Re: [ntp:questions] Dimensioning NTP Server

2007-12-23 Thread Luis Colorado

"Aggarwal Vivek-Q4997C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje news:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
> Hi
> Iam planning to have NTP Server for something around 50,000 Clients in
> the Network

If you are being to deploy NTP to 50,000 clients, perhaps you'd better to put 
your routers (sure you don't have only one) or your DHCP servers to proxy NTP 
for them.  You don't have to use just one NTP server, you can get several in 
synch so time is distributed with not so much network load.

In doing so you'll get several advantages:

* You'll get less network load, as NTP traffic don't pass over the local net.  
NTP is very sensible to network load.  Time offsets get greater in loaded 
network.  NTP proxies can use their clocks to stabilize time offsets due to 
network load.

* You'll get less synch delay.  People tends to think that using only one 
server will get all clients synched with it, but you'll get a couple of 50,000 
pcs with different times, because of network load at time servers. NTP gets 
better results in a low loaded net.  Time exactitude depends on two factors: 
network load introduces noise in time measurements, leading to greater time 
offsets from the source of time.  Network NTP hops introduces a constant (or 
nearly constant) latency from the source of time, but this latencies are taken 
into account when synchronizing and you'll have better results using more 
levels of deploying time than making everything point to a master server.

* You'll get more exact times if you balance the levels of stratumness with the 
number of clients that will ask a single server.  I think a good starting 
balance is making all routers take time from your master server (better two or 
three servers for all the routers to get fault tolerance) and then the final 
clients to ask the routers for time. If you are considering to join 50,000 
network nodes in a network, you'll be able to select routers capable of acting 
as timeservers for the localnet.

> 
> Can Anyone guide me in dimensioning the NTP Server. What are the
> guidelines that I should take care for dimensioning the NTP Server
> 
> Also can I two NTP Servers running in active-stand by or in Load
> balancing scenario in the same network

You can use better several NTP servers, and point routers to them all.  NTP is 
designed with fault tolerance in mind, even to get better clock timeline.

> 
> Regards
> Vivek Aggarwal

___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions


Re: [ntp:questions] Dimensioning NTP Server

2007-12-17 Thread Danny Mayer
Aggarwal Vivek-Q4997C wrote:
> Hi
> Iam planning to have NTP Server for something around 50,000 Clients in
> the Network
> 
> Can Anyone guide me in dimensioning the NTP Server. What are the
> guidelines that I should take care for dimensioning the NTP Server
> 

I'd probably set up 3 stratum 1 servers at each site and then use
multicast to distribute the NTP packets to the clients. The exact
configuration can depend a great deal on what the clients need in the
way of accuracy and how the network is laid out. While in general
network topology is not important to NTP you can reduce the error budget
by keeping the network stable.

> Also can I two NTP Servers running in active-stand by or in Load
> balancing scenario in the same network

load-balancing has no meaning to NTP. You send a NTP packet and the
server sends a response. You don't need anything in standby, just
include all of the relevant servers in the DNS and NTP will do the rest.
With the new pool conf option you can have it use all of the addresses
listed in the DNS.

This is not different from DNS which has no use for a load balancer or
standby either.

Danny

> Regards
> Vivek Aggarwal
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions


Re: [ntp:questions] Dimensioning NTP Server

2007-12-13 Thread Harlan Stenn
>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aggarwal Vivek-Q4997C) 
>>> writes:

Aggarwal> Hi Iam planning to have NTP Server for something around 50,000
Aggarwal> Clients in the Network

Is this a LAN or a WAN?

Have you seen http://support.ntp.org/Support/DesigningYourNTPNetwork ?

While I think 1 or 2 machines could handle the load (if the clients all
started at the same time it would be fun for a little while), you will do
better overall having at least several machines offering NTP service, both
in terms of reliability and load.  The machines you would need for this
service should all be pretty inexpensive.

And if you could write up your experience (or email it to me) I would
appreciate it.
-- 
Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ntpforum.isc.org  - be a member!

___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions


Re: [ntp:questions] Dimensioning NTP Server

2007-12-13 Thread Maarten Wiltink
"Aggarwal Vivek-Q4997C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Iam planning to have NTP Server for something around 50,000 Clients in
> the Network
>
> Can Anyone guide me in dimensioning the NTP Server. What are the
> guidelines that I should take care for dimensioning the NTP Server

"Do not start up all clients at once."

Under normal conditions, clients will quickly back off to one packet
per 1024 seconds. I could scrounge up an old 386SX-16 motherboard
for you, but even that isn't going to be fazed by 50 packets per
second, I'm afraid.


> Also can I two NTP Servers running in active-stand by or in Load
> balancing scenario in the same network

Load balancing... yes, I think so. I can't think of anything that
would go wrong. But the usual way to provide high NTP availability
is to simply have all clients query all of four servers all the time.
Because it's not only a question of the number of servers likely to
be up. The real question is 'what time is it?' when there are four
answers, or three, or two, all just a little different.

Groetjes,
Maarten Wiltink


___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions


Re: [ntp:questions] Dimensioning NTP Server

2007-12-13 Thread Aggarwal Vivek-Q4997C
Hi
Iam planning to have NTP Server for something around 50,000 Clients in
the Network

Can Anyone guide me in dimensioning the NTP Server. What are the
guidelines that I should take care for dimensioning the NTP Server

Also can I two NTP Servers running in active-stand by or in Load
balancing scenario in the same network

Regards
Vivek Aggarwal
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions