Peter,
Thanks very much. Good spotting, and that confirms what I'd deduced from the
code.
I think you're right that it would be useful to either make that explicit in
the definition of the se argument (and in the description, which also describes
them as standard errors), or expose the ff argument of the se.lines() function,
so that it can be set during the call to termplot(), by the user. The
selection of 2.0 as a scaling factor is presumably an approximation of 1.96, to
give roughly 95% confidence intervals, but it's possible users might want to
specify some other scaling factor.
Cheers,
Eric Goodwin
-Original Message-
From: peter dalgaard [mailto:pda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 11 January 2018 21:29
To: Eric Goodwin
Cc: Duncan Murdoch ; r-help@R-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] termplot intervals - SE or CI?
From ?termplot:
col.se, lty.se, lwd.se: color, line type and line width for the
‘twice-standard-error curve’ when ‘se = TRUE’.
...which is findable, but might usefully also be made explicit in the
definition of the se= argument.
-pd
> On 10 Jan 2018, at 23:27 , Eric Goodwin wrote:
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply Duncan.
>
> I had indeed assumed they were what the help file says until observation
> raised doubts, which is why I queried it.
>
> From reading the code for termplot(), it seems that either the predict()
> function doesn't return the 1x standard error, or the curves plotted by the
> termplot() function are not 1x standard errors. If they're not 1x standard
> errors, it seems misleading to call them (e.g. in the help file) "standard
> errors".
>
> The "se.fit" returned by a call in termplot() to predict() is multiplied by 2
> (in termplot's function se.lines()) before it is plotted as a curve described
> as "standard errors" by the help file.
>
> Thus, again, it seems that either termplot() is not plotting standard errors,
> or predict() is not returning standard errors in se.fit.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eric
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2016 12:02
> To: Eric Goodwin ; r-help@R-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] termplot intervals - SE or CI?
>
> On 28/06/2016 4:53 PM, Eric Goodwin wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> A reviewer queried what the intervals were on the termplot I provided in a
>> report. The help file for termplot() suggests they're standard errors
>> (se=T), but in the code the se.fit values from predict() are multiplied by
>> 2, suggesting it's a rough 95% confidence interval, is that right?
>
> I would assume they are what the help file says, but if I wasn't sure, I'd
> work them out for a simple case from first principles, and compare to what
> the code gives.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Eric Goodwin
>> Scientific data analyst | Coastal and Freshwater Group Cawthron
>> Institute Phone +64 (0)3 548 2319 | Mobile 027 439 1141
>> eric.good...@cawthron.org.nz<mailto:eric.good...@cawthron.org.nz> |
>> www.cawthron.org.nz<http://www.cawthron.org.nz/>
>>
>>
>> #
>> #
>> ###
>>
>> Note:
>> This message is for the named person's use only.
>> It=2...{{dropped:30}}
>
> __
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
--
Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000
Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Office: A 4.23
Email: pd@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com
#
Note:
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential,
proprietary or legally privileged information. If you receive this message in
error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system,
destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
Cawthron reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its
networks. Any opinions expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states
otherwise and the sender is authorised to make that statement.
This e-mail m
