Re: [R] Amelia error
Easily fixed, Peter -
str(ad04)
'data.frame': 1195 obs. of 15 variables:
$ V040001 : num 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
$ insurance: num 7 2 4 1 5 2 7 1 5 5 ...
$ jobs : num 7 3 4 1 6 5 7 5 4 7 ...
$ services : num 5 2 5 1 5 2 7 1 4 7 ...
$ ss : num 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 3 ...
$ women: num 1 2 4 1 4 4 1 1 1 1 ...
$ abortion : num 3 3 3 NA 3 3 1 1 NA 1 ...
$ gayrights: num 1 1 2 NA 4 4 1 1 NA 4 ...
$ demrep : num 4 3 7 4 7 4 7 2 3 7 ...
$ libcon : num 4 4 6 4 6 6 6 4 3 6 ...
$ educ : num 8 5 7 3 4 8 7 5 8 8 ...
$ south: num 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 ...
$ gender : Factor w/ 2 levels "1. Male","2. Female": 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 ...
$ demrep.1 : num 4 3 7 4 7 4 7 2 3 7 ...
$ race : chr "White" "Other" "White" "Other" ...
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Peter Ehlers wrote:
> On 2012-04-18 11:18, Gaurav Sood wrote:
>>
>> Using: Amelia::amelia
>>
>> R version: 2.15
>> OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
>>
>> data = National Election Studies (cross-sectional); mostly ordinal
>> variables, some nominal
>>
>> summary(ad04)
>>
>> insurance jobs services ss women
>> Min. :1.000 Min. :1.000 Min. :1.000 Min. :1.000 Min.
>> :1.00
>> 1st Qu.:2.000 1st Qu.:3.000 1st Qu.:2.000 1st Qu.:1.000 1st
>> Qu.:1.00
>> Median :4.000 Median :4.000 Median :3.000 Median :1.000 Median
>> :1.00
>> Mean :3.656 Mean :4.207 Mean :3.478 Mean :1.408 Mean
>> :1.92
>> 3rd Qu.:5.000 3rd Qu.:6.000 3rd Qu.:4.000 3rd Qu.:2.000 3rd
>> Qu.:2.00
>> Max. :7.000 Max. :7.000 Max. :7.000 Max. :3.000 Max.
>> :7.00
>> NA's :97 NA's :105 NA's :146 NA's :21 NA's
>> :52
>
>
> It would be far more useful to provide the result of str(ad04) than
> the above useless summary.
>
> Peter Ehlers
>
>>
>> aout04<- amelia(ad04,noms=c("race","south","gender","demrep"), m=5)
>> Error in if (sum(non.vary == 0)) { :
>> argument is not interpretable as logical
>> In addition: Warning message:
>> In FUN(X[[34L]], ...) : NAs introduced by coercion
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Sarah Goslee
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you mean the Amelia package? Or a function named Amelia()?
>>>
>>> What is your OS and version of R and package?
>>>
>>> What are the commands you are using?
>>>
>>> What do your data look like?
>>>
>>> Can you provide a reproducible example?
>>>
>>> Did you read the posting guide?
>>>
>>> Your problem doesn't "seem like a bug" rather than user error unless
>>> we know a whole lot more about it.
>>>
>>> Sarah
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Gaurav Sood wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Encountering the following error using Amelia -
>>>>
>>>> Error in if (sum(non.vary == 0)) { :
>>>> argument is not interpretable as logical
>>>> In addition: Warning message:
>>>> In FUN(X[[34L]], ...) : NAs introduced by coercion
>>>>
>>>> Seems like a bug.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sarah Goslee
>>> http://www.functionaldiversity.org
>>
>>
>> __
>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
>
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Amelia error
Sarah -
I have all the vars.. they all look sensible. I have been able to
trace the problem to NAs in the nominal variable, which is a bit
strange. The error that the program spits out is a class logical
equating error in presence of NAs etc. and hence was my hunch that it
was a bug.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Sarah Goslee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Gaurav Sood wrote:
>> Using: Amelia::amelia
>>
>> R version: 2.15
>> OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
>>
>> data = National Election Studies (cross-sectional); mostly ordinal
>> variables, some nominal
>>
>> summary(ad04)
>>
>> insurance jobs services ss women
>> Min. :1.000 Min. :1.000 Min. :1.000 Min. :1.000 Min. :1.00
>> 1st Qu.:2.000 1st Qu.:3.000 1st Qu.:2.000 1st Qu.:1.000 1st Qu.:1.00
>> Median :4.000 Median :4.000 Median :3.000 Median :1.000 Median :1.00
>> Mean :3.656 Mean :4.207 Mean :3.478 Mean :1.408 Mean :1.92
>> 3rd Qu.:5.000 3rd Qu.:6.000 3rd Qu.:4.000 3rd Qu.:2.000 3rd Qu.:2.00
>> Max. :7.000 Max. :7.000 Max. :7.000 Max. :3.000 Max. :7.00
>> NA's :97 NA's :105 NA's :146 NA's :21 NA's :52
>>
>> aout04 <- amelia(ad04,noms=c("race","south","gender","demrep"), m=5)
>
> According to the summary you posted above, the columns of ad04 are
> insurance, jobs, services, ss, women.
>
> But you tell amelia() that the nominal variables in your data frame
> are race, south, gender, demrem - none of which appear in ad04.
>
> You might want to take a look at the example given in ?amelia and then
> if you're still having trouble give us the rest of the information
> that I requested, particularly the versions and the reproducible
> example, or at the very least the output of str(ad04).
>
> Sarah
>
>
>> Error in if (sum(non.vary == 0)) { :
>> argument is not interpretable as logical
>> In addition: Warning message:
>> In FUN(X[[34L]], ...) : NAs introduced by coercion
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Sarah Goslee wrote:
>>> Do you mean the Amelia package? Or a function named Amelia()?
>>>
>>> What is your OS and version of R and package?
>>>
>>> What are the commands you are using?
>>>
>>> What do your data look like?
>>>
>>> Can you provide a reproducible example?
>>>
>>> Did you read the posting guide?
>>>
>>> Your problem doesn't "seem like a bug" rather than user error unless
>>> we know a whole lot more about it.
>>>
>>> Sarah
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Gaurav Sood wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Encountering the following error using Amelia -
>>>>
>>>> Error in if (sum(non.vary == 0)) { :
>>>> argument is not interpretable as logical
>>>> In addition: Warning message:
>>>> In FUN(X[[34L]], ...) : NAs introduced by coercion
>>>>
>>>> Seems like a bug.
>>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sarah Goslee
> http://www.functionaldiversity.org
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Amelia error
Using: Amelia::amelia
R version: 2.15
OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
data = National Election Studies (cross-sectional); mostly ordinal
variables, some nominal
summary(ad04)
insurance jobs services sswomen
Min. :1.000 Min. :1.000 Min. :1.000 Min. :1.000 Min. :1.00
1st Qu.:2.000 1st Qu.:3.000 1st Qu.:2.000 1st Qu.:1.000 1st Qu.:1.00
Median :4.000 Median :4.000 Median :3.000 Median :1.000 Median :1.00
Mean :3.656 Mean :4.207 Mean :3.478 Mean :1.408 Mean :1.92
3rd Qu.:5.000 3rd Qu.:6.000 3rd Qu.:4.000 3rd Qu.:2.000 3rd Qu.:2.00
Max. :7.000 Max. :7.000 Max. :7.000 Max. :3.000 Max. :7.00
NA's :97 NA's :105 NA's :146 NA's :21 NA's :52
aout04 <- amelia(ad04,noms=c("race","south","gender","demrep"), m=5)
Error in if (sum(non.vary == 0)) { :
argument is not interpretable as logical
In addition: Warning message:
In FUN(X[[34L]], ...) : NAs introduced by coercion
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Sarah Goslee wrote:
> Do you mean the Amelia package? Or a function named Amelia()?
>
> What is your OS and version of R and package?
>
> What are the commands you are using?
>
> What do your data look like?
>
> Can you provide a reproducible example?
>
> Did you read the posting guide?
>
> Your problem doesn't "seem like a bug" rather than user error unless
> we know a whole lot more about it.
>
> Sarah
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Gaurav Sood wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Encountering the following error using Amelia -
>>
>> Error in if (sum(non.vary == 0)) { :
>> argument is not interpretable as logical
>> In addition: Warning message:
>> In FUN(X[[34L]], ...) : NAs introduced by coercion
>>
>> Seems like a bug.
>>
>
> --
> Sarah Goslee
> http://www.functionaldiversity.org
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[R] Amelia error
Hi,
Encountering the following error using Amelia -
Error in if (sum(non.vary == 0)) { :
argument is not interpretable as logical
In addition: Warning message:
In FUN(X[[34L]], ...) : NAs introduced by coercion
Seems like a bug.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] writing data to file
look up dump
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:35 AM, mail me wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I created a data frame
>
> df <- data.frame( person = c('John','Bob','Mary'), team =
> c('a','b','c'), stringsAsFactors = F);
>
> and obtained the expected output
>
> df
> person team
> 1 John a
> 2 Bob b
> 3 Mary c
>
> now I want to save the whole content of df preserving its row and
> column order to a file in disk with the following command:
>
> write(df, file = "testfile", append=FALSE, sep=" ");
>
> and I get the error message
>
> Error in cat(list(...), file, sep, fill, labels, append) : argument
> 1 (type 'list') cannot be handled by 'cat'
>
> Can you help to solve the problem? Thanks in advance.
>
> deb
>
> __
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] compare two data frames with same columns names but of different dimensions
m <- rbind(reported, exportfile)
m1 <- m[duplicated(m),]
m[is.na(match(m$key, m1$key)),]
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Arnaud Gaboury
wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I want to compare and return the rows which are NOT in the two data frames.
> Classic methods don't work as the df have NOT the same dimensions.
>
>
> Here are one example of my df:
>
> reported <-
> structure(list(Product = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L,
> 3L, 4L, 5L, 5L), .Label = c("Cocoa", "Coffee C", "GC", "Sugar No 11",
> "ZS"), class = "factor"), Price = c(2331, 2356, 2440, 2450, 204.55,
> 205.45, 17792, 24.81, 1273.5, 1276.25), Nbr.Lots = c(-61L, -61L,
> 5L, 1L, 40L, 40L, -1L, -1L, -1L, 1L)), .Names = c("Product",
> "Price", "Nbr.Lots"), row.names = c(1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 6L, 7L, 5L,
> 10L, 8L, 9L), class = "data.frame")
>
> exportfile <-
> structure(list(Product = c("Cocoa", "Cocoa", "Cocoa", "Coffee C",
> "Coffee C", "GC", "Sugar No 11", "ZS", "ZS"), Price = c(2331,
> 2356, 2440, 204.55, 205.45, 17792, 24.81, 1273.5, 1276.25), Nbr.Lots = c(-61,
> -61, 6, 40, 40, -1, -1, -1, 1)), .Names = c("Product", "Price",
> "Nbr.Lots"), row.names = c(NA, 9L), class = "data.frame")
>
> As you can see, they have same column names.
> My idea was to merge these two df when passing as argument "not to take into
> account duplicate rows", so I will get one df with rows which are not in both
> df.
> Is it possible? How to do it?
>
> TY for any help.
>
>
> Arnaud Gaboury
>
> A2CT2 Ltd.
>
> __
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
