Re: [qmailtoaster] unionfs and fc4 trouble
Where I can find those instructions? I have googled around with no results. Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an FYI.. the upgrade from FC4 to CentOS 5 will work nearly flawlessly (You can find instructions on how to do this via YUM online). Justice On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 14:40 -0800, Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: I agree 110% and will start planning the upgrade. I have to check if the cms I am running for my website (also on the server) has any issues with centos. I was just trying to see if the was a quick way of addressing this issue, but I certainly don't want to create any more work for you folks. Ericwe shall be in touch. Thank You, Eric Shubert wrote: Since FC4 has reached its EOL, I'm inclined to think that we shouldn't add yet another version of unionfs to qtp-newmodel just to support that one obsolete kernel. Paco, you really should get off of the FC track and on to CentOS at some point. Then you won't run into this problem again. When you're ready to do so, contact me off list and we can discuss what it would take. Otherwise, you can continue to use the copied or linked sandbox to upgrade your toaster packages. Justice London wrote: Okay.. you managed to find the one release/kernel combo that would require another union module just for it. Is there any way you can simply upgrade the kernel release or fedora release? The fc4 release hasn't been supported for over a year, which means no security updates or anything. Justice On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 09:34 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Hey, Paco. Nice to hear from you. Indeed your observation is correct (afaict). Justice would know best though regarding the unionfs. That's a bit of a complicated situation, as there are 4 module/versions which provide that capability, each for various kernel versions. I suppose that we might not have the right module/version paired up with the right kernel in your case (kernel 2.6.17), but Justice would need to make that call. If Justice can't help to get this resolved, you can always use a linked or copied sandbox to do the upgrade. Please keep us posted. Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: Well, I tried the unioned sandbox method and it didn't seem to work for me. I appears I have an unsupported kernel (fc4 vintage). The logs mention that I can add some extra flags to the command but I am unsure of the impact or repercussions. Comments are welcome. I have pasted some text from my session, any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Would you like a unioned sandbox (quicker, smaller, maybe less stable) [y]/n: y Using union filesystem ... qtp-mount-sandbox v0.2.6 --No existing unionfs12 found. Continuing with build process --Testing for valid rpm install tool: yum -y install found! --Searching for valid kernel source/devel to build unionfs12: kernel-devel-2.6.17-1.2142_FC4 --Looking at current kernel --You have the kernel source for the running kernel! --Building mv: cannot stat `unionfs.ko': No such file or directory --Something went wrong with the unionfs12 build --Please check /var/log/unionfs-build.log to see what happened qtp-build-unionfs failed,ure. Exiting! qtp-newmodel - qtp-mount-sandbox failed, exiting --- Hit ENTER to return to menu --- ** my logs are as follows: ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CLEAN /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/.tmp_versions make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' rm -f subr.o dentry.o file.o inode.o main.o super.o stale_inode.o branchman.o xattr.o rdstate.o
Re: [qmailtoaster] unionfs and fc4 trouble
Try this http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/MigrationGuide/ServerCD_4.4_to_5 it should work (remember to backup!) Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: Where I can find those instructions? I have googled around with no results. */Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote: Just an FYI.. the upgrade from FC4 to CentOS 5 will work nearly flawlessly (You can find instructions on how to do this via YUM online). Justice On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 14:40 -0800, Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: I agree 110% and will start planning the upgrade. I have to check if the cms I am running for my website (also on the server) has any issues with centos. I was just trying to see if the was a quick way of addressing this issue, but I certainly don't want to create any more work for you folks. Ericwe shall be in touch. Thank You, Eric Shubert wrote: Since FC4 has reached its EOL, I'm inclined to think that we shouldn't add yet another version of unionfs to qtp-newmodel just to support that one obsolete kernel. Paco, you really should get off of the FC track and on to CentOS at some point. Then you won't run into this problem again. When you're ready to do so, contact me off list and we can discuss what it would take. Otherwise, you can continue to use the copied or linked sandbox to upgrade your toaster packages. Justice London wrote: Okay.. you managed to find the one release/kernel combo that would require another union module just for it. Is there any way you can simply upgrade the kernel release or fedora release? The fc4 release hasn't been supported for over a year, which means no security updates or anything. Justice On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 09:34 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Hey, Paco. Nice to hear from you. Indeed your observation is correct (afaict). Justice would know best though regarding the unionfs. That's a bit of a complicated situation, as there are 4 module/versions which provide that capability, each for various kernel versions. I suppose that we might not have the right module/version paired up with the right kernel in your case (kernel 2.6.17), but Justice would need to make that call. If Justice can't help to get this resolved, you can always use a linked or copied sandbox to do the upgrade. Please keep us posted. Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: Well, I tried the unioned sandbox method and it didn't seem to work for me. I appears I have an unsupported kernel (fc4 vintage). The logs mention that I can add some extra flags to the command but I am unsure of the impact or repercussions. Comments are welcome. I have pasted some text from my session, any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Would you like a unioned sandbox (quicker, smaller, maybe less stable) [y]/n: y Using union filesystem ... qtp-mount-sandbox v0.2.6 --No existing unionfs12 found. Continuing with build process --Testing for valid rpm install tool: yum -y install found! --Searching for valid kernel source/devel to build unionfs12: kernel-devel-2.6.17-1.2142_FC4 --Looking at current kernel --You have the kernel source for the running kernel! --Building mv: cannot stat `unionfs.ko': No such file or directory --Something went wrong with the unionfs12 build --Please check /var/log/unionfs-build.log to see what happened qtp-build-unionfs failed,ure. Exiting! qtp-newmodel - qtp-mount-sandbox failed, exiting --- Hit ENTER to return to menu --- ** my logs are as follows: ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CLEAN /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/.tmp_versions make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' rm -f subr.o dentry.o file.o inode.o main.o super.o stale_inode.o branchman.o xattr.o rdstate.o copyup.o dirhelper.o rename.o unlink.o lookup.o persistent_inode.o commonfops.o dirfops.o print.o malloc_debug.o mmap.o unionfs.o unionfs.ko *.d .*.flags \#* *~ rm -f TAGS tags rm -f unionfs-1.2.tar.gz make -C utils clean
Re: [qmailtoaster] unionfs and fc4 trouble
Just an FYI.. the upgrade from FC4 to CentOS 5 will work nearly flawlessly (You can find instructions on how to do this via YUM online). Justice On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 14:40 -0800, Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: I agree 110% and will start planning the upgrade. I have to check if the cms I am running for my website (also on the server) has any issues with centos. I was just trying to see if the was a quick way of addressing this issue, but I certainly don't want to create any more work for you folks. Ericwe shall be in touch. Thank You, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since FC4 has reached its EOL, I'm inclined to think that we shouldn't add yet another version of unionfs to qtp-newmodel just to support that one obsolete kernel. Paco, you really should get off of the FC track and on to CentOS at some point. Then you won't run into this problem again. When you're ready to do so, contact me off list and we can discuss what it would take. Otherwise, you can continue to use the copied or linked sandbox to upgrade your toaster packages. Justice London wrote: Okay.. you managed to find the one release/kernel combo that would require another union module just for it. Is there any way you can simply upgrade the kernel release or fedora release? The fc4 release hasn't been supported for over a year, which means no security updates or anything. Justice On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 09:34 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Hey, Paco. Nice to hear from you. Indeed your observation is correct (afaict). Justice would know best though regarding the unionfs. That's a bit of a complicated situation, as there are 4 module/versions which provide that capability, each for various kernel versions. I suppose that we might not have the right module/version paired up with the right kernel in your case (kernel 2.6.17), but Justice would need to make that call. If Justice can't help to get this resolved, you can always use a linked or copied sandbox to do the upgrade. Please keep us posted. Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: Well, I tried the unioned sandbox method and it didn't seem to work for me. I appears I have an unsupported kernel (fc4 vintage). The logs mention that I can add some extra flags to the command but I am unsure of the impact or repercussions. Comments are welcome. I have pasted some text from my session, any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Would you like a unioned sandbox (quicker, smaller, maybe less stable) [y]/n: y Using union filesystem ... qtp-mount-sandbox v0.2.6 --No existing unionfs12 found. Continuing with build process --Testing for valid rpm install tool: yum -y install found! --Searching for valid kernel source/devel to build unionfs12: kernel-devel-2.6.17-1.2142_FC4 --Looking at current kernel --You have the kernel source for the running kernel! --Building mv: cannot stat `unionfs.ko': No such file or directory --Something went wrong with the unionfs12 build --Please check /var/log/unionfs-build.log to see what happened qtp-build-unionfs failed,ure. Exiting! qtp-newmodel - qtp-mount-sandbox failed, exiting --- Hit ENTER to return to menu --- ** my logs are as follows: ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CLEAN /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/.tmp_versions make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' rm -f subr.o dentry.o file.o inode.o main.o super.o stale_inode.o branchman.o xattr.o rdstate.o copyup.o dirhelper.o rename.o unlink.o lookup.o persistent_inode.o commonfops.o
Re: [qmailtoaster] unionfs and fc4 trouble
Okay.. you managed to find the one release/kernel combo that would require another union module just for it. Is there any way you can simply upgrade the kernel release or fedora release? The fc4 release hasn't been supported for over a year, which means no security updates or anything. Justice On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 09:34 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Hey, Paco. Nice to hear from you. Indeed your observation is correct (afaict). Justice would know best though regarding the unionfs. That's a bit of a complicated situation, as there are 4 module/versions which provide that capability, each for various kernel versions. I suppose that we might not have the right module/version paired up with the right kernel in your case (kernel 2.6.17), but Justice would need to make that call. If Justice can't help to get this resolved, you can always use a linked or copied sandbox to do the upgrade. Please keep us posted. Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: Well, I tried the unioned sandbox method and it didn't seem to work for me. I appears I have an unsupported kernel (fc4 vintage). The logs mention that I can add some extra flags to the command but I am unsure of the impact or repercussions. Comments are welcome. I have pasted some text from my session, any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Would you like a unioned sandbox (quicker, smaller, maybe less stable) [y]/n: y Using union filesystem ... qtp-mount-sandbox v0.2.6 --No existing unionfs12 found. Continuing with build process --Testing for valid rpm install tool: yum -y install found! --Searching for valid kernel source/devel to build unionfs12: kernel-devel-2.6.17-1.2142_FC4 --Looking at current kernel --You have the kernel source for the running kernel! --Building mv: cannot stat `unionfs.ko': No such file or directory --Something went wrong with the unionfs12 build --Please check /var/log/unionfs-build.log to see what happened qtp-build-unionfs failed,ure. Exiting! qtp-newmodel - qtp-mount-sandbox failed, exiting --- Hit ENTER to return to menu --- ** my logs are as follows: ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CLEAN /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/.tmp_versions make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' rm -f subr.o dentry.o file.o inode.o main.o super.o stale_inode.o branchman.o xattr.o rdstate.o copyup.o dirhelper.o rename.o unlink.o lookup.o persistent_inode.o commonfops.o dirfops.o print.o malloc_debug.o mmap.o unionfs.o unionfs.ko *.d .*.flags \#* *~ rm -f TAGS tags rm -f unionfs-1.2.tar.gz make -C utils clean make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/utils' rm -f unionctl uniondbg unionimap TAGS tags make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/utils' ** If you have questions about or problems building Unionfs, please read INSTALL. ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CC [M] /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.o In file included from /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.c:22: /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:50:2: error: #warning You are compiling Unionfs on an unsupported kernel version. /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:51:2: error: #warning To compile Unionfs, you will need to define UNIONFS_UNSUPPORTED. /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:52:2: error: #warning Try adding: EXTRACFLAGS=-DUNIONFS_UNSUPPORTED to fistdev.mk make[2]: *** [/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [_module_/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' make: *** [unionfs.ko] Error 2 *** Francisco Paco Peralta - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] unionfs and fc4 trouble
Since FC4 has reached its EOL, I'm inclined to think that we shouldn't add yet another version of unionfs to qtp-newmodel just to support that one obsolete kernel. Paco, you really should get off of the FC track and on to CentOS at some point. Then you won't run into this problem again. When you're ready to do so, contact me off list and we can discuss what it would take. Otherwise, you can continue to use the copied or linked sandbox to upgrade your toaster packages. Justice London wrote: Okay.. you managed to find the one release/kernel combo that would require another union module just for it. Is there any way you can simply upgrade the kernel release or fedora release? The fc4 release hasn't been supported for over a year, which means no security updates or anything. Justice On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 09:34 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Hey, Paco. Nice to hear from you. Indeed your observation is correct (afaict). Justice would know best though regarding the unionfs. That's a bit of a complicated situation, as there are 4 module/versions which provide that capability, each for various kernel versions. I suppose that we might not have the right module/version paired up with the right kernel in your case (kernel 2.6.17), but Justice would need to make that call. If Justice can't help to get this resolved, you can always use a linked or copied sandbox to do the upgrade. Please keep us posted. Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: Well, I tried the unioned sandbox method and it didn't seem to work for me. I appears I have an unsupported kernel (fc4 vintage). The logs mention that I can add some extra flags to the command but I am unsure of the impact or repercussions. Comments are welcome. I have pasted some text from my session, any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Would you like a unioned sandbox (quicker, smaller, maybe less stable) [y]/n: y Using union filesystem ... qtp-mount-sandbox v0.2.6 --No existing unionfs12 found. Continuing with build process --Testing for valid rpm install tool: yum -y install found! --Searching for valid kernel source/devel to build unionfs12: kernel-devel-2.6.17-1.2142_FC4 --Looking at current kernel --You have the kernel source for the running kernel! --Building mv: cannot stat `unionfs.ko': No such file or directory --Something went wrong with the unionfs12 build --Please check /var/log/unionfs-build.log to see what happened qtp-build-unionfs failed,ure. Exiting! qtp-newmodel - qtp-mount-sandbox failed, exiting --- Hit ENTER to return to menu --- ** my logs are as follows: ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CLEAN /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/.tmp_versions make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' rm -f subr.o dentry.o file.o inode.o main.o super.o stale_inode.o branchman.o xattr.o rdstate.o copyup.o dirhelper.o rename.o unlink.o lookup.o persistent_inode.o commonfops.o dirfops.o print.o malloc_debug.o mmap.o unionfs.o unionfs.ko *.d .*.flags \#* *~ rm -f TAGS tags rm -f unionfs-1.2.tar.gz make -C utils clean make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/utils' rm -f unionctl uniondbg unionimap TAGS tags make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/utils' ** If you have questions about or problems building Unionfs, please read INSTALL. ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CC [M] /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.o In file included from /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.c:22: /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:50:2: error: #warning You are compiling Unionfs on an unsupported kernel version. /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:51:2: error: #warning To compile Unionfs, you will need to define UNIONFS_UNSUPPORTED. /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:52:2: error: #warning Try adding: EXTRACFLAGS=-DUNIONFS_UNSUPPORTED to fistdev.mk make[2]: *** [/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [_module_/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' make: *** [unionfs.ko] Error 2
Re: [qmailtoaster] unionfs and fc4 trouble
I agree 110% and will start planning the upgrade. I have to check if the cms I am running for my website (also on the server) has any issues with centos. I was just trying to see if the was a quick way of addressing this issue, but I certainly don't want to create any more work for you folks. Ericwe shall be in touch. Thank You, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since FC4 has reached its EOL, I'm inclined to think that we shouldn't add yet another version of unionfs to qtp-newmodel just to support that one obsolete kernel. Paco, you really should get off of the FC track and on to CentOS at some point. Then you won't run into this problem again. When you're ready to do so, contact me off list and we can discuss what it would take. Otherwise, you can continue to use the copied or linked sandbox to upgrade your toaster packages. Justice London wrote: Okay.. you managed to find the one release/kernel combo that would require another union module just for it. Is there any way you can simply upgrade the kernel release or fedora release? The fc4 release hasn't been supported for over a year, which means no security updates or anything. Justice On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 09:34 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Hey, Paco. Nice to hear from you. Indeed your observation is correct (afaict). Justice would know best though regarding the unionfs. That's a bit of a complicated situation, as there are 4 module/versions which provide that capability, each for various kernel versions. I suppose that we might not have the right module/version paired up with the right kernel in your case (kernel 2.6.17), but Justice would need to make that call. If Justice can't help to get this resolved, you can always use a linked or copied sandbox to do the upgrade. Please keep us posted. Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: Well, I tried the unioned sandbox method and it didn't seem to work for me. I appears I have an unsupported kernel (fc4 vintage). The logs mention that I can add some extra flags to the command but I am unsure of the impact or repercussions. Comments are welcome. I have pasted some text from my session, any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Would you like a unioned sandbox (quicker, smaller, maybe less stable) [y]/n: y Using union filesystem ... qtp-mount-sandbox v0.2.6 --No existing unionfs12 found. Continuing with build process --Testing for valid rpm install tool: yum -y install found! --Searching for valid kernel source/devel to build unionfs12: kernel-devel-2.6.17-1.2142_FC4 --Looking at current kernel --You have the kernel source for the running kernel! --Building mv: cannot stat `unionfs.ko': No such file or directory --Something went wrong with the unionfs12 build --Please check /var/log/unionfs-build.log to see what happened qtp-build-unionfs failed,ure. Exiting! qtp-newmodel - qtp-mount-sandbox failed, exiting --- Hit ENTER to return to menu --- ** my logs are as follows: ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CLEAN /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/.tmp_versions make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' rm -f subr.o dentry.o file.o inode.o main.o super.o stale_inode.o branchman.o xattr.o rdstate.o copyup.o dirhelper.o rename.o unlink.o lookup.o persistent_inode.o commonfops.o dirfops.o print.o malloc_debug.o mmap.o unionfs.o unionfs.ko *.d .*.flags \#* *~ rm -f TAGS tags rm -f unionfs-1.2.tar.gz make -C utils clean make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/utils' rm -f unionctl uniondbg unionimap TAGS tags make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/utils' ** If you have questions about or problems building Unionfs, please read INSTALL. ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CC [M] /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.o In file included from /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.c:22: /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:50:2: error: #warning You are compiling Unionfs on an unsupported kernel version. /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:51:2: error: #warning To compile Unionfs, you will need to define UNIONFS_UNSUPPORTED.
Re: [qmailtoaster] unionfs and fc4 trouble
Hey, Paco. Nice to hear from you. Indeed your observation is correct (afaict). Justice would know best though regarding the unionfs. That's a bit of a complicated situation, as there are 4 module/versions which provide that capability, each for various kernel versions. I suppose that we might not have the right module/version paired up with the right kernel in your case (kernel 2.6.17), but Justice would need to make that call. If Justice can't help to get this resolved, you can always use a linked or copied sandbox to do the upgrade. Please keep us posted. Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: Well, I tried the unioned sandbox method and it didn't seem to work for me. I appears I have an unsupported kernel (fc4 vintage). The logs mention that I can add some extra flags to the command but I am unsure of the impact or repercussions. Comments are welcome. I have pasted some text from my session, any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Would you like a unioned sandbox (quicker, smaller, maybe less stable) [y]/n: y Using union filesystem ... qtp-mount-sandbox v0.2.6 --No existing unionfs12 found. Continuing with build process --Testing for valid rpm install tool: yum -y install found! --Searching for valid kernel source/devel to build unionfs12: kernel-devel-2.6.17-1.2142_FC4 --Looking at current kernel --You have the kernel source for the running kernel! --Building mv: cannot stat `unionfs.ko': No such file or directory --Something went wrong with the unionfs12 build --Please check /var/log/unionfs-build.log to see what happened qtp-build-unionfs failed,ure. Exiting! qtp-newmodel - qtp-mount-sandbox failed, exiting --- Hit ENTER to return to menu --- ** my logs are as follows: ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CLEAN /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/.tmp_versions make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' rm -f subr.o dentry.o file.o inode.o main.o super.o stale_inode.o branchman.o xattr.o rdstate.o copyup.o dirhelper.o rename.o unlink.o lookup.o persistent_inode.o commonfops.o dirfops.o print.o malloc_debug.o mmap.o unionfs.o unionfs.ko *.d .*.flags \#* *~ rm -f TAGS tags rm -f unionfs-1.2.tar.gz make -C utils clean make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/utils' rm -f unionctl uniondbg unionimap TAGS tags make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/utils' ** If you have questions about or problems building Unionfs, please read INSTALL. ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CC [M] /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.o In file included from /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.c:22: /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:50:2: error: #warning You are compiling Unionfs on an unsupported kernel version. /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:51:2: error: #warning To compile Unionfs, you will need to define UNIONFS_UNSUPPORTED. /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:52:2: error: #warning Try adding: EXTRACFLAGS=-DUNIONFS_UNSUPPORTED to fistdev.mk make[2]: *** [/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [_module_/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' make: *** [unionfs.ko] Error 2 *** Francisco Paco Peralta -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] unionfs and fc4 trouble
I should be able to take a look at this mid-week. Justice On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 09:34 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Hey, Paco. Nice to hear from you. Indeed your observation is correct (afaict). Justice would know best though regarding the unionfs. That's a bit of a complicated situation, as there are 4 module/versions which provide that capability, each for various kernel versions. I suppose that we might not have the right module/version paired up with the right kernel in your case (kernel 2.6.17), but Justice would need to make that call. If Justice can't help to get this resolved, you can always use a linked or copied sandbox to do the upgrade. Please keep us posted. Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: Well, I tried the unioned sandbox method and it didn't seem to work for me. I appears I have an unsupported kernel (fc4 vintage). The logs mention that I can add some extra flags to the command but I am unsure of the impact or repercussions. Comments are welcome. I have pasted some text from my session, any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Would you like a unioned sandbox (quicker, smaller, maybe less stable) [y]/n: y Using union filesystem ... qtp-mount-sandbox v0.2.6 --No existing unionfs12 found. Continuing with build process --Testing for valid rpm install tool: yum -y install found! --Searching for valid kernel source/devel to build unionfs12: kernel-devel-2.6.17-1.2142_FC4 --Looking at current kernel --You have the kernel source for the running kernel! --Building mv: cannot stat `unionfs.ko': No such file or directory --Something went wrong with the unionfs12 build --Please check /var/log/unionfs-build.log to see what happened qtp-build-unionfs failed,ure. Exiting! qtp-newmodel - qtp-mount-sandbox failed, exiting --- Hit ENTER to return to menu --- ** my logs are as follows: ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CLEAN /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/.tmp_versions make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' rm -f subr.o dentry.o file.o inode.o main.o super.o stale_inode.o branchman.o xattr.o rdstate.o copyup.o dirhelper.o rename.o unlink.o lookup.o persistent_inode.o commonfops.o dirfops.o print.o malloc_debug.o mmap.o unionfs.o unionfs.ko *.d .*.flags \#* *~ rm -f TAGS tags rm -f unionfs-1.2.tar.gz make -C utils clean make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/utils' rm -f unionctl uniondbg unionimap TAGS tags make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/utils' ** If you have questions about or problems building Unionfs, please read INSTALL. ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CC [M] /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.o In file included from /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.c:22: /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:50:2: error: #warning You are compiling Unionfs on an unsupported kernel version. /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:51:2: error: #warning To compile Unionfs, you will need to define UNIONFS_UNSUPPORTED. /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:52:2: error: #warning Try adding: EXTRACFLAGS=-DUNIONFS_UNSUPPORTED to fistdev.mk make[2]: *** [/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [_module_/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' make: *** [unionfs.ko] Error 2 *** Francisco Paco Peralta - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] unionfs and fc4 trouble
Well, I tried the unioned sandbox method and it didn't seem to work for me. I appears I have an unsupported kernel (fc4 vintage). The logs mention that I can add some extra flags to the command but I am unsure of the impact or repercussions. Comments are welcome. I have pasted some text from my session, any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Would you like a unioned sandbox (quicker, smaller, maybe less stable) [y]/n: y Using union filesystem ... qtp-mount-sandbox v0.2.6 --No existing unionfs12 found. Continuing with build process --Testing for valid rpm install tool: yum -y install found! --Searching for valid kernel source/devel to build unionfs12: kernel-devel-2.6.17-1.2142_FC4 --Looking at current kernel --You have the kernel source for the running kernel! --Building mv: cannot stat `unionfs.ko': No such file or directory --Something went wrong with the unionfs12 build --Please check /var/log/unionfs-build.log to see what happened qtp-build-unionfs failed,ure. Exiting! qtp-newmodel - qtp-mount-sandbox failed, exiting --- Hit ENTER to return to menu --- ** my logs are as follows: ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CLEAN /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/.tmp_versions make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' rm -f subr.o dentry.o file.o inode.o main.o super.o stale_inode.o branchman.o xattr.o rdstate.o copyup.o dirhelper.o rename.o unlink.o lookup.o persistent_inode.o commonfops.o dirfops.o print.o malloc_debug.o mmap.o unionfs.o unionfs.ko *.d .*.flags \#* *~ rm -f TAGS tags rm -f unionfs-1.2.tar.gz make -C utils clean make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/utils' rm -f unionctl uniondbg unionimap TAGS tags make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/utils' ** If you have questions about or problems building Unionfs, please read INSTALL. ** make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4/build SUBDIRS=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2 FISTDEVMK=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/fistdev.mk modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' CC [M] /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.o In file included from /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.c:22: /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:50:2: error: #warning You are compiling Unionfs on an unsupported kernel version. /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:51:2: error: #warning To compile Unionfs, you will need to define UNIONFS_UNSUPPORTED. /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/unionfs.h:52:2: error: #warning Try adding: EXTRACFLAGS=-DUNIONFS_UNSUPPORTED to fistdev.mk make[2]: *** [/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2/subr.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [_module_/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/unionfs-1.2] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2142_FC4-i686' make: *** [unionfs.ko] Error 2 *** Francisco Paco Peralta
