Re: [R] I'm offering $300 for someone who know R-programming to do the assignments for me.

2009-05-08 Thread D Chaws
The venom from everyone is to be expected here ayaku.  While
scientific listservs are a bad place to ask for people to do your
homework, they are great for getting advice and soliciting tutors.  R
is a great program and a lot of fun to learn.  Why not put your money
to better use and hire a local tutor to help you learn something you
can use for many things and many years to come?

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:19 AM, ayaku1...@gmail.com
ayaku1...@gmail.com wrote:
 There are six assignments in total. It won't take you long if you were
 familiar with R. For those who are interested, please send me an email
 with your profile (your experience with R, how long and how often have
 you been using it.) I will be paying through paypal. Thanks!

 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Adjusting for initial status (intercept) in lme growth models

2008-08-29 Thread D Chaws
I read this very brief chapter, and don't see how this would address the
issues I raise.  Can you provide any further hints?  Sorry, I may be missing
something obvious.

-- DC

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Dieter Menne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 D Chaws cat.dev.urandom at gmail.com writes:

  Say, for instance you want to model growth in pituitary distance  as a
  function of age in the Orthodont dataset.
 
  fm1 = lme(distance ~ I(age-8), random = ~ 1 + I(age-8) | Subject, data =
  Orthodont)
 
  You notice that there is substantial variability in the intercepts
 (initial
  distance) for people at 8 years, and that
  this variability in initial distance is related to growth over time:

 Looks like a perfect example to use parameter weight=varPower(something)
  in
 lme; you could use some power function of the initial distance. See Chapter
 5.2
 in Pinheiro-Bates.

 Dieter

 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide
 http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] Adjusting for initial status (intercept) in lme growth models

2008-08-28 Thread D Chaws
Hi everyone, I have a quick and probably easy question about lme for this
list.

Say, for instance you want to model growth in pituitary distance  as a
function of age in the Orthodont dataset.

fm1 = lme(distance ~ I(age-8), random = ~ 1 + I(age-8) | Subject, data =
Orthodont)

You notice that there is substantial variability in the intercepts (initial
distance) for people at 8 years, and that
this variability in initial distance is related to growth over time:

R# summary(fm1)
...
Random effects:
 Formula: ~1 + I(age - 8) | Subject
 Structure: General positive-definite, Log-Cholesky parametrization
StdDev Corr
(Intercept) 1.8866 (Intr)
I(age - 8)  0.2264 0.209
Residual1.3100

Now 2 questions:

1.  With lme, how can you get a fit of the growth model accounting for the
relationship between initial status (intercept) and growth?
Some texts call this latent variable regression or something or other, which
seems to basically boil down to adding the random effects
intercept as a predictor in the growth model.  Is this done in lme by simply
adding the intercept results from ranef(fm1) to the model?
This two-step process seems wrong to me for some reason, perhaps because it
seems too simple.  Anyone know the proper way to do
in lme?

2.  In addition, suppose you see that there are significant differences in
initial status by Sex:

fm2 = lme(distance ~ I(age-8) + Sex, random = ~ 1 + I(age-8) | Subject, data
= Orthodont)

R# summary(fm2)
Fixed effects: distance ~ I(age - 8) + Sex
 Value Std.Error DF t-value p-value
(Intercept) 22.9170.5134 80   44.64   0.000
I(age - 8)   0.6600.0713 809.27   0.000
SexFemale   -2.1450.7575 25   -2.83   0.009

Along the lines of question #1, how would you get a growth model adjusting
for these Sex differences in initial status?  I am looking for something
similar to adjusting for baseline differences between Sexes in ANCOVA.  I
know Lord would not approve, but this is just by way of example...  Thanks
so much for your help, and this wonderful program Dr. Bates.

- DC

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.