[Bioc-devel] reproducing the BioC package error

2021-05-12 Thread Venu Thatikonda
Hello all,

I am trying to reproduce the build error of my package

https://master.bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.13/bioc-LATEST/ALPS/nebbiolo1-buildsrc.html

As I understand, BioC 3.13 uses R 4.1. However, it seems R 4.1.0 is not yet
officially released. Are other developers just downloading the R 4.1.0
devel version and testing their packages?

Thank you & stay safe!

-- 
Best regards
Venu Thatikonda
https://itsvenu.github.io/

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


[Bioc-devel] merge github + bioc versions

2019-11-01 Thread Venu Thatikonda
Hello all,

I am a bit confused by how git works with bioc ecosystem. I am following
this guide to sync my github + bioc repos (for the first time).

https://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/git/sync-existing-repositories/

After step-6, I see following branches

* master
  remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
  remotes/origin/master
  remotes/upstream/RELEASE_3_10
  remotes/upstream/master

So, if I add new features to the package and commit & push to master
branch, does it affect current version that is released in bioc10? Or do
they go to bioc11 devel branch and generate build reports, without
affecting the package in bioc10?

Should I create a branch RELEASE_3_11 and commit all changes to this
branch? I want the changes to be released in bioc11 and do not want to
affect bioc10 version.

Thank you & have a nice day!

-- 
Best regards
Venu Thatikonda
https://itsvenu.github.io/

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


Re: [Bioc-devel] 'tokay1' error but passed other OS

2019-09-04 Thread Venu Thatikonda
@Lori, sure. I will open the issue with an example.

@Daniel, I didn't understand, I thought this suggestion is for Lori (?).

Do I need to run `R CMD check --force-multiarch` on a windows 32bit system
from my side? If that's the case, It won't be practical from my side,
because I have to borrow someone's system who is using win32. If not, I ran
it on macOS with '--force-multiarch' and it's clean. Except one note about
'.BBSoptions' file, I guess it's okay? Any clarifications would be
appreciated.

Thank you.


On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 9:38 PM Kasper Daniel Hansen <
kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Venu, you should really follow Herve's suggestion and use R CMD check
> --force-multiarch and report back the result.
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 3:32 PM Shepherd, Lori <
> lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org> wrote:
>
>> Venu,
>> If you can produce a minimal example that can reproduce it and open the
>> issue on rtracklayer github that would be great.  Please tag me when you do
>> so I can keep track of it also @lshep on GitHub
>> Cheers
>>
>> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Venu Thatikonda 
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 4, 2019 3:11:56 PM
>> *To:* Kasper Daniel Hansen 
>> *Cc:* Shepherd, Lori ; bioc-devel <
>> bioc-devel@r-project.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Bioc-devel] 'tokay1' error but passed other OS
>>
>> @Daniel, I guess using libBigWig cause even more problems while build,
>> check commands as this is an non R library. But I'm not sure if this works
>> out.
>>
>> @Lori, Thanks a lot for looking into the error. Interesting to see what's
>> missing from win32. I will add the .BBSoptions file and bump the version as
>> suggested. I can create a small example to reproduce the error(?), to open
>> an issue at rtracklayer, please let me know if that's okay.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:50 PM Kasper Daniel Hansen <
>> kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> My experience with rtracklayer, bigwig and windows is indeed on some
>>> windows machines it works, and others it don't. Not sure what the deciding
>>> factor is, but if it is truly 32 vs 64 bit, that's interesiting
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 1:51 PM Shepherd, Lori <
>>> lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I looked into this more on our builders.  The examples run fine on 64
>>>> bit.  This seems to be caused by a 32-bit Windows specific ERROR from
>>>> the rtracklayer summary() function for BigWigFile objects.
>>>>
>>>> I will open an issue with rtracklayer (when I can come up with a
>>>> minimal reproducible example) and will post the issue link in your open
>>>> issue on the Contributions tracker to also monitor.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In the meantime you could add a file  .BBSoptions that contains the
>>>> line UnsupportedPlatforms: win32  to get an accurate build report and avoid
>>>> building on the 32 bit window until the issue is resolved.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lori Shepherd
>>>>
>>>> Bioconductor Core Team
>>>>
>>>> Roswell Park Cancer Institute
>>>>
>>>> Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
>>>>
>>>> Elm & Carlton Streets
>>>>
>>>> Buffalo, New York 14263
>>>> --
>>>> *From:* Bioc-devel  on behalf of
>>>> Kasper Daniel Hansen 
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 4, 2019 1:41:28 PM
>>>> *To:* Venu Thatikonda 
>>>> *Cc:* bioc-devel 
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Bioc-devel] 'tokay1' error but passed other OS
>>>>
>>>> Well, yes, its the status on the build system which matters.
>>>>
>>>> In your case it looks like you're doing BigWig parsing. Unfortunately,
>>>> some
>>>> of the tools we have for reading BigWig (tracklayer) does not work
>>>> reliably
>>>> on Windows - sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. My _guess_ is
>>>> that
>>>> you're running into this.
>>>>
>>>> It would be great to get this fixed, although that is not your package's
>>>> issue.  One possible alternative is
>>>> https://github.com/dpryan79/libBigWig
>>>> which Brent Peterson recommends. I don't know if that works on Windows,
>>&

Re: [Bioc-devel] 'tokay1' error but passed other OS

2019-09-04 Thread Venu Thatikonda
@Daniel, I guess using libBigWig cause even more problems while build,
check commands as this is an non R library. But I'm not sure if this works
out.

@Lori, Thanks a lot for looking into the error. Interesting to see what's
missing from win32. I will add the .BBSoptions file and bump the version as
suggested. I can create a small example to reproduce the error(?), to open
an issue at rtracklayer, please let me know if that's okay.

Thank you.

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:50 PM Kasper Daniel Hansen <
kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks
>
> My experience with rtracklayer, bigwig and windows is indeed on some
> windows machines it works, and others it don't. Not sure what the deciding
> factor is, but if it is truly 32 vs 64 bit, that's interesiting
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 1:51 PM Shepherd, Lori <
> lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org> wrote:
>
>> I looked into this more on our builders.  The examples run fine on 64
>> bit.  This seems to be caused by a 32-bit Windows specific ERROR from
>> the rtracklayer summary() function for BigWigFile objects.
>>
>> I will open an issue with rtracklayer (when I can come up with a minimal
>> reproducible example) and will post the issue link in your open issue on
>> the Contributions tracker to also monitor.
>>
>>
>> In the meantime you could add a file  .BBSoptions that contains the line
>> UnsupportedPlatforms: win32  to get an accurate build report and avoid
>> building on the 32 bit window until the issue is resolved.
>>
>>
>> Lori Shepherd
>>
>> Bioconductor Core Team
>>
>> Roswell Park Cancer Institute
>>
>> Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
>>
>> Elm & Carlton Streets
>>
>> Buffalo, New York 14263
>> --
>> *From:* Bioc-devel  on behalf of
>> Kasper Daniel Hansen 
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 4, 2019 1:41:28 PM
>> *To:* Venu Thatikonda 
>> *Cc:* bioc-devel 
>> *Subject:* Re: [Bioc-devel] 'tokay1' error but passed other OS
>>
>> Well, yes, its the status on the build system which matters.
>>
>> In your case it looks like you're doing BigWig parsing. Unfortunately,
>> some
>> of the tools we have for reading BigWig (tracklayer) does not work
>> reliably
>> on Windows - sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. My _guess_ is that
>> you're running into this.
>>
>> It would be great to get this fixed, although that is not your package's
>> issue.  One possible alternative is https://github.com/dpryan79/libBigWig
>> which Brent Peterson recommends. I don't know if that works on Windows,
>> but
>> at least its not Kent tools.
>>
>> Best,
>> Kasper
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 11:45 AM Venu Thatikonda 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > One of my packages during the review is giving an error in bioc windows
>> > system. When I build and check from my side in a windows system, there
>> is
>> > no error.
>> >
>> > It's been over a week, not sure what's happening? Should I do something
>> > from my side?
>> >
>> > Bioc issue: https://github.com/Bioconductor/Contributions/issues/1215
>> >
>> > Build report:
>> >
>> http://bioconductor.org/spb_reports/ALPS_buildreport_20190827110407.html
>> >
>> > Any update/suggestions would be helpful.
>> >
>> > Thank you.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards
>> > Venu Thatikonda
>> > https://itsvenu.github.io/
>> >
>> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best,
>> Kasper
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> _______
>> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>>
>> This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
>> information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or
>> agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended
>> recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited. If you have
>> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
>> e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
>
> --
> Best,
> Kasper
>


-- 
Best regards
Venu Thatikonda
https://itsvenu.github.io/

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


[Bioc-devel] 'tokay1' error but passed other OS

2019-09-04 Thread Venu Thatikonda
Hi,

One of my packages during the review is giving an error in bioc windows
system. When I build and check from my side in a windows system, there is
no error.

It's been over a week, not sure what's happening? Should I do something
from my side?

Bioc issue: https://github.com/Bioconductor/Contributions/issues/1215

Build report:
http://bioconductor.org/spb_reports/ALPS_buildreport_20190827110407.html

Any update/suggestions would be helpful.

Thank you.

-- 
Best regards
Venu Thatikonda
https://itsvenu.github.io/

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


[Bioc-devel] Error: DLL 'rgl' not found: maybe not installed for this architecture?

2019-08-23 Thread Venu Thatikonda
Hi,

During one of my R packages bioc review, I see the following 2 errors,

one:

Error in library.dynam(dynlib, pkg, lib) :
  DLL 'rgl' not found: maybe not installed for this architecture?
Error: .onLoad failed in loadNamespace() for 'rgl', details:
  call: NULL
  error:Loading rgl's DLL failed.
Execution halted
ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'ALPS'
* removing 
'C:/Users/pkgbuild/packagebuilder/workers/jobs/1215/2a61338/ALPS.buildbin-libdir/ALPS'

I'm not using any functions from 'rgl', not sure why it is a required
dependency. Or is there any key detail am I missing? R CMD build, check
BiocCheck are very clean on my system.

Two:

* ERROR: System Files found that should not be git tracked:
ALPS.Rproj


Based on this discussion (
https://community.rstudio.com/t/should-rproj-files-be-added-to-gitignore/1269),
it is in fact a bit useful not adding PACKAGE.Rproj to .gitignore. Do all
bioc packages require adding *Rproj to gitignore?

Here is the report, if it's helpful.

http://bioconductor.org/spb_reports/ALPS_buildreport_20190823145032.html

Thank you & have a ncie day!

-- 
Best regards
Venu Thatikonda
https://itsvenu.github.io/

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


[Bioc-devel] Is magrittr "%>%" acceptable in bioc packages?

2019-08-17 Thread Venu Thatikonda
Hi,

As the title says, is %>% acceptable in bioc packages? With BiocCheck, I
get a WARNING that is "Add non-empty \\value sections to the following man
pages: man/pipe.Rd".

Is it okay even if this warning appears ? `R CMD check` didn't give
warnings about it.

Thank you.

-- 
Best regards
Venu Thatikonda
https://itsvenu.github.io/

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel