Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
On Jul 8, 2010, at 11:34 PM, ext Bryce Schober wrote: It'd be nice if at least Nokia would release Qt 4.7 binary pre-releases for Linux, like the other platforms. That would make the process of getting to building Qt Creator a lot shorter. Hm, looks like we never release Qt-only binary packages for Linux. For the Qt 4.7 release candidate we'll distribute a RC of the updated Qt SDK as well, which will give you a binary Qt 4.7 for Linux again. ++ Eike On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-) I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle. Kai -- Eike Ziller Software Engineer Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks Nokia gate5 GmbH Firmensitz: Invalidenstr. 117, 10115 Berlin, Germany Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, Berlin: HRB 106443 B Umsatzsteueridentifikationsnummer: DE 812 845 193 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Halbherr, Karim Tähtivuori ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:37 AM, eike.zil...@nokia.com wrote: On Jul 8, 2010, at 11:34 PM, ext Bryce Schober wrote: It'd be nice if at least Nokia would release Qt 4.7 binary pre-releases for Linux, like the other platforms. That would make the process of getting to building Qt Creator a lot shorter. Hm, looks like we never release Qt-only binary packages for Linux. Should I assume there's a good reason for that? -- Bryce Schober ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
Hours? It only needs about 30 minutes to build on an (by now) old Core 2 Duo. I even got it to 20 minutes if I disable stuff I don't need. It's really fast and easy to build your own binaries. I highly recommend it :) On 07/08/2010 09:30 PM, Coda Highland wrote: Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if you're not intending to distribute). /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM,kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-) I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle. Kai ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
You can build QtWebKit that fast? *blink* I'd believe the 20 minute figure if you disable QtWebKit but I think Creator needs it. /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: Hours? It only needs about 30 minutes to build on an (by now) old Core 2 Duo. I even got it to 20 minutes if I disable stuff I don't need. It's really fast and easy to build your own binaries. I highly recommend it :) On 07/08/2010 09:30 PM, Coda Highland wrote: Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if you're not intending to distribute). /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM,kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-) I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle. Kai ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
30 Minutes? For all of Qt? What hardware are you building on? I have an 8 way Xeon Nehalem using GCC with 16 threads and it takes at least an hour or so to build with WebKit disabled... Mike Jackson On 7/8/10 3:00 PM, in article aanlktilfeinaqca9_lm9iw5ezkepn_nyoysgeds7x...@mail.gmail.com, Coda Highland wrote: You can build QtWebKit that fast? *blink* I'd believe the 20 minute figure if you disable QtWebKit but I think Creator needs it. /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: Hours? It only needs about 30 minutes to build on an (by now) old Core 2 Duo. I even got it to 20 minutes if I disable stuff I don't need. It's really fast and easy to build your own binaries. I highly recommend it :) On 07/08/2010 09:30 PM, Coda Highland wrote: Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if you're not intending to distribute). /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM,kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-) I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle. Kai ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
I have two dual-core Xeon 2.66GHz and build with five threads and it only takes me ~45 minutes to build Qt without WebKit; did you forget to disable demos and examples? /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Michael Jackson mike.jack...@bluequartz.net wrote: 30 Minutes? For all of Qt? What hardware are you building on? I have an 8 way Xeon Nehalem using GCC with 16 threads and it takes at least an hour or so to build with WebKit disabled... Mike Jackson On 7/8/10 3:00 PM, in article aanlktilfeinaqca9_lm9iw5ezkepn_nyoysgeds7x...@mail.gmail.com, Coda Highland wrote: You can build QtWebKit that fast? *blink* I'd believe the 20 minute figure if you disable QtWebKit but I think Creator needs it. /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: Hours? It only needs about 30 minutes to build on an (by now) old Core 2 Duo. I even got it to 20 minutes if I disable stuff I don't need. It's really fast and easy to build your own binaries. I highly recommend it :) On 07/08/2010 09:30 PM, Coda Highland wrote: Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if you're not intending to distribute). /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM,kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-) I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle. Kai ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
It'd be nice if at least Nokia would release Qt 4.7 binary pre-releases for Linux, like the other platforms. That would make the process of getting to building Qt Creator a lot shorter. On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-) I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle. Kai ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator -- Bryce Schober ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
Yes, ~30 minutes. That's without demos and examples; I've never built those and I don't know how much it would need with those. This is on Linux. I once tried on Windows, but after about two hours of compiling I gave up and aborted the build :-/ On 07/08/2010 10:32 PM, Michael Jackson wrote: 30 Minutes? For all of Qt? What hardware are you building on? I have an 8 way Xeon Nehalem using GCC with 16 threads and it takes at least an hour or so to build with WebKit disabled... Mike Jackson On 7/8/10 3:00 PM, in article aanlktilfeinaqca9_lm9iw5ezkepn_nyoysgeds7x...@mail.gmail.com, Coda Highland wrote: You can build QtWebKit that fast? *blink* I'd believe the 20 minute figure if you disable QtWebKit but I think Creator needs it. /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote: Hours? It only needs about 30 minutes to build on an (by now) old Core 2 Duo. I even got it to 20 minutes if I disable stuff I don't need. It's really fast and easy to build your own binaries. I highly recommend it :) On 07/08/2010 09:30 PM, Coda Highland wrote: Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if you're not intending to distribute). /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM,kai.koe...@nokia.comwrote: Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-) I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle. Kai ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
[Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
Hi everyone, a new indenter for the C++ editor has just been merged into master. Its main features are speed, the ability to use it without a TextEditor instance (like for refactoring) and the potential to be a lot smarter than the old one. At the moment, however, it's still in its infancy. It knows some tricks that the old one didn't, but probably messes up cases that used to work fine before. To help stabilize it, I'd like to ask everyone to create tickets for any incorrect or odd intentation you encounter during your daily use. (the component C++ support and assigned to me would be ideal) Happy hacking, Christian ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
