Re: [ntp:questions] Does an IPV6 address work with NTPD?
Quoting Harlan Stenn (st...@ntp.org): > > So, do IPV6 addresses result in anything useful when used in NTPD? > Works for me: > stenn@psp-fb1> sntp 2610:20:6F15:15::27 > 27 Nov 22:14:24 sntp[23486]: Started sntp > 2014-11-27 22:14:24.982440 (+) +0.00180 +/- 0.010162 secs > > stenn@psp-fb1> ntpq -p psp2 > remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset > == > 2001:4f8:fff7:1 149.20.68.1 3 u 373 1024 3770.341 -0.574 However, do note that 'refid' will not display correct IPv6 addresses. That might be a tad bit confusing if you don't expect it... -- | Everyone has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film. | 4096R/20CC6CD2 - 6D40 1A20 B9AA 87D4 84C7 FBD6 F3A9 9442 20CC 6CD2 ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] Does an IPV6 address work with NTPD?
Dear colleagues: The NIST server time-d (ipv4=129.6.15.27, ipv6=2610:20:6f15:15::27) currently receives approximately 400 NTP requests per second. About 30% of these are from ipv6 addresses. The server has been operating for a bit more than 2 years. Best wishes, Judah Levine Time and Frequency Division NIST Boulder On Thursday, November 27, 2014 7:10:02 AM UTC-7, Charles Elliott wrote: > The U.S. Government (NIST) has a new time server (time-d.nist.gov) > > whose address is 2610:20:6F15:15::27. When I put that address into > > ntp.conf the Meinberg Time Server Monitor indicates "Unknown clock > > type" in the Type column and Reach remains 000. However, when > > 2610:20:6F15:15::27 is pinged the return is "General failure". > > (Dr.) Judah Levine, Time and Frequency Division, NIST Boulder, says > > 2610:20:6F15:15::27 works as far as he can tell. So, do IPV6 addresses > > result in anything useful when used in NTPD? > > > > > > Charles Elliott ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] Does an IPV6 address work with NTPD?
Sander Smeenk writes: > Quoting Harlan Stenn (st...@ntp.org): > > > So, do IPV6 addresses result in anything useful when used in NTPD? > > Works for me: > > stenn@psp-fb1> sntp 2610:20:6F15:15::27 > > 27 Nov 22:14:24 sntp[23486]: Started sntp > > 2014-11-27 22:14:24.982440 (+) +0.00180 +/- 0.010162 secs > > > > stenn@psp-fb1> ntpq -p psp2 > > remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset > > === > === > > 2001:4f8:fff7:1 149.20.68.1 3 u 373 1024 3770.341 -0.574 > > However, do note that 'refid' will not display correct IPv6 addresses. > That might be a tad bit confusing if you don't expect it... It's also reasonably well-documented. The refid is a 32-bit field. Also see http://support.ntp.org/Dev/UpdatingTheRefidFormat H ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
