Re: [R] [R-sig-ME] lme function to obtain pvalue for fixed effect

2015-05-26 Thread Thierry Onkelinx
Because they test different hypothesis.

ir. Thierry Onkelinx
Instituut voor natuur- en bosonderzoek / Research Institute for Nature and
Forest
team Biometrie  Kwaliteitszorg / team Biometrics  Quality Assurance
Kliniekstraat 25
1070 Anderlecht
Belgium

To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more
than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say
what the experiment died of. ~ Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher
The plural of anecdote is not data. ~ Roger Brinner
The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does not
ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data.
~ John Tukey

2015-05-26 21:46 GMT+02:00 li li hannah@gmail.com:

 Thanks so much for replying.
 Yes LimerTest package could be used to get pvalues when using lmer
 function. But still the summary and anova function give different
 pvalues.
Hanna

 2015-05-26 15:19 GMT-04:00, byron vinueza byronvin...@hotmail.com:
  You can use the lmerTest package .
 
 
 
 
 
  Enviado desde mi iPhone
 
  El 26/5/2015, a las 13:18, li li hannah@gmail.com escribió:
 
  Hi all,
   I am using the lme function to run a random coefficient model. Please
  see
  output (mod1) as below.
   I need to obtain the pvalue for the fixed effect. As you can see,
  the pvalues given using the summary function is different from the
  resutls given in anova function.
  Why should they be different and which one is the correct one to use?
Thanks!
   Hanna
 
 
  summary(mod1)
  Linear mixed-effects model fit by REML
  Data: minus20C1
 AIC   BIC   logLik
   -82.60042 -70.15763 49.30021
 
  Random effects:
  Formula: ~1 + months | lot
  Structure: General positive-definite, Log-Cholesky parametrization
 StdDev   Corr
  (Intercept) 8.907584e-03 (Intr)
  months  6.039781e-05 -0.096
  Residual4.471243e-02
 
  Fixed effects: ti ~ type * months
  Value   Std.Error DF   t-value p-value
  (Intercept) 0.25831245 0.016891587 31 15.292373  0.
  type 0.13502089 0.026676101  4  5.061493  0.0072
  months  0.00804790 0.001218941 31  6.602368  0.
  type:months -0.00693679 0.002981859 31 -2.326329  0.0267
  Correlation:
(Intr) typ months
  type-0.633
  months -0.785  0.497
  type:months  0.321 -0.762 -0.409
 
  Standardized Within-Group Residuals:
   MinQ1   MedQ3   Max
  -2.162856e+00 -1.962972e-01 -2.771184e-05  3.749035e-01  2.088392e+00
 
  Number of Observations: 39
  Number of Groups: 6
  anova(mod1)
 numDF denDF   F-value p-value
  (Intercept) 131 2084.0265  .0001
  type1 4   10.8957  0.0299
  months  131   38.3462  .0001
  type:months 1315.4118  0.0267
 
  ___
  r-sig-mixed-mod...@r-project.org mailing list
  https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
 

 ___
 r-sig-mixed-mod...@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Re: [R] [R-sig-ME] lme function to obtain pvalue for fixed effect

2015-05-26 Thread byron vinueza
You can use the lmerTest package .





Enviado desde mi iPhone

 El 26/5/2015, a las 13:18, li li hannah@gmail.com escribió:
 
 Hi all,
  I am using the lme function to run a random coefficient model. Please see
 output (mod1) as below.
  I need to obtain the pvalue for the fixed effect. As you can see,
 the pvalues given using the summary function is different from the
 resutls given in anova function.
 Why should they be different and which one is the correct one to use?
   Thanks!
  Hanna
 
 
 summary(mod1)
 Linear mixed-effects model fit by REML
 Data: minus20C1
AIC   BIC   logLik
  -82.60042 -70.15763 49.30021
 
 Random effects:
 Formula: ~1 + months | lot
 Structure: General positive-definite, Log-Cholesky parametrization
StdDev   Corr
 (Intercept) 8.907584e-03 (Intr)
 months  6.039781e-05 -0.096
 Residual4.471243e-02
 
 Fixed effects: ti ~ type * months
 Value   Std.Error DF   t-value p-value
 (Intercept) 0.25831245 0.016891587 31 15.292373  0.
 type 0.13502089 0.026676101  4  5.061493  0.0072
 months  0.00804790 0.001218941 31  6.602368  0.
 type:months -0.00693679 0.002981859 31 -2.326329  0.0267
 Correlation:
   (Intr) typ months
 type-0.633
 months -0.785  0.497
 type:months  0.321 -0.762 -0.409
 
 Standardized Within-Group Residuals:
  MinQ1   MedQ3   Max
 -2.162856e+00 -1.962972e-01 -2.771184e-05  3.749035e-01  2.088392e+00
 
 Number of Observations: 39
 Number of Groups: 6
 anova(mod1)
numDF denDF   F-value p-value
 (Intercept) 131 2084.0265  .0001
 type1 4   10.8957  0.0299
 months  131   38.3462  .0001
 type:months 1315.4118  0.0267
 
 ___
 r-sig-mixed-mod...@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Re: [R] [R-sig-ME] lme function to obtain pvalue for fixed effect

2015-05-26 Thread li li
Thanks so much for replying.
Yes LimerTest package could be used to get pvalues when using lmer
function. But still the summary and anova function give different
pvalues.
   Hanna

2015-05-26 15:19 GMT-04:00, byron vinueza byronvin...@hotmail.com:
 You can use the lmerTest package .





 Enviado desde mi iPhone

 El 26/5/2015, a las 13:18, li li hannah@gmail.com escribió:

 Hi all,
  I am using the lme function to run a random coefficient model. Please
 see
 output (mod1) as below.
  I need to obtain the pvalue for the fixed effect. As you can see,
 the pvalues given using the summary function is different from the
 resutls given in anova function.
 Why should they be different and which one is the correct one to use?
   Thanks!
  Hanna


 summary(mod1)
 Linear mixed-effects model fit by REML
 Data: minus20C1
AIC   BIC   logLik
  -82.60042 -70.15763 49.30021

 Random effects:
 Formula: ~1 + months | lot
 Structure: General positive-definite, Log-Cholesky parametrization
StdDev   Corr
 (Intercept) 8.907584e-03 (Intr)
 months  6.039781e-05 -0.096
 Residual4.471243e-02

 Fixed effects: ti ~ type * months
 Value   Std.Error DF   t-value p-value
 (Intercept) 0.25831245 0.016891587 31 15.292373  0.
 type 0.13502089 0.026676101  4  5.061493  0.0072
 months  0.00804790 0.001218941 31  6.602368  0.
 type:months -0.00693679 0.002981859 31 -2.326329  0.0267
 Correlation:
   (Intr) typ months
 type-0.633
 months -0.785  0.497
 type:months  0.321 -0.762 -0.409

 Standardized Within-Group Residuals:
  MinQ1   MedQ3   Max
 -2.162856e+00 -1.962972e-01 -2.771184e-05  3.749035e-01  2.088392e+00

 Number of Observations: 39
 Number of Groups: 6
 anova(mod1)
numDF denDF   F-value p-value
 (Intercept) 131 2084.0265  .0001
 type1 4   10.8957  0.0299
 months  131   38.3462  .0001
 type:months 1315.4118  0.0267

 ___
 r-sig-mixed-mod...@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models


__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.