Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: .
Personally I like 'too low'. It looks right for me. With the extensions or longer springs someone exclaimed that it looks like it is riding on stilts. I'd think a front Anti roll bar would be more interesting than strut braces. M On 3 Nov 2011, at 10:47, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Whose Chris. So you car will have the higher spring and shock absorber mounts. If somebody has put standard fiesta springs on the rear then it will sit too low. Check that the rear shock absorbers still have there Quantum extensions screwed to the top as well. Jim -- From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:03 PM To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . q2022, so i assume that's series 2 car #22? Chris, you've probably just save me a few ŁŁŁ's there! Thanks, H Sent from my iPad On 2 Nov 2011, at 19:31, Steve Kodz st...@h4-turbo.co.uk wrote: Harry, You chassis number will start with a Q and contain the sequence number of Your car. Regards, Steve -- www.h4-turbo.co.uk www.quantumowners.co.uk www.quantumcars.co.uk www.quantumheritage.co.uk On Wednesday 02 Nov 2011, HB wrote: Sorry if i sound dense but how do i find out what number quantum i have? Also, will fiesta front/rear struts that fit between the top of the suspension posts fit the 2+2? Thanks for all your help, i'm really greatful chaps. H On Nov 1, 8:53 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: There are all sorts of variations on the spring and shock specs on the Mk2 Fiesta. But aftermarket parts tend to be specified as 1.1L and lower, 1.3L and 1.4L and then the XR2 which are both harder shocks and slightly lower. 2+2's often have rear shocks and/or springs from a 1.1 as the rear end is a lot lighter than the rear of a fiesta. Watch out if you've an early 2+2 (before the low 100's) as they have a higher rear spring and shock mounting which mean special springs and Quantum made extensions on the shock absorbers. Jim -- From: HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:34 PM To: Quantum Owners Group quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: . Thanks Bob. When you refer to fiesta shocks/springs as opposed to xr2 components, are the spring/shock specs the same for all types of mk2 'normal' fiestas? I believe it's a zetec block after checking. The oil filter is about 10cm in from the bottom rear corner, on the LHS from the drivers POV. Can you recommend any online spares stores for the dipstick apart from the obvious Ford? Cheers, H On Oct 31, 9:12 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Do you know if the bottom end is a 1.8 CVH , not that common as it was only used on the Sierra and needs a few mods to fit FWD. Or was it a 1.8 Zetec bottom end ?, often used with a CVH head to make what is commonly called a ZVH engine. The best way to tell is to see where the oil filter is on the back of the engine. If it's roughly in the middle of the block then it's a CVH, if it's down on the bottom corner of the engine (actually mounted on the oil pump) then it's a Zetec. You need the dipstick and tube that matches whatever the block is. Jim On Oct 30, 3:05 pm, HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi there, I ve recently acquired my first Quantum 2+2 and my first impressions are, wow! The licence plate is F229 UPB, if by any chance one of you have owned it! However, after a few Sunday drives a couple of niggles have appeared. Firstly and quite worryingly, under harsh acceleration/cornering, particularly around roundabouts (i can t resist), the rear arches do rub against the outside of the rear wheels. It s running 195/50/R15 tyres, which I don t believe are the problem, but if any of you do think they are the problem, please say. Other than that, could I have some advice on what springs/shocks to replace the current ones with to avoid the problem? Secondly, the engine is a 1.4cvh head with a 1.8 bottom end. Well, this is what the guy i bought it off has told me! The issue here is, the dipstick is from the 1.4 block so does not even reach the oil with a fresh 3.5L in. So my question is, will the 1.8 cvh dipstick be fit for purpose? Or, if any of you could point me in the right direction to what dipstick would suit/someone in the know, it d be greatly appreciated. FYI, the quantum was registered in 1992 and is based on a 1.4 mk2 of 1989. The now 1.8 engine has been gas flowed with a kent cam and scorpion exhaust with a TDLM carb. It s a beautiful black, with some tidy 15 alloys. 0-60 has been timed at 7.8 Thanks for reading this far, any information will be greatly appreciated. HB -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post
[Quantum Owners] CVH on 2 Cylinders - Q2009
Hi all. A funny thing happened on the way home from work on the other day well, it wasn't that funny and, now the clocks have gone back, it wasn't really daytime either, but I was coming home from work. The first symptom sounded like 'pinking' as I accelerated through 50mph. My first thoughts were of bad fuel or distributor slipping, as it got worse, I started thinking that 20 miles was a long way to walk! With some careful nursing and some jumping from brake to accelerator to keep it running (must learn to heel/toe one day) i got home. By then it sounded like a spark plug was rattling about every time I took up power. A first look revealed a spark and fuel at all 4 cylinders but pulling the plug leads on 3 and 4 made no difference to the (lumpy) running, pulling a lead on 1 or 2 prevented it from starting totally. So 20 miles on 2 cylinders is possible, but not good fro your stress levels. My next job is to check the compressions, so I'm coming home via Halfords today to get a tester. My current best suspicion is a head gasket (or valve lifters maybe - 2 failing at the same time?), especially with the speed that this came on at, my nightmare is a big crack between cylinders 3 and 4! I'll pass on what I find but if this sounds familiar to anyone please don't be shy, I'm having to drive the wife's Astra at the moment! Regards Dave English -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
Re: [Quantum Owners] CVH on 2 Cylinders - Q2009
Hi dave Same happened to me about 3 months ago, but only a mile from home. It sounded like a VW Beetle. Compression test showed next to nowt on two adjacent cylinders. Thankfully it was the head gasket. Regards Mark Cleminson Q2 027 On 4 Nov 2011, at 07:33, Dave English dave.hil...@virgin.net wrote: Hi all. A funny thing happened on the way home from work on the other day well, it wasn't that funny and, now the clocks have gone back, it wasn't really daytime either, but I was coming home from work. The first symptom sounded like 'pinking' as I accelerated through 50mph. My first thoughts were of bad fuel or distributor slipping, as it got worse, I started thinking that 20 miles was a long way to walk! With some careful nursing and some jumping from brake to accelerator to keep it running (must learn to heel/toe one day) i got home. By then it sounded like a spark plug was rattling about every time I took up power. A first look revealed a spark and fuel at all 4 cylinders but pulling the plug leads on 3 and 4 made no difference to the (lumpy) running, pulling a lead on 1 or 2 prevented it from starting totally. So 20 miles on 2 cylinders is possible, but not good fro your stress levels. My next job is to check the compressions, so I'm coming home via Halfords today to get a tester. My current best suspicion is a head gasket (or valve lifters maybe - 2 failing at the same time?), especially with the speed that this came on at, my nightmare is a big crack between cylinders 3 and 4! I'll pass on what I find but if this sounds familiar to anyone please don't be shy, I'm having to drive the wife's Astra at the moment! Regards Dave English -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
Re: [Quantum Owners] CVH on 2 Cylinders - Q2009
Agreed, probably the gasket. The only problem you may find is that if you've driven it any distance is that the head might be burnt away above the gap in the gasket as the combustion gases move from one cylinder to the other via the gap. I had this on my 2+2 (admittedly a turbo) the second time the head gasket went, got away with it the first time. I drove the car about 2 miles on 2 cylinders to get it away from the rolling road that the head gasket had gone on, before calling the AA. I managed to get a local alloy welding company to weld up the damage and then got the head skimmed. Maybe not worth the cost on a bog standard head but mine was a big valve gas flowed head. Jim -- From: Mark Cleminson mrclemin...@hotmail.com Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 8:08 AM To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] CVH on 2 Cylinders - Q2009 Hi dave Same happened to me about 3 months ago, but only a mile from home. It sounded like a VW Beetle. Compression test showed next to nowt on two adjacent cylinders. Thankfully it was the head gasket. Regards Mark Cleminson Q2 027 On 4 Nov 2011, at 07:33, Dave English dave.hil...@virgin.net wrote: Hi all. A funny thing happened on the way home from work on the other day well, it wasn't that funny and, now the clocks have gone back, it wasn't really daytime either, but I was coming home from work. The first symptom sounded like 'pinking' as I accelerated through 50mph. My first thoughts were of bad fuel or distributor slipping, as it got worse, I started thinking that 20 miles was a long way to walk! With some careful nursing and some jumping from brake to accelerator to keep it running (must learn to heel/toe one day) i got home. By then it sounded like a spark plug was rattling about every time I took up power. A first look revealed a spark and fuel at all 4 cylinders but pulling the plug leads on 3 and 4 made no difference to the (lumpy) running, pulling a lead on 1 or 2 prevented it from starting totally. So 20 miles on 2 cylinders is possible, but not good fro your stress levels. My next job is to check the compressions, so I'm coming home via Halfords today to get a tester. My current best suspicion is a head gasket (or valve lifters maybe - 2 failing at the same time?), especially with the speed that this came on at, my nightmare is a big crack between cylinders 3 and 4! I'll pass on what I find but if this sounds familiar to anyone please don't be shy, I'm having to drive the wife's Astra at the moment! Regards Dave English -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability,
[Quantum Owners] Pre registration insurance cover
Hello all, I have a quick question relating to insurance for unregistered cars. I recently failed my IVA test on my Xtreme (nothing major) for which I hired a transporter to get it there at a cost of £250 (no tow bar, so could not hire a trailer). To avoid this cost again, I would like to insure my car so that I can take it to a local garage for tracking and emissions testing (as allowed by VOSA) and to the IVA re-test. However, the club policy will only insure me on my chassis number for 2 weeks before cancelling if I do not provide a registration number. This poses a problem, as I can't allocate a big lump of time to complete the works in one go (due to family commitments), including the retest. Also, as I have no screen/roof and the test centre is nearly 2 hours drive away I can only go if the weather if favourable. Does anyone have any suggestions? Does anyone know if Footman James are flexible on this? Ideally I would like insurance to cover me on a Chassis number for up to about 6-8 weeks to give me enough time to get the works complete (it may require a couple of trips to my local garage on the emissions) before arranging a date for the re-test when the weather looks reasonable. Luke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
Re: [Quantum Owners] Pre registration insurance cover
Surely it is only the driver who needs to be insured. Provided you are prepared to take the risk of the car being driven by someone else, and them only having third party cover whilst driving your car, you could do your local running at least. I would double check to make sure that it is legal for you (or anyone else) to drive the car to the test station after you have had the problem areas sorted. Permission to drive other cars is not available on all insurance policies but my current policy arranged through Adrian Flux with Marker insurance allows me to do this. Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
Re: [Quantum Owners] Pre registration insurance cover
I think the driving other cars section of your policy is normally only valid if the cars owner has insurance as well. Jim From: michaelhughe...@aol.com Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 3:16 PM To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Pre registration insurance cover Surely it is only the driver who needs to be insured. Provided you are prepared to take the risk of the car being driven by someone else, and them only having third party cover whilst driving your car, you could do your local running at least. I would double check to make sure that it is legal for you (or anyone else) to drive the car to the test station after you have had the problem areas sorted. Permission to drive other cars is not available on all insurance policies but my current policy arranged through Adrian Flux with Marker insurance allows me to do this. Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
[Quantum Owners] Re: Pre registration insurance cover
Michael, thanks for you comments, but for someone to be able to drive another vehicle on their insurance, the vehicle in question must be insured in its own right - otherwise its illegal. I have had confirmation from VOSA that you can drive your car to the test station with no registration, but you must have insurance to do this. Likewise, to attend local garages for remedial works you must have insurance in place. Luke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
[Quantum Owners] Re: Pre registration insurance cover
Hi Luke When I SVA'd my saloon I got insureance using the vin no.and as I understood it the vehicle is insured by the owner driver only for purposes of the journey to and from the test. I was stopped 5 times once by an armed police because no reg plates, so I got a transporter for the retest. But yes it is legal as long as you have the letter and you insurance cert with you.. On Nov 4, 3:38 pm, Luke Neville lukemnevi...@googlemail.com wrote: Michael, thanks for you comments, but for someone to be able to drive another vehicle on their insurance, the vehicle in question must be insured in its own right - otherwise its illegal. I have had confirmation from VOSA that you can drive your car to the test station with no registration, but you must have insurance to do this. Likewise, to attend local garages for remedial works you must have insurance in place. Luke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
[Quantum Owners] Re: Pre registration insurance cover
Hi Luke When I said vin no I meant the Quantum no. On Nov 4, 4:10 pm, george pearcegeor...@hotmail.co.uk wrote: Hi Luke When I SVA'd my saloon I got insureance using the vin no.and as I understood it the vehicle is insured by the owner driver only for purposes of the journey to and from the test. I was stopped 5 times once by an armed police because no reg plates, so I got a transporter for the retest. But yes it is legal as long as you have the letter and you insurance cert with you.. On Nov 4, 3:38 pm, Luke Neville lukemnevi...@googlemail.com wrote: Michael, thanks for you comments, but for someone to be able to drive another vehicle on their insurance, the vehicle in question must be insured in its own right - otherwise its illegal. I have had confirmation from VOSA that you can drive your car to the test station with no registration, but you must have insurance to do this. Likewise, to attend local garages for remedial works you must have insurance in place. Luke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: Pre registration insurance cover
I was advised to ask if my insurer would issue repeat cover notes due to DVLA taking so long to issue the registration number - In the event this was sound advice as they took 12 weeks in total!, but your local office may be quicker than Norwich. Martin - Original Message - From: george pearcegeor...@hotmail.co.uk To: Quantum Owners Group quantumowners@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 4:12 PM Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: Pre registration insurance cover Hi Luke When I said vin no I meant the Quantum no. On Nov 4, 4:10 pm, george pearcegeor...@hotmail.co.uk wrote: Hi Luke When I SVA'd my saloon I got insureance using the vin no.and as I understood it the vehicle is insured by the owner driver only for purposes of the journey to and from the test. I was stopped 5 times once by an armed police because no reg plates, so I got a transporter for the retest. But yes it is legal as long as you have the letter and you insurance cert with you.. On Nov 4, 3:38 pm, Luke Neville lukemnevi...@googlemail.com wrote: Michael, thanks for you comments, but for someone to be able to drive another vehicle on their insurance, the vehicle in question must be insured in its own right - otherwise its illegal. I have had confirmation from VOSA that you can drive your car to the test station with no registration, but you must have insurance to do this. Likewise, to attend local garages for remedial works you must have insurance in place. Luke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s). - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1411 / Virus Database: 2092/3996 - Release Date: 11/04/11 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: .
Personally i would prefer the a low ride height aesthetically, if i could get away without any arch rubbing, it really isn't confidence inspiring! After reading a few more threads on here i've came to the provisional decision, do you think its ok on an early car? Tyres: 195/45/r15 Rear suspension: Monroe sensathingy dampers (will they be ok without an extension? If not would then, Avo adjustable xr2 dampers be suitable?). Complete with XR2 springs. I measured my ride height (ground to the lower edge of the arches) its 24.5 inches on the rear and 23.5 on the front, completely unloaded. What's your initial thoughts on those? Cheers, H On 4 Nov 2011, at 06:20, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: Personally I like 'too low'. It looks right for me. With the extensions or longer springs someone exclaimed that it looks like it is riding on stilts. I'd think a front Anti roll bar would be more interesting than strut braces. M On 3 Nov 2011, at 10:47, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Whose Chris. So you car will have the higher spring and shock absorber mounts. If somebody has put standard fiesta springs on the rear then it will sit too low. Check that the rear shock absorbers still have there Quantum extensions screwed to the top as well. Jim -- From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:03 PM To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . q2022, so i assume that's series 2 car #22? Chris, you've probably just save me a few ŁŁŁ's there! Thanks, H Sent from my iPad On 2 Nov 2011, at 19:31, Steve Kodz st...@h4-turbo.co.uk wrote: Harry, You chassis number will start with a Q and contain the sequence number of Your car. Regards, Steve -- www.h4-turbo.co.uk www.quantumowners.co.uk www.quantumcars.co.uk www.quantumheritage.co.uk On Wednesday 02 Nov 2011, HB wrote: Sorry if i sound dense but how do i find out what number quantum i have? Also, will fiesta front/rear struts that fit between the top of the suspension posts fit the 2+2? Thanks for all your help, i'm really greatful chaps. H On Nov 1, 8:53 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: There are all sorts of variations on the spring and shock specs on the Mk2 Fiesta. But aftermarket parts tend to be specified as 1.1L and lower, 1.3L and 1.4L and then the XR2 which are both harder shocks and slightly lower. 2+2's often have rear shocks and/or springs from a 1.1 as the rear end is a lot lighter than the rear of a fiesta. Watch out if you've an early 2+2 (before the low 100's) as they have a higher rear spring and shock mounting which mean special springs and Quantum made extensions on the shock absorbers. Jim -- From: HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:34 PM To: Quantum Owners Group quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: . Thanks Bob. When you refer to fiesta shocks/springs as opposed to xr2 components, are the spring/shock specs the same for all types of mk2 'normal' fiestas? I believe it's a zetec block after checking. The oil filter is about 10cm in from the bottom rear corner, on the LHS from the drivers POV. Can you recommend any online spares stores for the dipstick apart from the obvious Ford? Cheers, H On Oct 31, 9:12 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Do you know if the bottom end is a 1.8 CVH , not that common as it was only used on the Sierra and needs a few mods to fit FWD. Or was it a 1.8 Zetec bottom end ?, often used with a CVH head to make what is commonly called a ZVH engine. The best way to tell is to see where the oil filter is on the back of the engine. If it's roughly in the middle of the block then it's a CVH, if it's down on the bottom corner of the engine (actually mounted on the oil pump) then it's a Zetec. You need the dipstick and tube that matches whatever the block is. Jim On Oct 30, 3:05 pm, HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi there, I ve recently acquired my first Quantum 2+2 and my first impressions are, wow! The licence plate is F229 UPB, if by any chance one of you have owned it! However, after a few Sunday drives a couple of niggles have appeared. Firstly and quite worryingly, under harsh acceleration/cornering, particularly around roundabouts (i can t resist), the rear arches do rub against the outside of the rear wheels. It s running 195/50/R15 tyres, which I don t believe are the problem, but if any of you do think they are the problem, please say. Other than that, could I have some advice on what springs/shocks to replace the current ones with to avoid the problem? Secondly, the engine is a 1.4cvh head with a 1.8 bottom end. Well, this is what the guy i bought it off has told me! The issue here is, the
Re: [Quantum Owners] Pre registration insurance cover
Thanks Jim and Luke for the correction on this point. It also caused me to wonder about another cirumstance. Present laws say all cars must be insured all the time unless there is a SORN, however you cannot get a Statutory Off Road Registration unless the car has been registered in the first place. Does a car only become a car (for insurance purposes) after it has been registered? Can you tow a completed but unregistered kit car on public roads? Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: .
The car will handle well but you may get to know your dentist a bit better. I'd suggest a try before you buy excercise. I'm sure other Q owners would be happy to give you a run in their cars to help you make up your mind. If you are up near Glasgow at any time, drop me an email and I will gladly take you for a spin (hopefully not literally) Bob Craig (Q2-267) - Original Message - From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Cc: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 7:25 PM Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . Personally i would prefer the a low ride height aesthetically, if i could get away without any arch rubbing, it really isn't confidence inspiring! After reading a few more threads on here i've came to the provisional decision, do you think its ok on an early car? Tyres: 195/45/r15 Rear suspension: Monroe sensathingy dampers (will they be ok without an extension? If not would then, Avo adjustable xr2 dampers be suitable?). Complete with XR2 springs. I measured my ride height (ground to the lower edge of the arches) its 24.5 inches on the rear and 23.5 on the front, completely unloaded. What's your initial thoughts on those? Cheers, H On 4 Nov 2011, at 06:20, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: Personally I like 'too low'. It looks right for me. With the extensions or longer springs someone exclaimed that it looks like it is riding on stilts. I'd think a front Anti roll bar would be more interesting than strut braces. M On 3 Nov 2011, at 10:47, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Whose Chris. So you car will have the higher spring and shock absorber mounts. If somebody has put standard fiesta springs on the rear then it will sit too low. Check that the rear shock absorbers still have there Quantum extensions screwed to the top as well. Jim -- From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:03 PM To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . q2022, so i assume that's series 2 car #22? Chris, you've probably just save me a few ŁŁŁ's there! Thanks, H Sent from my iPad On 2 Nov 2011, at 19:31, Steve Kodz st...@h4-turbo.co.uk wrote: Harry, You chassis number will start with a Q and contain the sequence number of Your car. Regards, Steve -- www.h4-turbo.co.uk www.quantumowners.co.uk www.quantumcars.co.uk www.quantumheritage.co.uk On Wednesday 02 Nov 2011, HB wrote: Sorry if i sound dense but how do i find out what number quantum i have? Also, will fiesta front/rear struts that fit between the top of the suspension posts fit the 2+2? Thanks for all your help, i'm really greatful chaps. H On Nov 1, 8:53 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: There are all sorts of variations on the spring and shock specs on the Mk2 Fiesta. But aftermarket parts tend to be specified as 1.1L and lower, 1.3L and 1.4L and then the XR2 which are both harder shocks and slightly lower. 2+2's often have rear shocks and/or springs from a 1.1 as the rear end is a lot lighter than the rear of a fiesta. Watch out if you've an early 2+2 (before the low 100's) as they have a higher rear spring and shock mounting which mean special springs and Quantum made extensions on the shock absorbers. Jim -- From: HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:34 PM To: Quantum Owners Group quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: . Thanks Bob. When you refer to fiesta shocks/springs as opposed to xr2 components, are the spring/shock specs the same for all types of mk2 'normal' fiestas? I believe it's a zetec block after checking. The oil filter is about 10cm in from the bottom rear corner, on the LHS from the drivers POV. Can you recommend any online spares stores for the dipstick apart from the obvious Ford? Cheers, H On Oct 31, 9:12 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Do you know if the bottom end is a 1.8 CVH , not that common as it was only used on the Sierra and needs a few mods to fit FWD. Or was it a 1.8 Zetec bottom end ?, often used with a CVH head to make what is commonly called a ZVH engine. The best way to tell is to see where the oil filter is on the back of the engine. If it's roughly in the middle of the block then it's a CVH, if it's down on the bottom corner of the engine (actually mounted on the oil pump) then it's a Zetec. You need the dipstick and tube that matches whatever the block is. Jim On Oct 30, 3:05 pm, HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi there, I ve recently acquired my first Quantum 2+2 and my first impressions are, wow! The licence plate is F229 UPB, if by any chance one of you have owned it! However, after a few Sunday drives a couple of niggles have appeared. Firstly and quite worryingly, under harsh acceleration/cornering,
[Quantum Owners] Re: Pre registration insurance cover
Michael, I think you are right, in that a car is not a car until it has a number plate. RE:Martins comment, Were you insured on your VIN number for 12 weeks, if so which insurer did you use? Luke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
[Quantum Owners] Re: .
Thanks for the offer Bob, but alas i'm based in London. What set-up do you run by the way? I'll be uploading some pictures onto photo bucket soon for you all to have a nose, let me know what you think! This brings me onto another dilemma. I'm in the process of rebuilding the infamous boot. I'm probably going to split it into two levels with the lower one housing the spare tyre. What set-up do others have? Cheers, H On Nov 4, 8:46 pm, Robert Craig bobbycrai...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: The car will handle well but you may get to know your dentist a bit better. I'd suggest a try before you buy excercise. I'm sure other Q owners would be happy to give you a run in their cars to help you make up your mind. If you are up near Glasgow at any time, drop me an email and I will gladly take you for a spin (hopefully not literally) Bob Craig (Q2-267) - Original Message - From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Cc: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 7:25 PM Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . Personally i would prefer the a low ride height aesthetically, if i could get away without any arch rubbing, it really isn't confidence inspiring! After reading a few more threads on here i've came to the provisional decision, do you think its ok on an early car? Tyres: 195/45/r15 Rear suspension: Monroe sensathingy dampers (will they be ok without an extension? If not would then, Avo adjustable xr2 dampers be suitable?). Complete with XR2 springs. I measured my ride height (ground to the lower edge of the arches) its 24.5 inches on the rear and 23.5 on the front, completely unloaded. What's your initial thoughts on those? Cheers, H On 4 Nov 2011, at 06:20, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: Personally I like 'too low'. It looks right for me. With the extensions or longer springs someone exclaimed that it looks like it is riding on stilts. I'd think a front Anti roll bar would be more interesting than strut braces. M On 3 Nov 2011, at 10:47, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Whose Chris. So you car will have the higher spring and shock absorber mounts. If somebody has put standard fiesta springs on the rear then it will sit too low. Check that the rear shock absorbers still have there Quantum extensions screwed to the top as well. Jim -- From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:03 PM To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . q2022, so i assume that's series 2 car #22? Chris, you've probably just save me a few ŁŁŁ's there! Thanks, H Sent from my iPad On 2 Nov 2011, at 19:31, Steve Kodz st...@h4-turbo.co.uk wrote: Harry, You chassis number will start with a Q and contain the sequence number of Your car. Regards, Steve -- www.h4-turbo.co.uk www.quantumowners.co.uk www.quantumcars.co.uk www.quantumheritage.co.uk On Wednesday 02 Nov 2011, HB wrote: Sorry if i sound dense but how do i find out what number quantum i have? Also, will fiesta front/rear struts that fit between the top of the suspension posts fit the 2+2? Thanks for all your help, i'm really greatful chaps. H On Nov 1, 8:53 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: There are all sorts of variations on the spring and shock specs on the Mk2 Fiesta. But aftermarket parts tend to be specified as 1.1L and lower, 1.3L and 1.4L and then the XR2 which are both harder shocks and slightly lower. 2+2's often have rear shocks and/or springs from a 1.1 as the rear end is a lot lighter than the rear of a fiesta. Watch out if you've an early 2+2 (before the low 100's) as they have a higher rear spring and shock mounting which mean special springs and Quantum made extensions on the shock absorbers. Jim -- From: HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:34 PM To: Quantum Owners Group quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: . Thanks Bob. When you refer to fiesta shocks/springs as opposed to xr2 components, are the spring/shock specs the same for all types of mk2 'normal' fiestas? I believe it's a zetec block after checking. The oil filter is about 10cm in from the bottom rear corner, on the LHS from the drivers POV. Can you recommend any online spares stores for the dipstick apart from the obvious Ford? Cheers, H On Oct 31, 9:12 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Do you know if the bottom end is a 1.8 CVH , not that common as it was only used on the Sierra and needs a few mods to fit FWD. Or was it a 1.8 Zetec bottom end ?, often used with a CVH head to make what is commonly called a ZVH engine. The best way to tell is to see where the oil filter
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: .
Is that on an early quantum? How's the ride with that set up too, i know it's subjective, but just how unpleasant is it, if at all? Cheers, H On 4 Nov 2011, at 21:31, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: I've those tyre sizes with single damping adjustment Gaz and xr2 springs all around. No issues unless fully loaded with 2 people on Irish roads (and I mean fully loaded with tools luggage and back of car chockablock too). I need to increase the bump stops by a cm just never got around to it as I never normally carry such a full load so it's never really a problem. Matthew On 4 Nov 2011, at 19:25, Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com wrote: Personally i would prefer the a low ride height aesthetically, if i could get away without any arch rubbing, it really isn't confidence inspiring! After reading a few more threads on here i've came to the provisional decision, do you think its ok on an early car? Tyres: 195/45/r15 Rear suspension: Monroe sensathingy dampers (will they be ok without an extension? If not would then, Avo adjustable xr2 dampers be suitable?). Complete with XR2 springs. I measured my ride height (ground to the lower edge of the arches) its 24.5 inches on the rear and 23.5 on the front, completely unloaded. What's your initial thoughts on those? Cheers, H On 4 Nov 2011, at 06:20, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: Personally I like 'too low'. It looks right for me. With the extensions or longer springs someone exclaimed that it looks like it is riding on stilts. I'd think a front Anti roll bar would be more interesting than strut braces. M On 3 Nov 2011, at 10:47, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Whose Chris. So you car will have the higher spring and shock absorber mounts. If somebody has put standard fiesta springs on the rear then it will sit too low. Check that the rear shock absorbers still have there Quantum extensions screwed to the top as well. Jim -- From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:03 PM To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . q2022, so i assume that's series 2 car #22? Chris, you've probably just save me a few ŁŁŁ's there! Thanks, H Sent from my iPad On 2 Nov 2011, at 19:31, Steve Kodz st...@h4-turbo.co.uk wrote: Harry, You chassis number will start with a Q and contain the sequence number of Your car. Regards, Steve -- www.h4-turbo.co.uk www.quantumowners.co.uk www.quantumcars.co.uk www.quantumheritage.co.uk On Wednesday 02 Nov 2011, HB wrote: Sorry if i sound dense but how do i find out what number quantum i have? Also, will fiesta front/rear struts that fit between the top of the suspension posts fit the 2+2? Thanks for all your help, i'm really greatful chaps. H On Nov 1, 8:53 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: There are all sorts of variations on the spring and shock specs on the Mk2 Fiesta. But aftermarket parts tend to be specified as 1.1L and lower, 1.3L and 1.4L and then the XR2 which are both harder shocks and slightly lower. 2+2's often have rear shocks and/or springs from a 1.1 as the rear end is a lot lighter than the rear of a fiesta. Watch out if you've an early 2+2 (before the low 100's) as they have a higher rear spring and shock mounting which mean special springs and Quantum made extensions on the shock absorbers. Jim -- From: HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:34 PM To: Quantum Owners Group quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: . Thanks Bob. When you refer to fiesta shocks/springs as opposed to xr2 components, are the spring/shock specs the same for all types of mk2 'normal' fiestas? I believe it's a zetec block after checking. The oil filter is about 10cm in from the bottom rear corner, on the LHS from the drivers POV. Can you recommend any online spares stores for the dipstick apart from the obvious Ford? Cheers, H On Oct 31, 9:12 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Do you know if the bottom end is a 1.8 CVH , not that common as it was only used on the Sierra and needs a few mods to fit FWD. Or was it a 1.8 Zetec bottom end ?, often used with a CVH head to make what is commonly called a ZVH engine. The best way to tell is to see where the oil filter is on the back of the engine. If it's roughly in the middle of the block then it's a CVH, if it's down on the bottom corner of the engine (actually mounted on the oil pump) then it's a Zetec. You need the dipstick and tube that matches whatever the block is. Jim On Oct 30, 3:05 pm, HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi there, I ve recently acquired my first Quantum 2+2 and my first impressions are, wow! The licence
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: .
http://photobucket.com/quantumhb2011 Sent from my iPad On 4 Nov 2011, at 21:31, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: I've those tyre sizes with single damping adjustment Gaz and xr2 springs all around. No issues unless fully loaded with 2 people on Irish roads (and I mean fully loaded with tools luggage and back of car chockablock too). I need to increase the bump stops by a cm just never got around to it as I never normally carry such a full load so it's never really a problem. Matthew On 4 Nov 2011, at 19:25, Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com wrote: Personally i would prefer the a low ride height aesthetically, if i could get away without any arch rubbing, it really isn't confidence inspiring! After reading a few more threads on here i've came to the provisional decision, do you think its ok on an early car? Tyres: 195/45/r15 Rear suspension: Monroe sensathingy dampers (will they be ok without an extension? If not would then, Avo adjustable xr2 dampers be suitable?). Complete with XR2 springs. I measured my ride height (ground to the lower edge of the arches) its 24.5 inches on the rear and 23.5 on the front, completely unloaded. What's your initial thoughts on those? Cheers, H On 4 Nov 2011, at 06:20, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: Personally I like 'too low'. It looks right for me. With the extensions or longer springs someone exclaimed that it looks like it is riding on stilts. I'd think a front Anti roll bar would be more interesting than strut braces. M On 3 Nov 2011, at 10:47, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Whose Chris. So you car will have the higher spring and shock absorber mounts. If somebody has put standard fiesta springs on the rear then it will sit too low. Check that the rear shock absorbers still have there Quantum extensions screwed to the top as well. Jim -- From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:03 PM To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . q2022, so i assume that's series 2 car #22? Chris, you've probably just save me a few ŁŁŁ's there! Thanks, H Sent from my iPad On 2 Nov 2011, at 19:31, Steve Kodz st...@h4-turbo.co.uk wrote: Harry, You chassis number will start with a Q and contain the sequence number of Your car. Regards, Steve -- www.h4-turbo.co.uk www.quantumowners.co.uk www.quantumcars.co.uk www.quantumheritage.co.uk On Wednesday 02 Nov 2011, HB wrote: Sorry if i sound dense but how do i find out what number quantum i have? Also, will fiesta front/rear struts that fit between the top of the suspension posts fit the 2+2? Thanks for all your help, i'm really greatful chaps. H On Nov 1, 8:53 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: There are all sorts of variations on the spring and shock specs on the Mk2 Fiesta. But aftermarket parts tend to be specified as 1.1L and lower, 1.3L and 1.4L and then the XR2 which are both harder shocks and slightly lower. 2+2's often have rear shocks and/or springs from a 1.1 as the rear end is a lot lighter than the rear of a fiesta. Watch out if you've an early 2+2 (before the low 100's) as they have a higher rear spring and shock mounting which mean special springs and Quantum made extensions on the shock absorbers. Jim -- From: HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:34 PM To: Quantum Owners Group quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: . Thanks Bob. When you refer to fiesta shocks/springs as opposed to xr2 components, are the spring/shock specs the same for all types of mk2 'normal' fiestas? I believe it's a zetec block after checking. The oil filter is about 10cm in from the bottom rear corner, on the LHS from the drivers POV. Can you recommend any online spares stores for the dipstick apart from the obvious Ford? Cheers, H On Oct 31, 9:12 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Do you know if the bottom end is a 1.8 CVH , not that common as it was only used on the Sierra and needs a few mods to fit FWD. Or was it a 1.8 Zetec bottom end ?, often used with a CVH head to make what is commonly called a ZVH engine. The best way to tell is to see where the oil filter is on the back of the engine. If it's roughly in the middle of the block then it's a CVH, if it's down on the bottom corner of the engine (actually mounted on the oil pump) then it's a Zetec. You need the dipstick and tube that matches whatever the block is. Jim On Oct 30, 3:05 pm, HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi there, I ve recently acquired my first Quantum 2+2 and my first impressions are, wow! The licence plate is F229 UPB, if by any chance one of you have owned it! However, after a few Sunday
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: .
Yes on an early quantum. Ride is subjective. With damping set to min its about the same as a 'normal' car. I have damping set higher than it should be to compensate for springs which are not stiff enough IMHO. I need to do those as well sometime but it's after equal length drive shafts , updated rad and intercooler and a map tune, on the projects list. If I turned the dampers resistance to about 1/3rd I'd say it was the same as my m-sport BMW. I like the adjustables as i can play to get what is right for me and the conditions. M On 4 Nov 2011, at 21:50, Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com wrote: Is that on an early quantum? How's the ride with that set up too, i know it's subjective, but just how unpleasant is it, if at all? Cheers, H On 4 Nov 2011, at 21:31, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: I've those tyre sizes with single damping adjustment Gaz and xr2 springs all around. No issues unless fully loaded with 2 people on Irish roads (and I mean fully loaded with tools luggage and back of car chockablock too). I need to increase the bump stops by a cm just never got around to it as I never normally carry such a full load so it's never really a problem. Matthew On 4 Nov 2011, at 19:25, Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com wrote: Personally i would prefer the a low ride height aesthetically, if i could get away without any arch rubbing, it really isn't confidence inspiring! After reading a few more threads on here i've came to the provisional decision, do you think its ok on an early car? Tyres: 195/45/r15 Rear suspension: Monroe sensathingy dampers (will they be ok without an extension? If not would then, Avo adjustable xr2 dampers be suitable?). Complete with XR2 springs. I measured my ride height (ground to the lower edge of the arches) its 24.5 inches on the rear and 23.5 on the front, completely unloaded. What's your initial thoughts on those? Cheers, H On 4 Nov 2011, at 06:20, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: Personally I like 'too low'. It looks right for me. With the extensions or longer springs someone exclaimed that it looks like it is riding on stilts. I'd think a front Anti roll bar would be more interesting than strut braces. M On 3 Nov 2011, at 10:47, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Whose Chris. So you car will have the higher spring and shock absorber mounts. If somebody has put standard fiesta springs on the rear then it will sit too low. Check that the rear shock absorbers still have there Quantum extensions screwed to the top as well. Jim -- From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:03 PM To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . q2022, so i assume that's series 2 car #22? Chris, you've probably just save me a few ŁŁŁ's there! Thanks, H Sent from my iPad On 2 Nov 2011, at 19:31, Steve Kodz st...@h4-turbo.co.uk wrote: Harry, You chassis number will start with a Q and contain the sequence number of Your car. Regards, Steve -- www.h4-turbo.co.uk www.quantumowners.co.uk www.quantumcars.co.uk www.quantumheritage.co.uk On Wednesday 02 Nov 2011, HB wrote: Sorry if i sound dense but how do i find out what number quantum i have? Also, will fiesta front/rear struts that fit between the top of the suspension posts fit the 2+2? Thanks for all your help, i'm really greatful chaps. H On Nov 1, 8:53 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: There are all sorts of variations on the spring and shock specs on the Mk2 Fiesta. But aftermarket parts tend to be specified as 1.1L and lower, 1.3L and 1.4L and then the XR2 which are both harder shocks and slightly lower. 2+2's often have rear shocks and/or springs from a 1.1 as the rear end is a lot lighter than the rear of a fiesta. Watch out if you've an early 2+2 (before the low 100's) as they have a higher rear spring and shock mounting which mean special springs and Quantum made extensions on the shock absorbers. Jim -- From: HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:34 PM To: Quantum Owners Group quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: . Thanks Bob. When you refer to fiesta shocks/springs as opposed to xr2 components, are the spring/shock specs the same for all types of mk2 'normal' fiestas? I believe it's a zetec block after checking. The oil filter is about 10cm in from the bottom rear corner, on the LHS from the drivers POV. Can you recommend any online spares stores for the dipstick apart from the obvious Ford? Cheers, H On Oct 31, 9:12 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Do you know if the bottom end is a 1.8 CVH , not that common as it was only used on the
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: .
That looks like standard length springs with no extensions - about the same height as mine. I can't tell you how high mine is and I'm not going out to the garage now ;-) however the sills are too low to get a standard height trolley jack under, just, I have to use a scissor jack first. It looks right to me but horses for courses! M On 4 Nov 2011, at 21:56, Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com wrote: http://photobucket.com/quantumhb2011 Sent from my iPad On 4 Nov 2011, at 21:31, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: I've those tyre sizes with single damping adjustment Gaz and xr2 springs all around. No issues unless fully loaded with 2 people on Irish roads (and I mean fully loaded with tools luggage and back of car chockablock too). I need to increase the bump stops by a cm just never got around to it as I never normally carry such a full load so it's never really a problem. Matthew On 4 Nov 2011, at 19:25, Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com wrote: Personally i would prefer the a low ride height aesthetically, if i could get away without any arch rubbing, it really isn't confidence inspiring! After reading a few more threads on here i've came to the provisional decision, do you think its ok on an early car? Tyres: 195/45/r15 Rear suspension: Monroe sensathingy dampers (will they be ok without an extension? If not would then, Avo adjustable xr2 dampers be suitable?). Complete with XR2 springs. I measured my ride height (ground to the lower edge of the arches) its 24.5 inches on the rear and 23.5 on the front, completely unloaded. What's your initial thoughts on those? Cheers, H On 4 Nov 2011, at 06:20, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: Personally I like 'too low'. It looks right for me. With the extensions or longer springs someone exclaimed that it looks like it is riding on stilts. I'd think a front Anti roll bar would be more interesting than strut braces. M On 3 Nov 2011, at 10:47, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Whose Chris. So you car will have the higher spring and shock absorber mounts. If somebody has put standard fiesta springs on the rear then it will sit too low. Check that the rear shock absorbers still have there Quantum extensions screwed to the top as well. Jim -- From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:03 PM To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . q2022, so i assume that's series 2 car #22? Chris, you've probably just save me a few ŁŁŁ's there! Thanks, H Sent from my iPad On 2 Nov 2011, at 19:31, Steve Kodz st...@h4-turbo.co.uk wrote: Harry, You chassis number will start with a Q and contain the sequence number of Your car. Regards, Steve -- www.h4-turbo.co.uk www.quantumowners.co.uk www.quantumcars.co.uk www.quantumheritage.co.uk On Wednesday 02 Nov 2011, HB wrote: Sorry if i sound dense but how do i find out what number quantum i have? Also, will fiesta front/rear struts that fit between the top of the suspension posts fit the 2+2? Thanks for all your help, i'm really greatful chaps. H On Nov 1, 8:53 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: There are all sorts of variations on the spring and shock specs on the Mk2 Fiesta. But aftermarket parts tend to be specified as 1.1L and lower, 1.3L and 1.4L and then the XR2 which are both harder shocks and slightly lower. 2+2's often have rear shocks and/or springs from a 1.1 as the rear end is a lot lighter than the rear of a fiesta. Watch out if you've an early 2+2 (before the low 100's) as they have a higher rear spring and shock mounting which mean special springs and Quantum made extensions on the shock absorbers. Jim -- From: HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:34 PM To: Quantum Owners Group quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: . Thanks Bob. When you refer to fiesta shocks/springs as opposed to xr2 components, are the spring/shock specs the same for all types of mk2 'normal' fiestas? I believe it's a zetec block after checking. The oil filter is about 10cm in from the bottom rear corner, on the LHS from the drivers POV. Can you recommend any online spares stores for the dipstick apart from the obvious Ford? Cheers, H On Oct 31, 9:12 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Do you know if the bottom end is a 1.8 CVH , not that common as it was only used on the Sierra and needs a few mods to fit FWD. Or was it a 1.8 Zetec bottom end ?, often used with a CVH head to make what is commonly called a ZVH engine. The best way to tell is to see where the oil filter is on the back of the engine. If it's roughly in the middle of the block then it's a CVH, if
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: .
In my boot ... A can of tyre weld (RAC membership backup in my pocket), the battery, a thick rubber mat, assorted fluids, and motorbike bungee net to hold the loose things in place. M On 4 Nov 2011, at 21:26, HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks for the offer Bob, but alas i'm based in London. What set-up do you run by the way? I'll be uploading some pictures onto photo bucket soon for you all to have a nose, let me know what you think! This brings me onto another dilemma. I'm in the process of rebuilding the infamous boot. I'm probably going to split it into two levels with the lower one housing the spare tyre. What set-up do others have? Cheers, H On Nov 4, 8:46 pm, Robert Craig bobbycrai...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: The car will handle well but you may get to know your dentist a bit better. I'd suggest a try before you buy excercise. I'm sure other Q owners would be happy to give you a run in their cars to help you make up your mind. If you are up near Glasgow at any time, drop me an email and I will gladly take you for a spin (hopefully not literally) Bob Craig (Q2-267) - Original Message - From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Cc: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 7:25 PM Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . Personally i would prefer the a low ride height aesthetically, if i could get away without any arch rubbing, it really isn't confidence inspiring! After reading a few more threads on here i've came to the provisional decision, do you think its ok on an early car? Tyres: 195/45/r15 Rear suspension: Monroe sensathingy dampers (will they be ok without an extension? If not would then, Avo adjustable xr2 dampers be suitable?). Complete with XR2 springs. I measured my ride height (ground to the lower edge of the arches) its 24.5 inches on the rear and 23.5 on the front, completely unloaded. What's your initial thoughts on those? Cheers, H On 4 Nov 2011, at 06:20, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: Personally I like 'too low'. It looks right for me. With the extensions or longer springs someone exclaimed that it looks like it is riding on stilts. I'd think a front Anti roll bar would be more interesting than strut braces. M On 3 Nov 2011, at 10:47, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Whose Chris. So you car will have the higher spring and shock absorber mounts. If somebody has put standard fiesta springs on the rear then it will sit too low. Check that the rear shock absorbers still have there Quantum extensions screwed to the top as well. Jim -- From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:03 PM To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . q2022, so i assume that's series 2 car #22? Chris, you've probably just save me a few ŁŁŁ's there! Thanks, H Sent from my iPad On 2 Nov 2011, at 19:31, Steve Kodz st...@h4-turbo.co.uk wrote: Harry, You chassis number will start with a Q and contain the sequence number of Your car. Regards, Steve -- www.h4-turbo.co.uk www.quantumowners.co.uk www.quantumcars.co.uk www.quantumheritage.co.uk On Wednesday 02 Nov 2011, HB wrote: Sorry if i sound dense but how do i find out what number quantum i have? Also, will fiesta front/rear struts that fit between the top of the suspension posts fit the 2+2? Thanks for all your help, i'm really greatful chaps. H On Nov 1, 8:53 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: There are all sorts of variations on the spring and shock specs on the Mk2 Fiesta. But aftermarket parts tend to be specified as 1.1L and lower, 1.3L and 1.4L and then the XR2 which are both harder shocks and slightly lower. 2+2's often have rear shocks and/or springs from a 1.1 as the rear end is a lot lighter than the rear of a fiesta. Watch out if you've an early 2+2 (before the low 100's) as they have a higher rear spring and shock mounting which mean special springs and Quantum made extensions on the shock absorbers. Jim -- From: HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:34 PM To: Quantum Owners Group quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: . Thanks Bob. When you refer to fiesta shocks/springs as opposed to xr2 components, are the spring/shock specs the same for all types of mk2 'normal' fiestas? I believe it's a zetec block after checking. The oil filter is about 10cm in from the bottom rear corner, on the LHS from the drivers POV. Can you recommend any online spares stores for the dipstick apart from the obvious Ford? Cheers, H On Oct 31, 9:12 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Do you know if the bottom end is a 1.8 CVH , not that common
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: Pre registration insurance cover
I'm not sure that's true. If you leave the vehicle it would become uninsured and if that was a public road it could be illegal. Also you can drive a normally uninsured vehicle with trade insurance that covers any vehicle. M On 4 Nov 2011, at 15:38, Luke Neville lukemnevi...@googlemail.com wrote: Michael, thanks for you comments, but for someone to be able to drive another vehicle on their insurance, the vehicle in question must be insured in its own right - otherwise its illegal. I have had confirmation from VOSA that you can drive your car to the test station with no registration, but you must have insurance to do this. Likewise, to attend local garages for remedial works you must have insurance in place. Luke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: .
This is mine with lowered XR2 springs [IMG]http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q305/dolly-sprint/Dolomite%20Sprint%20and%20cars/quantum004.jpg[/IMG] and it was not nice to drive on our third world roads that we all enjoy now and it was slower because you could not drive it fast without grounding. Yours looks fine to me but I agree that the damping needs uprating over standard. Cheers Jon 2+2 RST - Original Message - From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 10:56 PM Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . http://photobucket.com/quantumhb2011 Sent from my iPad On 4 Nov 2011, at 21:31, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: I've those tyre sizes with single damping adjustment Gaz and xr2 springs all around. No issues unless fully loaded with 2 people on Irish roads (and I mean fully loaded with tools luggage and back of car chockablock too). I need to increase the bump stops by a cm just never got around to it as I never normally carry such a full load so it's never really a problem. Matthew On 4 Nov 2011, at 19:25, Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com wrote: Personally i would prefer the a low ride height aesthetically, if i could get away without any arch rubbing, it really isn't confidence inspiring! After reading a few more threads on here i've came to the provisional decision, do you think its ok on an early car? Tyres: 195/45/r15 Rear suspension: Monroe sensathingy dampers (will they be ok without an extension? If not would then, Avo adjustable xr2 dampers be suitable?). Complete with XR2 springs. I measured my ride height (ground to the lower edge of the arches) its 24.5 inches on the rear and 23.5 on the front, completely unloaded. What's your initial thoughts on those? Cheers, H On 4 Nov 2011, at 06:20, Matthew Wastell matt...@wastell.eu wrote: Personally I like 'too low'. It looks right for me. With the extensions or longer springs someone exclaimed that it looks like it is riding on stilts. I'd think a front Anti roll bar would be more interesting than strut braces. M On 3 Nov 2011, at 10:47, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Whose Chris. So you car will have the higher spring and shock absorber mounts. If somebody has put standard fiesta springs on the rear then it will sit too low. Check that the rear shock absorbers still have there Quantum extensions screwed to the top as well. Jim -- From: Harry Buckingham harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:03 PM To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: . q2022, so i assume that's series 2 car #22? Chris, you've probably just save me a few ŁŁŁ's there! Thanks, H Sent from my iPad On 2 Nov 2011, at 19:31, Steve Kodz st...@h4-turbo.co.uk wrote: Harry, You chassis number will start with a Q and contain the sequence number of Your car. Regards, Steve -- www.h4-turbo.co.uk www.quantumowners.co.uk www.quantumcars.co.uk www.quantumheritage.co.uk On Wednesday 02 Nov 2011, HB wrote: Sorry if i sound dense but how do i find out what number quantum i have? Also, will fiesta front/rear struts that fit between the top of the suspension posts fit the 2+2? Thanks for all your help, i'm really greatful chaps. H On Nov 1, 8:53 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: There are all sorts of variations on the spring and shock specs on the Mk2 Fiesta. But aftermarket parts tend to be specified as 1.1L and lower, 1.3L and 1.4L and then the XR2 which are both harder shocks and slightly lower. 2+2's often have rear shocks and/or springs from a 1.1 as the rear end is a lot lighter than the rear of a fiesta. Watch out if you've an early 2+2 (before the low 100's) as they have a higher rear spring and shock mounting which mean special springs and Quantum made extensions on the shock absorbers. Jim -- From: HB harry.bucking...@googlemail.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:34 PM To: Quantum Owners Group quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: . Thanks Bob. When you refer to fiesta shocks/springs as opposed to xr2 components, are the spring/shock specs the same for all types of mk2 'normal' fiestas? I believe it's a zetec block after checking. The oil filter is about 10cm in from the bottom rear corner, on the LHS from the drivers POV. Can you recommend any online spares stores for the dipstick apart from the obvious Ford? Cheers, H On Oct 31, 9:12 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: Do you know if the bottom end is a 1.8 CVH , not that common as it was only used on the Sierra and needs a few mods to fit FWD. Or was it a 1.8 Zetec bottom end ?, often used with a CVH head to make what is commonly called a ZVH engine. The best way to tell is to see where the oil filter is on the back of the engine. If
