Re: Re[2]: [qmailtoaster] Can anyone

[Kyle Quillen]

On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 20:46 +0300, Alexey Loukianov wrote:
> Greetings, Kyle.
> 
> On 20 декабря 2006 г., 20:29:19 you wrote:
> > Would this be done on the machine sending or the machine receiving
> > because the machine receiving is working fine with dk turned on?
> 
> This also might give you an insight:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# dktest -v
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: (qmail 17463 invoked by uid 89); 20 Dec 2006 16:48:16 -
> Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
>   s=private; d=hwy39.net;
>   b=RbMLlNZ2VFlaAJTl+P8pj0ZPXc/y52dqczdV4QzKizY1mEcdCrMzfeS276jR6uD/  ;
> Received: from unknown (HELO 12.168.80.126) (127.0.0.1)
>   by mail.hwy39.net with SMTP; 20 Dec 2006 16:48:16 -
> Received: from 12.168.80.3
> (SquirrelMail authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> by 12.168.80.126 with HTTP;
> Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:48:16 -0500 (EST)
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:48:16 -0500 (EST)
> Subject: test
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-1.3.4
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> Importance: Normal
> 
> test my man test
> 
> Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
> DomainKey-Status: no key
> dktest: DK_STAT_NOKEY: No public key available (permanent failure)
> 
> I mean, your DK setup is wrong, there's no public DK key available, so
> it's impossible for server to check a message, and due to a bug in
> qmail-dk it gets bounced no matter the settings you've got in
> DKVERIFY environment variable on server.
> 

I think what I am getting is the fact that I don't have a domain key
setup on the 80.5 address i think I will figure out how to do that then
that might fix this issue.

Thanks q


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: [qmailtoaster] Can anyone

[Alexey Loukianov]

Greetings, Kyle.

On 20 декабря 2006 г., 20:29:19 you wrote:
> Would this be done on the machine sending or the machine receiving
> because the machine receiving is working fine with dk turned on?

This also might give you an insight:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# dktest -v
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 17463 invoked by uid 89); 20 Dec 2006 16:48:16 -
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=private; d=hwy39.net;
  b=RbMLlNZ2VFlaAJTl+P8pj0ZPXc/y52dqczdV4QzKizY1mEcdCrMzfeS276jR6uD/  ;
Received: from unknown (HELO 12.168.80.126) (127.0.0.1)
  by mail.hwy39.net with SMTP; 20 Dec 2006 16:48:16 -
Received: from 12.168.80.3
(SquirrelMail authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by 12.168.80.126 with HTTP;
Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:48:16 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:48:16 -0500 (EST)
Subject: test
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-1.3.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal

test my man test

Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
DomainKey-Status: no key
dktest: DK_STAT_NOKEY: No public key available (permanent failure)

I mean, your DK setup is wrong, there's no public DK key available, so
it's impossible for server to check a message, and due to a bug in
qmail-dk it gets bounced no matter the settings you've got in
DKVERIFY environment variable on server.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexey Loukianov  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 System Engineer,
 IT Department,
 Lavtech Corp


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: [qmailtoaster] Can anyone

[Alexey Loukianov]

Greetings, Kyle.

On 20 декабря 2006 г., 20:29:19 you wrote:

> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 20:18 +0300, Alexey Loukianov wrote:
>> Greetings, Kyle.
>> 
>> On 20 декабря 2006 г., 19:52:18 you wrote:
>> 
>> > Shed some light on this situation.  I have just installed a fresh new
>> > server for a client but it seems to not be working they way it should I
>> > get this when I try to send out.  Could this be something with the
>> > domain keys?
>> 
>> > i. This is the qmail-send program at mail.hwy39.net.
>> > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following 
>> > addresses.
>> > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>> 
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12.168.80.5 failed after I sent the message.
>> > Remote host said: 554 mail server permanently rejected message (#5.3.0)
>> 
>> > --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>> 
>> > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Received: (qmail 17463 invoked by uid 89); 20 Dec 2006 16:48:16 -
>> > Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
>> > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
>> >   s=private; d=hwy39.net;
>> >  
>> > b=RbMLlNZ2VFlaAJTl+P8pj0ZPXc/y52dqczdV4QzKizY1mEcdCrMzfeS276jR6uD/  ;
>> > Received: from unknown (HELO 12.168.80.126) (127.0.0.1)
>> >   by mail.hwy39.net with SMTP; 20 Dec 2006 16:48:16 -
>> > Received: from 12.168.80.3
>> > (SquirrelMail authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>> > by 12.168.80.126 with HTTP;
>> > Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:48:16 -0500 (EST)
>> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:48:16 -0500 (EST)
>> > Subject: test
>> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-1.3.4
>> > MIME-Version: 1.0
>> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>> > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>> > Importance: Normal
>> 
>> > test my man test
>> 
>> > Thanks much 
>> 
>> Looks like qmail-dk trouble.
>> Fast fix is:
>> # cd /var/qmail/bin
>> # rm -f qmail-queue; ln -s qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue
>> 
>> For more info, read more on it here:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg09460.html
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg09841.html
>> 

> Would this be done on the machine sending or the machine receiving
> because the machine receiving is working fine with dk turned on?

This should be done on the server side, host 12.168.80.5 in your case.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexey Loukianov  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 System Engineer,
 IT Department,
 Lavtech Corp


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]