Re: [ntp:questions] Garmin GPS18x LVC problem since firmware 3.50

2010-12-29 Thread Rob
David J Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
 Following my previous message, I can confirm that the NMEA output from the 
 GPS18x LVC with the firmware 3.50 upgrade is coming out something like a 
 second after the PPS signal, and worse, it's very variable so sometimes 
 just before the PPS leading edge, and sometimes after.  No wonder NTP is 
 confused!

 I have contacted Garmin UK via the Web/e-mail form, but as it's almost a 
 two-week holiday here, if someone has a better contact with Garmin US it 
 might be worth alerting them as well.  I have requested that the firmware 
 be fixed so that the NMEA output be well under one second delayed, and 
 that the delay be more reproducible (although I haven't made that point 
 strongly enough, so it should be emphasised).

Technically, the timestamps in the NMEA messages are the time of fix,
not the current time.  So a receiver can rightfully keep a calculated
fix in memory and send it at some later time, with the timestamp of the
original fix included in the message.
This makes NMEA unusable for time synchronization.

I have seen the behaviour you describe from other receivers, from other
manufacturers, as well.  For example, I have seen it happen that the
offset between PPS and NMEA output varies every time the receiver is
restarted, and slowly wanders while the receiver is running.  Apparently
there is a software timer that sends the messages every second or other
interval, but is not locked to the PPS signal.

I think by expecting the NMEA to be locked to PPS, you are in fact
relying on an implementation detail that often is not covered in the
receiver spec, and that can be changed at will (accidentally or for
some reason).

It is better to switch to the binary protocol, which is manufacturer
specific.  There usually are messages in the binary protocol to communicate
the current time, as opposed to the time of fix, and there are specs
that define the relationship between the time and the moment the message
is sent.

___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions


Re: [ntp:questions] Garmin GPS18x LVC problem since firmware 3.50

2010-12-29 Thread David J Taylor
Rob nom...@example.com wrote in message 
news:slrnihlurn.9vm.nom...@xs8.xs4all.nl...

[]

Technically, the timestamps in the NMEA messages are the time of fix,
not the current time.  So a receiver can rightfully keep a calculated
fix in memory and send it at some later time, with the timestamp of the
original fix included in the message.
This makes NMEA unusable for time synchronization.

I have seen the behaviour you describe from other receivers, from other
manufacturers, as well.  For example, I have seen it happen that the
offset between PPS and NMEA output varies every time the receiver is
restarted, and slowly wanders while the receiver is running.  Apparently
there is a software timer that sends the messages every second or other
interval, but is not locked to the PPS signal.

I think by expecting the NMEA to be locked to PPS, you are in fact
relying on an implementation detail that often is not covered in the
receiver spec, and that can be changed at will (accidentally or for
some reason).

It is better to switch to the binary protocol, which is manufacturer
specific.  There usually are messages in the binary protocol to 
communicate

the current time, as opposed to the time of fix, and there are specs
that define the relationship between the time and the moment the message
is sent.


Rob,

Thanks for your input.

Whilst I understand what you are saying, it seems that this unit /used/ to 
work as most people expected, with the NMEA output being within the 
current second rather than outside it, and therefore that /something/ may 
have changed within the firmware rendering the unit perhaps useless under 
some circumstances (e.g. stand-alone).


Garmin say in the technical specifications for the unit:

The NMEA 0183 sentences that follow each rising edge of the PPS signal 
tell you when you were and where you were at that previous rising edge of 
the PPS signal, beginning with the GPRMC sentence as the lead sentence in 
any particular NMEA 0183 record


This implies to me that there is a sync-lock between the position 
determination, the PPS signal, and the data in the NMEA output, and I 
think it may imply that the GPMRC sentence /must/ be started (or even 
finished?) /before/ the next PPS rising edge.


I would hope that by bringing this problem to Garmin's attention, they may 
be able to restore the changes in the firmware which have broken this 
relationship, and has allowed the NMEA data to drift past the /next/ 
leading edge.


Cheers,
David 


___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions


Re: [ntp:questions] Garmin GPS18x LVC problem since firmware 3.50

2010-12-29 Thread Rob
David J Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
 Whilst I understand what you are saying, it seems that this unit /used/ to 
 work as most people expected, with the NMEA output being within the 
 current second rather than outside it, and therefore that /something/ may 
 have changed within the firmware rendering the unit perhaps useless under 
 some circumstances (e.g. stand-alone).

 Garmin say in the technical specifications for the unit:

 The NMEA 0183 sentences that follow each rising edge of the PPS signal 
 tell you when you were and where you were at that previous rising edge of 
 the PPS signal, beginning with the GPRMC sentence as the lead sentence in 
 any particular NMEA 0183 record

 This implies to me that there is a sync-lock between the position 
 determination, the PPS signal, and the data in the NMEA output, and I 
 think it may imply that the GPMRC sentence /must/ be started (or even 
 finished?) /before/ the next PPS rising edge.

 I would hope that by bringing this problem to Garmin's attention, they may 
 be able to restore the changes in the firmware which have broken this 
 relationship, and has allowed the NMEA data to drift past the /next/ 
 leading edge.

Yes, it seems that in this case there actually is a spec for the timing
and you should be able to make them change the software so it (again)
adheres to that spec.  The remarks I made were about a receiver (I forget
what make and type) where there was no spec like you wrote above.
But there was a binary protocol and it contained a specific message for
sending the current time, rather than the time-of-fix.  Of course the
content of that message was no longer valid at the time it was received,
but there was a spec that said at which time the content was valid.
(like at the start bit of the first byte sent)

In gpsd, receivers are switched to their binary protocol when possible,
and problems like you have encountered are less likely to occur.  But
still there are offsets caused by the limited serial bitrate and issues
beyond direct control (like the amount of data sent by the receiver,
which may vary depending on the number of satellites in view).

I never felt completely easy with the derivation of time from the messages
received from a GPS.

___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions


[ntp:questions] Garmin GPS18x LVC problem since firmware 3.50

2010-12-28 Thread David J Taylor

Folks,

Following my previous message, I can confirm that the NMEA output from the 
GPS18x LVC with the firmware 3.50 upgrade is coming out something like a 
second after the PPS signal, and worse, it's very variable so sometimes 
just before the PPS leading edge, and sometimes after.  No wonder NTP is 
confused!


I have contacted Garmin UK via the Web/e-mail form, but as it's almost a 
two-week holiday here, if someone has a better contact with Garmin US it 
might be worth alerting them as well.  I have requested that the firmware 
be fixed so that the NMEA output be well under one second delayed, and 
that the delay be more reproducible (although I haven't made that point 
strongly enough, so it should be emphasised).


Can NTP even handle an offset of more than one second between PPS and 
serial?


Thanks to Dave Hart for pointing out:
 http://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2010-December/052859.html

I felt it best to start a new topic for this problem.

Cheers,
David 


___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions