RE: [qmailtoaster] spammer / Boom email

2010-08-19 Thread Hajid
 

 

  _  

From: Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 8:39 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spammer / Boom email

 

On 08/12/2010 09:42 PM, Hajid wrote: 

 

 

 

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-66.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,

 
FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,FH_FAKE_RCVD_LINE,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,INVALID_MSGID,

 
MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MIMEOLE,

 
MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_SPAM,RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_IN_PBL,

 
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING,

SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no

 


The problem appears to be here:
USER_IN_WHITELIST
You have the user defined in your local.cf file as whitelisted, so they
start with a -100 score. As spamassassin adds together all of the positive
scores, they end up with a -66.8, so this user will never have their mail
deleted as spam.

Could it be a wildcard whitelist for hotmail in local.cf? Because I doubt
this user would have been manually added to local.cf.

Bharath



Possible. It would only be guessing until the local.cf is provided.

At local.cf I added whitelist_from *...@hotmail.com.

My others question, why this server can be as spammer. This server not
openrelay.i still looking for this.

 

 


You whitelisted everyone at hotmail.com, so every email that comes from
someone at hotmail.com starts with a score of -100 (note that is a NEGATIVE
sign before the 100). So the incoming email hit all of these rules:
FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,FH_FAKE_RCVD_LINE,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,INVALID_MSGID, 

 
MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MIMEOLE,

 
MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_SPAM,RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_IN_PBL,

 
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING,

SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO


Which added to a score of 33.2 which would normally cause the message to be
deleted, but since all users at hotmail.com start with a -100, it only added
the score to -66.8, which is still 71.8 points away from even being marked
as spam.
To stop these types of messages you need to remove the whitelisting for
hotmail.com (possibly only whitelist individual addresses?) and possibly
adjust your spam rules and their scoring.
The system worked as designed. It accepted a message (you have not shown us
enough of the headers to really know what was going on), and scored it
exactly how you told it to score messages. 

 

 

 

After remove whitelist_from *...@hotmail.com. At local.cf everything ok. 

 

When I look at /var/log/qmail/smtp/current I got this. Why by adding
whitelist_from at local.cf, can do smtp relay at server ?

 

 

@40004c6df0b53ad9549c CHKUSER rejected relaying: from
sougepeq...@hotmail.com:: remote 202.29.22.95:unknown:118.160.157.12
rcpt kuang2hs...@yahoo.com.tw : client not allowed to relay



Re: [qmailtoaster] spammer / Boom email

2010-08-16 Thread Jake Vickers

 On 08/12/2010 09:42 PM, Hajid wrote:


X-Spam-Status: No, score=-66.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,


FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,FH_FAKE_RCVD_LINE,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,INVALID_MSGID,



MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MIMEOLE,



MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_SPAM,RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_IN_PBL,



RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING,


SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no


The problem appears to be here:
USER_IN_WHITELIST
You have the user defined in your local.cf file as whitelisted, so 
they start with a -100 score. As spamassassin adds together all of the 
positive scores, they end up with a -66.8, so this user will never 
have their mail deleted as spam.


Could it be a wildcard whitelist for hotmail in local.cf? Because I 
doubt this user would have been manually added to local.cf.


Bharath



Possible. It would only be guessing until the local.cf is provided.

At local.cf I added whitelist_from *...@hotmail.com mailto:*...@hotmail.com.

My others question, why this server can be as spammer. This server not 
openrelay.i still looking for this.




You whitelisted everyone at hotmail.com, so every email that comes from 
someone at hotmail.com starts with a score of -100 (note that is a 
NEGATIVE sign before the 100). So the incoming email hit all of these rules:

FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,FH_FAKE_RCVD_LINE,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,INVALID_MSGID,


MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MIMEOLE,



MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_SPAM,RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_IN_PBL,



RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING,


SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO


Which added to a score of 33.2 which would normally cause the message to 
be deleted, but since all users at hotmail.com start with a -100, it 
only added the score to -66.8, which is still 71.8 points away from even 
being marked as spam.
To stop these types of messages you need to remove the whitelisting for 
hotmail.com (possibly only whitelist individual addresses?) and possibly 
adjust your spam rules and their scoring.
The system worked as designed. It accepted a message (you have not shown 
us enough of the headers to really know what was going on), and scored 
it exactly how you told it to score messages.


Re: [qmailtoaster] spammer / Boom email

2010-08-12 Thread Jake Vickers

 On 08/12/2010 03:33 AM, Bharath Chari wrote:

On Thursday 12 August 2010 11:18 AM, Jake Vickers wrote:

On 08/11/2010 03:31 AM, Hajid wrote:


X-Spam-Status: No, score=-66.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,


FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,FH_FAKE_RCVD_LINE,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,INVALID_MSGID,



MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MIMEOLE,



MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_SPAM,RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_IN_PBL,



RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING,


SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,USER_IN_WHITELIST 
autolearn=no





The problem appears to be here:
USER_IN_WHITELIST
You have the user defined in your local.cf file as whitelisted, so 
they start with a -100 score. As spamassassin adds together all of 
the positive scores, they end up with a -66.8, so this user will 
never have their mail deleted as spam.


Could it be a wildcard whitelist for hotmail in local.cf? Because I 
doubt this user would have been manually added to local.cf.


Bharath



Possible. It would only be guessing until the local.cf is provided.



RE: [qmailtoaster] spammer / Boom email

2010-08-12 Thread Hajid
 

 

 

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-66.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,

 
FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,FH_FAKE_RCVD_LINE,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,INVALID_MSGID,

 
MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MIMEOLE,

 
MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_SPAM,RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_IN_PBL,

 
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING,

SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no

 


The problem appears to be here:
USER_IN_WHITELIST
You have the user defined in your local.cf file as whitelisted, so they
start with a -100 score. As spamassassin adds together all of the positive
scores, they end up with a -66.8, so this user will never have their mail
deleted as spam.

Could it be a wildcard whitelist for hotmail in local.cf? Because I doubt
this user would have been manually added to local.cf.

Bharath



Possible. It would only be guessing until the local.cf is provided.

At local.cf I added whitelist_from *...@hotmail.com.

My others question, why this server can be as spammer. This server not
openrelay.i still looking for this.

 

 



[qmailtoaster] spammer / Boom email

2010-08-11 Thread Hajid
Any body could please help me how to stop this email.

 

 

 

./qmHandle -m573640

 

 --

MESSAGE NUMBER 573640

 --

Received: (qmail 7968 invoked by uid 89); 11 Aug 2010 05:44:26 -

Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 7893, pid: 7940, t: 1.2025s

 scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.94

/m: spam: 3.2.5

X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.avtour.com

X-Spam-Level:

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-66.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,

 
FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,FH_FAKE_RCVD_LINE,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,INVALID_MSGID,

 
MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MIMEOLE,

 
MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_SPAM,RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_IN_PBL,

 
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING,

SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no

version=3.2.5

Received: from unknown (HELO 202.29.226.195) (118.167.134.121)

  by mail with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 05:44:25 -

Received-SPF: softfail (mail: transitioning SPF record at spf-d.hotmail.com
does not designate 118.167.134.121 as permitted sender)

Received: from 128.90.172.176 by 200.90.174.88; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24
+0800

Received: from 174.172.104.212 by 49.38.224.152; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24
+0800

Received: from 18.156.145.204 by 40.120.66.152; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24
+0800

Received: from 253.73.206.160 by 146.80.123.197; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24
+0800

Message-ID: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24 +0800shi...@ms11.hinet.net,
r...@hotmail.com

From: Rocco Boykin glfl83...@hotmail.com

Reply-To: Rocco Boykin itidgh483...@hotmail.com

Subject: ¤â¾÷¥Ö®M«È¨î¤Æ

Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24 +0800

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary=--20220610593110575



RE: [qmailtoaster] spammer / Boom email

2010-08-11 Thread Michael Colvin
Looks like using Spamdyke with RDNS enabled would have stopped it.  Doesn’t
look like the sending IP has a reverse DNS (PTR) entry.  All “Legit” mail
servers should have a reverse DNS entry…Their IP should resolve to
*something*.  That setting alone will stop 60% of likely spam, maybe more.

 

 

Michael J. Colvin

NorCal Internet Services

 http://www.norcalisp.com/ www.norcalisp.com

(916) 864-

 



  _  

From: Hajid [mailto:ha...@masolusi.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 12:32 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] spammer / Boom email

 

Any body could please help me how to stop this email.

 

 

 

./qmHandle -m573640

 

 --

MESSAGE NUMBER 573640

 --

Received: (qmail 7968 invoked by uid 89); 11 Aug 2010 05:44:26 -

Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 7893, pid: 7940, t: 1.2025s

 scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.94

/m: spam: 3.2.5

X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.avtour.com

X-Spam-Level:

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-66.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,

 
FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,FH_FAKE_RCVD_LINE,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,INVALID_MSGID,

 
MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MIMEOLE,

 
MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_SPAM,RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_IN_PBL,

 
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING,

SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no

version=3.2.5

Received: from unknown (HELO 202.29.226.195) (118.167.134.121)

  by mail with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 05:44:25 -

Received-SPF: softfail (mail: transitioning SPF record at spf-d.hotmail.com
does not designate 118.167.134.121 as permitted sender)

Received: from 128.90.172.176 by 200.90.174.88; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24
+0800

Received: from 174.172.104.212 by 49.38.224.152; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24
+0800

Received: from 18.156.145.204 by 40.120.66.152; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24
+0800

Received: from 253.73.206.160 by 146.80.123.197; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24
+0800

Message-ID: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24 +0800shi...@ms11.hinet.net,
r...@hotmail.com

From: Rocco Boykin glfl83...@hotmail.com

Reply-To: Rocco Boykin itidgh483...@hotmail.com

Subject: ¤â¾÷¥Ö®M«È¨î¤Æ

Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24 +0800

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary=--20220610593110575

 

 

image001.jpg

RE: [qmailtoaster] spammer / Boom email

2010-08-11 Thread Hajid
How  to tracking this problem? I’m looking the sender who doing this spam.

 

  _  

From: Michael Colvin [mailto:mcol...@norcalisp.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 3:24 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] spammer / Boom email

 

Looks like using Spamdyke with RDNS enabled would have stopped it.  Doesn’t
look like the sending IP has a reverse DNS (PTR) entry.  All “Legit” mail
servers should have a reverse DNS entry…Their IP should resolve to
*something*.  That setting alone will stop 60% of likely spam, maybe more.

 

 

Michael J. Colvin

NorCal Internet Services

 http://www.norcalisp.com/ www.norcalisp.com

(916) 864-

 



  _  

From: Hajid [mailto:ha...@masolusi.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 12:32 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] spammer / Boom email

 

Any body could please help me how to stop this email.

 

 

 

./qmHandle -m573640

 

 --

MESSAGE NUMBER 573640

 --

Received: (qmail 7968 invoked by uid 89); 11 Aug 2010 05:44:26 -

Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 7893, pid: 7940, t: 1.2025s

 scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.94

/m: spam: 3.2.5

X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.avtour.com

X-Spam-Level:

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-66.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,

 
FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,FH_FAKE_RCVD_LINE,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,INVALID_MSGID,

 
MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MIMEOLE,

 
MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_SPAM,RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_IN_PBL,

 
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING,

SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no

version=3.2.5

Received: from unknown (HELO 202.29.226.195) (118.167.134.121)

  by mail with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 05:44:25 -

Received-SPF: softfail (mail: transitioning SPF record at spf-d.hotmail.com
does not designate 118.167.134.121 as permitted sender)

Received: from 128.90.172.176 by 200.90.174.88; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24
+0800

Received: from 174.172.104.212 by 49.38.224.152; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24
+0800

Received: from 18.156.145.204 by 40.120.66.152; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24
+0800

Received: from 253.73.206.160 by 146.80.123.197; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24
+0800

Message-ID: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24 +0800shi...@ms11.hinet.net,
r...@hotmail.com

From: Rocco Boykin glfl83...@hotmail.com

Reply-To: Rocco Boykin itidgh483...@hotmail.com

Subject: ¤â¾÷¥Ö®M«È¨î¤Æ

Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24 +0800

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary=--20220610593110575

 

 

image001.jpg

Re: [qmailtoaster] spammer / Boom email

2010-08-11 Thread Jake Vickers

 On 08/11/2010 03:31 AM, Hajid wrote:


Any body could please help me how to stop this email.

./qmHandle -m573640

 --

MESSAGE NUMBER 573640

 --

Received: (qmail 7968 invoked by uid 89); 11 Aug 2010 05:44:26 -

Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 7893, pid: 7940, t: 1.2025s

 scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.94

/m: spam: 3.2.5

X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.avtour.com

X-Spam-Level:

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-66.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,


FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,FH_FAKE_RCVD_LINE,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,INVALID_MSGID,



MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MIMEOLE,



MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_SPAM,RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_IN_PBL,



RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RDNS_NONE,SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING,


SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no

version=3.2.5

Received: from unknown (HELO 202.29.226.195) (118.167.134.121)

  by mail with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 05:44:25 -

Received-SPF: softfail (mail: transitioning SPF record at 
spf-d.hotmail.com does not designate 118.167.134.121 as permitted sender)


Received: from 128.90.172.176 by 200.90.174.88; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 
13:44:24 +0800


Received: from 174.172.104.212 by 49.38.224.152; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 
13:44:24 +0800


Received: from 18.156.145.204 by 40.120.66.152; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 
13:44:24 +0800


Received: from 253.73.206.160 by 146.80.123.197; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 
13:44:24 +0800


Message-ID: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24 +0800shi...@ms11.hinet.net, 
r...@hotmail.com


From: Rocco Boykin glfl83...@hotmail.com

Reply-To: Rocco Boykin itidgh483...@hotmail.com

Subject: ¤â¾÷¥Ö®M«È¨î¤Æ

Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:44:24 +0800

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary=--20220610593110575



The problem appears to be here:
USER_IN_WHITELIST
You have the user defined in your local.cf file as whitelisted, so they 
start with a -100 score. As spamassassin adds together all of the 
positive scores, they end up with a -66.8, so this user will never have 
their mail deleted as spam.