Re: [ntp:questions] packet: pad header 020 / Leap not in sync

2007-09-18 Thread Folkert van Heusden
  My ntpd won't sync.
  Situation:
  - windows 2003 server as ntp server
  - vmware esx 3.0.2 server as ntp client
 Virtual machines are best left unsynchronised. The host will

This is not the virtual machine, it is the service console. And from
what I've heard it's neccessary to keep it synced.


Folkert van Heusden

-- 
To MultiTail einai ena polymorfiko ergaleio gia ta logfiles kai tin
eksodo twn entolwn. Prosferei: filtrarisma, xrwmatismo, sygxwneysi,
diaforetikes provoles. http://www.vanheusden.com/multitail/
--
Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions


Re: [ntp:questions] packet: pad header 020 / Leap not in sync

2007-09-18 Thread Maarten Wiltink
Folkert van Heusden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 My ntpd won't sync.
 Situation:
 - windows 2003 server as ntp server
 - vmware esx 3.0.2 server as ntp client

 Virtual machines are best left unsynchronised. ...

 This is not the virtual machine, it is the service console. And from
 what I've heard it's neccessary to keep it synced.

Oh yes, definitely. Sorry for the confusion.

Groetjes,
Maarten Wiltink


___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions


Re: [ntp:questions] packet: pad header 020 / Leap not in sync

2007-09-17 Thread Maarten Wiltink
Folkert van Heusden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 My ntpd won't sync.
 Situation:
 - windows 2003 server as ntp server
 - vmware esx 3.0.2 server as ntp client

Virtual machines are best left unsynchronised. The host will
take care of it. This is really the best solution; if you
think SpeedStep is bad, try not to imagine five VMs fighting
for cycles.

http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vmware_timekeeping.pdf

Groetjes,
Maarten Wiltink


___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions


Re: [ntp:questions] packet: pad header 020 / Leap not in sync

2007-09-17 Thread Richard B. Gilbert
Maarten Wiltink wrote:
 Folkert van Heusden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
 news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
My ntpd won't sync.
Situation:
- windows 2003 server as ntp server
- vmware esx 3.0.2 server as ntp client
 
 
 Virtual machines are best left unsynchronised. The host will
 take care of it. This is really the best solution; if you
 think SpeedStep is bad, try not to imagine five VMs fighting
 for cycles.
 
 http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vmware_timekeeping.pdf
 
 Groetjes,
 Maarten Wiltink
 
 

In the case of VMWare ESX we found it best to let VMWare take care of 
the clock.  This was three or more years ago and may not still hold true!

___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions