[QUAD-L] Van ....which one?

2007-11-12 Thread wheelchair
 
Much of van conversion industry dates back to the earliest days of mobility  
conversions, the chassis and the embailment programs over the years.
 
Over the past years Fords body was raised over the chassis with  spacers.  
Chevy's bodies were always attached directly to the frame  directly with no 
spacers. Conversion companies had only a couple of choices to  choose from in 
the 
past years.  Either the company had their customers  purchase the van and turn 
it over to them for conversion or qualify and enlist  in one of the 
manufacturer's embailment programs.  Hence, when a company  signed up with 
Ford, they 
stayed with Ford.  Same would apply to both Chevy  and Dodge.  A couple of 
years ago, Chevy chose to redesign their  chassis/frames.  Also the van and 
truck 
manufacturers had the fuel tank  issues and crash protection safety equipment 
issues.  Also the  manufacturers embailment programs have changed.
Today, much depends on the working policy and commitments of each dealer as  
to how they acquire and service mobility vans.  Keep in mind that the  playing 
field changes with each production year.  A wise consumer is still  the best 
buyer.
 
Best Wishes
 
In a message dated 11/12/2007 1:17:22 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I think  William is dead on here. There is a place nearby here that does all 
kinds of  customs for all kinds of reasons and I was talking to a service tech 
while he  was eating at the diner and he said he isn't a Ford fan but when it 
comes to  full size customizing the ford is much easier to work with. I 
prefer the looks  of the GMC or the Chevy myself. The other tip: gas prices are 
never coming  down. Get the smallest engine you can. 
Has  anyone seen the 4cyl diesel utility van from Mercedes? I think it is 
selling  as a dodge. 
Whatever  you decide, my best wishes are with you.
 
 
john



 



** See what's new at http://www.aol.com


Re: [QUAD-L] Van ....which one?

2007-11-12 Thread DiannaL767
In a message dated 11/12/2007 3:06:15 PM Eastern Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Also the van and truck manufacturers had the fuel tank issues and  crash 
protection safety equipment issues.  Also the manufacturers  embailment 
programs 
have changed.
W,
I've always considered my gas tank on my full size ford directly in the  back 
where the spare tire should be extremely scary  now I see my  Chrysler is 
back there too. Are they made from a stronger steel than a regular  gas tank or 
does it make no difference...they just have to move it?  Curious.
Dianna

 



** See what's new at http://www.aol.com


Re: [QUAD-L] Van ....which one?

2007-11-12 Thread wheelchair
 
In a message dated 11/12/2007 8:49:16 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

W,
I've always considered my gas tank on my full size ford directly in the  back 
where the spare tire should be extremely scary  now I see my  Chrysler is 
back there too. Are they made from a stronger steel than a regular  gas tank or 
does it make no difference...they just have to move it?  Curious.
Dianna



The full tanks began in the rear of the van but to meet the federal  
standards for crash testing they moved the tank or tanks to midsize.  Then  
when the 
floors were lowered they could not use the same tanks and went with  racing 
bladder cells.  Ford also required the tow bar package to protect  the tank.
Fuel Cells meet NHTSA standards.



** See what's new at http://www.aol.com