[qmailtoaster] Help request to comunity on tech issue.

2012-05-21 Thread fmendez73
 Hello everyone
 I am the owner of a growing hosting enterprise in my country (Perú),
and we are facing big rise on our client number.
 As an efect of this we are seeying a rise in mail outbound in our 
servers. Even thoug we put limits to hourly sending, having more than
9k  clients, all delivering through the same cluster, it lacks of 
efectiveness because each server in cluster uses only one ip for
sending  tasks. We are now seeying blocking issues because of the many
clents  generated traffic.
 We talked to some people at godaddy and hostgator, as we know they
use a  cluster system that includes on each server a list of IPs that
rotates  in a random fashion, so even with high demand quality service
on mail  delivery from client accounts is always achieved.
 I would like to ask for some guidance and help to this comunity on
how can we could  implement such solution to rotate in a random or
other way the IPs for  sending clients mails.
 I hope you people can see my situation and can help me with this. We
used to  work with exim, but since we changed to QMT it was the best
desition we  ever made on this matters. Now we need to push it to a
next level.
 Thanks a lot.


Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Help request to comunity on tech issue.

2012-05-21 Thread fmendez73
 Hello Eric, thanks for your reply.
 We do not have spam issues with our customers, what we have is a high
volume due to large clients number.
 All meassures to void spam sending are taken, but the blocks are
being generated for large volume send from just a bunch of IPs (5)
which are the number of mta's qmt in our cluster. As all you may know,
having 9k clients with at least 4 email accounts per client and a
limit of 350 per hour per account, it is still a big traffic
generated. 
 So I am looking forward to have better service on delivery having in
mind that custmer number is growing fast and anti-spam messures do its
job preatty good. But of the lack of IP on each mta in cluster, it is
affecting delivery.
 Hope someone around may share a solution.
 Thanks.
 On lun 21/05/12  4:55  PM , Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net sent:
 I don't know if rotating addresses is the best solution or not. It's 
 certainly not practical for small QMT installations.
 I think in many (if not all or most) of these cases, the user's
password 
 has been compromised. This is especially likely if it's possible to 
 configure a client insecurely (plain text password with no TLS/SSL). 
 I've seen this happen on more than one occasion, on a small domain. 
 Password sniffing does happen.
 First step is to ensure that clients cannot attempt to authenticate
with 
 clear text passwords. This can be enforced with dovecot, but we don't

 have a way yet to enforce it on the sending/smtp side. I'm hopeful
that 
 Sam will get this feature built into spamdyke in the near future.
 Another good defensive weapon is a script I came across on the
spamdyke 
 list today, and hope to make available in some form with QTP in the 
 future. It's a script that periodically checks the logs for accounts 
 which have sent more messages in a given interval than some allowed 
 limit. When it finds such an account, it changes the password,
removes 
 messages from that account still in the queue, and notifies the 
 postmaster with an email. I think this is very practical, because 
 passwords do become compromised on occasion, even with full
encryption 
 (human action). The script is written in python, and will need a
little 
 tweaking for the QMT environment, as it's presently written to scan a

 spamdyke log (the author wasn't using the submission port at all). I 
 think it'd be better to scan the send log if that's feasible.
Anywise, I 
 think this approach is promising.
 If anyone has any thoughts on this, please chime in. It's in
everyone's 
 interest to be protecting our public IP addresses so they don't get 
 blacklisted.
 Thanks.
 -- 
 -Eric 'shubes'
 On 05/21/2012 01:42 PM, fmende...@terra.com [1] wrote:
  Hello everyone
 
 
  I am the owner of a growing hosting enterprise in my country
(Perú), and
  we are facing big rise on our client number.
 
  As an efect of this we are seeying a rise in mail outbound in our
  servers. Even thoug we put limits to hourly sending, having more
than 9k
  clients, all delivering through the same cluster, it lacks of
  efectiveness because each server in cluster uses only one ip for
sending
  tasks. We are now seeying blocking issues because of the many
clents
  generated traffic.
 
  We talked to some people at godaddy and hostgator, as we know they
use a
  cluster system that includes on each server a list of IPs that
rotates
  in a random fashion, so even with high demand quality service on
mail
  delivery from client accounts is always achieved.
 
  I would like to ask for some guidance and help to this comunity on
how
  can we could implement such solution to rotate in a random or other
way
  the IPs for sending clients mails.
 
  I hope you people can see my situation and can help me with this.
We
  used to work with exim, but since we changed to QMT it was the best
  desition we ever made on this matters. Now we need to push it to a
next
  level.
 
 
 
  Thanks a lot.
 
 
 
-
 Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them
today!
 
-
  Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.
   To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com [2]
  For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com [3]


Re: [qmailtoaster] Help request to comunity on tech issue.

2012-05-21 Thread fmendez73
 
 Hello Natalio,
 do you have a precise example on how to implement this?
 Thanks.
 On lun 21/05/12  4:35  PM , Natalio Gatti nga...@gmail.com sent:
 I can only think in one solution. Via iptables and src-nat. Not
so-random, but you can change your outbound IP address every minute.
And AFAIK, once a connection has been established, the nat table
mantains the translation.
 On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM,   wrote:
  Hello everyone
 I am the owner of a growing hosting enterprise in my country (Perú),
and we are facing big rise on our client number.
 As an efect of this we are seeying a rise in mail outbound in our 
servers. Even thoug we put limits to hourly sending, having more than
9k  clients, all delivering through the same cluster, it lacks of 
efectiveness because each server in cluster uses only one ip for
sending  tasks. We are now seeying blocking issues because of the many
clents  generated traffic.
 We talked to some people at godaddy and hostgator, as we know they
use a  cluster system that includes on each server a list of IPs that
rotates  in a random fashion, so even with high demand quality service
on mail  delivery from client accounts is always achieved.
 I would like to ask for some guidance and help to this comunity on
how can we could  implement such solution to rotate in a random or
other way the IPs for  sending clients mails.
 I hope you people can see my situation and can help me with this. We
used to  work with exim, but since we changed to QMT it was the best
desition we  ever made on this matters. Now we need to push it to a
next level.
 Thanks a lot.


[qmailtoaster] CentOS 6 install update?

2012-03-20 Thread fmendez73
 Hello, 

 anyone may tell me if there is any updates on scripts to install
qmailtoaster on CentOS 6 without any issues?
 Thanks.


Re: [qmailtoaster] Help needed with Qmail-Toaster setup

2012-02-05 Thread fmendez73
 oh! it was automatic, off now. Sorry.
 On dom 05/02/12 12:59  PM , Bharath Chari qmailtoas...@arachnis.com
sent:
On Sunday 05 February 2012 06:49 AM,
fmende...@terra.com wrote:Well   this is the scenario.
  Can you please turn off return receipts on mail sent to the
list.
 Thanks
 Bharath
-
  Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido.
 Este mensaje ha sido verificado por el E-mail Protegido.


Re: [qmailtoaster] Help needed with Qmail-Toaster setup

2012-02-05 Thread fmendez73
 Hey Peter, thanks for the answeres.
 About been permisive with spam, thats never something we do. We
actually suspend and then ban the users that by using our services
causes spam complaints or RBL listings (which demonstrates that the
list they use is harvested). We ZERO tolerant to spam. Although the
emailing  usage is a growing issue.
 I already read the link you share, but that is only if you have
multiple domains assigned to a singular and different ip to each one.
This is not the case.
 Hopefully some one around may share a solution.
 Thanks a lot.
 On dom 05/02/12  6:23  AM , Peter Peltonen peter.pelto...@gmail.com
sent:
 Hi,
 On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:19 AM,   wrote:
  Well this is the scenario.
 
  With 90 customers, having between 5 to 10 email accounts, all of
them
  sending every day no more than 300 emails/h
  giving as result peaks of even 270,000 emails an hour. It is simple
math to
 That is a lot of email...
  know that with only 1 IP for all that outbound will at least start
to be
  defered. To that you can add the fact that some user do send email
as
  mailing marketing within the already set limitations but still
their lists
  (who knows!) might and surely be plenty of haverst emails and
spam-traps and
  complainers. So in less than a week our main IP is broken. Lowering
the
 If it is valid marketing email (the receivers have accepted to
 receive the email) then I would implement a system that would somehow
 spread the emails sent to a longer interval of time so you won't hit
 any limit on the receiving side.
 But for me it sounds like some of your customers are sending spam?
You
 should not encourage this, even if you make money out of it. There
are
 rules and legislation that you can present to your customers and make
 them reconsider their marketing approaches.
  sending limits bellow 300/h is not atractive to new customers. So
you see
  the only way to balance this issues is by changing the outbound IP
in a
  random way or from time to time.
 If you still want to do this and you are 100% sure that it is legit
 email your users are sending, here are some approaches you could try:
 A quick googling revealed a patch that can assign a different ip to
 your qmail depending on the domain where you sent the email from:
 http://rno-consultores.com/mail/qmail/qmail-1.03_outgoingips.patch
[2]
 If an IP gets blacklisted you could then quickly change the mappings.
 This approach would be useful as you could this way also identify the
 domains that do get blacklisted and investigate why it happens. You
 need to recompile Qmail to integrate this patch and I have never used
 it by myself.
 The other approach is a simple one: AFAIK the address used by Qmail
 for sending email is defined in /var/qmail/control/me
 So You could rather easily come up with a script that randomly writes
 a new hostname to that file and run that script from a cron job. Not
 sure if Qmail restart is needed after changing the hostname.
 Regards,
 Peter
 
-
 Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them
today!
 
-
  Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.
   To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com [3]
  For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com [4]
 Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido.
 Este mensaje ha sido verificado por el E-mail Protegido.


[qmailtoaster] Help needed with Qmail-Toaster setup

2012-02-04 Thread fmendez73
Hi to all.  

I just build my qmail-toaster box for my sharing host business. But Im trying 
to protect the IPs we use for send customers emails under no more than 300/h. 
Since I have 90 users on that box and some users have like 10 emails each, I 
really need a way to protect the main IP. 

So what Im asking to you guys, is there a way to patch qmail-toaster so each 
time an email is sent it picks up a different IP from the box's IP pool (no 
more than 4 ips are in it)? Like a random pick up or such?

I hope you guys can help me out, 'cause otherwise I will be having problems 
soon due to emails sent of my many clients.


thanks in advantage for you kind help :)

Best regards.


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
  If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
 Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

  To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] Help needed with Qmail-Toaster setup

2012-02-04 Thread fmendez73
 Well this is the scenario.
 With 90 customers, having between 5 to 10 email accounts, all of them
sending every day no more than 300 emails/h 
  giving as result peaks of even 270,000 emails an hour. It is simple
math to know that with only 1 IP for all that outbound will at least
start to be defered. To that you can add the fact that some user do
send email as mailing marketing within the already set limitations but
still their lists (who knows!) might and surely be plenty of haverst
emails and spam-traps and complainers. So in less than a week our main
IP is broken. Lowering the sending limits bellow 300/h is not
atractive to new customers. So you see the only way to balance this
issues is by changing the outbound IP in a random way or from time to
time.
 I really hope some of you guys can help me out as I've been told that
this list is very helpfull with its users.
 Regards.
 On sáb 04/02/12  6:09  PM , Peter Peltonen peter.pelto...@gmail.com
sent:
 Hi,
 On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:10 PM,   wrote:
  I just build my qmail-toaster box for my sharing host business. But
Im trying to protect the IPs we use for send customers emails under no
more than 300/h. Since I have 90 users on that box and some users have
like 10 emails each, I really need a way to protect the main IP.
 I'm wondering: what does limit you for sending more than 300 mails
per
 hour -- your ISP? And how does they do this -- is your ISP perhaps
 blocking all other SMTP traffic from you than their own and they
 somehow limit this smart host connection? Could you maybe ask them to
 make an exception with your server, so you can make direct SMTP
 connections to the MX hosts you are delivering messages to, so you
 won't have to use your ISP's SMTP server as a smart host?
 Or are you just afraid that if you relay your customers email you
will
 get blacklisted because of spam they might send? For this I would
 rather see the solution being preventing them sending spam than
 changing IP addresses: forcing them to use authentication is the
first
 obvious step.
 Best,
 Peter
 
-
 Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them
today!
 
-
  Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.
   To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com [2]
  For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com [3]
 Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido.
 Este mensaje ha sido verificado por el E-mail Protegido.


[qmailtoaster] IP Rotation

2012-01-22 Thread fmendez73
 

Hi to all. 
 I run a little hosting enterprise. And for more than a year I had
problems with IP blocking due to clients sending mails using the same
main ip. After doing some research and talking to other hosting
wembasters they came with the idea to have a different set of ips but
linked to the main domain of the server. Like mx1, mx2, mx3...each one
of them assigned to a different IP of each other and different from
the main ip, and also make them rotate each time a mail is send. So at
the end any mail will come from one of the
mx[N].mysharehostingdomain.com
 The point is that I don't know how to do this with qmailtoaster. Any
ideas and help please?
 thanks.