
>> if [ -z $@ ]; then
>>echo "[no $process running]"
>> else
>>for pid in $process_pids; do
>>   echo "[$process #$pid -- limits]"
>>   cat /proc/$pid/limits
>> done
>> fi
>>  done
>> }
>> return-limits $1
>>
>> rajesh
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
>> To:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> Sent: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 17:28:40 -0600
>> Subject:
>>
>> I sent myself a large file so that I could examine simscan with the
>> below script (limits.sh). Here's the output:
>>
>> [root@pet105 simscan-1.4.0]# ./limits simscan
>> [simscan #31535 -- limits]
>> Limit        
>>         
>>      Soft Limit   
>>         Hard 
>> Limit        
>>    Units
>> Max cpu time       
>>        unlimited 
>> unlimited       
>>      seconds
>> Max file size       
>>       unlimited unlimited 
>>         
>>    bytes
>> Max data size       
>>       unlimited unlimited 
>>         
>>    bytes
>> Max stack size 10485760 unlimited    
>>         bytes
>> Max core file size      
>>   0 unlimited      
>>       bytes
>> Max resident set      
>>     unlimited unlimited   
>>          
>> bytes
>> Max processes 1024 31121     
>>         
>>    processes
>> Max open files       
>> ÂÂÂ