Re: [Rd] alpha, portable use
Doug
I do indeed have a Makevars file after all. Thanks for spelling out the
interpretation of the warning message.
Paul
Douglas Bates wrote:
> On 9/25/06, Paul Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am still confused about this (and it is still happening with R-beta).
>> Writing R Extensions suggests I need a Makefile or Makevars in my
>> package, but that has not been the case previously. Is there now a
>> requirement that all packages need Makefiles or Makevars if there is
>> fortran to be compiled? This is only happening on one of my systems.
>> Building R and make check work fine on that system, but it seems that
>> not all the information gets passed along to package compiles.
>>
>> (BTW, this is just a warning, but Kurt suggested we try to eliminate
>> warnings.)
>
> From the warning it seems that you have a Makevars file in the src
> directory for your package. The change in R-2.4.0 is that packages
> that did have a Makevars file of the form
>
> PKG_LIBS=$(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS)
>
> should change that to
>
> PKG_LIBS=$(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS) $(FLIBS)
>
>>
>> Paul Gilbert
>>
>> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>> > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>> >
>> >> When I build one of my packages with alpha from yesterday I am getting
>> >>
>> >> * checking for portable use of $BLAS_LIBS ... WARNING
>> >> apparently missing $(FLIBS) in 'PKG_LIBS=$(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS)'
>> >>
>> >> Is this something I should worry about? (Possibly I got this
>> before and
>> >> didn't notice.)
>> >
>> > Yes, please do check Writing R Extensions
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> La version française suit le texte anglais.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This email may contain privileged and/or confidential
>> inform...{{dropped}}
>>
>> __
>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>
La version française suit le texte anglais.
This email may contain privileged and/or confidential inform...{{dropped}}
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] alpha, portable use
On 9/25/06, Paul Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am still confused about this (and it is still happening with R-beta).
> Writing R Extensions suggests I need a Makefile or Makevars in my
> package, but that has not been the case previously. Is there now a
> requirement that all packages need Makefiles or Makevars if there is
> fortran to be compiled? This is only happening on one of my systems.
> Building R and make check work fine on that system, but it seems that
> not all the information gets passed along to package compiles.
>
> (BTW, this is just a warning, but Kurt suggested we try to eliminate
> warnings.)
>From the warning it seems that you have a Makevars file in the src
directory for your package. The change in R-2.4.0 is that packages
that did have a Makevars file of the form
PKG_LIBS=$(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS)
should change that to
PKG_LIBS=$(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS) $(FLIBS)
>
> Paul Gilbert
>
> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Paul Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >> When I build one of my packages with alpha from yesterday I am getting
> >>
> >> * checking for portable use of $BLAS_LIBS ... WARNING
> >> apparently missing $(FLIBS) in 'PKG_LIBS=$(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS)'
> >>
> >> Is this something I should worry about? (Possibly I got this before and
> >> didn't notice.)
> >
> > Yes, please do check Writing R Extensions
> >
>
>
> La version française suit le texte anglais.
>
>
>
> This email may contain privileged and/or confidential inform...{{dropped}}
>
> __
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] alpha, portable use
I am still confused about this (and it is still happening with R-beta).
Writing R Extensions suggests I need a Makefile or Makevars in my
package, but that has not been the case previously. Is there now a
requirement that all packages need Makefiles or Makevars if there is
fortran to be compiled? This is only happening on one of my systems.
Building R and make check work fine on that system, but it seems that
not all the information gets passed along to package compiles.
(BTW, this is just a warning, but Kurt suggested we try to eliminate
warnings.)
Paul Gilbert
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>
>> When I build one of my packages with alpha from yesterday I am getting
>>
>> * checking for portable use of $BLAS_LIBS ... WARNING
>> apparently missing $(FLIBS) in 'PKG_LIBS=$(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS)'
>>
>> Is this something I should worry about? (Possibly I got this before and
>> didn't notice.)
>
> Yes, please do check Writing R Extensions
>
La version française suit le texte anglais.
This email may contain privileged and/or confidential inform...{{dropped}}
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] alpha, portable use
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Paul Gilbert wrote: > When I build one of my packages with alpha from yesterday I am getting > > * checking for portable use of $BLAS_LIBS ... WARNING > apparently missing $(FLIBS) in 'PKG_LIBS=$(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS)' > > Is this something I should worry about? (Possibly I got this before and > didn't notice.) Yes, please do check Writing R Extensions -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] alpha, portable use
When I build one of my packages with alpha from yesterday I am getting
* checking for portable use of $BLAS_LIBS ... WARNING
apparently missing $(FLIBS) in 'PKG_LIBS=$(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS)'
Is this something I should worry about? (Possibly I got this before and
didn't notice.)
Paul Gilbert
La version française suit le texte anglais.
This email may contain privileged and/or confidential inform...{{dropped}}
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
